CONCLUSIONTeam 2
Abecrombie/Johnnyboyc
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topic: FETAL - EMBRONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH TAKING LIVES by breaking the code of life and its original delicate balance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our team, 2, has condensed the many phases, complications, contradictions, irradications, cover-ups, illegal activity, and varieties of other such industries having access to, and using stem cells without it being expressed to the public. Due to the billion dollar global financial costs, and all of its uncertainties, the conclusion in turn, has been broken down into all of the reasons me and my team partner decided it is certain, taking into all the data and factual issues, this research of embryonic stem cells will and has TAKEN LIVES. There is simply not enough evidence of the opposing argument that it saves lives in this field of stem cell research. Concluding, there is without a doubt, lack of security in the work involving human life. Below are evidential means that like wildfire spreading, will, not when, consume the human population. By causing a disconcern for any of interests, rights, safety and truths that constitute life in every form. This, financial means profited is obviously one motive as this concerning issue plays a vital role in the many faces this research has if human DNA is the factor that causes such devatational effects on the population of life in every form.
Key points of consideration:
Scenario: imagine if the scorpion in the following fable below represents embryo stem cell research
The frog represented the Earth’s populated human race. READ THE FOLLOWING
QUOTE
"The scorpion and the frog"
A scorpion out for a walk came upon a deep river. A frog was sitting along the banks. „How nice to meet you here,“ said the scorpion, „I’d like to ask you a favor.“ „You want to ask me a favor?“ the frog inquired. „That’s a little weird. When has a scorpion ever asked something of a frog?“ „Let’s put aside the enmity between the species,“ said the scorpion as he inched closer to the frog. „I’d like to be your friend!“
„I would really like to trust what you’re saying,“ the frog replied as he retreated a little in response to the scorpion’s advance. „But I’m still scared of you!“
The scorpion assured the frog that he was not true to type and that he longed to be friends with the frog. „Let me sit on your back and carry me across the water. I want to go visit my relatives on the other side of the river.“ „I’m afraid!“ the frog repeated. „I’m afraid that you’ll sting me and then I’ll die.“ „It’s very important to me that I meet up with my relatives! How can I, not being capable of swimming, ever cross the river unless someone carries me across trustingly on their back?“ And at that, the scorpion began to weep.
„Oh no, please don’t cry,“ said the frog, moved yet still skeptical. The scorpion, sensing his chance, pushed on. „And anyway, I’m not suicidal. If I were to sting you while I was on your back in the river, I’d fall off into the water and drown. Do you really think I’d be that dumb?“
That sounded very logical to the frog and he agreed. Once they reached the middle of the river, the frog felt the scorpion’s stinger go into his back. „What have you done!“ he exclaimed. „Now we’re both going to die!“ „I’m sorry,“ responded the dying scorpion. „I really had no choice. It’s just my nature to sting.“
(Freely adapted from an ancient fable in India.)
http://alternative-therapy-for-the-bipolar...rg/capter_8.phpQ: What constitutes life.? God has been a favorite answer and man and woman is an another, some say evolution even alien. We know from our ancestors and our prehistoric friends the dinosaur that animals were and still are an important part of the earth’s Eco system. Therefore, hence the term a delicate balance has been used by what life is generally. Human conception has constituted it as a form of life due to two counterparts making one as an individual being, from a cell fertilization is termed after conception takes place. So if one values life in general, would they impose potential harm to it or protect its vital origin?
SCIENCE – RELIGION = life. They both have many faces to its definition, and expressions of those faces could be frowning on life itself. You be the judge. Observe the findings that has this been so shocking for my own eyes as research in this debate.
QUOTE
“You kept me screened off in the belly of my mother”
Psalms139: 13MAN AND ANIMAL= There are no doubts that both animal and man learn from observing eachother. We would have to if both need to co exhists and survive. Man learned by observing the fowls of the air that airplanes became a duplicate model. Man took the computers technology from mimicking the system of the brain. Children copy their parents in looks as well as physical attributes. Copy cat killers after their serial killers detestable behavior. To better understand ourselves and the animal world and keeping both exhisting, science has researchers and means to do a lot of duplicated beneficial lessons from life here in the universe and earth is alive and well.
FACT- humankind is the one animal on the planet that has freedom of choice and with animals has the intelligence that free will can create and do works that spark imaginations and creative independent thought.
Crows look down and observe man in their cars. Learning that cars crush things, the crows started hurling their nuts they could not crack to the tar paved streets where a car would be speeding through and right on over the nut to break it for them.
http://www.pastpaper.com/List-Life1965.htmThen they learned, that going after the nut in the street at ground level got them killed so what did they do, they waited for the signal to change, knowing the car was going to stop and when persons below walked through the crosswalk, so did the crows to retreive the newly cracked open nut.
EXPERIMENTS – both human and animal experiments have been beneficial and informative to certain needs of life to continue. A fine line crosses it when harm or cruelty becomes centerstage. And in human experiments in any inhumane way becomes a discontinuing of the cause it could and future possible ethnic well being of what rights we all have for resect to life not to be an experiment for the independent mind of a man. A lot of controversy usually has to do with human life, rights, and morality.
THE CELL DIVIDED BY THREE = plant animal human – that delicate balance .Any harm done to one is harm to another in time and present.
QUOTE
“You kept me screened off in the belly of my mother” Psalms139: 13
http://www.pastpaper.com/List-Life1965.htmPOTENTIALS – Dangerous genetically cloned life in any form of the three above. Mixing is even worse and unpredictable when trying to master after mutations are the first obvious sign, potentially dangerous to try to altercate the strand of human DNA by a human stranger. Now who isn’t using their brain?
THREATS- our food resources are being genetically altered by cloning technologies, factory farming is one, and crop cloning another and the facts below will startle you.
CLONING CROPS. Pesticides that kill off insects in crops are effecting the consuming participant next up the Eco system, without knowing this. Animals cannot decide if they can consume chemically fed food, the population majority does not either.
Biochemical labs that genetically alter the cells of plant germs isolate projects of interests and modify it for market and production.
FOOD IRRADICATION cancer causing agents such as Benzene in our beverages has been going on for at least 15 years now with the knowledge being obviously threading for consumption. Issues are coming out of the woodworks just recently.
AGAIN…GO TO
THE MEATRIX.COM When time continues technology grows in to a competitive field of surviving in itself and today money is a main vein in the heartbeat of earth’s future by manipulating its cells. Man explodes in the numbers and survival is key so if money can purchase the most expensive tech to produce interests in gene altering, this is a underlined problem if potential dangers are present.
HYBRIDS –Ancient Egyptians domesticated the cat later modern men domesticated dog. That was then, today there is talking about hosting animals for the purpose of human organs. Seems barbaric. No. IS BARBARIC .
Taking ovaries from female foetuses aborted at a late stage and finding ways to
Mature their eggs in the laboratory. After all, scientists believe that a female foetus
Has some 7 million eggs in its ovaries; whereas a new-born girl has just 1-2 million; a
Teenage girl even fewer and just 400 on average is released in a woman’s lifetime.
-- Genetically engineering foetuses so that girls are born with their full 7 million
Complement of eggs.
-- Creating eggs by getting human embryonic stem cells extracted from left over
IVF embryos to develop into egg cells, or simply fusing these embryonic stem cells
With the cells from the sick adult patient to develop suitable transplant cells.66
When I learnt about these research avenues, I began to wonder whether my focus on
The potential hazards for women in providing human eggs was perhaps too narrow –
Alternatively, perhaps just the tip of the iceberg. These other developments might not involve
Women’s eggs and might not involve embryos, but they still have grave implications
For health care, childcare, livelihoods, the public interest and gender equity and justice
– Issues that perhaps underlie our unease about egg donation in the first place. Maybe
Some prior questions need to be asked about why such research avenues are really
Being pursued, and who decided to follow and support them.
.
The history of funding research into molecular biology, genetics, reproduction and
Embryo research both in the last century and this is fascinating.69 it ebbs and flows
Between wealthy individuals, universities, corporate foundations, governments, large
Corporations and venture capitalists in different countries and regions. An article in
The Financial Times a few years ago on biotechnology regulation posed the question:
Who is regulating all the biotech activity? Its answer? “Firstly, the financial markets”.
But the financial markets, venture capitalists and pharmaceutical companies – all
Those who aim to make profit somehow out of their investments – have not been that
Interested in putting their money into embryonic stem cell research, even as they look
Forward to large markets for stem cell therapies in future.70 “Venture capital, the
Traditional engine of biotechnology, is remarkably scarce in stem cells” comments The
Economist.71 Another Financial Times article in 2002 suggested that “the finances of
The world’s cloning companies are so precarious that a lack of funding may soon
Accomplish what moral objections have so far been unable to do: bring research in the
Area to a halt.”72
The citizens of California, the richest US state
With an economy larger than that of the UK, voted for legislation in November 2004
To raise $3 billion in public money over 10 years to support stem cell research and
Cloning techniques. The total cost to Californian taxpayers, however, will be about $6
Billion. Other US states are now following suit. 78
Public funding in any country invariably provides not just money but also
Acceptability, legitimacy and the prospect of additional private sector finance.
Commenting on the new Californian legislation, for instance, the CEO of a San
Francisco life sciences merchant bank, Burrill & Company, said:
“At present, stem cell science is tainted.
Proposition 71 [the name of the
Californian legislation] will legitimize a lot of research in the US, which under
Federal guidelines is perceived to be not investible”.
There is simply not enough evidence of the opposing argument that it saves lives in this field of stem cell research. Concluding, there is without a doubt, lack of security in the work involving human life. Population. By causing a disconcern for any of interests, rights, safety and truths that constitute life in every form. This, financial means profited is obviously one motive as this concerning issue plays a vital role in the many faces this research has if human DNA is the factor that causes such devatational effects on the population of life in every form.
CONSIDER Patient case studies to show a mass sum of successes might prove that this reasearch has potential. However, no posts were made for these implications to hold the argument. Consider and Compare what donors whom already are in action giving science voluntarily in wills after dying to science. Costs nothing. The donor decides to donate. Also there are options to have ones own bone marrow plasma extracted or blood for treating there own body if diseased later in life those would be stored for such necessity if it were having to occur. Again, it is an option with little to no risks. The fetal and embryonic stem cell research does not provide much except the definition of the cells ability to continue on, in the womb with placenta as the form of nourishment and oxygen until labor. Did anyone mention that the placenta could be cloned? Picture that? Not right- the placenta is vital for replacing the missing exchange of hormones the mother needs after birth, to replenish her system
OUR FINDINGS – resulting in, the potential to prove outcomes resulting in Conclusion
That this fetal embryonic stem cell research is TAKING LIVES.
Thanks to the BOARD and to our team as well
Abecrombie and JohnnyboyC