Has anyone got any information on Buzz Aldrin saying in an interview that on the moon he saw alien spacestations and were scared off by large ships?

I find it hard to believe he said this after watching the Ali G show where he clearly states there was no life on the moon and he didn't expect there to be life on the moon.

Any thoughts?

Maybe he saw it when he was there...back on Earth he was told to deny it...

That's my point of view

I personally believe that there's life on the moon. But the life doesn't live there. They just have bases there. And they just work there. I think the bases are military bases. Where the aliens preform their experiments,research,studies etc. But that's just me. I could be wrong. Who knows.

Well there is truth to that I mean pretty much every time they've gone up there they've seen something weird.

Like what? you got links to any reliable sources saying so?

I agree with this too.

How am I ment to give reliable links to something I saw on the TV years ago, if I knew reliable souces I wouldn't be posting on here for reliable sources.

dude think. what he means is alien spaceships going from the moon to well who knows where. And alien bases on the moon.

No offense. But next time use that noggin of yours. That I know is in there somewhere.

I think you can find what you are looking for in the book Alien Agenda, if I remember that title correctly.

So true.

But that's just me.

I read that book. I personally don't know what to think of it. Now the book is falling apart and I only bought it a few months ago. Must have been a good read. Even though I don't know what to think of it. Interesting book though. I personally highly recommend it.

Are you serious?
Now it's suddently a known fact that "aliens operate the moon"? Not really, it's a theory, and I challenge you to find any reliable source who support that theory.

Really hope you were kidding there.

I was actually planning on making a new thread on this, but I guess I will just post here.


"The Ukert crater, with a perfect 16 mile equilateral triangle within it! This crater is located near the centre of the moon as viewed from Earth. At full moon, the triangle can be made out even with a small telescope. Note also the three brighter areas on the rim of the crater. If they are connected together with straight lines, another equilateral triangle is formed, resulting in two perfectly interlocking triangles!"


"Sticking up from an otherwise, flat, rounded, eroded lunar landscape, the "Shard" as it has been named is one and a half miles tall. Note the shadow to the left of the Shard. The cross shape above the Shard is a camera registration mark. [A close-up of the Shard]"


"To the left of the shard, a faint anomaly was photographed. After printing the negative over and over again at different exposure levels, and analysing the results with various computer imaging processes, the anomaly was found to be a massive "tower/cube" hanging more than seven miles above the Moon! [A large version of the Megacube] Note the highly reflective "debris" surrounding this structure seemingly embedded in a darker material. This looks very much like reflective crystalline material being held miles above the lunar surface by a framework or matrix of "rebar" (reinforcing bars)."


"On enlarging one of the small reflective specks in frame 4822 (taken during the manned Apollo 10 mission) a stunningly complex object is revealed. Nicknamed "The Castle" due to its shape, this object is suspended miles above the lunar surface! A close-up reveals a "drooping cable" from which the object hangs! [A larger version of the Castle]"

Source of pictures: http://www.mufor.org/moon.htm

Here are some interesting articles from ufocasebook.com that correlate to the moon base: http://ufocasebook.com/moon.html
http://ufocasebook.com/nasafacts.html
http://ufocasebook.com/Astronaut.html

Karl Wolf of the disclosure project also explained his experience with the base on the dark side of the moon which he was shown pictures of back in the late 60's I believe it was.

"I didn't want to look at it any longer than that, because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying? I would have loved to have looked at it longer, I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have said more about it, discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. I knew the young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point.

"I felt that he just needed somebody to talk to. He hadn't discussed it, couldn't discuss it, and he wasn't doing it for any ulterior motive other than the fact that I think he had the weight of this thing on him and it was distressing to him…

"I knew that I couldn't go anyplace for at least five years without telling the State Department where I was, after I left the military. Any time I traveled I had to notify and get permission, even in the United States. They had to know where I was all the time. As an example, if we went to Vietnam there was always someone there with us, with a gun, ready to annihilate us basically if we should fall into the hands of the enemy. They didn't want the enemy to get us; we would be killed instead.

"So we knew we were operating under these sort of conditions. Your life was in jeopardy all the time, should you fall into the wrong hands. So we were aware of that. I was told when I left that I would be investigated on a regular basis to make sure that I wasn't involved in any peculiar activities that didn't suit the government's needs."

You can see Karl Wolf's testimony in the disclosure project press conference video available online. Here is the link: http://disclosure.netro.ca/npcc.wmv
If you download it (right click and save target as...) and save it to your computer than you will be able to fast forward and rewind it at your own leisure. Karl Wolf's testimony begins at 57:47.

Other Photo's:



Highly reflective "crater".


Bilot Crater in 1966. Notice how absolutely perfect a circle this crater is. Almost to perfect to have been formed naturally....



Bilot Crater. (1994)

And More:





Here is an interesting one:


"The extraterrestrial one that you will see,was photographed at two times different, by a lunar probe from NASA."

Here is the second picture taken of the same location by the lunar NASA probe:


"The proof by the movement of the body of the giant.On the first image the extraterrestrial one is upright. On the second it sat."

I originally wanted to put these all in one single post but it would not allow me to post that many photo's in 1 post which is why I had to separate it into 3 parts incase anyone was wondering.

This is by NO MEANS the best pictures NASA has. The most convincing photo's are undoubtedly still locked up possibly forever. NASA would never allow for an irrefutable photo of the ET base to be divulged to the public.

thanks! that's the kind of reply I was hoping for

Interesting site:

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicphotos.html

huh explain

i'll try and see if i can find better pics of the alien bases on the moon.

here look at these pics on this website:

www.holloworbs.com/ Lunar_Atmosphere.htm

What is the source / web page of this pics, Prophecy?

I apologize, I thought I included it in my post. Here it is: http://www.enigma.fr.tt/ The last one with the alien figure in the crater was found in the ET section.

This does sound out there but it all makes perfect sense.

Or it could be sent out purposly by NASA to make us believe they saw aliens and are hiding them when instead they are hiding that they never went to the moon, so basically making us look the wrong way....but I doubt it.

Regarding the pictures of the purported 'alien being' on the moon, one word...scale. I'm willing to speculate that when the scale is taken into consideration that this 'being' would be even larger than what one considers a giant. Also, simply because something resembles a human form, doesn't make it a human (or alien) being. As for the reported movement of the 'being' from one photo to the next...I don't see this at all. These photos certainly don't serve to influence me (in the least).

Well if the reports from the astronauts is authentic then we have BIG problems if an alien race is watching us on the moon then science and the world we know it will be changed forever. Until then all we can do is make up theories and hope and pray that it isn't real.

I do not think aliens are on the moon. I believe that the structures are the product of earlier human civilizations.

earlier humans. you mean like the pleiadians and the nordics.

maybe they studing us or created us to see what happens.
i think the japanese are sending a probe to photo the whole of the moon soon.

Everyone is in the race again for the moon lately.. I am reading things about Helium 3 being on the moon.

And your point is....? If they do photograph the extraterrestrial base they without a doubt will withhold the information from the public. It will be so restricted that many of the very people involved with the project itself will never know a thing about it. That is how secretive this issue is. All the major powers of the world have a UFO policy within their government and this policy is consistent throughout the world and is accompanied by pressure from the remaining powers to keep this information restricted.

I have a recent missive on the moon but it is rather long although recent. I can't swear to it's authenticity though. Anyway here 'tis.
If you want a source you will have to google as it was on a group post I belong to.

Posted By: Nevyn
Date: Monday, 2 January 2006, at 5:06 a.m.
OUR ENIGMATIC MOON by N. Huntley, Ph.D.
(December, 2005)
N. Huntley, Ph.D.
It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?
Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite---and therefore artificial.
Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?
Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.
In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969 Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity. Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artifacts until about the 1950s (remember the book Alternative III?). Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given.
It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.
Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing. The American flag was seen briefly to wave in ... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in . . . what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum---they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface---were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.
Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?
The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.
The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).
What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, 'My God, I don't believe it, look at this . .. ' Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.
Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, tears in the surface, revealing massive interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment. Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.
Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.
Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow---it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.
It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes---for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.
Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.
We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution.
In fact, if we include relevant data from extraterrestrial material transmitted by Ashayana Deane (see other articles for more information on this source) taken from a now vast body of advanced scientific knowledge about the universe, life and man's downfall, it is made clear that the Moon is another of the many components of the Beast machine (see Cosmic Map article), and does indeed play a sinister role. The natural matter of the Moon came from a very large planet, Maldek (or Marduk), which orbited our Sun thousands of years ago between Mars and Jupiter. It was inhabited by a thriving civilisation which degenerated to such a degree that the planet was destroyed. The asteroid belt is a product of the many fragments; also Wormwood (Bible), referred to as Battlestar Wormwood by ETs (see Planet X article).
We can tentatively assume now that the Moon consists of a metallic framework which has been packed by pieces from Maldek, forming the spherical shape but is essentially hollow. Similarly for Wormwood. Thus the Moon contains energies and coding (frequency patterns) supporting the original ET agenda for assimilation of our planetary system and in fact the whole time matrix. Further programmes emanate from the moon, such as one to cause unnatural hormonal/menstrual cycles in women to produce more children---thus losing control over when to have children. The purpose being to keep a plentiful stock of DNA for their genetic experiments (the human DNA, that is, its original template is valuable to these spiritually-fallen ETs).
In fact, not only does the Moon affect the tides of Earth but the blood in living organisms. A separate source of information (channelling) refers to the Moon as being an electromagnetic computer which can be programmed intelligently, such as to influence the feminine cycle (as also mentioned above in the Deane material), and has been transmitting signals to maintain our DNA for aeons.

Excellent article!

Also, I've read that when it is a FULL moon there seems to be higher rate of crime and domestic issues etc.