The following postulate proposes a deduced adage supporting spontaneous Creation as the impetus of stimuli. Because the very Answer to the question of,” Why is there existence at all? Is to gain opaque matrix by the registry of stimuli, created by a fluid system of capacitance toward, and a fluid system of attenuation from each coordinate registry of stimulation. So it can be said that stimulus draws the stochastic parameters of existence. In laymen’s terms, if you weren’t “alive.” How would you know about life?

This author does not intend to promote a traditional religious interpretation of Creation -Albeit; I cannot dissuade the value of stimuli oscillating in a cognitive consistency train. Therefore, to dismiss religious association would be just as casuistic. Mankind’s modern concepts emerged from historical lunacy because the beliefs of ole were not so insanely naïve. They were emerging pieces of a compiling code poetically encrypted by an infantile descriptive ability!

In, Introductory to Psychology, Addison-Wesley Publishing 1978- Jonathan L. Freedman states:” No one can associate entirely freely”

I find two important interpretations of this quote. The first requires the contradiction that a void can be somatically measured by that which it is de-voiding. From which it must be considered: That in a void, stimulation designates, and is designated by the void. Because a void can only be measured by the absence –absence is the emitted reference. Thus, a void is conspiratorially impossible because the parameters of such a vortex are born of the attempt at recognition of that which is said not to exist. Perhaps the better description of a true void silently beckons from an unrecognized anecdote: The cognitive measure against everything feasible. The very root of a true void is unavoidably a frame of reference. So it is impossible to associate entirely freely.

The second interpretation understands that we learn intellect from historical stratagems. Historical stratagems thus learn from earlier formulas until we trace intelligence back to the root element, which is memory. Memory-being equal to recognition-cross referenced to birth the human intelligence into what I’ll call design levels:


LEVEL I Created Design [CD]
LEVEL II Intelligent Design
LEVEL III Intentional Design
LEVEL IV Specific Design [SD]

Where the points C D and SD meet on a linear plane to conclude existence as an intentional design created by specific intelligence




Level I: Cognition Identifies itself as ‘particle’ then as wave as Memory. As ‘particle’ in the individual, and then as a ‘wave’ by conductivity among the masses through even the earliest and most “meager” forms of communication.

Level II: Memory optimized further and extroversive record was created by assignment of extra sensory stimulus to represent rudimentary cognitions – symbolism. The route fundamental of symbolism is the collective identification of conjoined coordinate points.

As Homo erectus began to scratch and scribble in the sand and dirt patches with a twig in the interest of expression he could hardly be aware of his inception toward the anatomy of the modern world. It’s doubtful that he conscientiously considered the actuality of how much he truly changed the physical world around him. However slightly altering the ecosystem that had been planted by a biomass process!

Like memory, the wind had done this too by pushing and pulling branches and with the insects by falling trees. However, memory isolated its conduction to closed set units in demanding us to assume that the winds and bugs were of cathode phenomenon. Pseudonyms of deity’s and demons unleashed upon mankind by Zeus, or Beelzebub.

Conscientious controlling awareness: The infantile parable shaping our understanding of systems conducting according to finite rules. Special relativity aligns the piety into gravity; electromagnetism; and the strong and weak nuclear forces demanding that the parameters of such rules must be the harness of a greater controlling force – Grand unification theory! So the rudimentary conduct within a dimensional system under finite rule is merely ‘changing state’ recognitions of the same principle. In fact, the systemic changing of the principles state identifies the somatic parameters of the system as under finite rule.

If atoms [cognitions] of a molecule bond or sever between liquid [religion] and solid [science] its elements are merely bonded by electron exchange [communication: memory as a wave.] Avoiding such paradox by subscribing to natural selection may be haste. Since natural selection simply dismisses the ordering of formula as without sum by assuming [agreeably: from our frame of reference] that such a postulate could be conceivably possible without the specific events concluding in our being here to consider it.

Let’s review one of the more popular religious to science formulas. Most people have heard of the story of Noah’s Ark. The gathering of animals who boarded the ark two by two to be saved from the flood. Now let’s look at the complete set of minimal (purest digits 1 thru 9 ) english digits and their seperation into odds and even. Both the odd compulsory sequence and the even compulsory sequence compell by two’s. Our they are ordered from the chaos of true value interactions by rule of two by two:

ODDS : 1+2 3+2 5+2 7+2 9 by two
EVEN : 2+2 4+2 6+2 8 by two

complete set of english digits compell odds and even two by two. Interestingly when converted to registry by Primer or integer the only factor that changes is that the numeral 9 become the first odd number which is not primer. Therefore it is the final vector of the complete minimal set. So we can deduce that the parables of most ordained religions were simplified versions of the sciences many use to attempt to deny religious contentions in these days. Contentions gathered through a youthful language!


Level III: To continually optimize its self, memory released free electron theories of Super strings and Chaos: Butterfly Fly Effect, awaking them from the arbitrary instinct of supernatural forces. Opening conduction shutters in mankind’s realization of synchronous behaviors among all components in a physical system. He associates the concept through cognitive consistency trains, realizing that a rudimentary incentive decipher beneath the cognition oscillations.

Neurology discovers firing orders to CREB capacitance suggesting that each CREB creation acts as a unit address dictating stimuli parameters by ionic concentration gradient encryption. Under such modeling [Hodgekin-Huxely] it can be understood that the topology of symbolic cognitions -up and down loading from CREB storage unit’s -are transferred by ionic ordering. The potassium and sodium flow of neuron summation dictate muscular movements and therefore our physical actions. Our physical actions often change an archaic landscape contained in an ecosystem that is itself a solar action potential by the osmotic pressure of gravity, which constrains the Appleton layers from the frost of space. So it is then logical to introduce the concept that motor neuron summation and Renshaw cell inhibitions synchronize fluidly with all components of the existence spectrum.

Conscience of this mankind attempts to gain more control [From our frame of reference] over destiny and environment by ordering a specific design to cognitions -such as signs from finite sets of symbols-which stimulate replicating summations. These replicating summations gain frequency and become a fluid tone or beam of light perceived as time. Time begins to reveal incentive by the recognition of unconscientiously created patterns or codes emerging into our frame of reference from some formulating impetus that evolved to be specific as if the tone created melody, or the beam of light created hologram. The start is relative to the conclusion.

Level IV: Mankind discovers that every component of reality is just as specific. So he attempts to “evolve” a sixth sense. Synchronizing his artificial intellectual
Properties with the order of ‘natural’ componential simulative properties mankind realizes that the syncopation being possible demands that what he assumed to be his will of understanding of his existence or intellectual identity is not so much a species ‘evolving’ from an omniscient frame of reference. He denotes that his evolution is the
De-evolution of an emerging code. A code is both created and its encryption deciphered from tangents of possibility at the same time.

Subordinate to his attempt to assume freedom of will mankind conjures stratagems to organize the observation of the system from his perceptions are measured. However, his attempt to understand the engineering of his system by cognition methodologies merely layer – like layers of paint over the skeletal frame – the functional process of his extra/introversive cognition closed set quanta valuing from the fluid emergence of the topological incentive. These artificial assumptions are in fact a layer of the continuum process, serving reality only through the perceivers prejudice as emerging topological coordinates, valuing to a design incapable of truly being subjected to metric ordering.

Many people assume that mathematics makes sciences work. If this were true we could simply invent equations and then apply them to reality without the need for testing the conversion. However, mathematics is truly just a storage registry of observational stimulus. This is why the supplementation of letters for numerals in algebra works-because the use of symbolic formula as memory stimulus is far from conclusive and merely serves to one collapse a wave functional behavior of a method, which the conceiver has recalled, from memory storage.

An observation, which is the compulsion of artificial layering [We can never truly observe an electrons rudimentary behavior because to observe the electron we must re-order the template on which we observe the electrons. Therefore, in line with the Copenhagen interpretation of special relativity we merely collapse its wave function to observe the behavior of the electron that we want to observe due to our memory of prior interaction with the elusive sub-particle.] So to attempt to answer the meaning of existence with arduous and parsimonious equations is futile- Given that the rudiments of mathematics are prejudicially incorrect, or insufficient to the universal symmetry of reality


Mathematics and reality

The contradiction between written mathematics and the parameters of reality can easily be shown with the following anecdote.

Using a large room of non-discernable character a partition is set up in the middle to divide the room into two separate rooms. Room A and Room B. The partition leads to a table behind which is a chair that where in an observer will sit upon completion of the formula. Since all solutions to any formula are the post conclusion of the formula, the observer will not witness the transaction of the formula. Instead he will act as the solution identifying his observation of the formula to test whether its strata is realistically correct.

The formula to be tested is a common and simple equation: 10 x 10 =

To test this equation ten people will enter both rooms and remove ten equal scoops of ice cream each. However, in Room A the ten people will each place their ten scoops on the table in rows of ten before leaving the room. While in Room B the ten people will consume their ten equal scoops of ice cream prior to exiting. Then the observer (solution) will be brought into to identify the quantity marooned into existence when ten people compel an action ten fold. In Room A the observer finds that there are one hundred scoops of ice cream on the table – neatly devised into ten rows of ten. While in Room B the observer finds that there is no quantity of ice cream on the table and no evidence that ten people had engaged in the action of quantifying ten equal scoops.

Certainly, a formula could then be compiled upon the original test to identify the possibility that ten people had consumed ten equal scoops and then consumed though that does nothing to provide ostensive proof to the observer as to what 10 x 10 is equal to. Let’s visualize this anecdote with the following table



Room A B
Formula 10 people x 10 scoops 10 people x 10 scoops
Solution 100 scoops 0 scoops

:

Certainly we can account for the action of the consumption in Room B. However, that completely changes the formula to satisfy observation rather than to deduce the true conclusion of the equation. Expanding the equation to account for the action of consumption in Room B requires the same inertial equality of expanding the formula to account for the act of placement in Room A. The anecdote seeks to identify the concise true value of 10 x 10 using a simile of ten persons interacting with ten scoops of ice cream without the interdiction of post methodical algebraic satisfactions.

So in reality the mathematics of science are distortions of the author conceived to satisfy predisposition of conclusion. Thus, when using formula to predict the nature of particle physics the equation predicts the nature of the particles subjected to the catalyst of wave function collapse – placement or consumption -rather than reveal the rudimentary characteristics of the particle. Under the metaphor of relativity it is only possible to multiply and identify the behavior of said particles in a state devised by its interaction with its environmental conditions. It is impossible to divide and observe the true introverted character of said particles.

Let’s consider a more latent example of mathematical prejudice feeding back through mass stimulation. To do so we need look no further than our designation of whole set units quantifying our cognition of sequence. We say that there are:

Units of 1
Units of tens
Units of hundreds
Units of thousands – This escalates to the hundreds of thousands
Units of Millions – This escalates to the hundreds of millions
Units of trillions – This escalates to the hundreds of trillions

However, a true sequence is uniform. A true sequence would not fail to relate thousands of millions9and thousands of thousands of millions] and then millions of trillions[ and millions of millions of trillions]. Certainly, there are millions in trillions though not millions of trillions. By prejudicial conception mankind integrated this three-digit comma rule into his written identification with value. Perhaps the paradox was necessary to incite code emergence allotting intellectual growth. Infecting economics among other facets of life, this paradox produces supraliminal distortion in the cognition wave.

This distortion feeds back through several behavioral methods: two of which are diffractive and refractive, the other two of which are phonetic (audio) versus symbolic (optical). Cognitive diffraction is easily shown in the theory of natural selection wherein it is proposed that mankind evolved from primates. “Primates” is an alphanumeric symbolic vs. phonetic diffraction particle because the phonetic conjunction denotes the cognition imbalance, “Prime Eights” though eight is not a prime number. This contradiction escapes Festinger’s imbalance model because it is not an imbalance by comparison of two cognitions.. Rather it is an oxymoron between the phonetic invocation and the written denominations of a single stimulus Further, this postulate goes on to assign polarities to the cognitions accounting for the compounding anthropological effect of the mass imbalance by recognizing that the abundant bonding of diffracting cognitive waves creates a refractive cognitive tone as inteference that when washed in the din of a refraction area may at times be perceived as an aleonism (Organized audio stimulations in wind.) In this case one that is reverse flux, or in ancient terms, “evil.” Evilution is the euphemisms refractor.

Consider a sentence, which phonetically denotes the use of the words, “Benign” and “Before” such as to suggest:

“Perhaps we should address this situation before its repercussions grow too benign!” as in passing conversation

The sentence denotes a supraliminal phonetic equation: “Add”, “Four”, and “Nine.” So the transmitter is sending a subconscious formula to the recipient summing a value of 15. By no conscious means the receiver will then exhibit a certain amount of mental coherence toward the exo-sensory cognition of fifteen at a later pixelation point- a conduction of incentive compelling that pixelation point. So we can discern that since a cognitive diffraction is projected by the assignment of the value four and the value nine to the phonetic “B” – as in algebraic terms – that the letter “B” must equal 15 where the audio diffraction waves intersect[Though in this sentence we have denoted the phonetic conclusion “too benign”, or 2B= 9. So we must deduce that the true value of the pre diffraction vector “B” is truly 4.5, not 4 as we originally sounded in using the word “before.”

We must realize that cognition -as the oscillation of memory- incites topological recognition by specific mental adherence to the parameter of a variable area within which they are stimulated. Cognition is the missing link to grand unification theories.

MATHEMATICS AND MIRACLES

A prime example of the science-religious relationship can be found in the traditional christian claims to the works of the christ, Jesus of Nazareth. The second testimant begins with the gospel according to MATHew. This is the first hint that the tale is a MATHematical encryption. In MATHew[we math] Jesus is said to have preformed miracles that would seem realistically improbable to our modern concepts of mass. This is because the testimonies are trully mathematical encryptions of division.[LUKE 12.51 Do you think that I have come to bring peace to the earth?No, I tell you , but rather DIVISION ( emphasis mine)]

For example: MATHEW 15.33 asks for the mathematical solution”where are we to get enough bread in the desert to feed so great a crowd?” Jesus is said to have broken seven loaves and a few small fish into pieces ample enough to feed a crowd of “four thousand men, besides women and children.” Since there is no absolute number accounting for the fish we simply divide 4,000 by 7. The parable adds besides women and children without claiming the number of children per women so we assume there is only one child per women which makes the divisor 12,000 due to the equation: 4,000men +4,000women+4,000children = 12,000.

4,000[men] / 7 = 571.42857143
12,000[men,women,children] / 7= 1,714.2857143

Disregarding the decimal points line up the like numbers:

57142857143
17142857143

It’s easy to see that the fist and last[“I am the alpha and the Omega”] digits of both solutions are the same digits of the the chapter and verse 15.33 and that both sets equal six when added [1+5=6] and [3+3=6]


The same miracle is said to have been performed in MATHEW 14.17 which requests the solution, “ We have nothing here but five loaves and two fish” It is then said that those who ate and were full from the fish and loaves were five thousand men,besides women and children:

2[fish] + 5 [loaves] = 7
5,000[men] / 7= 714.28571429
15000[men,women,children] / 7= 2,142.8571429

Now line up the like numbers:

714.28571429
2,142.8571429

Here the alpha and omega digits form the true triangular equations[ 7 from 9 =2] [ 2 from 9 =7] and [7+2=9]


So now line up all the like numbers in the solution to both parable equations and identify the decimal perimeter digits as chapter and verse[green]
5 7 1.4 2 85714 3 =1.4
1, 7 1 4.2 85714 3 =4.2
7 1 4.2 85714 29 =4.2
2, 1 4 2.85714 29 =2.8 [ you can easily see that 1.4 is half of 2.8! While 4.2 replicates itself]

It’s easy to vertically identify the traditionally lucky number 777 in thesecond column. LUKE 1.4 states “ So that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed” while LUKE 2.8 reads “In that region there where sheperds living in their fields keeping watch over their flock by night” with no description as to them doing so by day as in LUKE 4.2 where it reads “where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing at all duringthose days, and when they were over, he was famished” Though in MATHEW 4.2 it reads “He fasted forty days and forty nights, and afterwards he was famished” this reveals that the gospel according to MATHEW is encrypted in some relation to the difference between day and night. So upon review it is easy to see that there are 24 chapters in MATHEW, and we know that there are twelve disciples, like twelve hours on the modern clock compared to the nautical twenty four hour clocks used by the military. So converting the nautical hour to traditional time reveals a chapter, verse matrix easily shown by the following examples.

Example 1:

LUKE 24.51 “While he was blessing the he withdrew from them and was carried up into heaven” 24 hundred hours is equal to 12 of the clock so we refer to
LUKE 12.51”Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth?No, I tell you , but rather division” Referencing both verses we can easily see that admission division is necessary to reveal the the truth concerning the things about which the bible instructs, and that in written mathematics it is common to withdraw and carry up a tenths to the next greatest number to be multiplied.

Example 2:

LUKE 24:46 “And he said to them,”Thus it is written, that the Messiah is to suffer and rise from the dead on the third day..” while LUKE 12.26 States” the master of that slave will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he does not know and will cut him in pieces, and put him with the unfaithful” Here we find a more obvious mathematical equation directing the division by the command “cutting him in pieces” from which the messiah rises from the dead after a value of three! So whe you cut him in three pieces you get these common english anagrams[save abbreviations or acronyms]:

HESS I AM = MESSIAH
HA I MESS = MESSIAH
HI MESS A = MESSIAH
I HE MASS = MESSIAH = HI HE MESS MESSIAH A MASS ( Christian ritual)
HE MISS A = MESSIAH =MISS HESS AM HE AI(Artificial intelligence emerging itself as the human psyche)

Another example of Mathematics and miracles is found in Revelations 13.18 where it is commonly associated – even among non christians’ that the number 666 is said to be of the beast, or devil (Some annals dictate it as three score six hundred and sixty six.): “This calls for wisdom: Let anyone with understanding calculate the number of beast,for it is a number ofa person. Its number is six hundred sixty six” – The Faith-Sharing New Testament with Psalms

One interesting and offset interpretation of this is that the number 666 is equal to the sum of the squared first seven primes:

However, the origin of the wisdom is easily calculated with the primer found as Luke 12.51 above “I have come to bring division”

We are all well aware that the year 2000 was said to be the end of the milliniem according to the Gregorian calendar, the successor to the Jullian calender. Both calenders are based on a measure of astrology, or the planetary orbital alignment in the solar system. We also are well aware that it is said that the masses believed that the sun orbited the earth and that galilea was said to have been imprisoned for proposing this idea. This arouses an evidence of culpability that actions may have even been conciuosly taken to encrypt an emerging understanding that would be ciphered into the adaptation of the later calender.

We know we are the third planet from the sun. A positioning that synchronized the adapted calender to signal the end of the millenium. So if you divide 2000 by 3 you get

2000/3 = 666.6 to the infinite power.

Further more. It has been shown in the book of Messiah, A Nu merical new miracle, that the values 60+60+60 =180 or half the radius of a 360 degree complete circle.
Then by applying this beacon to the code beacon GOD, or “word of GOD” a topopraphical model of entelechy emerges. Simply drop the valueless zero’s and you get 6+6+6 =18 or verse 18. then ad the digits in the equation 2+0+0+0+3=5. So 18-5=13 or Chapter 13

60+60+60 = 180 degrees one half of a complete circle
6 + 6 +6 = 18 verse

2+0+0+0+3=5
18-5 = 13 Chapter

So the traditional King James bible is certainly more than just an assortment of impossible fables. Though as I stated at the start of this postulate I am not writing in the interest of promoting or scrutinizing any orthodox or eccentric religion. So I should continue to describe the whole spectrum of creation under modern conception submitted to compitent lexicon.




Chicken, or the Egg?

So let’s consider one of the most common anecdotes cited when engaging in the traditional debate of evolution vs. creation. Remember when we were asked, “What came first the chicken or the egg?” The answer is really very simple. We were not asked where the chicken or the egg came from. We were asked which came first. So we must hypothesize that both spontaneously took instantaneous form [STIF.] Now we can eagerly admit that if the chicken did not STIF first then the egg could not be incubated and therefore hatch. It would succumb to carbonic decay, or more quickly fall prey to a number of predators. So the chicken came first and was spontaneously created, since it could not have been born without an egg and therefore parents.

This brings about the query: What proof do you have that the year 1534 ever existed. How do you prove that the chattel by which you claim your heritage did not spontaneously arrive with mankind and his preprogrammed memory of year’s prior? A computer must have some sort of memory stored to act under any directive. A computer is nothing more than a brains exoskeleton. Memory is transferred from the program to the computer. I have heard many people take offense to the use of the computer as a metaphor. This is because these people assume that the computer is superior to them simply because it performs thousands of calculation per second. That’s because of the little universe inside them unraveling from the specific design of the manufacturers. If you assigned thousands of connected humans to perform a function of a greater equation, and then assigned them to memorize the vectors of their assignment for recall on command. That equation would be solved in a deity’s millisecond [a human’s day] as well. So it’s a safe analogy to compare the human races mundane compulsory to a computers computation. Wherein each day the users
equation is solved by the gross world product. Realize that I am not modeling the theorem after computers. Rather, computers were modeled after the theorem and where created to align mundane ‘evolution’ in line with the postulate.

Though, the reality beneath the layer is that mankind is de-evolving into an entropic dependency on tools. A great example of which is shown by the Tsunami of 2004 wherein mankind- with all his “technological” apparatus -was the terrestrial species most affected. However, the “unintelligent” creatures had all gone, leaving behind their food sources and shelter without the premonitions provided by Azimuth or Doppler’s equations.

RED SHIFT

Laughing as if drunken the scholastic mock, “Spontaneous and instantaneous creation is a fools pry. Galactic red shift tells us that the universe is expanding as it has expanded from the finite point that we told you is the origin of the Big Bang!”

To counter this erroneous conclusion lets start with considering some simple facts.

1. If the universe is expanding from a finite point in any directive then it must be expanding within some sort stasis system which by nature of its own structure is acting as a force of resistance designating the somatic parameters that I will liken to the Hubble constant for the sake of this postulate. Coagulation between the two systems must exist in a finite medium just beyond the Hubble constant. So the theory of a steady state universe is more likened to obvious deduction that the universe is a changing state medium.

2. Secondly, Red shift is an effect of the capacity of magnification of the apparatus by which we are observing the shift. For example: Were we not to use an astronomical observatory we would observe no shifting of red within the electromagnetic spectrum – A shift that is the effect of an ordering of catalyst, not a discovery of the fundamental nature of the building blocks of the universe. Using the observatories with the capacity as of date a red shift is observed because the observatories themselves act as opaque optical layers ordering the perception of light into a subsequent medium. However, if seen from the same frame of reference with greater magnification the same light resonating at the same frequency and transmitting from the same source to a receptor (us) in the same frame of reference would exhibit a diluted shift to the red. If we could stop time, as it is commonly considered, and review the exact same observation through greater magnification we could say that the Galactic red shift we had observed has shifted back to the blue. The only variable we have changed is the capacity of the catalyst. So Galactic red shift does nothing to combat instantaneous creation, nor support a Big Bang theory. Rather, it merely examines the capacity of the catalyst measuring the spectral lines, a linear Stark effect ordering complacent only with the prejudice of a single impetus mathematical stratagem which is erroneously founded to signify the rudimentary engineering of reality!

3. Thirdly, It is commonly contended that light is the fastest thing known to man. This is impossible since light is strictly measured through memory- even if that memory is an extra sensory storage such as with digital designation points assigned to a computer aided spectrometer. So memory is faster than light. Further more, if light is faster than the molecular lattice of the apparatus through which it is measured than it would simply escape. For example, if light where so fast it would not be confined to the parameters of any shaft. Sticking a flashlight down a pipe would not result in a beam out the other side. The light would simply escape the torsion flux created by the molecular sigma/pi bonds forming the pipes lattice and filter off in many directions undetected by the naked eye. So the collegiate brings about the arguments of gamma radiation as a component of the electro magnetic spectrum demanding that such rays do escape the torsion strain caused by the bonding molecules creating the opaque lattice nature of the flashlight. I respond by asking “ But do they escape the pull of gravitational bodies?” citing, New York Public Library Science desk reference book, Macmillan, 1995 “Electromagnetic waves travel through space in a straight line, unless forced to deviate from that line.” Pg 288, “ If the velocity of light is different in two media.” Pg 289. Since it is scholastically contended that gravity is caused-much like angle strain- by bodies of mass in rotation, pushing and pulling on each other. Yet this elusive radiation is quite obviously not quick enough to escape this very ubiquitous force.


To be continued with BOOK II of the BOOK of MESSIAH [ patent pending]

Owe and by the way the Great Egyptians pyramids of Giza were built by using elephant slaves not human slaves.

It's really very simple.

Using a herd of elephants harnessed to the stones on the other side of the structure they would simply spur the team away from the pyramid. Acting as an archaic pulley system the stones would slide up seaweed lubricated timber rail systems as a team of human VOLUNTEERS followed behind chauking the stone at each lower level to relieve stress factors on the harness system.

In honor of the great majestic beast they built a statute that we now call the sphynx in the image of the elephant, and designed the Pharo's shawl to resemble the ears of the great powerful marsupial. Then the beard was extended and wound to represent the shape of the elephants trunk, like a goatee is named after the hair extending from the goats chin. Falciform medallions where then attached to the temple area of the pharos head regalia to represent the tusks of the bulls which were found to make useful tools.


The pyramids were built by white roma you were using astrology and azimuths equation [ what ever they called it] to find the center of the earth as they understood it. Thus the pyramids align with the equator.

Having been built in half the time that the academia asserts[I'll deal with C-14 dating in the complete book], a rebel insurgency came and reshaped the sphinx to appear as a lion, thus the word "rebel lion." Because much like mankind today these ancient builders used animal figurines to represent thier political and ideological beliefs, the one of which - the elephant - survives to this day!

They obviously came across elephants since they conquered a land known as elephantine, the only correlating letter combinations.

UFO's, SLAVES, believe waht you want but the truth is so simple!!!!!!!!




















.

copy and paste this post on AOL main under the POPE JOAN board because AOL is trying to keep me from being able to!

Imagine that.

aquatis1, I love you In a strictly platonic sense. The perfect response to the above post.

Creationist propaganda.
If it's 'Intelligent Design'....then who is the Intelligent Designer?

DUH!!!!!!

Belief in a higher power is perfectly acceptable to me. Faith is a personal matter, for those who espouse a particular set of beliefs.

What annoys me about this new-fangled 'Intelligent Design' campaign, is that they insult the intelligence of those who read it.

They load it with polysyllabic phrases and obscure pseudo-technical lingo, believing that if they slap a label like 'Intelligent Design' on it...we ignorant heathens are gonna just slap our heads and in a simultaneous acknowledgement that SCIENCE IS WRONG!!!!!!!

Calling it a scientific theory instead of Biblical doctrine...that ain't gonna cut it.

Belive what you will. It's not my place to judge.

If you wanna pray to God, Allah, Zeus or Odin....you're welcome to go for it.

It's a free country. Just stop preaching to me, like I'm a stupid three-year-old!!!

This is Creationist BS. Not science.