Okay, here's the plan:

America can easily take over all of central and south america.
America moves to Africa and takes over everyone there.
America's army grows.
America forces the Brits to join them or just take em over along with the rest of Europe.
Lastly take over the mid-east with Nukes and F... the Chinese.

This is not what will happen but is it possible for America to take over the world if they want to?

sorry, it's to stupid a question to answer the poll. :/

...

Is this thread even a serious one?

too stupid as in.....?

Its serious but the whole plan thing isnt

i would say it depends on what you mean by America

are we talking last man standing ?

if so id say yes, we can take over the world

id say if we start small, then when other nations begin to rise up, we just basically send nukes in all directions

we may have 100 people left standing when the dust settles

but they can rule the world

true
Its a risk we probably shouldnt be willing to take

This thread is too stupid to even consider making a meaningful reply.

Ever heard of Rome? We could fight wars, we could win wars. Only problem is after the wars are over, our forces are stretched to thin, we fall apart from the inside and all is left is an entire war torn world.

Now why would you even consider this? What could America possible benefit by invading South America? Africa? India? Europe?

Please think above a 5th grade level before hitting that "Make new thread" button

actually, we're not spread too thin, as we kill everyone along the way

could really go out for a walk and stretch your legs then eh ?




actually its the "New Topic" button

i think a 5th grader could have read that

Certainly.

"Can America take over the world?"

ya mean it hasn't?

Fast food, clothing...etc...?

America will have one hell of a time taking over Central and south America, mainly do to the fact that the combines militaries of all those nations out number the US and besides EVERYONE down there owns guns.

Now we have China, a nation that could easily press 100-200 MILLION people into armed service. The US at best could get 40-70 million troops and thats lower standards.

Then there are the combined forces of Europe, which equal and surpass the US in force strength and technology, I would rather be in a Leo2A6 then an M1A2 in an engagement, plus they have the best advantage known, They know the terrain.

Britain would not be forced to join the Imperial Americans. Imperial Britain and its commonwealth will once again be thrown into battle to defend the world against a threat.

Germany with all its technology could not defeat Russia, because of Russias resolve to defend the Mother Land, and the not one step back. And like the Germans the yanks would crumble due to too many fronts.

And if you kill everyone as you go along it will just strengthen the resolve and anger the defendors. and when the War cames to washington they will leave no one and nothing.

~Thanato

are you kidding me?!?! the united states's technology far surpasses that of ANY other country, true we dont use highly advanced tanks or hummvys when we are fighting, but what good will armor do when we are bombing the #$*& out of some country's capital

the Euro Fighter can over take any fighter known except the F22s. And there are more Eurofighters then there are F22s and so i Think they will have a hard time bombing the hell out of any european capital or Moscow (wich has some farly advanced fighters of its own.

~Thanato

why ????

Vietnam

There is too many different nationalities in the United States. That it self would pose as a major problem to their suggested goal.

I doubt the US could take over the rest of the Americas and Africa before some European or Asian country intervened. And even if they did capture all of America and Africa without intervention, our weapon caches would probably be closer to empty than full.

oh shut up

Not to mention your man power.

Because we Canucks would pull a gurriala war.

~Thanato

Yeah, seeing as how I've been posting here for 2 days, and didn't feel like scrolling down to check what said "New Topic" button is for this forum , you can lay off. I just dont like stupid threads, especially from someone who seems to strengthen the thought in posters from other countries that Americans are dumb, arrogant buffoons.

Are you proposing that every man, woman and child be killed when invading a country? Because that is the only way to keep a guerrilla war from happening when invading many countries. You really think the US could fight several "Iraq's" and keep enough troops stationed in the U.S. to deter any possible invasion force?

I'm not knocking on the U.S. military seeing as how I'm a military brat and will serve when I'm done with college, but I'm not so naive as to think we could fight on multiple fronts against the combined forces of the rest of the world.

Granted we would put a whoopin on em though.

But then again, this is ridiculous seeing as how it will never come to pass.

The british empire, which was around about a quarter of the planet and prob second only to the mongul empire in size will probably be the last of the great land acquisitions.by any nation .

yes, thats what im saying

we start lobbing nukes all over the place

as i said in the end we may only have 100 or so officials left that were sheltered, but we would be the only ones left




yes i agree youre right




unless the NWO has thier way


lol

Canada and War in the same sentence??

Canada use to be more militaristic then America, in our early days. Up untill Korea. We crushed many rebellions, Fought in 4 Wars from the begging, Beor War, WW1, WW2, Korea. ANd have since partaking in every UN Peace Keeping operation ever put together.

~Thanato

I don't think America will be able to take over the entire world. If the U.S. decided to do so they would be facing a lot of "insurgencies" within it's country. Not to mention an increase funding and possible funding of other countries to terrorists organizations already planted in the US and stationed around who knows where.

Even simple american's would run wild thinking "the world is over so let's burn down everything and cause chaos". That being said the U.S. will utimately be waging wars within itself - civil war.

*sighs*...America...

It entirely depends on one's perspective as to whether it is a stupid question or not. On the surface I agree...it isn't a really serious inquiry of any substance...but if pondered a bit deeper:

America can take over the world...America doesn't need to conquer Iraq for instance to gain the worlds oil supplies. We could nuke Iran, nuke the hell out of China, invade Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and be bully of the world if we wanted to....but that is all just so much Hollywood...

in the real world...there are those in AMerica who are conspiring to conquer globally. These are the Democrats. But first they must conquer America. If the Liberals ever conquer America...the rest of the world will not stand a breath of a chance...because in disguise the liberals are nothing more than New World Communists and one only needs to look toward Siberia and the left over Soviet empirical mess to see what America would do to the world if they ever get complete control again. Many think that Bush is the Evil One. He isn't. Not by a long shot. Chew on that for awhile......

America Wouldn't be able to take over the world. God would intervene at some point and time and halt or put a stop to our World Conquest. Ever heard of the saying
"The earth wasn't made for one man to rule alone
To all colors increases, to home it belongs
I want land, mansions, banks and gold
The diamonds in Africa, oil in my control
The world's natural resources, all its residuals".

So I say no America wouldnt be able to. And why would we want to take over the world anyways? To call this planet: America? Or to hoist that American Flag on every piece of land on this planet? What kind of question was this? World was meant to be shared and to live in peace.

lol, that was funny ) .. and quite possibily very close to the truth .


On reflection.. america trying to take over the world would be the one single event that could lead to harmony between nations and world peace .

This thread is a joke right,..I mean no one really believe's the US has the need to take over the world...

we were thinking about the ability to rather than the need , least i was ,..just russia or china is extremely doubtfull.. ask hitler or napoleon about russia. you might bite off more than you want to chew there ..

You might have some early successes against russia, like those 2 did, they arent always that well prepared for war.. but once you've woken up that bear.. be prepared for the biggest godawful bite in the ass imaginable. Russia will rip you a new one.

Germany would ressurect its Wehrmacht , we would love a few aggressors to train the blitzkrieg on again . Europeans have had warfare for ages, a lot longer than you. it's in the blood to fight .

In a few months we'll be building walls down the middle of washington.

Yes, the United States could take over the planet by eliminating 80% of the world's population outside of its borders.

The United States would be stopped dead in their tracks at South America.

Not by the UN, not by the Chinese, but by the South American's themselves. In fact, I think the United States would ultimately end up limping away with their tales between their legs for a number of reasons which include the difficult terrain and already active rebel and terrorist cells that have a crapload of experience in guerilla warfare.

The scenerio you presented was just silly.

Lets just say the United States DID conquer South America (this alone would take decades) and then moved to Africa, the African nations are not as easy to squash as you'd like to think (thats at least another ten years).

Then lets say they're done conquering South America and Africa (up to sixty years later), they must maintain their empire...which is hard.

But lets play along...their army grows...and their pointless invasion continues...

The United States takes over Europe. While at the same time maintaining order in South America and Africa. Sure, it could happen. If there were not rebellions in said countries and if Europe was idiotic enough to not prepare themselves.

So yeah...in the impossible event that they've come this far...

They swipe aside the Middle-East. Even though, to date, they can barely handle Iraq and Afghanistan. But yeah, lets go off to la-la Land and pretend it can happen.

Then they simply nuke China. Mmm hmm.

What of Russia? What of Japan? What of Australia and Canada?


No offense, but your entire post reeks of ignorance.

don't be too mean to make them not post such drivel again, it is fun to watch them envisage such foolish plans and what makes them think they can do it , it is fun to watch delusions..

By the time they were mid-way through africa , european, russian and chinese tanks would be rolling across the cornfields of the usa , and the towns would be hoping the europeans got there first or hide the women ..

imagine , america .. the land of the free.. under chinese and russian control, under a foriegn control like east germany ..their fear of that would make sure they did not start a war that was not 100% winnable.

No America could not for one simple reason,they are outnumbered.They would not risk firing a nuke as that would trigger a war with no winners.So they would be overpowered by the rest of the world.But I'm always on my guard

what happens , is people get deluded ..when they think think they have some kind of superiority over people, nations etc .. next thing you know .. they dont think they are superior to any one nation or people, they are above and beyond and far better than any nation(s) combined , then they talk of world conquest , such as we have seen here . and its all down to a delusion that one nation is superior to all and any other . but i have an idea of why that is , its about being insular and etnic-centric. you lose touch, you lose the measure between yourselves and these apparant lesser types , soon its just easier to just say your just better than they are and throw the measure away . that can happen in isolation, and usa is ..isolated definetely .but this superiority complex can cause a whole lot of trouble.

Oh for crying out loud. Get over it. Get over your stupid childish 'Omg America' attitudes. This is almost as bad as Bush-bashing. It's ignorant. America could NOT take over the world themselves. It's taking them 3 years to get Iraq for crying out loud.

And no, they wouldn't just nuke everything and everyone. Because once they do, what's there to take over? A bunch of fallen buildings, and a few trees.

And like.. since when was the worlkd so gullible? "Oh yeah, America just took over Africa. There's nothing to see here"
If America all of the sudden refused all of their alliances, they'd be in trouble.. and like, what about other alliances? Like, once they set foot in Canada, Australia will run in, and then so will NZ, and UK. All the while, places like China and Russia are kinda thinking... "Well, this isn't good" and they send support in too.
And due to the lack of concentration in the US army, (because some are still in the US, Africa, etc.) they're not as strong...

Like.. where do you start picking holes in this silly thread?

Nah amaerica, is crap with Bush. They would be good with another president.

But his admin are sh** strategists. North Korea would have a chance, having the largest army in the world and good training. Their weaponry is developed in an advanced environment and they are f'ing good at using them. Plus they hate the west with a passion.

The Brits are good too. They have the most advanced military training in the world and do all the dirty work in the war that no one else does in a coalition. They have the SAS who captured the main Al queada members and other ppl which they couldnt get.

In all honesty America are nothing without the UK and the UK is nothing wothout the US. The both develop and depend off each othetr. My bro is told me that and he is high up in the army.

No single country could take over the world. Germany could take over Europe with the help from the Finnish, Austrians, and other Axis allies. Japan could of talen southren Asia, but that's only through team work of 3 or more countries militaries. If you want to see a war where our technology failed, look at Vietnam. One soldier was equal to 20 of their deaths, yet, we pulled out. They had the will to win, they had the will to retake their land. We had them out gunned, out experienced, out everything. But in the end, we lost. The United States taking over any major portion of the world is completely ridiculous and will never happen. The major influence America's made on the world is the economical Tobacco industry and pop culture through the years. Maybe in 500 years America will of fought and won enough wars to have a foriegn, Eastern Heimosphere portion but that's exactly how long it would take, 500 years.

i dont know why so many of you insist on making this so difficult

if the powers that be decided to take over the world, why would they care about any of us ?

why would they want to take over any nation then try and rule its people ?

nukes are the answer

the powers that be in this country could hide out for years in thier underground bases

(no, im not talking about some alien lab. im talking about places like NORAD)

then when the fall-out settles they emerge as basically the only people left on the planet

seems fairly simple to me actually

go into your bunker and press the button, then put a movie in the dvd player and pop the popcorn

send a few hundred nukes out in all directions

you really think they would have to worry about the army of china ? NK ? the terrain in south america ?

i really think many of you think too small

a war where we have to rule 5 billion people on the planet by force

that truely is laughable

they put 1000 or so people stocked away in NORAD or other type places, and launch everything they have

what the hell is the rest of the world going to do about it ?

die, thats what theyre going to do

methinks you under estimate the power of the nuke



edit: oh, and while theyre at it, they also lob some of the bombs that emit the EMP

so much for your elite jet fighters

I partially agree with Who Shot Mr Burns. Tony Blair does seem to depend on President Bush. He happily goes along with what Bush says and doesn't think of the consequences in his own country. I don't think Bush depends on the UK though.

I can't vote on the poll questions. Is this a "how could they" or a "what if they did"?

If they did, we'd have no more wars. How could they? I dunno.

Would I even want to? No.

That is actually the complete opposite of what would happen.

It would be the one thing that would ensure a state of perpetual war, death, and misery. look at how well we're received in Iraq right now and multiply that by 10 million. That's how it would be - the US always fighting insurgencies in every part of the globe.

And addressing the idea that we could "just nuke" everything, leaving behind newly-aquired American soil, I think Pink said it the best:

"As the windshield melts
and my tears evaporate
leaving only charcoal to defend
finally I understand the feelings of the few
ashes and diamonds
foe and friend
we were all equal in the end"

If the impossible happened and we actually took over the world by brute force, we would be the Kings of Misery and Destruction.

Sounds peachy.

This is so flawed it's laughable. Do you think we possess enough nukes to cover every square inch of the globe? Of course not, so you'd probably assume we'd make more, and bomb the places we haven't decimated yet. Do you think that we wouldn't get fired upon by anyone else in the interim? Do you think we possess every nuclear bomb in the world?

But say we did and succeeded in pulverizing the entire world with nukes. Then, when it's all said and done, do you think you're going to run naked up the Eiffel Tower? No, it's gone. Gonna go take a leak on Big Ben? Nope, evaporated. Every man-made structure on the planet, oustide US borders would be reduced to blackened rubble.

So we rebuild, right? Who will pay for it? We're the only ones left! How do you propose we rebuild Asia, Europe, part of North America, South America, Oceania, and Africa with money generated solely within these borders? Impossible. But something has to be done - there will be bodies everywhere, which will spawn disease, which left uncontrolled will wipe out what's remaining of the globe. Maybe we hand out gasmasks to all American man, woman, child, and baby and make them wear them until all the disease wafts away! Figure maybe 100 years. What a utopia!

Also, you've just eliminated any trace of human history outside of our borders. All that history and tradition completely wiped out so we could plant the Stars and Stripes on disease-ridden, uninhabitable charcoal. Go us.

It's like the saying goes: World War 3 will be fought with nukes, World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.

perpetual war for perpetual peace; this whole thread is madness...say the usa took over the world will we all be evangelical christians who drive to church rallys in our chevys NASCAR would become huge.

Although the roar of the crowd would be muffled, due to the gas masks....

World War 3 is going to be fought with bare hands, for shaking.

Well trust, the dude is right!! The US gov has the majority of their army trained by the UK army. The UK army are militant combat soldiers and they know how to handle themselves armed and unarmed. And the SAS they are too bad man. Bush and Blair both agreed to send in the SAS to take out the Taliban in Afghanistan and they did a GOOD job of it too. Bringing home 3 of their head chiefs and rescuing hundreds of innocent afghanistani's. But the UK army are real good, real real good.

Who shot Mr Burns is right man. I think North Korea would mess the place up!! But lets just hope none of this would ever happen!!

Yeah, the UK military force is the most 'powerful' in the world, the U.S just have numbers and flexibility. Though, our planes are more leaned on stealth than fire power and speed like the Eurofighters. Wait, the UK is second, U.S Third, and China and North Korea equal at the top.

China... North Korea, lolz, are you kidding me? Numbers oh noes! This isn't WW1 people. Numbers mean nothing in this age of war. You can have 1 billion people armed with aks facing an army of 100 jet fighters. Who will win? Yeah, that's what I thought...

British Soldiers are good, but their special forces is what makes their Armed Forces awesome. American has the most "powerful" army, UK has the Second. We share a lot of technology though, I say we are tied actually... All depends on location and what not.

France/Germany is about 3rd. You think france has a panzy army, but they have the best armored cores in the world.