Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Nessie: Prehistoric Beast or Elephant?
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Cryptozoology, Myths and Legends
MadEyePixie
QUOTE
Elephant theory in Nessie search

Unexplained sightings of the Loch Ness monster could have been elephants enjoying a swim, a scientist has said.


Neil Clark, curator of palaeontology at Glasgow University's Hunterian Museum, spent two years researching Nessie.

He said they could have been circus elephants, as fairs visiting Inverness would often stop on the banks of Loch Ness to give the animals a rest.

The trunk and humps in the water would bear similarities to some of the most famous Nessie photographs.

There have been reporting sightings of "something" in Loch Ness dating back to the 6th Century and it has grown into one of the world's most enduring myths.

Hazy photographs and eyewitness accounts have sprung up over the past 100 years, without offering conclusive evidence that Nessie exists.

Dr Clark said most sightings of Nessie could be explained by floating logs or waves.

But he is promoting the elephant theory because his research showed circuses were a common occurrence in the area, particularly from the early 1930s.

"The circuses used to take the road up to Inverness and allow their animals to have a rest, swim about in the loch and refresh themselves," he said.

"It's quite possible that the people around Loch Ness saw some of these animals.

"When their elephants were allowed to swim in the loch, only the trunk and two humps could be seen - the first hump being the top of the head and the second being the back of the animal.

"The elephant theory would not explain some of the later sightings. I don't know when the last circus to Inverness was, but I'm presuming there were some after 1933."

Asked whether he believed in the Loch Ness monster, Dr Clark said: "I do believe there is something alive in Loch Ness."

Dr Clark's findings are published in the Open University Geological Society journal this month.


user posted image

Source

Kryso
I heard about this today on the radio... Had to check it wasn't Aprils Fools Day. I hope they are having a laugh? blink.gif
Bella-Angelique
That elephant picture you posted does look a lot on the surface as to what I have always seen portrayed.
frogfish
Also, a famous picture of Mokele-mbembe was also most likely a elephant swimming.
Azalin
QUOTE
"I do believe there is something alive in Loch Ness."


Really ?, I thought it was empty, putting that university degree to good use.
psyche101
I still like the Eel theory, this could account for some of the past sightings I guess.
Agent. Mulder
true.
and its obvious that theres not an elephant in the loch. although, someone may have taken a picture of one, then claimed it to be nessie
jackie boy
This theory is without a doubt the most ridiculous one ever made on the nessie debate.I mean,come on,how on earth an elephant population would remain hidden from eyes right in the heart of Scotland?The plesiosaurus theory is more credible then this one,assuming of course that the whole elephant theory thing isn't a joke itself rolleyes.gif
frogfish
I doubt its an elephant...but mokele-mbembe sightings in Africa could very easily be Elephants.
Dragonic Darkness
I too doubt it's an elephant...
And if it was the most credible thing would be that the first Nessie sighting was an elephant and the rest were made up, and I don't think so.

I think Nessie is either some sort of Sea Dragon or a Pleseasaurus (possibly with families).
speaker of the house
QUOTE(jackie boy @ Mar 6 2006, 07:37 PM) [snapback]1092316[/snapback]

This theory is without a doubt the most ridiculous one ever made


More ridiculous than a dinasour still alive and swimming around a lake in scotland???
Dragonic Darkness
Could've been a family or something. :S
frogfish
QUOTE
Pleseasaurus (possibly with families).

A family of pliosaurs? Nonsense...1. They are extinct. 2. They were solitary predators.
psyche101
^^
3. Common Sense grin2.gif

QUOTE(jackie boy @ Mar 7 2006, 10:37 AM) [snapback]1092316[/snapback]

This theory is without a doubt the most ridiculous one ever made on the nessie debate.I mean,come on,how on earth an elephant population would remain hidden from eyes right in the heart of Scotland?The plesiosaurus theory is more credible then this one,assuming of course that the whole elephant theory thing isn't a joke itself rolleyes.gif


LOL, I don't think it is supposed to account for all of the sightings, only possibly some of them. Passing Circus Elephants. Not naitive Loch Elephants

*Imagines Elephants in Kilts hiding on the shores of Loch Ness hiding from tourists, Bwahahaha*
frogfish
QUOTE(psyche101 @ Mar 7 2006, 02:22 AM) [snapback]1092492[/snapback]

^^
3. Common Sense grin2.gif
LOL, I don't think it is supposed to account for all of the sightings, only possibly some of them. Passing Circus Elephants. Not naitive Loch Elephants

*Imagines Elephants in Kilts hiding on the shores of Loch Ness hiding from tourists, Bwahahaha*

thumbsup.gif
BigfootForever
QUOTE(jackie boy @ Mar 6 2006, 07:37 PM) [snapback]1092316[/snapback]

This theory is without a doubt the most ridiculous one ever made on the nessie debate.I mean,come on,how on earth an elephant population would remain hidden from eyes right in the heart of Scotland?The plesiosaurus theory is more credible then this one,assuming of course that the whole elephant theory thing isn't a joke itself rolleyes.gif

lol, hes not saying there is a hidden elephant population, just that some circus ones may have been seen and mistaken for nessie.
jackie boy
QUOTE
hes not saying there is a hidden elephant population, just that some circus ones may have been seen and mistaken for nessie


So what?A circus visiting the loch over and over for years and secretly making their elephants go and swim in the lake so that a lot of people will mistake them for a prehistoric monster?

Come on you guys,it just makes no sense!
The pleasiosaurus theory is more credible than the elephant one indeed,because elephants being seen and mistaken for an enormous prehistoric being through all these years is simply incredible.
And of course I assume you are all aware that claiming Nessie is a circus elephant is an insult to ,if not many,a few credible eyewitnesses who clearly describe the monster as something really extraordinary and prehistoric in appearance.

VoodooNinja
I'm not sure if this has been brought up before, but if Nessie was a pliosaur, would'nt it(they) have to come up for air quite often? Wouldn't that mean you'd be able to see them surface many times throughout a single day?
jackie boy
QUOTE
if Nessie was a pliosaur, would'nt it(they) have to come up for air quite often?


Not as often as an elephant would have to,and that's exactly what I was trying to tell.I don't claim that Nessie is a plesiosaurus,it's just that the elephant theory is so ridiculously incredible the plesiosaurus one almost seems possible compared to it.
But then,this is just me and I certainly am not an expert on the subject.
VoodooNinja
QUOTE(jackie boy @ Mar 7 2006, 09:57 AM) [snapback]1092949[/snapback]

Not as often as an elephant would have to,and that's exactly what I was trying to tell.I don't claim that Nessie is a plesiosaurus,it's just that the elephant theory is so ridiculously incredible the plesiosaurus one almost seems possible compared to it.
But then,this is just me and I certainly am not an expert on the subject.


Oh, don't get me wrong. I believe that trying to say an elephant is responsible for every nessie sighting is indeed quite ridiculous. Just the plesiosaurus theory is just as bad.
jackie boy
QUOTE
Just the plesiosaurus theory is just as bad.


I suppose hmm.gif
Talon
QUOTE
More ridiculous than a dinasour still alive


Nobodies ever said it was a dinosaur. The only animal from that time period ever mentioned is a plesiosaur and they were not dinosaurs.
Azalin
Im no expert on the Loch Ness Monster, but were there not stories of loch ness a lot longer ago ?. In the 6th century St.Columba witnessed Loch Ness for the first time. So I suppose if you believe in that experience, it would more then likely rule out the idea of elephants.
xstortionist
QUOTE(frogfish @ Mar 7 2006, 02:10 AM) [snapback]1092477[/snapback]

A family of pliosaurs? Nonsense...1. They are extinct. 2. They were solitary predators.


ok for one thing nobody know what kind of predators the dinosaur was...so your claims are ridiculous. Many creatures have survived what ever caused the dinosaurs to go extinct. Loch Ness monster could be anything.
Conspiracy
make a trail of peanuts to lead it to shore


or throw a mouse in the water, see what happens wink2.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.