Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Cars and bikes!
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Other > General Off-Topic Discussion > Hobbies & Interests
Pages: 1, 2, 3
REBEL
QUOTE (questionmark @ Feb 7 2008, 09:24 AM) *
'73 Norton Commando 750. I traded it in for a Honda 750 four... and hated me for months after it.


You ain't crazy, don't feel bad, the Honda 750 CB Four is a collector's classic. (assuming your talk'n bout that model?)
The first of the Japanese super bikes even by todays standards. They are sought after & fetch big buck$ here in Oz even in rough condition. The '68/'69 right up to '74/'75 are revolutionary motorcycling masterpieces with it's 4 carb/one carb per cylinder engine.


I'm a Harley man but the 750 CB Four is an awesome one to ride i have to admit.

linked-image

linked-image
questionmark
QUOTE (REBEL @ Feb 7 2008, 01:22 AM) *
You ain't crazy, don't feel bad, the Honda 750 CB Four is a collector's classic. (assuming your talk'n bout that model?)


I am talking about that one... call it what you want, after the first curve you would want the Commando back too. Can't remember how many times I bounced over the pavement (bike and all) because the shocks couldn't take it. The Commando was a dream handling.

And now you will really call me crazy, I only had one Harley (1200 Sportster) and I hated it.

REBEL
QUOTE (questionmark @ Feb 7 2008, 10:13 AM) *
QUOTE
I am talking about that one... call it what you want, after the first curve you would want the Commando back too. Can't remember how many times I bounced over the pavement (bike and all) because the shocks couldn't take it. The Commando was a dream handling.


I don't doubt it, the Poms got their sh*t together with the Norton, it's just that i've never ridd'n one.
As for the 750 CB, the shocks may have been faulty from the previous owner(?)



QUOTE
And now you will really call me crazy, I only had one Harley (1200 Sportster) and I hated it.


lol! No sweat, my preference is only in theHarley Softail range anyway...FLSTF/FLSTFI FatBoy or FLSTC/FLSTCI Classic Heritage Softail Classic. Personally i think Harley Davidson are pumping too many too quick off the production line, they're not holding their value like they once did. They still have that legendary status attached to em tho.

'05 FatBoy...
linked-image

linked-image



I like the classics curves & styling on these Modified Harley Choppers... w00t.gif linked-image

linked-image

linked-image
questionmark
QUOTE
As for the 750 CB, the shocks may have been faulty from the previous owner(?)

Nope, the thing was brand new out of the package. Looked great in front of a disco though. The Benelli Sei I had after it looked a little better (smirk).

ED:
linked-image
Lilith Incarnate
There a a few bikes that i love, at the moment i ride a hondaCBR900RR Fireblade, Im actually doing up a ducatti 999 that was in a bit of a ding and im currently thinking about selling my honda for the new Yamaha R1 2008 model.

Heres a pic and the specs:

• 180 PS @ 12.500 rpm
• Yamaha Chip Controlled – Throttle & Intake
• 6-pot front callipers with 310mm discs
• Slipper clutch


Engine
Engine type Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, forward inclined, parallel 4-cylinder
Displacement 998 cc
Bore x stroke 77.0 x 53.6 mm
Compression ratio 12.7:1
Maximum power without induction : 132.4 kW (180 PS) @ 12,500rpm with induction : 139.0 kW (189 PS) @ 12,500rpm
Maximum torque without induction : 112.7 Nm (11.5 kg-m) @ 10,000rpm with induction : 118.3 Nm (12.1 kg-m) @ 10,000rpm
Lubrication system Wet sump
Fuel System Fuel injection
Clutch type Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Ignition system TCI
Starter system Electric
Transmission system Constant mesh, 6-speed
Final transmission Chain
Fuel tank capacity 18 L (3.4 L)
Oil tank capacity 3.83 L


Chassis

Chassis: Aluminium die-cast Deltabox
Front suspension system Telescopic forks, Ø 43 mm
Front travel 120 mm
Rear suspension system Swingarm
Rear travel 130 mm
Front brake Dual discs, Ø 310 mm
Rear brake Single disc, Ø 220 mm
Front tyre 120/70 ZR17MC (58W)
Rear tyre 190/50 ZR17MC (73W)

Dimensions

Length 2,060 mm
Width 720 mm
Height 1,110 mm
Seat height 835 mm
Wheel base 1,415 mm
Minimum ground clearance 135 mm
Dry weight 177 kg Click to view attachment
mentalman
this is something that like nobody believes.

I drive a jaguar.

not my dads,,,,not my moms,,,,mine

now you may think because i'm 15 I can't legally own it but apparently I can.

I got it for free!!!!!!

it's a 92' jaguar xj6 soverieng.
I LOVE IT!!!!
questionmark
Just 'cause it fits in this thread:

From The Sunday Times
February 3, 2008
Jeremy Clarkson's greatest flops
Bad cars usually lack one vital ingredient – soul. They’re built by accountants, not a man with a passion.

Jeremy Clarkson

Read reviews of the 25 worst cars Jeremy has driven

The cars you will find on this page do not necessarily cost more than Caribbean islands, they are not unduly thirsty and none has a steering wheel that falls off every day or killer scorpions in the seat fabric.

Some are even quite spacious and practical and mostly they emit very small carbon dioxides. This, of course, makes little difference to the weather but does give you a warm glow of sanctimonious pride at least.

However, I don’t like them and, as often as not, there’s a very good reason for that . . .

It’s not that hard to make a car. You go to a company that makes brakes for the brakes, to a company that makes glass for the windows and to a company that makes seats for the seats. Then you get a subsidy from the Malaysians to clear a bit of jungle, pop up a factory, employ some locals to nail all your pieces together and Bob’s your uncle.

Making a car, then, is like following one of Jamie Oliver’s recipes. You take so many eggs, cook the cress for so long, drizzle so much jus onto the finished product and yum yum, you have a delicious and nutritious dinner for four.

There is, however, a small problem. I have followed many of Jamie’s recipes over the years and I have ended up with something that looks nothing like the incredible creation in the pictures. What’s more, when I serve it to guests, it usually makes them vomit copiously all over the floor.

I’m willing to bet that if Gordon, or Anton, or Marco, or Heston were to follow the same recipe using the same ingredients and the same utensils, the guests would drown in their own dribble long before they’d picked up a knife and fork.

And this is the thing with cars. The new Tata Nano, that 40p commuter runabout launched in India recently, has all the right parts. There are wheels, windscreen wipers, an engine (sort of) and places for people to sit. But do you want one? I don’t. In fact, I’d rather kiss Nicholas Witchell. With tongues.

And it’s not a problem restricted to cheap cars either. Other cars I don’t want include the Mazda2, the Subaru WRX, the BMW 3-series, the Mercedes GL, the Vauxhall Vectra, the Porsche Boxster, anything with a Seat badge, and even the £117,500 Bentley Flying Spur.

The Bentley may tick all the boxes. It may be the fastest four-door saloon car in the world and it may have exquisitely machined heater vent knobs. What’s more, it uses many of the same parts as the Volkswagen Phaeton, a car I like very much indeed. And yet it lacks the vital final ingredient. Call it what you will: flair, élan, passion. It’s not there. It is a car with no soul.

There’s a very good reason for this. Volkswagen made the Continental GT because it wanted to make a good large car. And having done that, at very great expense, the marketing people and the accounts department obviously pointed out that a few more could be sold if a cheaply reengineered saloon version was added to the lineup. The Flying Spur, then, was created not to be brilliant. But as a sop to the economies of scale. It was built to make money. And that never works.

Full story, source: The Times
Username Deleted
QUOTE (questionmark @ Feb 7 2008, 12:33 AM) *
Nope, the thing was brand new out of the package. Looked great in front of a disco though. The Benelli Sei I had after it looked a little better (smirk).

ED:
linked-image


My uncles got the 900, i had a go on it a few years back, i couldn't put my finger on it but i just never really took to it, he absolutely loves it though. I've got an old 1980 GS 1000 at the mo (i do like 80's muscle bikes) but i want this: grin2.gif

linked-image
thump
1969 GTO ... only candy apple red wink2.gif
questionmark
QUOTE (Username Deleted @ Feb 7 2008, 05:38 PM) *
My uncles got the 900, i had a go on it a few years back, i couldn't put my finger on it but i just never really took to it, he absolutely loves it though. I've got an old 1980 GS 1000 at the mo (i do like 80's muscle bikes) but i want this: grin2.gif

linked-image


By the that time I was back to reliable two cylinders, I think I had a Yamaha TR-1 then.

theghost
QUOTE (Super Pancake @ Nov 4 2005, 06:44 PM) *
linked-image
Toyota Prius, hybrids are it man. The future is near, safe alternative energy is the way!

They need to pimp that ride.

thats one ugly car I dont think even pimping it will do any good tongue.gif but as long as it is energy effective.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.