Ok I have ben doing a lot of research on this Virgin Mary sightings and photos I would like you opinions ad findings and anything that you could help with the research.

Here are some pictures I have found


There Are movies as well and I am sorry if this is a repost.

All opinions and help is wanted

These are just some pictures that I thought looked good

whats in the second one?

nifty pix. never can see faces or people in any of those though (except the last one, which looks a little to good to be true, though i could be wrong)...

Those are really convincing

The second one is suppose to be doves

I am glad to say this is a true event....A worldwide wide event that took place in 1962 and lasted for 3 year...Everynight this apparition would appear like that and just flat around the top of the church and somewhere there is film of this and that is what I am looking for, there are plenty of other photos of this apparition I just posted the best looking ones. This took place in Egypt and thousands of people saw I mean it is old news but it is amazing.

There was also in 2000 bunch of video tapes and pictures I believe at the same church of something on the roof and there is flashing light....I am a little skeptcical of that but the first one is just plain amazing because as far I am concerned it is real

THE EGYPTIAN GAZETTE. FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 1969

'APPARITION OF VIRGIN STILL BEING SEEN'
MORE than a quarter million Egyptians and overseas visitors, attended a ceremony held at the Church of the Virgin Mary at Zeitun, near Cairo, to mark the first anniversary of an apparition of the Virgin Mary at and near this church.

Although a year now has elapsed since the apparition was first reported, yet it is still appearing. The most recent report of Her appearance was on Friday April 4 when She was seen for thirty minutes between the central dome of the church and the cross situated above the church fence. The apparition was seen nodding to a large number of people, who stood outside the church.

On three other recent occasions the apparition was seen and each time was preceded by the appearance of shining white clouds shaped like doves, and followed by a light which covered the church.


This is from a newspaper article from when it first happened

I am sorry for the mis information it did happen in 1967 once I am sorry for giving the wrong that was my mistake

The fourth one is impressive, but seems to good to be true . . . looks like a double exposure.

I can do that very easily in Photoshop.

I don't believe it one bit, it's not convincing at all.

If you can please make them I'm a skeptic myself.

I would like to add my own opinion.

Ok I like to read a lot of the topics in all the forums and anytimme when someone says they have good of something people say it is to good to be true.

Let me ask you this if everything is to good to be true then how in the heck are we ever going to discover anything of the unknown?

I mean some people have their own pictures of UFO's, ghost, creatures etc....

And they truly believe they have found perfect proof of something that will change everyone's mind on a certain topic.

Now I know that there are a lot of fakes of things and it is hard to accept anything anymore because of all the lies. But I mean give people a chance instead of just passing it off as "to good to be true".

Come on people you can post all the stories you want but if you always pass every picture and video you want as "To good to be true" Then it will be impossible to ever find truth and nothing will ever be solved.

One more thing if you see something with your own eyes and have picutres of videos of it and you swear it was real and someone says it is to good to be true then this whole searching for answers is a waste of time.

what is the 2nd picture supposed to be?

That is 6 doves that came with the Virgin Mary that flew around her sometimes.

Sure, i'll make a few images.

Give me a while though. I'll probably have them up by tomorrow night sometime.

they didn't have photoshop back then...

As for the pictures, the fourth one looks almost as if the area around the apparition is inverted. I don't see anything special in the other three.

ok the fourth picture is looks inverted because the Virgin Mary would have flashes with her in the sky that looks as if they came from nowhere some pictures look like that and others are normal and for that other person that spoke gibberish It seems as though you have ADD or something when you want to talk on a forum please post readable comments and don't make yourself look like a fool.

[font=Tahoma]
I think those pictures look good. Better than any of the ones I've seen beforehand.

there not ghosts or anything, there just reftaction of the light on the lens, or the buildings. like the face on the moon.

how could over a quarter of a million see the reflection of a photocamera in the 60s going on for thirty minutes? I find that stranger than the theory of it being Mary.

And to the one who said he could do it in photoshop: could you do it with photoshop in the 60s? also remember the thousands of people seeing it (not on a photograph).

I'm not saying it IS the Virgin Mary, mostly because I'm not christian. But also because the "pose" of the figure (picture number 4) is a bit too stereotypical imo.
Interesting story tho

There have been camera tricks since the camera was invented. I'm personally sitting on the fence as I think those pictures are WAY to small to make a decision and I dont really believe.

But lets not disregard a dodgy photo too easily.

Cameratricks - yes
but how about the thousands of eyewitnesses? (talking about the egypt incident, fourth photo)

Ok my friends I have found more photos of the same event and a photo of the place where it happened.

1.) Virgin Mary with a dove over her head.
2.) Virgin Mary but a farther away shot.
3.) Virgin Mary from another angle and on a different side of the church.
4.) 2 doves flying over the church.
5.) Doves flying over the church making a cross formation.

I am open to all opinions on this one I am trying to find evidence of it being a hoax but I can't find any.

I believe that this is something though.

-Brint

Thanks brint
I was just looking for those, there's a thread about it somewhere here already, but I couldn't find it.

dont need photoshop for doube exposures

They look fake,specially the fourth one.I suspect it's been faked the same way as the Cottingley Fairy photos.The image just looks like a paper cut-out.
And I don't think it was that hard to fake pics back then,even if they didn't have photoshop.