Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: spinning facts
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
bacca
Just a simple question for all you bible followers......How do you justify picking and choosing quotes, or spinning them to make the bible suit your needs at the time? I have seen the bible described as fictional stories by at least one of you, yet you on another post will claim that it's all true....I don't understand this can you try and help me out?
Yelekiah
Something that is interpretable "changes" its meaning. You read the same sentence twice and you may find it had a different meaning altogether.
bacca
perhaps but you can't change facts right? and when you change the meaning to fit your needs that's not faith anymore, at least not to me
Yelekiah
What metaphor in the Bible is factual?
bacca
I never said that anything in the bible is fact, I personally think it is a work of fiction but there are those who claim that it is all true, at least most of the time, those are the ones I was asking the question to......no harm intended hmm.gif
Yelekiah
Oh, I see what you mean. You said you can't change facts, and there are people who think it is factual. I agree with you.
GIDEON MAGE
you have to remember the rules-if something in the bible doesn't agree with modern xian teachings:
1. It was symbolic.
2. It was a parable.
3. Even though Jesus said it, he was referring to something else.
4. If you were saved, you would understand the real meaning.

There really is no arguing with them. They will dodge every time.
bacca
that's my point though gideon, a symol or a parable are fiction.....no longer can claim it's a fact now can then?
GIDEON MAGE
i have been over this a thousand times. an example:

you-know-who tells his disciples they have to hate their families, and love God. It's symbolic. He meant "love less". Okay, then, so the resurrection was a symbol, something to ispire us to "die" symbolically, and "resurrect" ourselves in god's grace? no, it literally happened. After a while, you give up and realize they aren't really listening.
bacca
I agree with you....I would just like to see if one of those who do it can somehow explain it logically grin2.gif
ramster83
My personal stance is that some of the Bible may have been corrupted in time. I also believe much of the Bible to be factual as well. I believe what i want to believe basically.
I dont twist stories around to fit my needs, yet everyone knows a lot of the Bible isnt to be taken literally and its poetic and in parables etc. Oh and thats about as hypocriticle as skeptics using Bible quotes to support their opinion. What do you say about that? When skeptics use a book they call "fiction" to support their "fact"? wink2.gif
bacca
I don't use bible quotes so I can't answer for those who do as to the whys....

As for what you just said.....You pick and choose what you believe? and you call that faith? If you think that some of it has be changed, corrupted etc, how can you believe any of it? I've heard a lot of strange things in my life but that has got to be one of the strangest....You don't have faith you have convenience rofl.gif and that's funny to me rofl.gif
Paranoid Android
Ok, most of the time it's pretty easy to "interpret" the Bible. It all comes down to context. Read before it, read after it. What kind of writing is it - is it a narrative, a parable (it will say something like "Jesus told them this parable"), poetry, wisdom sayings, history, teaching. Each style is different.

I am convinced that a majority of non-Christians and ex-Christians never actually read the Bible (zandore has admitted as much), they just cut and paste from websites without doing any of their own research into the matter. Then the Christian will refute that by posting a Christian website, and suddenly that's 'apologetic crap'. So I go and do my own research. Read the Bible to see what it says. Then post the context. It's a nice ride for the non-Christian. They just cut and paste, make the Christian do all the work and then claim us to be interpreting the Bible to fit our own needs, then cut and paste again, leaving us again to do all the work sad.gif

Then the non-Christian complains that whenever I quote the Bible it is true, but whenever they do, it is suddenly out of context. Well, guess what, rather than whinging about it, why not read the Bible yourself and tell me where I'm out of context, or support your own argument as to why it is in context (at least Gideon has made an effort at doing this, for which I respect him greatly).

The sad thing is that (on this site for example), the non-Christian will take the word of someone who has cut and pasted all these passages from ex-Christian apologetics, then claim it is the CHristian who is interpreting the Bible to suit their own ends, not the other way around.

Sorry, I've gone a little off-topic in my ramblings blush.gif As I said at the beginning, on the whole, interpretation comes down to context primarily, it's writing style, it's place in the book as a whole etc..... To play devil's advocate, there is a gray area, where passages are unclear as to their meaning. Organized religion has a set of doctrine's and laws that have to box it in and say exactly what it means. My own faith will tell me, I don't know. It's ok not to know everything. We're not perfect.

Personally, as I've said before, I'll take the large themes in the Bible, the overarching one's, and run with that for my faith. If something is ambiguous or could mean many things, and it does not adversely affect my belief, then I leave it to the realm of intellect, think about it, debate it, even contradict myself at times as to its possible meaning.

Sorry for the long post. Hope this helps thumbsup.gif

Regards, PA

bacca
Ok PA fair enough, I may not personally think it makes sense but at least that was an honest answer and I thank you for it
ImOne
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 18 2005, 05:28 PM) [snapback]981752[/snapback]

..... As for what you just said.....You pick and choose what you believe? .....

Have you found some source of information where you are able to accept the whole, and that contains all you need, or is practicing hypocrisy part of your belief system?

bacca
ImOne, I never claimed to have "faith" in the book if you do then you don't pick and choose you have 'faith' that it's all true that is what it means.....or is that to confusing for you?
ramster83
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 19 2005, 12:28 PM) [snapback]981752[/snapback]

I don't use bible quotes so I can't answer for those who do as to the whys....

As for what you just said.....You pick and choose what you believe? and you call that faith? If you think that some of it has be changed, corrupted etc, how can you believe any of it? I've heard a lot of strange things in my life but that has got to be one of the strangest....You don't have faith you have convenience rofl.gif and that's funny to me rofl.gif


Yes i pick and choose what i believe. Isnt that the basis of everyones path in faith? Not everyone follows their religion 100% to the bone, even if they think they do. Another funny thing is non believers says that a Christian is a sheep and cant think for himself, but when one says he picks and chooses what he wants to believe then he has no true faith? Theres no winning with some people honestly wink2.gif . My faith is me getting guidance from God for the truth, we all seek truth and the Bible has been through the hands of many, so i cant trust it- i trust God but i dont trust people. So i seek the truth from God as the Bible MAY have been corrupted in time. My faith isnt religion, my faith is in God- not the Bible or any other book. I believe some of it to be factual but my communication with God is personal and not Bible related. Thank You. original.gif
Paranoid Android
QUOTE(bacca)
Ok PA fair enough, I may not personally think it makes sense but at least that was an honest answer and I thank you for it
I'm shocked bacca! Is the Christmas spirit getting to you? I was expecting to be ripped to shreds for that post tongue.gif

Seriously, thanks thumbsup.gif

Regards, PA

edit:
QUOTE(Ramster83)
Another funny thing is non believers says that a Christian is a sheep and cant think for himself, but when one says he picks and chooses what he wants to believe then he has no true faith? Theres no winning with some people honestly wink2.gif
laugh.gif I hadn't thought of that one yet......


bacca
To both of you PA and ramster, I somewhat know where you two stand and no matter how many times I walk away from my computer with the urge to pull you thru it and pummel you I can respect that you always say the same things. And as i said I don't agree with the picking and choosing thing to me it's like saying that I love all chocolates of every kind and then throwing away have the box because they are nuget. It doesn't add up....does that make sense to you ramster? It's not about you or anyone else imparticular it's the concept that some of the people here change their tune depending on the topic, and I'm sure you've seen it as well. have you not? So again thanks for the honest answer, I truly and honestly appreciate that you posted here...PA even under threat of attack wink2.gif


And no it's not Christmas..................ba humbug
ImOne
bacca, your internal struggle to justify your beliefs will not be helped by your inability to understand others.
bacca
rofl.gif rofl.gif rofl.gif sorry to disappoint or ruin your try at making this about me and my stuggle or whatever rofl.gif but I don't have any reason to justify my personal beliefs as a matter of fact you don't even have a clue what they are so who am a justifying them to? w00t.gif you know i am tired and that gave me a really good laugh so thanks for that and better luck next time
ramster83
QUOTE
And as i said I don't agree with the picking and choosing thing to me it's like saying that I love all chocolates of every kind and then throwing away have the box because they are nuget. It doesn't add up....


Wheres the freedom in not being able to pick and choose? Are you saying my only other option besides organised religion is Atheism? Dont think sooooo. wink2.gif

QUOTE
It's not about you or anyone else imparticular it's the concept that some of the people here change their tune depending on the topic, and I'm sure you've seen it as well. have you not?


Oh i totally wont deny that...I've seen it! Agree there. thumbsup.gif
ImOne
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 18 2005, 06:13 PM) [snapback]981829[/snapback]

rofl.gif rofl.gif rofl.gif sorry to disappoint or ruin your try at making this about me and my stuggle or whatever rofl.gif but I don't have any reason to justify my personal beliefs as a matter of fact you don't even have a clue what they are so who am a justifying them to? w00t.gif you know i am tired and that gave me a really good laugh so thanks for that and better luck next time

Good, making people laugh is one of the things that brings me joy.

I don't need to know what your beliefs are to know that at the root is something you take on faith, something unknowable. Either that or you lack any conviction.
Jesusfan
QUOTE(Paranoid Android @ Dec 18 2005, 08:30 PM) [snapback]981756[/snapback]

Ok, most of the time it's pretty easy to "interpret" the Bible. It all comes down to context. Read before it, read after it. What kind of writing is it - is it a narrative, a parable (it will say something like "Jesus told them this parable"), poetry, wisdom sayings, history, teaching. Each style is different.

Agreed... There are different genres of writtings within the Holy Scriptures, and each has its own peculiar rules to based an intrepretation upon... Most important rule though is Context determines ultimatly how to view what is being said...

I am convinced that a majority of non-Christians and ex-Christians never actually read the Bible (zandore has admitted as much), they just cut and paste from websites without doing any of their own research into the matter. Then the Christian will refute that by posting a Christian website, and suddenly that's 'apologetic crap'. So I go and do my own research. Read the Bible to see what it says. Then post the context. It's a nice ride for the non-Christian. They just cut and paste, make the Christian do all the work and then claim us to be interpreting the Bible to fit our own needs, then cut and paste again, leaving us again to do all the work sad.gif
Yep... many people say that Bible cleacontridicts itself here and here, but they have actually either never read the Bible, taking someone's word as truth, or else just have read people who have a bias against the Bible being true as stated...

Then the non-Christian complains that whenever I quote the Bible it is true, but whenever they do, it is suddenly out of context. Well, guess what, rather than whinging about it, why not read the Bible yourself and tell me where I'm out of context, or support your own argument as to why it is in context (at least Gideon has made an effort at doing this, for which I respect him greatly).

The sad thing is that (on this site for example), the non-Christian will take the word of someone who has cut and pasted all these passages from ex-Christian apologetics, then claim it is the CHristian who is interpreting the Bible to suit their own ends, not the other way around.
Yes sir... Amazing that those who are so against truth of Bible/Jesus etc are same persons who allow for shoddy work to support their own pet dogmas, yet ANY kind of evangelical views of Bible/Jesus etc are tainted and wrong...
Sorry, I've gone a little off-topic in my ramblings blush.gif As I said at the beginning, on the whole, interpretation comes down to context primarily, it's writing style, it's place in the book as a whole etc..... To play devil's advocate, there is a gray area, where passages are unclear as to their meaning. Organized religion has a set of doctrine's and laws that have to box it in and say exactly what it means. My own faith will tell me, I don't know. It's ok not to know everything. We're not perfect.

Personally, as I've said before, I'll take the large themes in the Bible, the overarching one's, and run with that for my faith. If something is ambiguous or could mean many things, and it does not adversely affect my belief, then I leave it to the realm of intellect, think about it, debate it, even contradict myself at times as to its possible meaning.

Sorry for the long post. Hope this helps thumbsup.gif

Regards, PA

Paranoid Android
And you quoted this because.....?
GIDEON MAGE
QUOTE(Paranoid Android @ Dec 18 2005, 10:47 PM) [snapback]981997[/snapback]

And you quoted this because.....?

he is new, and not sure how to do it.
67thbook
QUOTE(ramster83 @ Dec 19 2005, 01:10 AM) [snapback]981739[/snapback]

... yet everyone knows a lot of the Bible isnt to be taken literally and its poetic and in parables etc. Oh and thats about as hypocriticle as skeptics using Bible quotes to support their opinion. What do you say about that? When skeptics use a book they call "fiction" to support their "fact"? wink2.gif
That is a problem is it not? Not everyone agrees as to what is meant literally, hence, the absence of solidarity in not just religious belief but in Biblical interpretation. It all depends on how a Christian or Jew or Muslim chooses to interpret a particular verse or verses, at any given time, as suits their agenda. It is a moving target.

Only a god who intends to keep everyone at odds with each other would create and or support such an agenda.
Paranoid Android
^^Or perhaps there really is only one interpretation. But sinful humanity, intent on keeping one agenda or another, coloured by one's own pre-conceived beliefs, means that a hundred different ideas come out.

Yes, that means that my interpretation may be as wrong as the next person's. I'm just providing an alternative explanation to what you have given.

Just something to think about.

Regards, PA
QueryAnalyzer
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 18 2005, 04:56 PM) [snapback]981487[/snapback]

Just a simple question for all you bible followers......How do you justify picking and choosing quotes, or spinning them to make the bible suit your needs at the time? I have seen the bible described as fictional stories by at least one of you, yet you on another post will claim that it's all true....I don't understand this can you try and help me out?


Sadly, many of the science books out there, are also open to interpretations. I am a believer in evolution, but I sometimes (maybe always) try to build up my own view of evolution, but I know it happened, just that it is hard to believe all of our scientists when they are changing their evolution sub-theories every new discovery of a fossil or footprint or who knows. And not to mention all the contrasting points of view between evolutionists. So the best thing is, interpret the writings yourself and build up an image that best suits you.

I think it is the same with the Bible, so I think your opinion applies to all of us people who read and study wink2.gif

And no, I like to think the Bible can't be taken factual.
ramster83
QUOTE(67thbook @ Dec 19 2005, 03:50 PM) [snapback]982081[/snapback]

That is a problem is it not? Not everyone agrees as to what is meant literally, hence, the absence of solidarity in not just religious belief but in Biblical interpretation. It all depends on how a Christian or Jew or Muslim chooses to interpret a particular verse or verses, at any given time, as suits their agenda. It is a moving target.

Only a god who intends to keep everyone at odds with each other would create and or support such an agenda.


Not necessarily these religions are closer than you think. Its all the same thing really. They all know this hence even though they fight (cause they are family- religion wise) when in trouble they are really close. A good indication is the thousands of young Muslim volunteers that will be guarding churches during Christmas in Indonesia to keep them safe (as there's been problems last year). When a church was recently burned down in Sydney due to racial issues- Muslim, Jewish and Christian officials together talked about the reconciliation of believers and the rebuilding of a bigger even better church. Muslims and Jews have recently supporting more nativity scenes in shops and telling Christian shop owners not to feel like they are "offending" anyone. You get the deal- these 3 faiths are MEANT to get along because they are the same thing, they got each others backs.
bacca
QUOTE(ImOne @ Dec 18 2005, 09:21 PM) [snapback]981850[/snapback]

Good, making people laugh is one of the things that brings me joy.

I don't need to know what your beliefs are to know that at the root is something you take on faith, something unknowable. Either that or you lack any conviction.




So let me guess you are trying to attack me, unsuccessfully i might add, because you can't answer the question? that's ok it'll be alright for you someday i'm sure......but just so you know, the entire point in this is to ask questions etc, it has nothing to do with the conviction in my own faith this isn't about me no matter how hard you try to make it that.

Ramster, like I said it's not everyone and perhaps for some picking and choosing works for them, it's those that claim that it's 100% true then start doing it and changing even how they explain things that I put this question to......so please to those of you who always keep with the same answers, don't take offence this isn't for you, although you might notice you are the only ones who dare answer............who'd a thunk it w00t.gif
ImOne
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 19 2005, 05:12 AM) [snapback]982354[/snapback]

So let me guess you are trying to attack me, unsuccessfully i might add, because you can't answer the question? that's ok it'll be alright for you someday i'm sure......but just so you know, the entire point in this is to ask questions etc, it has nothing to do with the conviction in my own faith this isn't about me no matter how hard you try to make it that.

Well it certainly isn't about me, you started the thread. I can only answer the question by showing you that you pick and choose your beliefs. You are attempting to reveal that as a weakness in other persons.

You are to smart to believe someone that says it's all true and then choses parts will have a rational explanation. If you are trying to teach your targets you are going about it the wrong way. If you're not trying to help what are you doing?
bacca
What do you think I am supposed to be doing? I am asking a simple question that you haven't even attempted to answer. You have made judgements about me that are false. The point in the question was to see if anyone could even attempt to explain it which apparently they can not. And as for me picking and choosing my beliefs again I must ask do you have any idea what mine are? you don't have a clue what I do in my own beliefs so please don't try to say you do.....and don't try to be smart with me, I have plenty of practice going back and forth with some very intelligent people who are here all the time and although I am not in the mood for the simple ideas of people who obviously don't have anything constructive to add I will happily put you in your place whenever need be....so if you can't answer the question you need not try to personally attack me it will not work
101
in some cases - not all churchs believe the Bible is infallable. This is why some may say it is false in one way and true in another.

But with me the Bible is true - the whole thing.

It is just different Christian sects that believe different.
Paranoid Android
ImOne - bacca's right. You seem to be attacking her for no apparent reason. Just hold back a little, and perhaps even answer the question.

bacca - things aside, ImOne does have a point. We all choose our beliefs, whatever they may be. The American poet Allan Ginsburg once wrote:

For I am of Slavic parentage, and a Buddhist Jew
who worships the sacred heart of Christ, the blue body of Krishna,
the straight back of Ram, the beads of CHango
the Nigerian singing Shiva, Shiva, in a manner
which I have invented


Whatever our beliefs, they are our choice to hold them, and ours alone. We choose what we wish to believe, and what we wish to discard as false.

Just thinking out loud (typing at least tongue.gif)

Regards, PA
bacca
I agree with you PA and perhaps the problem that i have is those that change the meaning to best suit their argument at the time.........you know what I mean?
Paranoid Android
Yeah, that's what I thought you were meaning. Or perhaps the picking and choosing of what is allegorical and what is fact, what is real and what is not.


bacca
QUOTE(Paranoid Android @ Dec 19 2005, 09:43 AM) [snapback]982419[/snapback]

Yeah, that's what I thought you were meaning. Or perhaps the picking and choosing of what is allegorical and what is fact, what is real and what is not.




exactly, does that make more sense? see your so helpful sometimes....thanks thumbsup.gif
ImOne
QUOTE(bacca @ Dec 19 2005, 06:28 AM) [snapback]982399[/snapback]

What do you think I am supposed to be doing? I am asking a simple question that you haven't even attempted to answer.

The answer to your question, as you already know, is people are not always rational.
QUOTE

You have made judgements about me that are false.

You are welcome to attempt to clear those up.
QUOTE

The point in the question was to see if anyone could even attempt to explain it which apparently they can not. And as for me picking and choosing my beliefs again I must ask do you have any idea what mine are? you don't have a clue what I do in my own beliefs so please don't try to say you do

Please point out where I'm mistaken.
QUOTE

.....and don't try to be smart with me, I have plenty of practice going back and forth with some very intelligent people who are here all the time and although I am not in the mood for the simple ideas of people who obviously don't have anything constructive to add I will happily put you in your place whenever need be....so if you can't answer the question you need not try to personally attack me it will not work

I don't doubt that you practice being intelligent. Your mood has no bearing on the truth. I was trying to help you see something. Please put me in my place I aspire to remain humble.

This thread was started by you and is about you. You pretend you are seeking information but your agenda is transparent.
bacca
no actually i didn't have an "agenda" when starting this topic it was something that bothered me so I asked a simple question that most people seem to understand. As for judgments about me you have made more then one without knowing anything about me and frankly what you have said about me and my faith or what not is not true....you should try to figure people out before you make comments about them...you aren't trying to help anyone from what I can tell you came on here and made comments about me not the question...I ask all sorts of questions on here and at times I get irritated with people doing what this question is about. So again if you can't answer the question with any logic other then your statement of people being irrational then you aren't helping anyone.....
ImOne
Concerning belief systems and picking and choosing or taking the whole you only have the two ways to go. To do both is not rational. Hope that helps.
bacca
QUOTE(ImOne @ Dec 19 2005, 10:18 AM) [snapback]982471[/snapback]

Concerning belief systems and picking and choosing or taking the whole you only have the two ways to go. To do both is not rational. Hope that helps.




that is true, the problem is people that do both and the simple asnwer of it not being rational is fine for you perhaps but that's not a good enough answer to satisfy my personal curiosity about it.......make sense? i'm hard headed I know unsure.gif
ImOne
Ok, my bad. I'm not a psychologist so that's the best I can do.
bacca
QUOTE(ImOne @ Dec 19 2005, 10:32 AM) [snapback]982498[/snapback]

Ok, my bad. I'm not a psychologist so that's the best I can do.




no that's fine, it's something.......thanks
101
Well the reason why some do both is because they are in a state of confusion.

This is why sometimes anyone will be sitting on the fence- rather then on either side.

I have noticed that when a person grows they become more aware of what they believe in. Then they have a firm stance. Neither side means they are deciding. Once the person decides they can truly discuss their reasons why. But when a person is undecided their decisions can be decided by someone else rather then themselves. This is why new believers in any religion or in any philosphy should really think about what they belive and not what John believes.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.