RamboIII
Feb 19 2006, 06:20 AM
I had a dream last night leading me to believe that the thrid world war is on its way. The dream does not matter but what I am wondering is what the outcome is gonna be for the third world war. Will it again be based around the Jews? Who will win? Who will be involved?
Dont get too off hand in anything racist please. Hope its interesting!
The REAl RamboIII
Glacies
Feb 19 2006, 06:35 AM
wow, that is interesting! I'd say the third world war will be fought with the following peoples: Iran, North korea, and america...canada will probably show up and save the day like we did the last two ww's...(jk) I think it will be around 'terrorists' and the following witch hunts for wmds....just my opinion of course!
Rykster
Feb 19 2006, 06:36 AM
The next world war will be far from a joke. It will be the end of times.
Bella-Angelique
Feb 19 2006, 06:47 AM
Or maybe just the end at long last of absolute monarchies and slavery.
Lin
Feb 19 2006, 06:50 AM
Well, the world is supposed to begin its end in 2012 A.D.
Rykster
Feb 19 2006, 06:50 AM
It will be a world full of opportunities.
BornInTheCasket
Feb 19 2006, 06:51 AM
I'm 19. You think i'll be in this?
Rykster
Feb 19 2006, 06:51 AM
I don't know
cryztalwing
Feb 19 2006, 06:55 AM
many expert's now consider that the cold war was world war 3. And the next world war well be world war 4. the way thing's are going, it really could be right around the corner...
Rykster
Feb 19 2006, 06:59 AM
Could be. But perhaps not
angrycrustacean
Feb 19 2006, 07:33 AM
QUOTE(Glacies @ Feb 18 2006, 11:35 PM) [snapback]1068316[/snapback]
canada will probably show up and save the day like we did the last two ww's...(jk)
I'll bet money that the only enemy casualties we score are those who were crushed when our helicopters fall from the sky.
Glacies
Feb 19 2006, 07:36 AM
You mean helicopter
Harks
Feb 19 2006, 01:32 PM
QUOTE(Rykster @ Feb 19 2006, 04:36 PM) [snapback]1068318[/snapback]
The next world war will be far from a joke. It will be the end of times.
Well that is happening now, a little cartoon is starting riots over the world by a country that has very little effect over the world.
Comic strips have been ridiculing all well known and respected known figures of the world, how can one comic create such violence. There is a small minority of the world that reaps on havoc and will waste no time in making an opportunity to create havoc.
I feel sadden that violence can be created by such.
magik boi
Feb 19 2006, 01:35 PM
omg is there goin 2 be a 3rd war?
The Doctor
Feb 19 2006, 01:45 PM
It was Einstein who said something along the lines of: "I do not know with what weapons WW3 will be fought but WW4 wil be fought with sticks and stones"
Amen to that
Uversa
Feb 19 2006, 01:53 PM
QUOTE(Lin @ Feb 19 2006, 06:50 AM) [snapback]1068337[/snapback]
Well, the world is supposed to begin its end in 2012 A.D.
why?
Harks
Feb 19 2006, 02:02 PM
It is very likely that WWIII will happen, unless we can resolve our religious and economical differences, there will be war.
In known history all major powers crave more power, and it will not stop until they are no more. This is how man has advanced, by conquering and pillaging. Now our current predicament are with religion and oil, before in history it was religion and power, I see no difference, just that current technology is different. If we did not see it comming then we are blind.
BazookaTooth
Feb 19 2006, 02:21 PM
Nuclear weapons will make it a short war.
Raptor
Feb 19 2006, 02:24 PM
World War 3 will probably involve China and America if anything, but no one really knows so there's not much point speculating.
Stellar
Feb 19 2006, 05:15 PM
QUOTE
Well, the world is supposed to begin its end in 2012 A.D.
No its not.
AnuKabal
Feb 19 2006, 07:30 PM
QUOTE(BazookaTooth @ Feb 19 2006, 08:21 AM) [snapback]1068715[/snapback]
Nuclear weapons will make it a short war.
That won't be till the end of the war, but once the war is over people will be living in tribes
L815
Feb 19 2006, 07:59 PM
Seems a lot like sticks and stones to me right now.................... (-_-)
AnuKabal
Feb 19 2006, 08:20 PM
more like sitting on tanks sharpening swords
mklsgl
Feb 19 2006, 08:40 PM
If there is a WWIII, there won't be any people left to form tribes, there won't be any Life at all on this planet.
AnuKabal
Feb 19 2006, 08:43 PM
The war won't destroy 100% of the population
et's daddy
Feb 19 2006, 10:37 PM
QUOTE(AnuKabal @ Feb 19 2006, 03:43 PM) [snapback]1069042[/snapback]
The war won't destroy 100% of the population
i think youre right
many countries have bunkers like NORAD to house officials and the like
id say less then 1 million people will be left after the next world war
question is can they survive long enough to reemerge ?
RamboIII
Feb 19 2006, 11:09 PM
QUOTE(T-Nemesis @ Feb 19 2006, 08:24 AM) [snapback]1068716[/snapback]
World War 3 will probably involve China and America if anything, but no one really knows so there's not much point speculating.

Why would you say that when China and America hardly fight at all. We are ALLIES...kinda
Goingcrazy
Feb 19 2006, 11:24 PM
There isn't going to be a WWIII.
I'm not saying there won't be wars, there's a couple big ones raging now, hell maybe WWIII is now, but the tittle "World War ___" is only every granted in hindsight. The fact that we thus far have had 2 and think we're staring 3 in the face is purely the result of historical myopia. A century from now historians will look back at the 20th century and see one long 100 year long conflagration, one massive conflict, "WW!" and "WWII" as we know them will ceas to exist as seperate and distinct from eachother and from all the subsequent conflicts of the 20th century. As for the present, well one day what we're witnessing now will be looked at as the culmination of the drastic realignments that resulted from the End of the Cold War, ie the Great 20th Century War; an appendix to the 20th century. I suppose the issue is whether or not we are facing a major war in the near future -mmm yes and no. What the US is doing now can only escalate BUT do not expect a radical realignment and reallocation of power or for the rise of Evil empires or the end of the US and above all DO NOT expect "the End of the World!" oooh.
Nothing will happen in 2012.
RamboIII
Feb 20 2006, 12:36 AM
QUOTE(Goingcrazy @ Feb 19 2006, 05:24 PM) [snapback]1069249[/snapback]
There isn't going to be a WWIII.
I'm not saying there won't be wars, there's a couple big ones raging now, hell maybe WWIII is now, but the tittle "World War ___" is only every granted in hindsight. The fact that we thus far have had 2 and think we're staring 3 in the face is purely the result of historical myopia. A century from now historians will look back at the 20th century and see one long 100 year long conflagration, one massive conflict, "WW!" and "WWII" as we know them will ceas to exist as seperate and distinct from eachother and from all the subsequent conflicts of the 20th century. As for the present, well one day what we're witnessing now will be looked at as the culmination of the drastic realignments that resulted from the End of the Cold War, ie the Great 20th Century War; an appendix to the 20th century. I suppose the issue is whether or not we are facing a major war in the near future -mmm yes and no. What the US is doing now can only escalate BUT do not expect a radical realignment and reallocation of power or for the rise of Evil empires or the end of the US and above all DO NOT expect "the End of the World!" oooh.
Nothing will happen in 2012.
I kinda agree but during WWII they were aware that it was indeed the second world war. If a war with brews from these minor present wars containing all or most of the coutries, il know it as WWIII
Rosencruez
Feb 20 2006, 01:30 AM
QUOTE(AnuKabal @ Feb 19 2006, 11:30 AM) [snapback]1068960[/snapback]
That won't be till the end of the war, but once the war is over people will be living in tribes
Funny you should say this when there is an upsearch of "tribalism" amongst many people across the planet these days. You see it in drum circles popping up in city parks around the U.S. You see it in the return of the Old Ways, the Native American sweat lodge, the vision quest and the return of the Warrior Sun Dance. You see it in the return of Nordic, Germanic, and Scandanavian people to Asatru, the ancestral religion of their folk. You see it in the growing interest in Wicca and paganism. You see it in the Rainbow Family and the hippies that spontaneously explored entheogens and invented rock-n-roll. You see it in the underground barter culture and hemp festivals. Tribalism. A return to the old ways. To the tribe. To mother nature.
So, if there were indeed a WWIII and people were returned to living in tribes, then it would mean the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. The hippies would have just been ahead of their times.
Peace
mklsgl
Feb 20 2006, 02:03 PM
Yes, 100% of the population will cease to exist, along with all other Life if there is a World War. Whoever and whatever that survives the actual war still won't have a chance in the aftermath. Nuclear winter will enshroud the planet for at least a decade rendering Earth sterile.
Goingcrazy
Feb 20 2006, 03:27 PM
QUOTE(mklsgl @ Feb 20 2006, 09:03 AM) [snapback]1069976[/snapback]
Yes, 100% of the population will cease to exist, along with all other Life if there is a World War. Whoever and whatever that survives the actual war still won't have a chance in the aftermath. Nuclear winter will enshroud the planet for at least a decade rendering Earth sterile.
No, i don't think so...
Celumnaz
Feb 20 2006, 03:36 PM
QUOTE(Goingcrazy @ Feb 20 2006, 09:27 AM) [snapback]1070056[/snapback]
No, i don't think so...
I think I agree with you Goingcrazy. (but you may not agree with the rest of what I'm saying...

)
The fearmongering scientists/politicians have been wrong before.
I get this vision in my head that if the nuke go boom did happen, that a few good rains or hurricanes or something similar and the planet would become relatively "normal" in a Very short span of time, if it even affected global as is theorized. Like, within a month or week.
Edit: Forgot to say, I also think there's some people that could be fairly resistant to small doses of radiation that would survive even if it were that bad. That's not to talk about the ones with shelters built to survive a couple decades or whatever... the NORAD guys or whatever...
TK0001
Feb 20 2006, 04:30 PM
I think, if you want to kill off the population, nukes aren't the way to go. Bio-warfare would potentially wipe out more than all the nukes in the world combined.
AnuKabal
Feb 20 2006, 10:15 PM
radiation doesn't affect everyone the same
I'm pretty sure sure some animals will start to repopulate after its over also
MJB222
Feb 20 2006, 10:41 PM
It'll come, I mean we are well overdue for another World War arn't we? There will always be war, therefore there will eventually be a WWIII. It could be in 100 years or even this year, who knows......
et's daddy
Feb 20 2006, 10:49 PM
QUOTE(TK0001 @ Feb 20 2006, 11:30 AM) [snapback]1070108[/snapback]
I think, if you want to kill off the population, nukes aren't the way to go. Bio-warfare would potentially wipe out more than all the nukes in the world combined.
are you for real ? ? ?
the US has over 5,000 nukes in its stockpile alone
we as a planet ccould to far more damage with nukes
TK0001
Feb 21 2006, 03:10 PM
QUOTE(et's daddy @ Feb 20 2006, 05:49 PM) [snapback]1070799[/snapback]
are you for real ? ? ?
the US has over 5,000 nukes in its stockpile alone
we as a planet ccould to far more damage with nukes
Do you know anything about biological warfare? I'm not trying to be condescending here, I'm just curious.
If a strain of a quick-killing deadly virus, to which humans have no natural immunity, were released in major airports across the globe, it would spread like wildfire all over, effectively killing most of the population in a very short time. Only the most remote tribes in Africa and South America would be untouched.
Plus, it's not as messy as nukes.
et's daddy
Feb 21 2006, 03:27 PM
QUOTE(TK0001 @ Feb 21 2006, 10:10 AM) [snapback]1071801[/snapback]
Do you know anything about biological warfare? I'm not trying to be condescending here, I'm just curious.
If a strain of a quick-killing deadly virus, to which humans have no natural immunity, were released in major airports across the globe, it would spread like wildfire all over, effectively killing most of the population in a very short time. Only the most remote tribes in Africa and South America would be untouched.
Plus, it's not as messy as nukes.
i agree it would be effective to a great degree
and it wouldnt be
as messy
but think of the foul stench of 5 billion rotting bodies
TK0001
Feb 21 2006, 03:55 PM
QUOTE(et's daddy @ Feb 21 2006, 10:27 AM) [snapback]1071822[/snapback]
but think of the foul stench of 5 billion rotting bodies
Agreed. But body disposal would be a problem with nukes as well, since not everyone will be immediately turned to vapor. Most would die of radiation poisoning over the course of months, perhaps up to a year.
Also, with bio-warfare, we can enjoy Mother Earth as it is, without all the pesky crowds and whatnot. After a nuclear holocaust, nothing but charred earth would remain (for the most part).
Nadal
Feb 21 2006, 04:06 PM
Well, Nukes end the planets major life forms...microorganisims will survive (some) but that's all. a Biological disease that can kill all living things would pretty much kill out entire life.
TK0001
Feb 21 2006, 04:10 PM
QUOTE(Nadal @ Feb 21 2006, 11:06 AM) [snapback]1071898[/snapback]
a Biological disease that can kill all living things would pretty much kill out entire life.
True, but I believe the disease that would be used (like anthrax) would have no affect on plant and marine life, as well as most animals. I could be wrong.
Captain_Boots
Feb 21 2006, 04:12 PM
You guys are looking at this all wrong, you never goto battle with only one type of Soldier. If the world were to become completely devoid of life it would entail some massive tactical Nuclear, and Bio warfare on the planet itself... or a lack thereof.
Also I would just like to state that in the 3rd war, it will be started when Russia comes down on a middle-eastern country and we come in actually to fend off the Russians. Other's come in too but that is a good section of how I feel it will start. I know it's contrary to current politics in the middle east. But you have to think, America sees Isreal as a treasured holy state. (and they see us as american-pig-dogs lol)
Nadal
Feb 21 2006, 05:13 PM
So, you're talking about the Russians and Georgia confliction?
newyork
Feb 21 2006, 08:59 PM
America and russia will never go to war that is nonsense, the only world war 3 i see happening is all of the middle east vs nato.
Celumnaz
Feb 21 2006, 09:04 PM
according to NATO provisions we should be bombing Iran right now. The day after the Danish embassy thing the bombs should have been sent as that's a declaration of war... and as members of Nato...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.