QUOTE(Seraphina @ Nov 9 2005, 11:48 PM) [snapback]925337[/snapback]
or of idiot girls who can't keep their legs together having sixteen kids, and leeching off the state because they can't afford them...take the bloody kids off them and sterilise them. Problem solved.
What about the children of the mother who kept making moronic decisions, should they have to suffer? The children were just born into a bad situation, it’s not their fault their mother forgot or dose not know how to use contraceptive. Maybe she just decided to have another child to collect one more welfare check.
Even if the state dose decides to take the children away, if there are no family members willing to take them in, they’re not in a much better situation. Either way they’ll just grow in an environment knowing how the welfare system works, and soon they’ll be collecting welfare checks. In the end it’s just going to cost taxpayer more money.
The question is, how to stop the cycle of deadbeats?
QUOTE(Purplos @ Nov 10 2005, 06:15 AM) [snapback]925583[/snapback]
NO extra money for any children conceived or born while on welfare.
Someone needs to look out for the children, It’s not the child’s fault their mother is a deadbeat moron. If the state ignores them, the children as they get older could become on burden on society.
QUOTE
drug addiction can be considered a disability as well. NJ actually has some ex important government worker who couldn't shake her drug habit so she now receives full disability plus her pension for working for the state -- even though she was on drugs the whole time.
If this is true that drug addiction counts as a disability in New Jersey, the state needs to rewrite who qualifies for welfare benefits.
If a person is abusing drugs, it is probably no one fault, but their own. Why should the taxpayers pay for some drug addict's misery?
QUOTE(Perfect Imperfection @ Nov 10 2005, 08:08 AM) [snapback]925748[/snapback]
People can cheat benefits so easily it's scary. Also there was a case I read in England were the man wasn't bothering to find work because apparently if he did find work he wouldn't be earning enough to support the family.
This has to be addressed. If a person or families are making more money on welfare then they would have working blue-collar jobs, they’re going to try to stay on welfare as long as they can.
Welfare should be six months to a year of financial support, then cut off. If one wants to continue collecting benefits, they would have to apply again in one year’s time.
QUOTE
His wife was popping kids out as if it was going out of fashion *never* used birth control!! They had something like 12 kids and a couple of grandkids!!! And to think are money goes towards paying for lazy people like this!!!!

It is irresponsible when couples are having children while on welfare. All the couple is accomplishing is making life harder on taxpayers, state, society and themselves. It shows a lack of common sense and the well being for other.