Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: more than myth
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Cryptozoology, Myths and Legends
makaya325
bob heironimus definitely is a liar bc he is 5 foot 5 not 7ft like bigfoot in the patty film. dont believe anyone who comes forward bc their wrong. fact is that was a bipedal creature and not a man in a suit. case closed
DaKong
......?

Uhh mind shedding some light on whoever your talking about and what the case is? Please don't speak 1337 (elite), the mods don't like it very much...
makaya325
QUOTE(DaKong @ Jan 26 2006, 01:32 AM) [snapback]1036155[/snapback]

......?

Uhh mind shedding some light on whoever your talking about and what the case is? Please don't speak 1337 (elite), the mods don't like it very much...


sry
frogfish
Do you have any proof? Otherwise, you do not call it fact that it wasn' human....please type more legibly
Clobhair-cean
You seem to close cases rather quickly (like the "sea monster footage" topic)... It is good that you can convince yourself so easily, but personal beliefs and facts are two different things. The latter has to be proved to the outside world, not just proclaimed. ("Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some moistened bink lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!")
XSAS
QUOTE(makaya325 @ Jan 26 2006, 01:25 AM) [snapback]1036143[/snapback]

bob heironimus definitely is a liar bc he is 5 foot 5 not 7ft like bigfoot in the patty film. dont believe anyone who comes forward bc their wrong. fact is that was a bipedal creature and not a man in a suit. case closed


Why start yet abother thread on this.. there is alread an actice Patterson bigfoot film thread discussing this.

I love all the evidence you put forward to close this case.. I can see you have put a lot of hard work into this conclusion?
makaya325
QUOTE(XSAS @ Jan 26 2006, 10:58 AM) [snapback]1036634[/snapback]

Why start yet abother thread on this.. there is alread an actice Patterson bigfoot film thread discussing this.

I love all the evidence you put forward to close this case.. I can see you have put a lot of hard work into this conclusion?


but cmon bob didnt do it hes not tall enough. 90 percent its real
Clobhair-cean
QUOTE(makaya325 @ Jan 26 2006, 07:16 PM) [snapback]1036971[/snapback]

but cmon bob didnt do it hes not tall enough. 90 percent its real


1: Grammar is your friend. Don't abuse it.

2: Why do you think that the bigfoot on the film is 7 ft. tall? As far as I've seen, there is no proper reference point on the footage, so no-one can tell the exact height of it. Also, on film, it is not hard to make something look bigger/smaller than it really is: one of the methods for it is called "false perspective" and is one of the oldest tricks of the trade.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.