Theories of Ed Leedskalnin, inventor of coral castle in Florida.

Backed up by experiments. You can buy his books and research his experiments yourself. They are real elementary physics experiments.

I'll summarize what he found out by experimenting with magnets. Just like physics considers an electron or proton to be the smallest unit of electric charge, there is a smallest unit of magnetism which he calls north and south pole individual magnets. They are free to flow in metals, in the air and in other things. The iron shavings around a bar magnet trace their path. From the North end of a magnet, there are many north pole magnets flowing out and going around the outside of the magnet and coming into the south pole of the magnet and then running in the metal and returning to the North pole. From the South pole of the magnet, there are many south pole magnets flowing out and going around the outside of the magnet and going into the North pole and flowing through the metal and returing to the South pole. Some flow straight out from the poles and don't return, but are replaced by others from the air.


Mineral, Vegetable and Animal Life, Copyright October 1945 By Edward Leedskalnin Quote:
"The North pole magnets come out of the battery's positive terminal and South pole magnets come out of car battery's negative terminal. To be sure it is so, you get two pieces of soft steel welding rod four inches long, put them in clips and connect them with the car battery. Put those two loose rod ends together until the rod gets hot. Now test each of those rod ends you were putting together with a small needle-like horizontally hanging magnet. Then you will see the one which is connected with positive terminal is North pole magnet, and the one which is connected with negative terminal is South pole magnet (Like poles repulses, and unlike poles attract). You can change the rod peices, but every time the one is connected with positive terminal will be North pole magnet, and the one connected with negative terminal will be South pole magnet".

Experimenting with small magnets hung over a wire carring a current he concludes this: Electricity is really north pole magnets flowing out from the + terminal of a battery and flowing through the wire with a right hand twist and there is an opposite flow of south pole magnets coming out of the - terminal of a battery and flowing in the wire with a right hand twist. Modern electronics developed with the theoretical notion of a positive current flowing through a wire, but this is only a way of thinking about electricity to describe and quantify its effects. There is no real positive current flowing through the wire, because protons will not flow through a wire like electricity. Free electrons in the wire only have a slow drift speed, so negative charge cannot flow through a wire like electricity either. This idea of opposing north and south pole magnetic units flowing through a wire might be what is really happening in an electric current.

Summary: Electromagnetic theory needs to be reduced to just magnetism. It will always have contradictions until it is.

Electron is really a south magnetic pole unit.

Leedskalnin believed that electostatic force was really a magnetic force. He would describe an electrostatically charged piece of rubber this way: IN rubber the north and south pole magnetic units are not flowing like they are in a bar iron magnet, (he said the magnetic units flowing in an iron magnet are excess magnetic units that were added to the metal when it was magnetized) but in rubber they are stationary and they are the north and south pole magnetic forces that hold the rubber molecules together. This causes many small north and south magnetic poles on the same side of the rubber, and this is what causes the electrostatic charge. He proves this to be a magnetic force by
attracting iron filings to an electrostatically charged rubber, and bringing a metal bar magnet near. When the bar magnet's poles are reversed by turning it to the other end, some of the iron filings jump off of the rubber. He believed the first approach of the bar magnet with its stronger field, reversed the magnetic fields of some of the iron filings and when the magnet was turned around, the magnetic fields repelled each other. He believed it was magnetic and not electrostatic.



He also detected South pole magnetic units flowing upward and North pole magnetic units flowing downward in the northern hemisphere, by hanging a long magnet in the middle and the south pole end would always hang down. To make it level, the south pole end needed to be longer. -- magnetic declination of compass needles.

Scientists cannot explain how Leedskalnin built coral castle. It was featured on IN Search of with Leonard Nimoy. He moved coral stones weighing as much as 28 tons with equipment designed to only lift 10 tons, and only lift it, not move it. People spying on him with binoculars signed sworn affidavits that they saw coral stones weighing tons, floating in the air like helium balloons.

My best guess is: He put a strong negative electric charge on them, (at night to avoid the photo electric effect) and the Earth's magnetic field pushed up on them and they floated.

According to him, a strong negative charge is really filling it with south magnetic pole units and the whole stone becomes a south magnetic monopole.

I experimented and made a cement brick weighing 15 pounds, to weigh 13 pounds. Did it twice and never tried it again.

It makes a small amount sense from a theoretical standpoint, but where did this man get the immense energy that needed to be applied to the coral in order to lighten it?

And, if you had to carry, say, 100 of those 13 pound blocks 10 feet each, in the end would the 2 pounds you shaved off really matter?

Coral Castle has been debunked long ago:

http://www.coralcastle.com/photos/edatwork1.jpg
http://www.peter-thomson.co.uk/coralcastle/coralcastle.html

On the coral castle website it shows more of how he did it. He was a determined man and it shows what one guy can do in 28 years with chains, pullies and tripods. No magic though. His theories on magnetism were unfortunately overly simplified and simply wrong. There are no contradictions in electromagnetic thoery. He was a talented and dedicated engineer though.

He was also obsessive-compulsive, and ended up literally working himself to death. His body was throughly ravaged when he died in the hospital. It wasn't the body of a man who pushed floating blocks with one hand; it was the body of a man who spent months physically moving boulders without rest.

That experiment with the car battery and the welding rods tends to prove it. Further experimentation with magnets near current established the right hand twist in the flow.
According to accepted physics, those welding rods should not turn a compass needle, but they do.


There is no immense energy needed to be applied to lift it. When the stone becomes a magnetic monopole the Earth's magnetic field does the lifting. There is electrical energy, along with proper connections (probably high amps) to put the charge on the stone. Coral stone is full of cavities which might aid in collecting a large charge.

It has not been debunked. His equipment could at best lift 10 tons, and not lift and move 28 tons.
The coral castle people running the site don't know how he did it. Scientists investigating it for decades don't know how he did it.
It was featured on In Search Of, with Leonard Nimoy because scientists did not know how he did it.
And sworn affidavits were signed by people who saw the stones floating.
The whole castle was moved stone by stone. The man driving the flat bed truck was asked to stand around the corner, so he could not see. After about 2 minutes he would hear a loud crash in his truck. He would walk around the corner and see a stone weighing tons sitting in the truck. No lifting equipment was seen near it.
This was repeated over and over again until the whole castle was moved. It was as if they were floated out to the truck and fell into the truch when a charge was taken off them.
I copied a whole page of mathematical contradictions in present electromagnetic theory with the websites they came from. But I deleted them from my files to save space.
Get on the internet and search for inconsistencies in electromagnetic theory; you will probably find it.
Look up electricity and see how they don't really know what it is made of. You can find opposing theories and nothing definite.
Electrons only have a drift velocity, slow as a snail. Protons don't move in wire. Large flow of fast moving particles from a cathode means you need a large flow of fast moving particles in the wire. Electron slow drift velocity cannot supply enough particles fast enough to explain the cathode ray. - It isn't electrons, though it is called that.
Strange theory about virtual photons is debated to explain current, with no experimental evidence.
Science in the classroom cannot tell you what electricity really is. They only discuss its effects.
Look up electric current on search engine and see for yourself.

Leedskalnin was anorexic and sick before he starte building it. People in Florida found him as a young man and nursed him back to health. (tuberculosis or pneumonia, I don't remember.)
Leedskalnin was about 5 ft tall, and weighed less than 100 pounds most of the time. The idea that he used his physical force to move almost 2 million pounds of coral stone by himself is ludicrous.
He boasted that he knew how the Egyptians built the pyramids.
Rejected by science, he seems to have built coral castle to prove he was right and J J Thompson was wrong. - Electrons are not coming off a cathode. Electrons never should have been invented. Electrons have a slow drift velocity in wire, slow as a snail and the flow of electrons cannot account for the large number of fast moving particles coming from the cathode in a cathode ray tube.
Leedskalnin stated from his experiments, it is all magnetic. Where do these mysterious electrons come from?
Virtual photons are just a theoretical way to try to explain current with no experimental evidence behind it. [I think virtual means they don't really exist like cyberspace don't.]

And yet, he did. Regardless of whether he used magic or levers, he nonetheless still worked himself to death, literally not eating for days at a time.



Lot of people do. What matters is what they can provide as evidence.



He built Coral Castle in order to impress the love of his life. She wasn't that impressed. In Coral Castle, you will find two massive stones, about a ton and a half each, with holes carved into them in the form of a keyhole. One is about five feet high, the other about three feet high. The small one was for the children he was supposed to have had. When they were naughty, he intended to place their heads in through the keyhole, wedging it in place, so that he could lecture them at length. What was the large one intended for? His wife, of course, for when she was naughty.

The guy was disturbed. His reasoning was disturbed. His causes were disturbed.

I am working on the riddle of the Coral Castle in Fla. I will not go into detail about that site since there are plenty of references on the web. I have just received a response from the Coral Castle and the email exchange will explain everything. If anyone is located in the Southern Fla area and would like to do some research in the local library to find a reference to the "numbers" it would be greatly appreciated. (The emails are listed in reverse chronological order.)

Ms. .............

Thank you for your response.

I have determined the meaning of the numbers but must validate the time period
when the numbers were etched into the wall. For instances, if a newspaper article
was written about Ed's death, perhaps it mentioned the numbers. If the article was
from a 1950's newspaper, then we know the etching is authentic and that the finding
I have made is truly breathtaking!

Is there anyone in your organization that would like to participate in a search for
such a newspaper article? Any photographs that show a living Mr. Ed with the
numbers or a photo that can be accurately dated would also lend credibility to the
numbers.

If the numbers were etched during the 1980's or later, we can conclude they are
fraudulent and have no connection to Mr. Ed's work.

The finding is based on hard science that was discovered in the early 90's or late
80's and later refined in the early 2000's. The original discovery had no relation to
the Coral Castle and was based on research done by Brookhaven National Labs,
The University of Boston, Yale University and several other physics labs around the
world. Apparently I am the first to notice the connection between their very obscure
findings and the etching on Mr. Ed's wall.

Again, thank you for your response. I assure you that if proven, this finding will
shake the world of physics and put Coral Castle into a worldwide spotlight!

If any one would like to contact me by phone, I may be reached at (901)-----------.

Best regards and I look forward to working with you and your staff,





On 19 Mar 2007 at 7:28, Coral Castle wrote:

>
> The numbers are actually etched onto the wall in the upstairs living
> quarters of Ed's castle. We have no other documentation relating to
> such.
> > > From: CCResearcher
> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 10:33 PM
> To: Coral Castle
> Subject: Comments from .............
>
>
> Name: ..............
> IP Address: .............
> Date Sent: 3/18/2007
> Feedback:
> Please,
> I have made several calls to your office and sent several emails. The
> calls are not returned and the email is not answered.
>
> I am writing an article that explains the riddle of the plaque found
> after Mr. Ed Leedskalnin's death that reportedly contains the
> statement, "The Secret to the Universe is 7129 / 6105195."
>
> Is it true that such a plaque was found and if so, what documentation
> do you have that dates this plaque (newspaper article, photo, etc)?
>
> Please respond.
>
> Thank you
>
>

Electrons do flow, and do cause the effects of electricity. They also cause magnetic field production around the conductor. It is not possilble to separate the two. It is well known that electron drift is slow, and that the "positive" current flow reference is a matter of reference only. Hole flow is apparent, and is used simply because it is easy to deal with; anyone versed in basic circuit analysis is familiar with this aspect. What travels fast is the effect, and any instructor worthy of the name will have explained this to his students. Simplistically, it's like filling a pipe with ping-pong balls and pushing another ball into one end. Obviously, when a new ball is pushed in, a ball at the other end of the pipe will come out. And it happens a lot faster than the ball is pushed in.
Secondly, it is correct that not everything is known about magnetics. However, Leedskalnin didn't have the ultimate answers either (I have in my possession all of his writings, by the way). One of the pieces not accounted for is the Bloch wall. Using modern methods, a field paper can show that the fields around a permanent magnet are NOT as stated in physics books: the Bloch wall magically appears in the magnetic center, where the south and north pole have the directional reversal. This area emits gravitic waves, and magnetic spin reverses within. The Bloch wall properties are not currently completely understood. Nor can the Bloch wall be shown using iron filings, as the particles are far too large.
It is also true that a static magnetic field has interesting effects shown by the Johnson generator of c. 1827, where it was shown that a neutral zone exists away from the n-s poles of a horseshoe magnet. In that area, an iron bar will alter its polarization from same as magnet to opposite of magnet, and during the transition the bar will be neutral. Johnson utilized this as a means of generating electrical power by winding the bar, then mechanically moving the bar through the neutral point back and forth. If anyone is interested in this, I'll look up the patent number (Canadian) and put it in here.
As to the magnetization of paramagnetic materials to lift same, this theory is wholly inaccurate. A common idea of the magnetic field of the earth is that it is extremely strong, but that is not the case. To wit: MAD gear is required to be extremely sensitive, able to detect changes of a few lines of flux. The earth field is barely capable of turning a compass, let alone lifting a 100 lb stone. Otherwise, little magnetic rocks would be flying all over the place. It is better to understand that there is no proper unified field theory and let the magnets pass on this.
Gravitic anomalies, and the possibility of lifting stones belongs more to the theories proposed by Dr. Richard LeFors Clark. If nothing else, here are some theories that bear investigation.
I do not minimize the Coral Castle; and, I might say, that I doubt seriously that I could do such a thing myself (physically) in the less than 3 decades of construction. I weigh more than twice Mr. Leedskalnin, and am likely far, far stronger (I exercise daily, including weightlifting) than he; even given my knowledge of engineering, I doubt I could do it. I've changed engines in my backyard (long ago, when cherry pickers were hard to come by) using block and tackle on a tripod. Those engines were around 450 lb or more, so I have practical knowledge of this operation. Anyone who claims that that 100 lb little guy moved 10 ton rocks with this stuff (by himself) is nuts.
And yes, I would like to know how Leedskalnin did it, without all the fluff about how he might have done it.

RabidCat,

Yes I too would like to know how he did it. The solution that I found explains the meaning of the numbers found on his wall but I can not expain how he applied it. The important information to recognize here is that if he knew these numbers, he, in fact, did know a great secret. The meaning of the numbers wre not discovered until the last few years.

It is for that reason that it is SO IMPORTANT that we document the fact that Ed himself wrote those numbers on the wall. I do not want to be part of a scam that prepetuates a myth organized by some one that engraved those numbers on the wall AFTER 1990 and claimed Ed wrote them.

We must find a newspaper article from the 1950 or 1960's that mentions the numbers. That will tells us that the numbers were written BEFORE they were proven by major physics around the world!

Proving that alone would be astounding! The next task is trying to figure out how Ed applied the secret of these numbers.

RaidCat,

I went back and re-read your last posting several times. You suggest some great stuff! However, let's take this in a step by step manner. Number one on our list is to prove that Ed did have some special knowledge.

If that is proven, then we can struggle to figure out the HOW of his use of this information.

Dr. Richard LeFors Clark. Dr. Clark suggests (and backs his theories) that gravity can be deflected. Clark basically states that (if one accepts his theories) since matter does not truly exist (only sticky energy), then mass attraction is false and the source of gravity must be revised. He suggests that, for instance, the gravity exerted by Earth isn't really gravity at all, as currently defined, but that it consists of an influx of vacuum energy used by the planet for keeping itself together, so to speak. In this sense, and if he is correct, gravity is the pressure of constantly flowing energy that any physical (energetic) body attracts and requires to keep itself in one piece. Confusing, hey? If the theory is right, then Leedskalnin could well have discovered, or re-discovered, an means to divert the pressure around his stones, so that they would essentially be weightless.
Strange as it may seem, this theory isn't any farther out than many of those proposed by the establishment; further, Dr. Clark can explain some things that are relatively inexplicable otherwise.
It is a must to research Clark in order to understand his stuff. However, it just might be that he can shed some light on Leedskalnin, though indirectly.

I might also state that I know engineers (mechanical) that have looked at the castle, and come away in awe that such a construction was done by one individual without the aid of building machinery. There was something there that has yet to be properly explained.

RabidCat,

As you know, Clark wrote a good deal about the Bloch Wall or “zero-spin energy transfer.”
This is more recently referred to as ZPF or zero point field. Clark's work is a lot of fun to read.
What is amazing is how much of this is coming together in labs across the world.

More and more research is being done in this area by today's quantum electro-dynamic physicists.

Did Ed discover how to apply some of these ideas? I don't know. But I do know what the numbers mean.

Remember that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Right now we don't know if
Ed really wrote those numbers on the wall or moved any large blocks at all.
I have not seen any proof that these are natural stone blocks.
He may have built the Castle out of masonry cement and they were poured to look like natural stone.

We must verify each step. If the numbers on the wall are authentic, then we really have something.
I don't care if he built the place out of silly putty, if the numbers are authentic it poses a very strange and
unanswered question. From there, we move to the next step.

I am trying to get someone at the Miami Herald newspaper to search their archives and determine if there
is an early article that mentions the numbers. I am also trying to contact the "Florida Room" at the
Miami library for the same help.

We can have fun all day long speculating about this, but let's try to nail it down for sure this time.
This thing is solvable. It just takes research and verification with original sources!

Thanks for your postings and I have enjoyed reviewing the material you submitted. Keep up the
interest and I hope more people will post their comments and support the effort to solve this.

I'll have to look in my library, which is currently in disarray. I seem to remember pictures of the quarry from whence the coral came. There were also pictures of the blocks being moved (unfortunately not in action, always sitting on the ground).
Other aspects are: my mech engineer friends stated such things as "it would be nearly impossible to balance a rock so that it swung by a finger touch, the way his door was." Or, "I don't know how the guy carved such a comfortable chair out of a hunk of rock, and that rock wasn't even smooth!" And so forth. The general tone was amazement, considering it was done quite some time ago.

There is some conjecture among Clark's supporters that Leedskalnin did indeed discover how to divert Clark's vacuum flow, essentially using the same methods as the party throw that Clark uses in description of gravity lobes. Clark lived in San Diego, and I lived in San Diego for a time, and it is verifiable that there are strange anomalies in the area, especially south of the border, and southwest of the port. And, at one point, years ago, I had some friends with whom I tried the party throw, and darned if it didn't work.
As to some of Leedskalnin's claims in magnetism, they are true. One is that an electromagnet with a closed magnetic circuit will store energy. A horseshoe soft iron core is wound, and a bar is placed across the poles (which are not yet poles). Current is passed through the winding, causing flux flow within. Since the circuit is closed, if the bar is properly machined so there is no gap, magnetic flux will be virtually undetectable. Take the current off and attach the wires to a voltage/current sensor (voltmeter/ammeter) or a resistance and o'scope. When the shorting bar is removed, there will be a voltage/current spike as the field collapses.

I'm curious why you think that idea is on par with "the establishment"'s understanding of gravity, as well as what inexplicable things it explains?

It explains, to some extent, such things as the party lift, which isn't addressed by current ideas. Also certain areas of the world where gravity does some weird things that current science tries to explain away (if they do try) with junk arguments. Similar to answers to the question: If a pulse transformer is being used, it isn't absolutely necessary to protect the output electronics against transients, but it is necessary to protect the primary drivers against same. Outputs can be managed with simple filters, but the drive electronics will be destroyed if something isn't done to protect the drivers.
It's been a while since I read Clark for aforementioned reasons, so I'm a bit hazy on his math. I'll just say this: Henry Ford hired some educated people to explain to him "Principia". When they were through, Ford turned and said "Nuts!". I agree with Ford. It's simply that not enough investigation is given to anomalies.

I've always wondered what 'electricity' really is and the concept of gravity. One of those things I've been meaning to look into.

If you ever find something that says specifically what electricity is, please let me know. I've been an electronics engineer since 1972 and have yet to find a definition. It is known what the effects are, and how it is produced in nearly every form, but you'd likely need a thorough understanding of quantum physics to find a suitable definition. Even then...
It is also true that gravity remains undefined. 'Principia' and other papers allow a viable macro definition. However, there are bugs, and while we can calculate the effects of gravity, knowing what it actually is, that's another story.
Magnetism also falls into this category. We more or less know the effects, but still some people hold onto the ideas of last century and the century before. As with the Bloch wall, what happens in there is simply theory; and the theory will fall flat if it is proved that magnetism is not caused by particle spin, but by something else.
The three are inextricable linked, and we deal with them only in a macro sense, and then with error. Maxwell, Lenz, Newton, and the others eliminate the factors that they could not account for, and aligned their research with providing something workable. What is denied by the physics community is that the excluded factors can be used. Such as the fact that switched reluctance motors are not bound by many of the "laws", but instead deliver extremely efficient conversion without back emf, excluding the inductance, and it is difficult to convince the conventional ones of this. It is also true that the electrical power used in the conversion can be, to some degree, recovered. It requires some creativity, some engineering skills, and the rejection of standard concepts, but it is possible to make a switched reluctance motor that is over unity. I'm sure that will draw people out of the woodwork, but it is fact. Go to the Texas Instruments site, and find the papers on switched reluctance. Schematics are there with the methodology to accomplish the above, but the drive signals are not programmed correctly to do it; a change in the drive software will solve that. The switched reluctance concepts in there should also be modified to lessen interaction in the fields, also a small matter.
Within the concepts of the above, it is also possible to make a switched reluctance generator which also skirts Lenz. If the stator contains both permanent magnet (field generator) and armature (wire), and the flux path is altered so there is more and less reluctance, then the requirement of field motion is accomplished; however, if the device doing the alteration is mechanical, and there is momentum involved (flywheel), then the input can be made to appear exactly the same with the output at no load as it is with full load. In other words, no load to full load generator with zero increase in input power. See Ecklin.
It would probably be best if this discussion were in the science section, so I'll terminate this now, and if there are people wishing to discuss it, they can start a thread in science.
Whoops!!!! This IS a thread in science! Well, we all make slips occasionally, right? OK. I'll go now, with slightly red face.

I'd rather not get into a discussion about free energy, since those in opposition will do little more than say inane junk like "you can't get something for nothing" and so on. So I'll place a site here that has a quite interesting paper. The paper is a Word doc file, so you'll need something that can read that to get the full import.
The electric ****el was developed first in the US, then the concept was expanded and refined in Japan. Originally, the machine appeared in Popular Science, or one of its sister magazines, in the 1980s. If you can find the article, it was a good one. Sorry, my ex-wife threw my copy out (heh). However the paper does give a reasonably good analysis of the machine, and enough technical info and references to explain it well.
So here's the place:

www.cheniere.org/references/Walters%20et%20al%20-%20Asymmetrical%20Regauging%20to%20increase%20COP.doc

You'll need the theory and the math to decode the whole thing, but I can't help with that, since I don't teach any more.

As far as gravity goes, a very brief look at how physicists currently view it is available in this thread.

The wonderful folks at the Miami-Dade county Library have responded. I thank them for their great effort.

(Now this puts us in a position of not being able to prove the numbers were written by Mr. Ed.)

The library's response:
RESPONSE:

Dear Mr. ........,

Thank you for your question. We went through our clipping file for the 1950's to 1969 and there is no mention of the numbers. I checked Leedskalinin's book without success. We also spoke to a local historian who has researched the sites and he doesn't know anything about the numbers. You might try and contact the current owners and ask them if they can document the numbers for you.

Thank you again for using this online service. If you need further assistance please call the Helen Muir Florida Collection at 305.375.5023 or write to us at:

Helen Muir Florida Collection
Main Library
101 West Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33130

Ask-a-Librarian
Miami-Dade Public Library System
www.mdpls.org

i ve read on some russian website, a guy explains what that thing that we assume his generator is, a magnetic vortex generator, it has a pipe right next to it, and in his theory ed used a tourch to ionize a mg. vortex, wich created lift somehow, the handle in the middle is used for directing the mg. energy, also i see the gen, build of many magnets, in rows of 5, exactly the same number needed to create hubachy array, a magnetic monopole, it is posible, to cancel out forces of one pole with certan arrangment of magnets, but i could be wrong, thou,
also someone mentioned hollow structure of coral, there is a theory of Cavity Structural Effect, that was allagedly used in Anti-gravitational Platform build by Viktor GREBENNIKOV. but again, nobody repeated nether ed's nor, Viktor GREBENNIKOV, antigravitational devices, that we know, but if i made one, i doubt i'd go tell everyone about it.

OK, Folks,

Let's give an update to some of my findings on the Coral Castle investigation:

1. It was very possible for Ed to move 20 ton blocks by himself and stack them any way he wanted to. This can be done using a two fulcrum system with counter balances. No levitation, no hookum, no magic, nothing unnatural, no machinery.....just common sense and using gravity to help you . If you want proof positive of how this is done, I suggest you visit the amazing web site of Mr. Wallace Wallington at:
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage1
He has short video clips showing how he actually did it. No Problem. Mr. Ed may have used the same process or something similar, but for sure he could have done it by himself!

2. The next issue deals with the statements made on many web sites stating that a plaque was found hanging over the bed of Mr. Ed that read, "The Secret of the Universe is 7129 / 6105195." This statement is not entirely true. To see a photo of the numbers, please go the Scott Lang's web site at:
http://www.leedskalnin.com/7129x6105195.html
You will notice the the numbers are actually carved into a door jam and say nothing about "Secret of the Universe"! Who started the false rumor about it mentioning "secrets of the universe?"

3. The mystery still exists about how these two numbers remarkably they agree with the findings of the Brookhaven National Lab regarding subatomic particle magnetic attraction. It may be a coincidence. But the real photo tells a much different story than has been reported!

4. We are now working on an attempt to document other "facts" that are reported about the Coral Castle; such as the famous truck move, and the story about the kids seeing him "sing" to the blocks. We must have original source information to verify these things.

Sorry to spoil the fun, but no unnatural activity seems to be happening here. It is a remarkable accomplishment that one man was so dedicated and worked so long on this project but that's about it.

More to come as things develop.