Ok, most of the time it's pretty easy to "interpret" the Bible. It all comes down to context. Read before it, read after it. What kind of writing is it - is it a narrative, a parable (it will say something like "Jesus told them this parable"), poetry, wisdom sayings, history, teaching. Each style is different.
Agreed... There are different genres of writtings within the Holy Scriptures, and each has its own peculiar rules to based an intrepretation upon... Most important rule though is Context determines ultimatly how to view what is being said...
I am convinced that a majority of non-Christians and ex-Christians never actually read the Bible (zandore has admitted as much), they just cut and paste from websites without doing any of their own research into the matter. Then the Christian will refute that by posting a Christian website, and suddenly that's 'apologetic crap'. So I go and do my own research. Read the Bible to see what it says. Then post the context. It's a nice ride for the non-Christian. They just cut and paste, make the Christian do all the work and then claim us to be interpreting the Bible to fit our own needs, then cut and paste again, leaving us again to do all the work

Yep... many people say that Bible cleacontridicts itself here and here, but they have actually either never read the Bible, taking someone's word as truth, or else just have read people who have a bias against the Bible being true as stated...
Then the non-Christian complains that whenever I quote the Bible it is true, but whenever they do, it is suddenly out of context. Well, guess what, rather than whinging about it, why not read the Bible yourself and tell me where I'm out of context, or support your own argument as to why it is in context (at least Gideon has made an effort at doing this, for which I respect him greatly).
The sad thing is that (on this site for example), the non-Christian will take the word of someone who has cut and pasted all these passages from ex-Christian apologetics, then claim it is the CHristian who is interpreting the Bible to suit their own ends, not the other way around.
Yes sir... Amazing that those who are so against truth of Bible/Jesus etc are same persons who allow for shoddy work to support their own pet dogmas, yet ANY kind of evangelical views of Bible/Jesus etc are tainted and wrong...
Sorry, I've gone a little off-topic in my ramblings

As I said at the beginning, on the whole, interpretation comes down to context primarily, it's writing style, it's place in the book as a whole etc..... To play devil's advocate, there is a gray area, where passages are unclear as to their meaning. Organized religion has a set of doctrine's and laws that have to box it in and say exactly what it means. My own faith will tell me, I don't know. It's ok not to know everything. We're not perfect.
Personally, as I've said before, I'll take the large themes in the Bible, the overarching one's, and run with that for my faith. If something is ambiguous or could mean many things, and it does not adversely affect my belief, then I leave it to the realm of intellect, think about it, debate it, even contradict myself at times as to its possible meaning.
Sorry for the long post. Hope this helps

Regards, PA