QUOTE(Nadal @ Mar 21 2006, 12:20 AM) [snapback]1113257[/snapback]
That's not true, microorganisims are the most primitive creatures on our planet. They're the first organisims to had exist. 100 million years ago, they could of been a lot EVEN more primitive. By saying this, they'd need less of the more carbon based requirements that we need. I'm sure that more earlier micro organisims could of survived space.
Actually even the most primitive life on earth was carbon based, the very DNA on which all earth based life is based is a carbon based chemical.
By 100 million years ago life on earth was very advanced, this is the period of the dinosaurs. Micro-organisms have not changed much since then.
The most primitive life on earth dates back to more than 3 BILLION years ago.
Bacteria have been known to survive the harsh environment of space. Living bacteria were found on parts of the Surveyor 3 un-manned lunar lander returned to earth by Apollo 12 and on the the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) which was placed into orbit by the shuttle in 1984 and returned in 1990. However their is a big difference between 6½ years and the 5 million years the scientists are talking about.
The Guinness Book Of Records says that the oldest surviving bacteria were found in salt crystals. They were in a kind of suspended animation but were revived by scientists. They were 250 million years old.
Despite the fact that is possible I personally doubt that life has been transferred from Earth to Europa or Titan this way. First of all we have the 130 rocks that will have hit these worlds. This is just a statistical number based on computer simulations. The scientists will almost certainly have made a few assumptions to get these figures so we can not be sure exactly how accurate they are.
Secondly even if their calculations are 100% the figure they have generated is a statistical probability. The motion of small objects through the solar system is chaotic. Over long periods of time it is impossible to predict their motion. It is, therefore, possible that in reality 260 earth meteorites hit these worlds or none at all.
Thirdly, even though bacteria 250 million years old survived on earth they needed particular conditions. I don't know how common these conditions are but I'd bet my house that considerably less than 1% of rocks will produce these conditions. Even if the figure is as high as 1% that means only 1 of these rocks would have the conditions for the bacteria to survive.
Next we have the blast itself. The bacteria need to survive the impact blast and intense heat generated at the moment that the impact body collided with earth.
After surviving their traumatic launch and millions of years in space things are going to get worse for these bacteria. They are going to hit either Europa or Titan. Europa has no atmosphere so the rock containing the bacteria is not going to be slowed down. It will impact Europa at tens of thousands of miles an hour. This means there will be a high energy impact which the bacteria must survive. Titan has a thick atmosphere. The rock will be slowed down by it's plunge through Titans atmosphere so it will not hit the ground so fast, however the rock will be heated and partly burned up by the atmospheric atmosphere.
If the bacteria have survived all this they must be luck enough to find an environment they can survive in. On Europa it is hypothesised that there are geothermal vents which provide the heat where life could survive. If the rock were to just sit on the surface or plunge into the ocean at a point where there are no geothermal vents it seems unlikely to me that it will be able to find the energy required for it to survive and reproduce. Titan is very cold. It also has an atmosphere more like the earth had billions of years ago rather than that in which life has become abundant. Unless the conditions are right, again the bacteria will not be able to reproduce.
The study in the initial article shows that it is possible that Earth seeded the solar system with life, it didn't show that it was likely.