QUOTE(coeur noir @ Dec 17 2005, 05:46 AM) [snapback]979010[/snapback]
Soooo, obviously alchemy is an important componant of this book. Any speculations as to why? Or what the author(s) were trying to illustrate by injecting alchemy as one of the main characters?
Why not just ask your own husband that question? Oh, and while you are at it, please ask him to put the answer into the thread he created and bragged about knowing the secrets to...
QUOTE(coeur noir @ Dec 17 2005, 09:22 AM) [snapback]979330[/snapback]
No actually I am NOT Pison, I am his wife.
As for sending the manuscript anonymously to Yale, that's not going to happen. He was venting, angry because they wouldn't listen. He is however, serious about wanting to publish something on this. And he is also serious about the contact at CNN (however, being a news producer myself, I doubt it will get coverage without something being published first)
Pison isn't nor was he ever leading any of you on.
And as for the ideas generated on these pages, they are good ones and relevent to the "whole" package.
If I have come across as rude or as playing the devil's advocate, I apologize, I was simply enjoying witnessing the wheels turn.
And my questions were meant to have you probe even deeper into your own findings.
It wasn't about stealing ideas, or any sort of nonsense like that...
Now leave alchemy alone for a second and go back to biology and DNA....see what you find there.
We have to dissect these things carefully, from the astronomical to the biological to the mathmatical and so on and so forth....after the different parts are uncovered and examined, a whole new idea can be formed as to what the heck this book is about.
He should just post his own answers about all these things. We are not his workers or quiz-show attendants.
QUOTE(Pison @ Dec 17 2005, 09:52 AM) [snapback]979373[/snapback]
I am not leading anyone on.
Dead serious.
One has to be patient.
I started this thread to post MY ideas, all the other posting is distracting.
THEN POST YOUR IDEAS!!
QUOTE(coeur noir @ Dec 17 2005, 11:00 AM) [snapback]979487[/snapback]
for a second....meaning, not permanently...as in come back to it later. I'm sorry you took this to mean abandon forever.
However, an arguement over semantics at this point is just silly.
Too late now...