Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Are moon hoax believers stupid?
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Pages: 1, 2
hazzard
It seems a lot of people are willing to automatically turn off their critical thinking skills and accept the most ridiculous things as long as it comes tagged with a "government cover up or government conspiracy" label.

Could it be that most of these hoax stories are created by people who have never accomplished anything (that they feel is important) in their lives, and want to comfort themselves by believing that they now,finally,has one up on the,government,scientists,NASA,military,etc.

I know there is lot of money to be made selling all kinds of weird theories to the gullible.

Anyway,here is a funny site about the moonhoax.
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Are%20hoax%2...rs%20stupid.htm
Snowball
Is this a genuine question or just your roundabout way of calling people, who believe the moon landing was a hoax, stupid?

I think there are already enough threads devoted to discussing the moon landing without you starting another, and further to this I also believe the way you have started the thread, whether intentional or not, will inevitably lead to the ridicule and belittling of those that do not hold they same beliefs as yourself on this subject.

I'd ask that this thread gets either locked or deleted before it gets going for the above reasons.
Solofront
"Not again! Did you actually READ my page?"
I stopped, half way through, I was actually losing knowledge from reading this site, rather from gaining any.

"Well, that proves it was all a hoax then. Also proves the Titanic didn't sink either."
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Are%20hoax%2...rs%20stupid.htm

How the hell does it prove the titanic didn't sink, omg, lmao...

laugh.gif

That website is full of $h1tt.
The author is for all I know, some nerd who is unemployed, making stupid websites and hanging around kiddy chat rooms.
hazzard
QUOTE(Solofront @ Dec 16 2005, 02:33 PM) [snapback]978528[/snapback]


The author is for all I know, some nerd who is unemployed, making stupid websites and hanging around kiddy chat rooms.



laugh.gif Calm down,of course the guy is a wanna bee "debunker",or a real one who just blew a fuse, that is why I wrote funny instead of good.Granted he speaks the way many thinks after answering the same"stupid"question for the gaziliond time.

scoobysnack
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 16 2005, 06:15 AM) [snapback]978490[/snapback]

It seems a lot of people are willing to automatically turn off their critical thinking skills and accept the most ridiculous things as long as it comes tagged with a "government cover up or government conspiracy" label.

Could it be that most of these hoax stories are created by people who have never accomplished anything (that they feel is important) in their lives, and want to comfort themselves by believing that they now,finally,has one up on the,government,scientists,NASA,military,etc.

I know there is lot of money to be made selling all kinds of weird theories to the gullible.

Anyway,here is a funny site about the moonhoax.
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Are%20hoax%2...rs%20stupid.htm


Personally Hazzard I'm more on your side of this argument. That's only because I have not done any research into this, and I was brought up to believe we went to the moon. I'm going off blind faith of my government and it's controlled press. I don't trust this government to tell me the truth, or the media for the same reason, but since I have not done any research into this, I'm going to assume we made it to the moon.

Do I think it's possible that the US faked the moon landing, yes. Is there a motive, yes, to show American supremacy.

I think you seem to think the US could not get away with faking it, because the people would find out. You underestimate the government of the most powerful country on the face of the planet.

Did you ever watch the press conference of the Disclosure project and how the astronauts saw buildings on the back side of moon, when they flew around the moon. This of course is still classified. I would highly recommend you watch this. In fact you need to, it will help your cause.

http://www.netro.ca/disclosure/npccmenu.htm

I'm on the fence with this one. The government in my mind has no credibility at all. I'm going to assume they are lying before they tell me the truth. Why because they can get away with it, and have been lying to our faces for decades.
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 16 2005, 05:02 PM) [snapback]979220[/snapback]

Personally Hazzard I'm more on your side of this argument. That's only because I have not done any research into this, and I was brought up to believe we went to the moon. I'm going off blind faith of my government and it's controlled press. I don't trust this government to tell me the truth, or the media for the same reason, but since I have not done any research into this, I'm going to assume we made it to the moon.

Do I think it's possible that the US faked the moon landing, yes. Is there a motive, yes, to show American supremacy.

I think you seem to think the US could not get away with faking it, because the people would find out. You underestimate the government of the most powerful country on the face of the planet.

Did you ever watch the press conference of the Disclosure project and how the astronauts saw buildings on the back side of moon, when they flew around the moon. This of course is still classified. I would highly recommend you watch this. In fact you need to, it will help your cause.

http://www.netro.ca/disclosure/npccmenu.htm

I'm on the fence with this one. The government in my mind has no credibility at all. I'm going to assume they are lying before they tell me the truth. Why because they can get away with it, and have been lying to our faces for decades.



Disclosure Project, from about 5 years ago, was a UFO convention. There were no astronauts present speaking about their observations of "buildings" on the far side. There were no astronauts present at all.

It is dubious at the outset with an actor dramatizing in really rather silly fashion, and the thrust seems to be that people have seen UFOs, and the Government is witholding beneficial technologies that should be made public and which could save the planet from the "energy crisis" we face, and from the effects of "global warming". Various folks appear describing their experiences.

No "proof" at all was given for these people's assertions. Simply a bunch of folks stating what lots of others have stated in the past...they've seen evidence of UFOs.

Nothing's wrong with that of course. Just about anyone in ATC or a pilot (like myself), has seen a UFO. It means little, being that the term simply means Unidentified Flying Object. It has utterly nothing to do with alien life. "UFOs" are reported and spoken of frequently in the aviation field. No one, however, says, "Aliens".

Now, that having been said, it seems rather logical that we are in fact not alone in the universe. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no evidence whatsover that we have been recently visited by any of the life forms out there. There have been no sightings of alien artifacts on the surface of the moon.

Just as, in kind, there is no substantive scientific evidence that there is any such thing happening as global warming, or that there is an energy crisis.

You seem to be making the point that the government lies. Well, they have certainly done so, and likely will again. However, your point also seems to be that the government could in fact cover up something so immense and involved as the "hoaxed lunar landing", a project involving a decade of work by almost 400,000 people.

That assertion is just a wee bit elementary, and a bit of a stretch of the imagination.

I say this because they couldn't possibly have done so with all those people involved...after all, Nixon couldn't even cover up the clandestine little Watergate affair, a small operation involving a small group of people, and Clinton couldn't keep his little affairs private...

How do you think that the Apollo project could've possibly been faked and so incredibly covered up for almost 35 years, when such small potatoes things can't be hidden fdrom public scrutiny?

Regards.
scoobysnack
QUOTE(MID @ Dec 16 2005, 11:14 PM) [snapback]979820[/snapback]

Disclosure Project, from about 5 years ago, was a UFO convention. There were no astronauts present speaking about their observations of "buildings" on the far side. There were no astronauts present at all.

It is dubious at the outset with an actor dramatizing in really rather silly fashion, and the thrust seems to be that people have seen UFOs, and the Government is withholding beneficial technologies that should be made public and which could save the planet from the "energy crisis" we face, and from the effects of "global warming". Various folks appear describing their experiences.

No "proof" at all was given for these people's assertions. Simply a bunch of folks stating what lots of others have stated in the past...they've seen evidence of UFOs.

Nothings wrong with that of course. Just about anyone in ATC or a pilot (like myself), has seen a UFO. It means little, being that the term simply means Unidentified Flying Object. It has utterly nothing to do with alien life. "UFOs" are reported and spoken of frequently in the aviation field. No one, however, says, "Aliens".

Now, that having been said, it seems rather logical that we are in fact not alone in the universe. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no evidence whatsoever that we have been recently visited by any of the life forms out there. There have been no sightings of alien artifacts on the surface of the moon.

Just as, in kind, there is no substantive scientific evidence that there is any such thing happening as global warming, or that there is an energy crisis.

You seem to be making the point that the government lies. Well, they have certainly done so, and likely will again. However, your point also seems to be that the government could in fact cover up something so immense and involved as the "hoaxed lunar landing", a project involving a decade of work by almost 400,000 people.

That assertion is just a wee bit elementary, and a bit of a stretch of the imagination.

I say this because they couldn't possibly have done so with all those people involved...after all, Nixon couldn't even cover up the clandestine little Watergate affair, a small operation involving a small group of people, and Clinton couldn't keep his little affairs private...

How do you think that the Apollo project could've possibly been faked and so incredibly covered up for almost 35 years, when such small potatoes things can't be hidden fdrom public scrutiny?

Regards.



Well I hope you actually watched the whole two hours. The point is that it is still classified. That means you don't tell the public. You don't tell anyone unless they have the classification clearance. They are willing to testify under oath to congress.

Why do you think there was no proof presented. It's a crime to reveal classified information to the public. The point was to allow the witness to go before congress and allow them to override there oath of secrecy and reveal to the people what they and the government know about alien life.
bathory
Are moon hoax believers stupid?

Yes
hazzard
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 16 2005, 11:02 PM) [snapback]979220[/snapback]

I think you seem to think the US could not get away with faking it, because the people would find out. You underestimate the government of the most powerful country on the face of the planet.


I don't share your belief that the mighty US government can do whatever they want,remember Watergate, "Weapons of MD" in Iraq and many other flukes that made the guys in control look like morons.If they cant keep the Clintons cigarr trick from the tabloids, the fake moon landing,with all the people involved, would have been out there along time ago,don't you think.

QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 16 2005, 11:02 PM) [snapback]979220[/snapback]

Did you ever watch the press conference of the Disclosure project and how the astronauts saw buildings on the back side of moon, when they flew around the moon.


Can you post the name of the Apollo astronaut that said there were alien bases on the far side of the moon,thanks.
Lilly
Now, now, hazzard, I wouldn't say that moon hoax believers are *stupid*. Let's strive to be a bit more "politically correct"...I'd say that they are severely intellectually challenged! user posted image

Say, has anyone here noticed that Bart Sibrel's initials are, "B.S."? There seems to be some significance to this beyond mere coincidence? user posted image
artymoon
There would have to be a mass cover-up across the board. Do you think the folks who worked there butt off at Nasa would take credit for something that didn't happen? I don't think so. Too much pride in what they do. They would have spilled the beans by now, somebody.
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 17 2005, 12:54 AM) [snapback]979866[/snapback]

Well I hope you actually watched the whole two hours. The point is that it is still classified. That means you don't tell the public. You don't tell anyone unless they have the classification clearance. They are willing to testify under oath to congress.

Why do you think there was no proof presented. It's a crime to reveal classified information to the public. The point was to allow the witness to go before congress and allow them to override there oath of secrecy and reveal to the people what they and the government know about alien life.



Of course I watched the whole two hours...twice. Much to my disappointment actually. If all this is classified, then merely talking about it places these people in danger. They would've been in violation just by going public in such a forum and speaking of it. One guy had all this "classified" paper with him, transcripts, radar plots, etc. None of that was seen , of course, but there he was, supposedly carrying this material. How would he have it if it was classified and he was retired...no longer in service? All such material would've been locked away and he'd have been sworn to secrecy.

The melodrama of Jon Cypher, the singing, and the X-Files reference, lends a decided air of incredulity to the whole affair as well.

But again, as I said, this all has nothing to do with Apollo being faked.

It's just fine to search for extraterrestrial life. One day we'll find it. Maybe we already have. It doesn't matter...

Apollo cannot be disproved, and this thread was about people who believe in the Apollo hoax being "stupid".

How about we address that?

Stupid of course is a harsh word. Political correctness is a joke, but stupid is still inapproproitate for most people who adhere to that wild notion. Uninformed, intellectually lazy and unwilling to investigate, learn, and understand, or just removed by too much time from the actual events are likely more realistic terms, depending on who it is who is presenting the ideas.

There are those who are just low-life, schlocky journalists or liars or pseudo-scientists, like Sibrel, Kaysing, Percy, et.al. who have used people's ignorance of the facts to make a pretty decent living. They deserve a worse name than stupid, of course, but the vast majority of hoax adherents are simply uninformed.

Regards.

MJB222
Their opinions may seem stupid, but they themselves are not "stupid".
Essan
I don't know about people who believe in moon hoax theories, but anyone who perpetrated such a hoax is most definitely stupid. It must be costing them billions a year to keep it going by now, plus they've got to build a new spaceship, fly to the moon - with replicas of everything they claim was left there - without anyone knowing, and all before the Chinese get there.

Blimey, if there was a moon hoax I reckon you're gonna see a 200% tax hike in the USA next year at the very least!
scoobysnack
QUOTE(MID @ Dec 17 2005, 10:37 AM) [snapback]980147[/snapback]

Of course I watched the whole two hours...twice. Much to my disappointment actually. If all this is classified, then merely talking about it places these people in danger. They would've been in violation just by going public in such a forum and speaking of it. One guy had all this "classified" paper with him, transcripts, radar plots, etc. None of that was seen , of course, but there he was, supposedly carrying this material. How would he have it if it was classified and he was retired...no longer in service? All such material would've been locked away and he'd have been sworn to secrecy.

The melodrama of Jon Cypher, the singing, and the X-Files reference, lends a decided air of incredulity to the whole affair as well.

But again, as I said, this all has nothing to do with Apollo being faked.

It's just fine to search for extraterrestrial life. One day we'll find it. Maybe we already have. It doesn't matter...

Apollo cannot be disproved, and this thread was about people who believe in the Apollo hoax being "stupid".

How about we address that?

Stupid of course is a harsh word. Political correctness is a joke, but stupid is still inapproproitate for most people who adhere to that wild notion. Uninformed, intellectually lazy and unwilling to investigate, learn, and understand, or just removed by too much time from the actual events are likely more realistic terms, depending on who it is who is presenting the ideas.

There are those who are just low-life, schlocky journalists or liars or pseudo-scientists, like Sibrel, Kaysing, Percy, et.al. who have used people's ignorance of the facts to make a pretty decent living. They deserve a worse name than stupid, of course, but the vast majority of hoax adherents are simply uninformed.

Regards.


That's why it was never reported on in the news. And yes, they are breaking the law some of them, many of the other witness are afraid to come forward, because it would force them to break their oath of secrecy. The people who have come forward feel it's their duty as a responsible American/Human being to make the public aware of what's really going on behind the scenes. The point was to show that the government is lying. This is the problem. All the facts and evidence of a moon landing we have, comes directly from the government. They release information after they declassify it. In fact they are lying to us everyday. Are the moon hoax believers stupid for doing research that proves the government is lying in other instances. Then in their eyes the government really has no credibilty, and just to be safe you now have to assume they are lying about everything. I have pretty much come to that conclusion. I just have not done any reserach into the moon landing.

You could say every American is stupid in this regard. Do you know the stock market crash of 1929 was a planned crash. Yet Americans in the government controled public schools tell us it was kind of an accident the result of many variables.

I'm at work now, and don't have my list of quotes but here is just one from one of the people in the know of how the world really works:

"For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. "The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."
--Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

alien.gif
Beckys_Mom
QUOTE(MJB222 @ Dec 17 2005, 04:48 PM) [snapback]980161[/snapback]

Their opinions may seem stupid, but they themselves are not "stupid".


Correct, their opinions are down right stupid but that doesn't mean they are stupid, I never thought there was people that thought the moon landing was just a hoax...gee you learn something every day blink.gif
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 17 2005, 02:11 PM) [snapback]980281[/snapback]

That's why it was never reported on in the news. And yes, they are breaking the law some of them, many of the other witness are afraid to come forward, because it would force them to break their oath of secrecy. The people who have come forward feel it's their duty as a responsible American/Human being to make the public aware of what's really going on behind the scenes. The point was to show that the government is lying. This is the problem. All the facts and evidence of a moon landing we have, comes directly from the government. They release information after they declassify it. In fact they are lying to us everyday. Are the moon hoax believers stupid for doing research that proves the government is lying in other instances. Then in their eyes the government really has no credibilty, and just to be safe you now have to assume they are lying about everything. I have pretty much come to that conclusion. I just have not done any reserach into the moon landing.

You could say every American is stupid in this regard. Do you know the stock market crash of 1929 was a planned crash. Yet Americans in the government controled public schools tell us it was kind of an accident the result of many variables.

I'm at work now, and don't have my list of quotes but here is just one from one of the people in the know of how the world really works:

"For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. "The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."
--Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

alien.gif



Scoob:

You know you shouldn't be doing this at work grin2.gif

I'll tell you straight up, what you state is correct. I understand completely what you're talking about, and you don't have to quote any further. I know what you're saying is true regarding the great depression. There are many other things that have occurred in this country in the ensuing decades that we have been lied to about as well.

So, I'll say, no, moon hoax believers are not stupid for wanting to do research that proves that the government has lied in other areas. As I've said, by and large, moon hoax believers aren't stupid at all for the most part. They are simply un-knowledgable. There's a lot to know, alot of engineering and science regarding orbital mechanics and behaviors in the space environment and such that simply aren't part-and-parcel of the average man's knowledge base that are required to really understand what happened back then; how it was done, etc.

I'll also say that Apollo information was not classified, save that which was hidden for security purposes (such as specific system development and operations, like research and development on spacecraft and especially propulsion systems and launch vehicle specifics), because we didn't want any of the specifics of our successful Saturn to get into the hands of the Soviets. This however, was just prudent, nominal stuff.

I suppose my point is that details regarding every single aspect of Apollo (and Mercury and Gemini as well) are available for public consumption. Apollo is the most documented endeavor in human history, and all of it is available for anyone who wishes to plumb its depths. There is no hoax. There couldn't have been.

If anyone examines what's available on Apollo, one cannot help but come to the conclusion that this thing happened...just as it was presented.

But that fact does not mean that there are cover-ups, lies, and conspiracies in many other areas.

Regards.
hazzard
For a specific question about the moon landings here are two sites that does a very good job explaining all the claims and supposed evidence of a hoax.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://www.clavius.org/index.html
user26071
I'm honestly not too sure about the moon landing... hmm.gif
hazzard
QUOTE(Kacen @ Dec 19 2005, 06:07 PM) [snapback]982603[/snapback]

I'm honestly not too sure about the moon landing... hmm.gif


Then Im sure that you dont know enough about them.
user26071
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 19 2005, 12:09 PM) [snapback]982606[/snapback]

Then Im sure that you dont know enough about them.


No, I know exactly how they supposedly happened. I just...I mean the Lunar Lander seems like it would need side thrusters to steady it. Plus there was no blast crater under the lunar lander. hmm.gif
The Skeptic Eric Raven
QUOTE(Kacen @ Dec 19 2005, 11:13 AM) [snapback]982610[/snapback]

No, I know exactly how they supposedly happened. I just...I mean the Lunar Lander seems like it would need side thrusters to steady it. Plus there was no blast crater under the lunar lander. hmm.gif

Check out the links above. They will explain any supposed problems.
MID
QUOTE(Kacen @ Dec 19 2005, 12:13 PM) [snapback]982610[/snapback]

No, I know exactly how they supposedly happened. I just...I mean the Lunar Lander seems like it would need side thrusters to steady it. Plus there was no blast crater under the lunar lander. hmm.gif



Kacen:

As I indicated, there is simply a lack of knowledge about the specifics involved.

For instance, you should be aware that the LM ("lunar lander") did have "side thrusters" to steady it. There were 4 pods around the asdcent stage of the LM which contained 4 RCS jets which provided thrust along all axes. These jets could be used for translation (movement forward, backward, up or down relative to a stable member (i.e., a stable reference plane), or could be used to maneuver (i.e., pitch, yaw, or roll). These jets "burped regularly during powered descent in order to keep the thrust line of the descent propulasion engine pointed along the appropriate path.

That sort of firing, plus engine gimbaling (the movement of the engine itself in various directions to compensate for off line moments) is how all engine burns in space were stabilized. In fact, the Saturn rockets engines gimballed during the launch phase to keep the vehicle on its flight path.

As to blast craters...

There were none because there wasn't any "blast" to cause one. The LM DPS (descent propulasion system) engine was only pushing about 2500-3000 pounds of thrust in proximity to the lunar surface. Given the size of the engine bell, that equates to approximately 1.5 PSI of exhaust gas pressure coming out of the thing. It was not anywhere near close enough to cause a "blast crater", because there was no blast. In fact, engines up to 20 times that thrust level have been static fired onto the ground on Earth and have not produced "blast craters".

A blast crater requires a blast...an impact, or an explosive force. There was none on an Apollo landing. Many an artist's conception erroneously portrayed impossibilities in Apollo illustrations (all flight phases, not just lunar landing), especially given the very hard and compacted nature of the lunar substrate.

What was seen was a nominal effect: the blowing away of the very fine lunar surface dust and some thermal effect (i.e., burning, charring, or melting of the lunar substrate in the immediate vicinity of the LM DPOS engine exhaust).

These effects were typcal, expected, or common.

These are merely things the general public does not understand about spaceflight. This of course is not unusual, nor unexpected. However, lack of knowledge of these rather common things has fueled a great deal of speculation and erroneous thinking pertaining to things Apollo.

Regards.
hazzard
QUOTE(Kacen @ Dec 19 2005, 06:13 PM) [snapback]982610[/snapback]

No, I know exactly how they supposedly happened. I just...I mean the Lunar Lander seems like it would need side thrusters to steady it. Plus there was no blast crater under the lunar lander. hmm.gif



Like I said,go to the two links I posted and you will find all the answers,like your "missing" blast crater and many other common questions from the hoaxbelievers.All you have to do is click on the link. disgust.gif
Zeus
Great thread. Intelligent. I can see that all organisations flurishing in the public eye hold secrets. There are the employees who report the crap of nasa and read the numbers, there are also departments that hold government secrecy so no, the employees of any secret government related organisation never know everything.....

how are nasa pushing out faked images to the world's media without their employees susing out the hoaxes? The same way different Army divisions have limited access to sharing information upwards or downwards....very simple logic.

perhaps we need to listen to the INDEPENDENT space researchers themselves.

http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search?p=blue+m...piracy&ie=UTF-8

I realized some time ago that all nasa data is suspect data.





How many moons and planets actually do not rotate on their access?

The moon. Only the Earth's moon. Is this fact? that only the moon is not rotating on it's axis? if true, why, how? is this how our telescopes miss any real surface structures....

QUOTE
19) NASA is keeping it secret that there is a mile high artificial tower on the moon.

Amazing! Please explain why no telescope has detected it. Even my own telescope would resolve an object that large.



How many moons and planets actually do not rotate on their access?

The moon. Only the Earth's moon. Is this fact? that only the moon is not rotating on it's axis? if true, why, how? is this how our telescopes miss any real surface structures....


Problem is, i really do not know why they would lie when there is enough to sus them out.


To add to the debate. http://www.livejournal.com/community/cr_r/143602.html

Thanks hazzard, for making me think about the hoaxes.user posted image
hazzard
QUOTE
Great thread. Intelligent. I can see that all organisations flurishing in the public eye hold secrets. There are the employees who report the crap of nasa and read the numbers....


I dont think we are on the same threadZeus ,everything you wrote in your post are just weird speculations, and I hope you realise that the links you provided us with are filled with alot of pseudo nonsense.

QUOTE(Zeus @ Dec 20 2005, 10:52 AM) [snapback]983907[/snapback]

Thanks hazzard, for making me think about the hoaxes.


Yea,like you needed help with that. laugh.gif

QUOTE
How many moons and planets actually do not rotate on their access?


Stars, planets and similar bodies all rotate around their axes.
scoobysnack
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 17 2005, 04:00 AM) [snapback]979981[/snapback]

I don't share your belief that the mighty US government can do whatever they want,remember Watergate, "Weapons of MD" in Iraq and many other flukes that made the guys in control look like morons.If they cant keep the Clintons cigarr trick from the tabloids, the fake moon landing,with all the people involved, would have been out there along time ago,don't you think.
Can you post the name of the Apollo astronaut that said there were alien bases on the far side of the moon,thanks.


Dammit Hazzard! Why do I have to do all your homework for you. Besides if I told you, I doubt you would take my word for it. You have formed your opinion by only factoring in half of the variables. How can you possibly be confident in your conclusion. You know for a fact the government is not lying to you? Or is your entire argument based on that assumption? That's where the skeptics are coming from. They are not positive the government is telling the truth. They are skeptic, which you should be. But instead of being skeptic of everything you blindly trust government and are skeptic of everything they deny. So if they say jump, you say how high, instead of asking why to jump in the first place.

Watch the Disclosure project press conference. You will also hear from NASA employees who talk about how NASA airbrushes objects out of pictures before they release them to the public. Those NASA employees who have the classified clearance levels are aware of this but others are not. If you have slow internet and can't download a two hour video, I will try to find the transcripts for you. If nothing else I could mail you a copy on DVD.

In case you are wondering, the government is not going to allow these people to testify and make there knowledge public. That's why nothing has developed in the past five years.
hazzard
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 20 2005, 08:49 PM) [snapback]984436[/snapback]

You know for a fact the government is not lying to you?


About the moonlandings, I would bet my life on it.


QUOTE
Watch the Disclosure project press conference.


MID pretty much said it all in his post on the first page,maby you should read more than just the last post in a thread before replying.

Like you said,homework!
scoobysnack
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 20 2005, 02:00 PM) [snapback]984449[/snapback]

About the moonlandings, I would bet my life on it.
MID pretty much said it all in his post on the first page,maby you should read more than just the last post in a thread before replying.

Like you said,homework!


no.gif

I read all the posts in this thread, thankyou very much happy.gif. You seem to ignore my posts about the disclosure project. This is what you are refereing to :

QUOTE(MID @ Dec 17 2005, 10:37 AM) [snapback]980147[/snapback]

Of course I watched the whole two hours...twice. Much to my disappointment actually. If all this is classified, then merely talking about it places these people in danger. They would've been in violation just by going public in such a forum and speaking of it. One guy had all this "classified" paper with him, transcripts, radar plots, etc. None of that was seen , of course, but there he was, supposedly carrying this material. How would he have it if it was classified and he was retired...no longer in service? All such material would've been locked away and he'd have been sworn to secrecy.

The melodrama of Jon Cypher, the singing, and the X-Files reference, lends a decided air of incredulity to the whole affair as well.

But again, as I said, this all has nothing to do with Apollo being faked.

It's just fine to search for extraterrestrial life. One day we'll find it. Maybe we already have. It doesn't matter...

Apollo cannot be disproved, and this thread was about people who believe in the Apollo hoax being "stupid".

How about we address that?

Stupid of course is a harsh word. Political correctness is a joke, but stupid is still inapproproitate for most people who adhere to that wild notion. Uninformed, intellectually lazy and unwilling to investigate, learn, and understand, or just removed by too much time from the actual events are likely more realistic terms, depending on who it is who is presenting the ideas.

There are those who are just low-life, schlocky journalists or liars or pseudo-scientists, like Sibrel, Kaysing, Percy, et.al. who have used people's ignorance of the facts to make a pretty decent living. They deserve a worse name than stupid, of course, but the vast majority of hoax adherents are simply uninformed.

Regards.



I didn't know MID was your sock puppet who did your talking for you. (no offence MID) You still have not said whether you watched it or not. Are you going to take MIDs word for it. Have you watched the video. Just answer me that question and we can move on. If you have not, then I have nothing more to say then you must look at all sources, decide which ones are valid and then form your conclusions. Personally the moon landing doesn't interest me, which is why I normally don't post about it. There are much bigger things to investigate.
scoobysnack
adding to my above post...

I transcribed this myself a while back, and it's based off speaking so it's not in sentence form all the time. This is just an example of what was talked about at the press conference by people who worked in the US government. Are all these people liars? They want the government to tell the people what they all know, and declassify it.

Sgt Clifford Stone Army: "I had a secret clearance with nuclear assority I could get the clearance I needed to do whatever it was that was necessary for me to do at the time in special operations when I was called in on those, what I'm refereing to here is that I was involved in---we actually did recoveries of crashed saucers for lack of better term degrees there of, there were bodies that were involved in these crashes also some were alive while we were doing all this, we were telling the American public there was nothing to it, and we were telling the world there was nothing to it. We have sat back and told the American public there are no such things as UFOs I've been involved where we have recovered these objects, we know of them to be of extraterrestrials, in 1969, I had an event that happened to me while I was stationed at Fort Lee Virgina, we went to Indian town Gap Pennsylvania, that would be my first exposure to anytime that we would be recovering an unidentified flying object, we were a back up team which was supposed to be MBC because there was supposed to be some nuclear materials on board this craft. Later on most people involved were to be told that there was nothing on board it, it was nothing more then just a crash of one of our aircraft, I know better, because I was one of the people that approached it with a geiger counter to get surface readings. I was the first person to see that there was bodies on it. I know we are not alone in the universe. I know that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It's evidence that has been denied to the American people."

"When I got out in 1989, we had cataloged 57 different species. You have individuals that look much like you and myself that could walk among us and you wouldn't even notice the difference. Except for some of the things that uh, they might be able to go ahead in a dark room and touch and object and identify what color that object might be. They would have a heightened sense of smell, sight, hearing. The situation is that you have various types of what we normally call greys, we didn't call them greys in the military, but you had at least three types of the greys. You had some that were much taller then we were the unique thing that I would like to point out is that for the most part is that the entities that we did catalog were in fact humanoid. Now this in fact created a situation with the scientific community was trying to figure out why that would be the case because you would expect that if life evolved on other planets that they would take on some type of other being so to speak not necessarily look humanoid or be bipedal such as we are but apparently we have quite a few of the species out there that are humanoid in appearance. And that creates a question that yet has to be answered by science."

QUOTE
Clifford Stone is unique among those experiencing and investigating UFO and ET phenomenon. He spent 22 years in the US Army as a part of an extremely elite and secret group that was rapidly dispatched to crash sites in order to recover UFO or ET craft, bodies, and artifacts. Since his retirement from the Army, he has devoted his time to a diligent Freedom of Information Act search of government archives. He maintains that we have knowledge that intelligent life is visiting this planet in craft capable of traveling distances of many light years very quickly; effectively bypassing acceptably known physics. Further, he stresses that our recovery of these ET craft and artifacts have allowed our government to make staggering scientific gains of great potential benefit to the world. He maintains, as do many others, that this information is held in deeply secret programs beyond Constitutional controls and safeguards, and that despite the end of the cold war, those controlling these 'black projects' have continued to keep these important discoveries to themselves and for motives known only to them.

Sgt. Stone is coming forward with his story to encourage citizens and our elected officials to open investigations and end this Constitutional bypass by a powerful and covert organization operating under our noses and in our skies.

Clifford Stone was born in Portsmouth, Ohio. At an early age, he has memories of being contacted by ETs and that contact continues today. At age eight, he was befriended by an Air Force captain and that relationship continued through his early adult life. During the VietNam war, he felt an obligation to enlist in the Air Force but was rejected due to a skin affliction and classified 4F. He was advised by his friend, the captain, to try the Army and after a 'lenient' medical examination, he was allowed into the Army as a clerk typist, a job he never had to fulfill.

Within weeks, he found himself picked up in a staff car on the pretense of seeing a low ranking friend with a job at the Pentagon. On arrival, his friend's clearances allowed them into levels beneath the Pentagon, onto a tram, and soon he found himself thrust into a room and circumstances beyond imagination. His career was never normal, and for a newly minted soldier, he was suddenly thrust into the USA's deepest secrets: ETs are real and we are successfully recovering many of their craft intact as well as hundreds of ET artifacts worldwide. Further, we are familiar with much of their technologies and have in fact, back engineered some of the ET gear. After 22 years of being on the scene with ET craft and dead, wounded, and living ETs, Sgt. Stone is highly qualified as an expert in ET tech, black ops organizations/procedures, and the potentiality of ET contact to mankind.

Stone maintains that this secrecy is unconstitutional and beyond control and knowledge of our elected officials. Thereby, this represents a government hidden within our society with tremendous assets, funding, and knowledge.

This illegal government is operating without oversight, control, and the consent of the Executive, or Legislative branches.

Further, he feels this secrecy has split large parts of the citizenry into those that have seen UFO or ET craft/beings and those that place these observers in a category as something less than competent. Much of the malaise and mistrust of government can be attributed to a remarkable majority of its citizenry seeing or believing in these objects while the government and its officials and representatives deny or lack the courage to disclose what is now obvious. Also, the considerable scientific skills and assets of the world are for the most part, diverted by this bias from working on projects generations ahead of current understanding. This continues to allow important discoveries and advances within the control of the few.

Mr. Stone is bravely, and with resistance from covert quarters, coming forward with his story to do the following. He urges those in the know to admit that UFOs seen by millions worldwide are both ET and our own 'back engineered' ET-style craft. Release the abundant information and materials that show intelligent life is visiting our planet and has been monitored by numerous governments for decades. Provide the information that will allow our Constitutional government take back control of these deeply compartmented programs and restore confidence and trust in our system of government and military organizations. And at last, urge our government to finally entrust its citizens and the world with the truth about ET existence and technologies. With this information we can begin to formulate our place and relationship to other intelligent life in the cosmos. Sgt. Stone is a person that can provide the extraordinary evidence required for such extraordinary claims and provoke others to demand that the inheritance of mankind be reported to the all.

http://www.myufo.com/stone/

hazzard
Scoob,go back and read post #6,that is as close to my reply about the Disclosure project as anyone else could get, MID simply beat me to it.
scoobysnack
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 21 2005, 02:23 AM) [snapback]985582[/snapback]

Scoob,go back and read post #6,that is as close to my reply about the Disclosure project as anyone else could get, MID simply beat me to it.


Oh so this is what you wanted to write. You still have not said if you even watched the whole thing yet, but you seem to imply so. But that's not good enough. So to clear up any confusion, Did you watch the two hour press conference? Yes or No

QUOTE
Disclosure Project, from about 5 years ago, was a UFO convention. There were no astronauts present speaking about their observations of "buildings" on the far side. There were no astronauts present at all.

It is dubious at the outset with an actor dramatizing in really rather silly fashion, and the thrust seems to be that people have seen UFOs, and the Government is withholding beneficial technologies that should be made public and which could save the planet from the "energy crisis" we face, and from the effects of "global warming". Various folks appear describing their experiences.

No "proof" at all was given for these people's assertions. Simply a bunch of folks stating what lots of others have stated in the past...they've seen evidence of UFOs.

Nothings wrong with that of course. Just about anyone in ATC or a pilot (like myself), has seen a UFO. It means little, being that the term simply means Unidentified Flying Object. It has utterly nothing to do with alien life. "UFOs" are reported and spoken of frequently in the aviation field. No one, however, says, "Aliens".

Now, that having been said, it seems rather logical that we are in fact not alone in the universe. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no evidence whatsoever that we have been recently visited by any of the life forms out there. There have been no sightings of alien artifacts on the surface of the moon.

Just as, in kind, there is no substantive scientific evidence that there is any such thing happening as global warming, or that there is an energy crisis.

You seem to be making the point that the government lies. Well, they have certainly done so, and likely will again. However, your point also seems to be that the government could in fact cover up something so immense and involved as the "hoaxed lunar landing", a project involving a decade of work by almost 400,000 people.

That assertion is just a wee bit elementary, and a bit of a stretch of the imagination.

I say this because they couldn't possibly have done so with all those people involved...after all, Nixon couldn't even cover up the clandestine little Watergate affair, a small operation involving a small group of people, and Clinton couldn't keep his little affairs private...

How do you think that the Apollo project could've possibly been faked and so incredibly covered up for almost 35 years, when such small potatoes things can't be hidden fdrom public scrutiny?

Regards.


So you are saying everyone of these people who worked for the US government are liars? They are willing to commit pergery in front of congress? Why was no proof ofered?, because they would have been thrown in jail. It's all classified. What they want is the govenrment to tell the public the truth. So you belive what the government says, but you should realize they only tell you whats declassified. It's a lie. the story will change when they declassify the info, and then your reality will change because they control your reality, and I don't think you realize that. Some of these people worked in government with classified levels where they know we have alien UFO's, they were in charge of keeping them secret. Why have the astronauts not come forward you think. They have sworn an oath of secrecy, and they would have broken the law if they spoke. They would have been arrested. Stop trusting the government to create your reality, it's all a matter of perception.
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 21 2005, 02:55 PM) [snapback]986435[/snapback]


So you are saying everyone of these people who worked for the US government are liars? They are willing to commit pergery in front of congress? Why was no proof ofered?, because they would have been thrown in jail. It's all classified. What they want is the govenrment to tell the public the truth. So you belive what the government says, but you should realize they only tell you whats declassified. It's a lie. the story will change when they declassify the info, and then your reality will change because they control your reality, and I don't think you realize that. Some of these people worked in government with classified levels where they know we have alien UFO's, they were in charge of keeping them secret. Why have the astronauts not come forward you think. They have sworn an oath of secrecy, and they would have broken the law if they spoke. They would have been arrested. Stop trusting the government to create your reality, it's all a matter of perception.



As I had indicated, if these people were actually sworn to silence, this very gathering would've been cut off at the neck. It wasn't. Then again, perhaps after the fact these folks were corralled and told to can it by the government. Who knows.

I cannot say they are liars. They are saying what they want to, for whatever reasons. I believe they saw UFOs. If one of them wants to say he's actually seen aliens, fine. I can neither believe it or disbelieve it. I am not concerned quite frankly. What does it mean...that there's life out there besides ours? So? I thoroughly expect that. I do not think that any major cultural shock would result from revelations of alien life or contact with it. Maybe that's just me.

As to the Astronauts, I should say that UFOs were sighted several times, including on the Apollo 11 flight. I will also state that the sightings were not reported as such by the crews, who used discreet language to ask specific questions to try and narrow down what it was they were seeing.

This was done not to hide anything...but to prevent what was inevitable if the use of the common aviation term "UFO" was said over the public feed: that being speculation, conspiracy theorizing, and all sorts of associated crap that people typically indulge in when they don't understand something. The headlines would've read, "Moon Walkers Spy Aliens!" had they mentioned on the public feed that they were seeing something out one of their windows. Thus, they'd ask, "Houston, can you tell us where the S4B would be right about now, over?" because they were seeing a uniformly flashing white object out one of their windows while in trans-lunar coast some 150,000 miles out in space, where nothing should've been (a spinning LM covering panel from the S4B shroud, some 50-100 miles distant, the logical explanation based on trajectory analysis, would never have been bought. It would've morphed into aliens watching Apollo 11. That's why these things were never mentioned.

No astronaut saw anything alien. However, many of them, including Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, and Mike Collins, will tell you they saw a UFO on their flight. Means nothing really.

How about we get back to the hoaxers and stay off the alien thing? It's irrelevant.

Regards.
scoobysnack
QUOTE(MID @ Dec 21 2005, 04:37 PM) [snapback]986761[/snapback]

As I had indicated, if these people were actually sworn to silence, this very gathering would've been cut off at the neck. It wasn't. Then again, perhaps after the fact these folks were corralled and told to can it by the government. Who knows.

I cannot say they are liars. They are saying what they want to, for whatever reasons. I believe they saw UFOs. If one of them wants to say he's actually seen aliens, fine. I can neither believe it or disbelieve it. I am not concerned quite frankly. What does it mean...that there's life out there besides ours? So? I thoroughly expect that. I do not think that any major cultural shock would result from revelations of alien life or contact with it. Maybe that's just me.

As to the Astronauts, I should say that UFOs were sighted several times, including on the Apollo 11 flight. I will also state that the sightings were not reported as such by the crews, who used discreet language to ask specific questions to try and narrow down what it was they were seeing.

This was done not to hide anything...but to prevent what was inevitable if the use of the common aviation term "UFO" was said over the public feed: that being speculation, conspiracy theorizing, and all sorts of associated crap that people typically indulge in when they don't understand something. The headlines would've read, "Moon Walkers Spy Aliens!" had they mentioned on the public feed that they were seeing something out one of their windows. Thus, they'd ask, "Houston, can you tell us where the S4B would be right about now, over?" because they were seeing a uniformly flashing white object out one of their windows while in trans-lunar coast some 150,000 miles out in space, where nothing should've been (a spinning LM covering panel from the S4B shroud, some 50-100 miles distant, the logical explanation based on trajectory analysis, would never have been bought. It would've morphed into aliens watching Apollo 11. That's why these things were never mentioned.

No astronaut saw anything alien. However, many of them, including Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, and Mike Collins, will tell you they saw a UFO on their flight. Means nothing really.

How about we get back to the hoaxers and stay off the alien thing? It's irrelevant.

Regards.


Thanks for your post, but I'm really trying to get hazzard to answer a simple question about it he watched it or not.

Do you think the government would tell the public if we discovered aliens or UFOs. If you say yes, I have to assume to didn't pay close attention to a couple of the speakers in the two hour press conference. One man was told by CIA not to tell anyone of the (one of many) discovery, and that they don't tell the public info like this involving aliens or UFO's.

This is the problem I have come across. Most people don't know how corrupt the US media is. They think the government can't get away with things because of Watergate, and the Clinton affair. Both were puppets. Nixon was no longer needed, and Clinton was blackmailed to keep in under control. That's the reason you found out about the cigar incident. In fact the news can legally lie and say it's news. It went to court and that's what the court decided. It's government controlled propaganda. They are liars by omission.
hazzard
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 22 2005, 01:59 AM) [snapback]987016[/snapback]

Thanks for your post, but I'm really trying to get hazzard to answer a simple question about it he watched it or not.


Yes I did.

QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 22 2005, 01:59 AM) [snapback]987016[/snapback]

Do you think the government would tell the public if we discovered aliens or UFOs. If you say yes, I have to assume to didn't pay close attention to a couple of the speakers in the two hour press conference.


Yes I do,and you can assume what ever you want,you always have. I don't think its up to your government to say what is to be made public in this matter.There are thousands of astronomers around the world that don't give a squirt about the US,why would they ask your government how to handle the information if they found "something."First thing that would happen is getting conformation that what they are seeing is real,every available telescope in the world would zoom in on the object/phenomenon.After that your CIA/Men in black would have to kill a lot of people to keep it a secret.laugh.gif

And by the way,if life were confirmed els were in the solar system,NASAs budget problems would be over,forever.

About the "evil empire" and your lack of trust in the US media,well,fortunately for the astronomers and the science communities around the world they can figure things out for them selves.

And one last thing,lets get back on topic. Moonhoaxbelievers.

Check this out.
http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1089&b=1&c=1

Scoob may have a point though, the distrust in the US government seems to be spreading to all sorts of achievements and areas.

What do you think,are US citizens more prone to believe in the hoax than the rest of the world?
MID
QUOTE(hazzard @ Dec 22 2005, 03:09 AM) [snapback]987495[/snapback]



And one last thing,lets get back on topic. Moonhoaxbelievers.

Check this out.
http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1089&b=1&c=1





Haz...

I like it...kinda says what I feel pretty concisely. grin2.gif

Regards
Solofront
Omg you guys, this thread is still going strong unfortunately... laugh.gif
Obviously this guys a fool:
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Are%20hoax%2...rs%20stupid.htm

"3) They made the Apollo 13 movie don't you think they could have made the other Apollo landings fake? I do!!"

You mean Ron Howard,omg...

"Well, that proves it was all a hoax then. Also proves the Titanic didn't sink either. (How do you answer such a stupid remark?)"

Hmm...by answering with another stupid remark you p@nzee.

"4) On almost ALL of my research papers I got off the Internet" *illegal by the way* "they say they filmed Apollo 11 in the Nevada Desert!!"

Whos they, you and your little chatroom buddies?


"That about wraps it up then," (your the one that should get wrapped up buddy) "it must have been a hoax. I dread to think the sites you selected." (Which happened to be yours)

"THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS"
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/index.htm

The only theory with a problem is that dudes existence. wink2.gif

Remember that dudes title to his site:
Are Moon Hoax believers stupid?
I think not wink2.gif
MID
QUOTE(Solofront @ Dec 22 2005, 07:20 PM) [snapback]988629[/snapback]

Omg you guys, this thread is still going strong unfortunately... laugh.gif
Obviously this guys a fool:
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Are%20hoax%2...rs%20stupid.htm

"3) They made the Apollo 13 movie don't you think they could have made the other Apollo landings fake? I do!!"

You mean Ron Howard,omg...

"Well, that proves it was all a hoax then. Also proves the Titanic didn't sink either. (How do you answer such a stupid remark?)"

Hmm...by answering with another stupid remark you p@nzee.

"4) On almost ALL of my research papers I got off the Internet" *illegal by the way* "they say they filmed Apollo 11 in the Nevada Desert!!"

Whos they, you and your little chatroom buddies?
"That about wraps it up then," (your the one that should get wrapped up buddy) "it must have been a hoax. I dread to think the sites you selected." (Which happened to be yours)

"THEORIES WITH PROBLEMS"
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/index.htm

The only theory with a problem is that dudes existence. wink2.gif

Remember that dudes title to his site:
Are Moon Hoax believers stupid?
I think not wink2.gif



That's a little tough to follow.

You seem to be referring to Mr. Mayes, who's site is called "Theories with Problems".
Apparently, you take issue with his somewhat impatient diatribe on the questions he's received...calling him a fool, and stating that "the only theory with a problem is that dudes existence".

Kinda harsh, and also rather inapplicable, as his existence doesn't seem to be theoretical.

I can certainly understand his impatience, especially after answering the same question a thousand times, and he's really being a bit toungue-in-cheek with some of his replies in the "Are Moon Hoax Believers Stupid?" section. I can understand where he's coming from. I wouldn't be the same way about it...but it's tempting at times original.gif .

He states himself that his actual replies were alot more polite than what he wrote in this exposition, and further, he qualifies his statements with some attributes of the typical hoax believer prior to listing the sample questions he's received.

All in all, it's a little humorous. That's all, really.

Apparently, you take issue with this fellow, and seem to dislike him alot...why?
Perhaps you have questions that he hasn't answered?
You're welcome to ask them here if that's the case...I entertain all questions Apollo, so long as they're actually questions, and don't digress into immature and insecure name-calling, or are mired in the conspiracy theorist's mindset that makes everything a lie and a scam anymore....

And by the way, he states that he does not actually think that all moon hoax believers are stupid...and as I've said, neither do I, just mis-informed, perhaps gullible, most certainly removed from the events by a generation, and in many, many cases, not cognizant of the science and mechanics involved in the Apollo program. And the latter is certainly not anyone's fault. It was a rather complex program and not many people in the general public knew exactly how it was done, save basic information presented via the media (some of which was rather erroneous at best!).

Regards.
scoobysnack
Here's somthing I came across

To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.

All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echo the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the Illuminati's secret religion. The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at 1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion), placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival), communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13). 13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter), and the transition from the old to the new. Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles, "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis... and all Challengers shall be destroyed."

Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes.

No man has ever ascended much higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. At or under that altitude the astronauts are beneath the radiation of the Van Allen Belt and the Van Allen Belt shields them from the extreme radiation which permeates space. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology.

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, Solar flares, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings

If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum... and that is not even taking into consideration any effects of cosmic radiation, Solar flares, micrometeorites, etc. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.

http://www.hourofthetime.com/majestyt.htm

look into it if it interestes you.
frenat
Professor James Van Allen whom the belts were named for does not dipute the moon landings. The Gemini project went into th lowere reaches of the Van Allen belts, and satellites operate there everyday. If they were truly as dangerous as that site would like you to believe then all of the different commercial, non-government, companies with satellites in the Van Allen belts would have to be in on the coverup too. They have to know how much radiation there is for their stuff to continue working. The radiation in the belts is primarily particle radiation, which is easily stopped by thin metal.

Why should there be a problem with the astronauts wearing spacesuits in a vacuum? They do it all the time in orbit. Why should it be different on the moon? As far as the temperature, keep in mind that it is only a temperature of the ground (as there is no air to hold the temp in a vacuum) and that it only gets up to that temperature after two full weeks (one lunar day) in sunlight. The astronauts landing in lunar morning, thus the ground had not heated up to that temp yet.
hazzard
Van Allen belts.
http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html

Heat.
http://www.clavius.org/envheat.html
vampirate
Why would the Government want to pretend they landed on the moon? What could they gain from it?

Another thing: if conspiracies are true, and the Government have worked so hard to make us believe a lie, then wouldn't they do everything possible to debunk these conspiricies? I'm sure they have enough power to shut down or do some sort of damage to a forum like this if people were uncovering some sort of "truth"
NME_locus
QUOTE(MJB222 @ Dec 17 2005, 04:48 PM) [snapback]980161[/snapback]

Their opinions may seem stupid, but they themselves are not "stupid".


that's the best thing I've heard
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 26 2005, 06:59 PM) [snapback]993788[/snapback]

Here's somthing I came across

To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.

All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echo the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the Illuminati's secret religion. The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at 1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion), placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival), communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13). 13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter), and the transition from the old to the new. Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles, "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis... and all Challengers shall be destroyed."

Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes.

No man has ever ascended much higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. At or under that altitude the astronauts are beneath the radiation of the Van Allen Belt and the Van Allen Belt shields them from the extreme radiation which permeates space. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology.

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, Solar flares, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings

If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum... and that is not even taking into consideration any effects of cosmic radiation, Solar flares, micrometeorites, etc. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.

http://www.hourofthetime.com/majestyt.htm

look into it if it interestes you.



It's not really very interesting.
What it is is a combination of intellectual laziness and mythological crap. Numerology and occult associations to events are easy to formulate, but are utterly irrelevant. Claims of such ridiculous nature are easy to find all over the place any more, and are the product of a generation which has been woefully en-educated in critical reasoning skills and prefers to accept the mindless prattlings of a Fox TV special...

To wit, the innaccurate information presented about Apollo 13 is a classic example...all that association with the number 13 and all...it's quite frankly, stupid.

Not only is time a human construct which only applies to one time zone (of 24), the information here is inaccurate as well.

Apollo 13's explosion did not take place at 1313 in any time zone on 13 April 1970. It took place at 2107 eastern time, 2007 central time, and about 22 other times depending on where in the world you happened to be on that day. The LAUNCH took place at 1313 CENTRAL TIME on 11 April 1970...which was of course was a different hour depending on where you might have been at that time. On the East Coast of the U.S., it was 1413, and out in California, it was 1113 hours. The number 13 is irrelevant to anything. It is 10+3, or 7+6...or the sqaure root of 169. It has nothing to do with death and re-birth...save in the minds of those who are prone to such associations.

1313 Eastern time was simply the beginning of the Apollo 13 launch window, which lasted that day until 1636. As was typical, launches were planned to be executed at the beginning of the window and were set by celestial mechanics, not by some silly numerological coincidence.

But I'm sure that since Apollo actually launched at 1313 someplace is just too mystical to ignore...

Several Gemini crews ascended well above the lower fringe of the Van Allen Belts in the mid 1960s. The data is conclusive from these missions, and from all of the Apollo lunar flights ( which all had multiple radiation monitoring sources). No one ever received any exposure close to a danger level in any flight of any type of radiation. This is probably one of the most well-documented medical facts in the extensive reports issued on all of these missions. It is utterly ludicrous to claim in this day and age that the Van Allen Belts or cosmic flux presented any danger to any Gemini or Apollo crew, given their exposures or mission profiles.

Now, let's examine this question...

"...explain how the astronauts walked on the moon's surface in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum..."

original.gif

OK:

This is a really poorly worded statement, which lists a bunch of irrelevant factors, but we'll give it a shot, and try to clarify as we go along.

Astronauts walked in a spacesuit on the moon's surface because they had to, and were trained to, and in fact they found it rather easy to do.

The reason was that they were surrounded by a vacuum. They needed those suits primarily for that reason, as life cannot be sustained in a vacuum without a pressure garment. This is why, curiously enough, astronauts wear spacesuits when they're doing any sort of "space walk". It's really nasty what happens to a human body when exposed to a vacuum.

The reason astronauts did so in full sunlight is because there's always full sunlight on the moon's surface during the day, and we always landed during the day so we could SEE WHERE WE WERE LANDING.

And, no astronaut ever "absorbed" 265 degrees (F, I'm assuming) of heat. All Apollo landings were conducted during lunar morning, with relatively low sun angles. This was done to provide adequate shadow for relief and visualization of surface features by the LM pilots. It also insured that the temperatures would be relatively low during EVAs.

Did you know that the surface temperature at the Apollo 11 site when they stepped out on the surface was a rather cool 50-55 degrees F? Uh hu, that's right. No Apollo crew member experienced much more heat than about 125-135 degrees F on any lunar foray. And that didn't really matter, as the suits were built for the worst that the moon could throw at someone. The temperatures experienced minimized the load on the cooling systems however, to a certain degree, and that was prudent.

These statements are ridiculous and show a decided lack of intellectual honesty. They also contain erroneous "facts" which cannot be substantiated anywhere. All of the material is now readily available to anyone who seeks it. Apollo is the most documented scientific accomplishment in history.

The idea that it was faked is beyond ludicrous.

Regards.
scoobysnack
It was really just intellectual laziness on my part. I came across it while reading up on something else, and thought I would post it.

Good to see you know more about this then I do.
MID
QUOTE(scoobysnack @ Dec 27 2005, 06:31 PM) [snapback]995052[/snapback]

It was really just intellectual laziness on my part. I came across it while reading up on something else, and thought I would post it.

Good to see you know more about this then I do.



Then I'd say that was someone else's intellectual laziness, not yours.

I rather thought that may have been a quote of someone else's. I'm really kind of glad grin2.gif

Regards.
darkninja
QUOTE(bathory @ Dec 17 2005, 02:56 AM) [snapback]979952[/snapback]

Are moon hoax believers stupid?

Yes

yes.gif thumbsup.gif w00t.gif thumbsup.gif yes.gif
hazzard
I don't think that they are all stupid,they just cant wrap their head around the whole space flight concept.So maybe they think that if they cant,no one else can either.....No wait they cant be that stupid. laugh.gif
JesseTheMutt
QUOTE(Essan @ Dec 17 2005, 11:59 AM) [snapback]980170[/snapback]

I don't know about people who believe in moon hoax theories, but anyone who perpetrated such a hoax is most definitely stupid. It must be costing them billions a year to keep it going by now, plus they've got to build a new spaceship, fly to the moon - with replicas of everything they claim was left there - without anyone knowing, and all before the Chinese get there.

Blimey, if there was a moon hoax I reckon you're gonna see a 200% tax hike in the USA next year at the very least!


What the hell are you talking about?
JesseTheMutt
QUOTE(vampirate @ Dec 27 2005, 09:44 AM) [snapback]994491[/snapback]

Why would the Government want to pretend they landed on the moon? What could they gain from it?




um.It was the space race..We wanted to win..
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.