Around mid-day on April 27, 1961, Bruno Ghibaudi, a scientific journalist, was driving the highway paralleling the beach at Montesilvano (Pescara), felt a flat tire and pulled his car over and stopped. As he began changing the bad tire, and as he was working at that task, he noticed an unusual metallic-looking disc- shaped flying objectcoming in at a low level over the ocean. It passed overhead, slowed, made a sharp turn towards the north and flew away. (Case 16, Project Blue Book)


UFO or Sky beast...

Or electron micrograph of some virus, or just about anything.
It amazes me that UFO junlkies provide little but diffuse, grainy, unidentifiable pictures of "things"...no scalar references, no context, no identification whatsoever.
Save the fact that this object is certainly not dish-shaped, nor does it give any indication of being metallic, or plastic, or organic.


It's an image of some "thing". That's all. It is unrecognizable...completely. You can't tell if it's flying, if it's in a petri dish, or what.

Thus, a UFO, or perhaps a "sky beast"??

looks kinda like a grasshopper landed on the lens...

I am very open minded, but sometimes, a pic will appear what you make of it. This pic in particular doesn't say too much to me besides the possibility that it can be anything! who knows..

I'm not sure what it is, but I'm pretty sure it's not a grasshopper...

I dunno, it looks like a big blurry grasshopper to me

You'd really have to convince me on that one. I mean, i can sort of see what might look like legs, but grasshooper's wings are a little more distinct than that, and the head shape is all wrong.

Now...let me see, mybe this can help u a bit.... MID..

Only recently, New Zealand photographer Michael White, while shooting a strange looking dark cloud managed to capture on film yet another enigmatic, organic looking craft or creature. According to his information, he was shooting the strange looking black cloud which he observed for more than thirty minutes, when it suddenly disappeared. It happened so suddenly he did not even realize what he captured on film, which defies explanation. The image is certainly no cloud. It's no bird or jet. The dark object has very distinct properties of shadow and light, is solid and appears to be considerably large. But this was not what the photographer saw with the naked eye at all. He says he felt the strange cloud sensed it was being photographed, as it simply vanished, leaving only this mysterious shape on film. The cloud, as he described it, was 'fiberous' and peculiar looking.

Wow! that one...really defies explanation. Do you have the actual video clip of it? that would be quite interesting to see. but yeah, that one's weird

First thing that popped into my mind was. [attachmentid=23005]

nice pix yadava. the top one really looks odd completely without distinct form or function. nifty!

sorry guys there is no video clip of the picture...

but the UFO in the picture look more like as living organism than mechanical veichle..just want to know what you guys have in mind about this..

I don't know what you mean by "help me"...

These images are of another undefined, unusual flying object. A UFO, most asuredly.
My point is that it is nothing other than that, a UFO...Unidentified Flying Object. Know one knows what precisely these images show. They are not clear enough to show any detail save a general shape, which is typical.

UFO is an aviation terminology, which has somehow been assoiated with "alien" spacecraft, but its actual intent is to describe traffic than cannot be identified. It's very simple, and every pilot with enough time under his belt has seen a UFO.

He has not seen an alien spacecraft, but a UFO. What it is is sometimes resolved, and sometimes it is not.

But any discussion beyond the fact that it is flying and unidentified or unrecognizable is moot, and speculative. It has nothing to do with science, or any substantive proof of extraterrestrial life.

http://www.rense.com/1.imagesF/gamera.gif



the bottom one looks like a flying turtle

I wonder if it is a kite...?

That picture above the blurred one, for a first look it looked like a fighter jet, but maded gray and blurred....not as UFO, just a picture of something like a fighter jet, or a grasshopper etc and editted. Or it could be a collection of pictures merged together because the front part on the right looks like a sausage

The last set of 4 pictures look like a sea turtle...does anyone see that?

I would have to agree they do looked kinda like a turtle, and the top right one looks like a frog

This is an artist impression of it.

turtle all the way. but with my last interpretation leaning towards grasshopper, I was worried I was seeing insects/reptiles where none were before, kinda like faces in clouds, only with animals...

Yup. Grasshopper and then turtle falling from the sky. Poor little guy doesn't even have a chute.

More here guys check em out

"What the hell was that thing ?"
http://www.rense.com/general50/whatthe.htm

First you go on to say that people shouldn't be saying it's "alien" because it is only a Unidentified Flying Oject. But right after that you say that it's something natural! LOL!!!!

If you don't know what it is, how can you tell someone what it isn't, then tell them what it is and expect them to accept it, just like you accepted what they believe it to be?

I think those pictures are from a low budget UFO movie made in Australia or New Zealand. I don't remember which. It appears pretty fake looking to me.

Hitman

I, for one, cannot tell them what it is, or what it isn't.
You should read a little more carefully.

A UFO is simply that. Nothing can be derived from that definition save that it's an object that is flying and that it is unidentified.

People shouldn't be saying it's anything other than that, because that is all that can be derived from the observation (it's why we coined the phrase, "UFO"). There doesn't seem to be any conflict here.

No one's telling them anything about what it is, or what it isn't...simply that it is...and no one knows anything more. How difficult is that?

What was said here is that one should not speculate, because there is no evidence whatsoever to support "alien spacecraft". It is also stated that some UFOs are resolved, i.e., later identified (a weather balloon, a large kite, some nut sitting in a lawn chair with 50 helium balloons attached to it at 13,500 feet, atmospheric phenomenon generated by chemical release by a sounding rocket at 40 miles altitude, etc.), and some are not.

They could be alien...but without any proof...it's folly to say so.
So laughing out loud is not exactly the appropriate thing to do....

The guy, Kenny Young, who took the above pics/ or vids- He died last year in 2005- only 38 years old.

In Memory Of Kenny
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/update...b/m01-005.shtml

Unfortunately his web site (the links shown in article) no longer work. I hope other sites might have his vids and pics for viewing.

Another about Kenny with his picture here:
http://www.ufowatchdog.com/kenny.html

EDIT: Well, I found some of his video works - "The Washington DC 2002" (including Ohio sitings and 911 actual audio phone calls ) is pretty interesting

Link: http://www.anomalyresponse.org/radiotv.php

I have not watched them all.. hoping to see find that one video as pictured above