Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Roswell
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
et's daddy
user posted image


why, after all this time, would they still be studying the debris if it is in fact just a Mogul balloon ? huh.gif

seems it wouldnt take that long hmm.gif

i think that part leads creedence to the idea that it wasnt Mogul
rapid7
LoL laugh.gif
Like it Et's daddy! thumbsup.gif

Anubi
I am not from the US, i do not know who Kyli Miller is, does her signature add endorsements of any kind?, i am not saying anything is wrong with the letter . just i do not know who she is.
shikon1
shes from the house of representatives


WTF how is it still being anylized after over 50 years, that tells you something right there
Cinders
"...the debris is STILL being analyzed and NOT open to the public at this time.."

Jeez either they are VERY slow at analyzing this "so-called Mogul balloon" THEY say that went down or they have something up the wazoo to hide !!

This is letter was RECENTLY written, and is just too funny! Does the government really think we are still THAT stupid in the year 2006?? In 1947 the government could easily get away with it.. but now?? LOL

I wonder if the person who received this letter posted / sent it over to The Disclosure Project as they would also like to see these letters.

Thank you for posting this ETD! thumbsup.gif

The more I read things like this and Kecksburg etc.. the more I see how the public will refuse to report their findings, what they saw or where something went down etc..

That was my first thought back in 1988 and 1992 - Why call the police? No one was in any harm besides they'd only call the government and then God only knows what would happen then. Who needs another ROSWELL cover up?
Lilly
1) Is this document really from William Delahunt's office?

2) Who is Ms. Kyli Miller?

3) How did Ms. Miller come by this information?

4) Is Ms. Miller's source credible?

In order for me to form an opinion about this, I'd need an answer to these questions first.

Cinders
Lilly, I looked into this a bit and found this bit:

New Mexico - Roswell Letter

Dave Veterick writes, “I spoke to Ms. Kyli Miller who composed the letter referenced in the article to Robert F. Brown from U.S. Rep. William Delahunt's office that stated, "Thank you for your letter about UFOs and the July 1947 incident that happened in Roswell, New Mexico. After looking into this matter, I have found that the debris from that is still being analyzed and is not open to the public at this time."

Ms. Kyli Miller called the Roswell UFO Museum. THEY told her debris, presumably in their possession, was being analyzed, not open to the public, etc. This is her ONLY source for what she put in this letter. She DID NOT stumble on to anything within the government needing further investigation.

I hope this avoids some of you from wasting time.
Thanks to Dave Vetterick veterick@ix.netcom.com

Link: http://www.ufoinfo.com/filer/2005/ff0517.shtml

NOTE: The above mentions: "..THEY told her debris, presumably in their possession, was being analyzed," WHO is it that has this in "THEIR possession"? The Museum or the government?? LOL

One could email or contact this office below to be sure Kyli works there - but it looks like someone has already. But if the above is true, I can't believe Miller would call the MUSEUM about this! Someone passed off the buck to Miller to handle this letter, and I don't think it was handled the "best way" LOL

http://www.house.gov/delahunt/ (hokey looking web site.. yikes! as are alot of others found here: http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml ) Like even one of Oregons looks like he is some Real estate Agent website!
Unlimited
another solved mystery ..a google search of her name leads to a mufon site?? dontgetit.gif
et's daddy
this is the only info i could find of her as well

if it is all true she sounds like an idiot blink.gif

AstroPro
Background information on the document: http://www.rense.com/general63/roswell.htm
aquatus1
QUOTE
So, when I read the letter from the office of Congressman, Mr. William D. Delahunt, I see it as reading: "Someone has looked into the matter." (as it states in the letter). In other words, the Congressman has looked into the alleged Roswell event and possibly found information on the actual crashed craft.


How does one jump from "analyzing some debris" to "information on an actual crashed craft"?

In all cases, it sounds very much like a form letter. I sincerely doubt more than a few minutes worth of thought went into composing it, if that.
et's daddy
hell im hoping the Congressman doesnt know about it

sorta makes his office people look like idiots

doesnt say much for his hiring policy




when i posted it i didnt know all she did was call the Roswell Museum
Master Sage
That says cover up all over it. tongue.gif
aquatus1
It says 'Pass the Buck." all over it. Seriously, if I'm in charge of something fairly important, I'm not going to waste my time with someone demanding proof of aliens and a claiming a government conspiracy. I'm going to give it to my secretary to respond with the form letters "Dear___________, thank you for your interest in ________. Unfortunately, we do not have information at this time, but we reccomend you contact _______ at __________ for more. Thank you for your vote."
Lilly
It sounds to me like a typical political tactic; "Tell 'em what they want to hear", followed by, "Thank you for your vote".
Agent. Mulder
definitely agreeing with etd here. why would they go through all this trouble and time just to cover up a friggin crashed weather balloon. and if it was a weather balloon then where did the bodies come from, or 'victims' from that ramy memo. theyre covering something up.
Tokoyo
I wouldn't call it a smoking gun, but I don't quite see why she would specify "I have found that the debris from that is still being analyzed and is not open to the public at this time." She could have even said that the museum contained a bunch of info on the topic or something...I don't know exactly what, but it seemed like there would've been an easy and less specific way to avoid the question. I have confidence that our pres. would've dodged the question without a problem!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.