Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: let's face it
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Cryptozoology, Myths and Legends
27495
because whenever a photo is posted, it is debunked straight away as 'photoshopped'.
The only way we can get proof for cryptids is tissue samples or a living/dead specimen.

So people, get hunting! devil.gif (i dont mean shoot them lol)
gothikchile13
I agree, but that's where we are in this technological age. It just makes it more difficult to trust people.

--Jon
Taylor
QUOTE(gothikchile13 @ Dec 12 2005, 07:16 PM) [snapback]972339[/snapback]

I agree, but that's where we are in this technological age. It just makes it more difficult to trust people.

--Jon

I agree with you Jon.
Arsenik
I agree. With photo alteration programs out there such as Photoshop, photographs may no longer be considered as proof.
darkknight
even with latest technologies investigators couldn't find cryptids.... how to hunt them down then....
vertigoflow
I agree.

Most of the crypid pics from the Worth1000 photoshop contests look more convincing than the pics people post claiming to be the real thing.
Vidgange
I agrre with everyone else, but howabout videos? they must be harder to falsify? Not that it would convince sceptics wink2.gif
BazookaTooth
True,true years ago people woulden't pass them off as fake,but now in a technological age photo's just aren't trustworthy enough.
Welsh Shaun
QUOTE(Vidgange @ Dec 13 2005, 02:29 PM) [snapback]973501[/snapback]

I agrre with everyone else, but howabout videos? they must be harder to falsify? Not that it would convince sceptics wink2.gif

Correct they still would not convince sceptics. You could sit a Big Foot in a chair and try and interview it infront of 100's of people, but that would still not be convincing enough for everyone.
vertigoflow
QUOTE(Welsh Shaun @ Dec 13 2005, 02:25 PM) [snapback]974056[/snapback]

Correct they still would not convince sceptics. You could sit a Big Foot in a chair and try and interview it infront of 100's of people, but that would still not be convincing enough for everyone.


lol. That'd be a funny interview.

I doubt any evidence would convince a skeptic short of catching a live bigfoot and dna testing it.

And even then most would probably say, "So what, it's not Bigfoot. It's just a new species of primate."
aquatus1
QUOTE(vertigoflow @ Dec 13 2005, 07:37 PM) [snapback]974074[/snapback]

And even then most would probably say, "So what, it's not Bigfoot. It's just a new species of primate."


Nah. We'd just shrug and say "Cool. A new monkey."

A couple of months later, it would be old news.
foxmulder27
In the future, there could be biological entities popping up all over the place and, with the rate of technological advances, no one could ever be use. Destroy PhotoShop!!!!

But it can be fun...
Timetravel_0
I'd like to adjust this definition: Any photograph either of low quality or without a terrificly large crowd's tale backing it, is no longer considered eveidence.
kourui
oh yeah! thumbsup.gif
RedRaider9981
See, this is living proof that everything has its trade-off. We have this great new technology, but because of it, now we can't trust any photographs or videos we see anymore. This really stinks... sad.gif
MJB222
I agree. At this time and age, any kind of faked photo can look just as or even more realistic as a real one. Now, science will not accept any cryptid's existance without a living/dead specimen.

Break out the rifles. gunsmilie.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.