QUOTE
When you say the "current Bible," are you referring to the various translationa available today, or else one spefic one in mind?
The traditional King James Version.
QUOTE
Someone who takes up and reads any good modern translatation of the ancient greek/hebrew/Aramiac texts would find that they would be reading very close to what the original writers/authors had wriiten down...
One would also find that Hebrew words can have multiple meanings and conotations.
This is why Christians typically hate people who call themselves witches, because the KJV of the Bible says that they are bad. However, the hebrew words that are used have the conotation of these witches or sorcerers being malicious, but that isn't really conveyed in the KJV of the Bible.
QUOTE
Keep hearing that the Church, heretics etc kept adding too the ancient texts, and corrupt them, so modern versions are corrupt, but if you check the standard texts of Kurt Aland and Bruce Metsger, than you will find assurance that the Bible of today is very close to the original text wriiten in the originals...
The original whats? The Bible wasn't one complete volume that just popped up one day.
Parts have been removed (The Septuagint), added on (Revelation), and just thrown away (Enoch).
QUOTE
Still, to automatically reject some wise words or good sense just because it's written in the Bible is foolish too..
You don't have to be religious to take at least something from what's written there; no matter where it came from. I see far too many people arguing semantics to the point where the original meaning of what was written is lost in the shuffle..
I agree with most of what Jesus said actually, its the other stuff that bothers me.