Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Pregnant woman claimed she was driving for 2
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > World Of The Bizarre
DR. YO
PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- Fetuses do not count as passengers when it comes to determining who may drive in the carpool lane, a judge has ruled.

Candace Dickinson was fined $367 for improper use of a carpool lane, but contended her unborn child qualified to use the lane. Motorists who use the lanes normally must carry at least one passenger during weekday rush hours.

Municipal Judge Dennis Freeman rejected Dickinson's argument Tuesday, applying a "common sense" definition in which an individual is someone who occupies a "separate and distinct" space in a vehicle.

"The law is meant to fill empty space in a vehicle," the judge said.

Sgt. Dave Norton stopped Dickinson's car November 8. When asked how many people were in the car, Dickinson said two, pointing to "her obvious pregnancy," the officer said.

Norton said Dickinson's theory "would require officers to carry guns, radios and pregnancy testers, and I don't think we want to go there."

Source

That was creative I have to admit. yes.gif yes.gif
Yelekiah
Over here, a pregnant woman is considered two. Interesting.
Conspiracy
some people amaze me on what they do tongue.gif
Pyro Pheenix
lmao! creative indeed laugh.gif
Celumnaz
I call it manipulative. It's disregard for intent of purpose like this that ruins freedom for the rest of us. imo, her and people like her that try to get around things like this are complete utter <expletive omitted>!

yes I guess it was creative, criminals are often very creative. Using her baby like that... sick.
rocky4
If she had twins would that be considered 3 seats?
angrycrustacean
I think she should have been allowed to continue driving in the carpool lane regardless. Not because there were 'two people', but because maybe they should give all pregnant women rights to drive in the carpool lane anyways, sort of as a gift. Maybe that's a crazy idea though. blush.gif
nativechick1989
Crazy . . . but must admit it's very creative.
distortedpandy
QUOTE(Celumnaz @ Jan 12 2006, 12:00 PM) [snapback]1017898[/snapback]

I call it manipulative. It's disregard for intent of purpose like this that ruins freedom for the rest of us. imo, her and people like her that try to get around things like this are complete utter <expletive omitted>!

yes I guess it was creative, criminals are often very creative. Using her baby like that... sick.



so you never once tried to find a loop hole in the system? ever?

I think what she did was alittle errr...weird...but I wouldnt go as far as calling her a criminal rolleyes.gif people have done worse yes.gif
__Kratos__
Guess it was worth a shot to try. tongue.gif
charlie181
QUOTE(Celumnaz @ Jan 13 2006, 01:00 AM) [snapback]1017898[/snapback]

Using her baby like that... sick.


what about the woman who auctioned off naming rights to her unborn child?
AztecInca
She could have added that she was practicing driving in this lane for when she did have to travel with her baby.
distortedpandy
QUOTE(AztecInca @ Jan 12 2006, 08:56 PM) [snapback]1018606[/snapback]

She could have added that she was practicing driving in this lane for when she did have to travel with her baby.


ohhh good idea...

such a criminal mind ya got there wink2.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.