Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Cat Owner Turns to DNA to Implicate Dog
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > World Of The Bizarre
__Kratos__
LEESBURG, Va. - A cat owner, frustrated that officials couldn't prove a neighbor's dog had killed her pet, took a cue from television legal dramas and used DNA evidence to pursue the case herself.

A lab that analyzed the DNA concluded that the dog was linked to the cat's death, but officials said they still can't make a case because there were no witnesses.

After discovering her cat Cody dead under a tree in front of her home in August, Marylin Christian came to suspect Lucky, a German shepherd mix belonging to neighbors Sean and Janet Daryabeygi.

After authorities said they could do nothing because they needed a witness, Christian went to the Daryabeygis, who gave her samples of Lucky's saliva and fur.

Armed with the DNA test results, she asked the county to declare Lucky dangerous, which would have required the Daryabeygis to carry at least $50,000 in liability insurance, keep the dog locked up at home and muzzle it during walks. Officials declined to do so because no one had seen Lucky kill the cat.

About 10 days after the cat's death, Lucky was found running loose, and Sean Daryabeygi was fined $116. There have been no problems since.
Source
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's bull... who can know for sure the cat didn't go over by lucky then wounded ran back home? disgust.gif
Bahamut_0
Yeah, right...
pfft, stupid court judges...
poor kitty...

=(
a_blue_fish
Poor cat. I'd probably murder our rottwiler if he hurt one of my kittens. I completely understand what this woman is doing. It reminds me of a few years ago, when someone prosecuted a couple of people for shooting her cat. She claimed it had made her severely depressed and near suicidal, but the judge said he didn't see why her cat dying could affect her emotionally. Idiot.
Bahamut_0
^What the F***?
That guy is an idiot, he obviously never had any pet.
Bebi
*shakes head* People have been convicted on DNA evidence alone with no eye-witnesses.... Why is the same science not allowed in a pet case? A lot of people's pets are their "children" and their death hurts them as badly as if a family member has died.
nativechick1989
QUOTE(Bebi @ Jan 10 2006, 02:30 AM) [snapback]1014710[/snapback]

*shakes head* People have been convicted on DNA evidence alone with no eye-witnesses.... Why is the same science not allowed in a pet case? A lot of people's pets are their "children" and their death hurts them as badly as if a family member has died.

I totally agree!

Poor kitty . . sad.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.