Intro:

Human and animal sacrificing rituals have been being performed at pyramids across the globe, all throughout history. Killings and mass murders have taken place at the steps, on the steps and even inside pyramids for thousands of years. Many have mass graves in their surrounding areas. Most historic human sacrifices were to appease or please deities, but in modern times it has mostly been used for personal empowerment (black magic), even on the scale of thousands with the entire world watching blindly. In the future we face the ultimate pyramid/human-sacrifice: all of humanity, to complete the "unfinished pyramid".



This is a huge post containing tons of images and all new analysis, see the rest here:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...B2BBEB616153150

Hmm. My telepathic powers lead me to the conclusion that the website is pure scheisse to begin with ... so why waste my time? I mean, when the title to the thread is "the untold WTC Pyramids Sacrifice" you know you're dealing with pure fantasy to begin with. This is the height of mental insanity. There sure is a lot of mental illness out there.

LOL

You got that right:

Now go look in the mirror.

haha, can I post that chart on other forums?

blog looked good btw, didn't read it all tho

so, I guess we are up to the "Is there any chance in your lifetime that you may be mistaken on any issue?" part....

Interesting thread, shall read more in detail when Im at home

Ya, you can repost any of my stuff if you'd like.

I'm still waiting for a debate...

Voilà!

LOL

My my, if it isnt my ol buddy steller. No creativity? You gotta borrow my material, my innovation? You cant mess with the master son, look what happened in my old Ai thread. Who was right? Who's ego was tarnished by their "skepticism" and disrespectful behavior? Maybe you can redeem yourself, but I doubt it:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...showtopic=59497

The reason for writing the above as "skepticism" was to address your condition, the issue where you must (from my experience with you) consider yourself a "skeptic". What's funny about that is you're not even a true skeptic, youre true "skeptinazi". Skeptinazi is the term I decided to apply to the mental condition I identified. Confused?

skep·tic also scep·tic
- One who instinctively or habitually doubts, questions, or disagrees with assertions or generally accepted conclusions.
-someone who habitually doubts accepted beliefs
-One who is yet undecided as to what is true; one who is looking or inquiring for what is true; an inquirer after facts or reasons.
-Of or pertaining to a sceptic or skepticism; characterized by skepticism; hesitating to admit the certainly of doctrines or principles; doubting of everything.

See the rest here:
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...showtopic=59726

Now, back on point. Your wannabe flowchart says what?

TITLE: "Nazi conspiracy theorist's debate flowchart"-
If I'm an Nazi, then why would I title the most insulting thing for your type skeptinazi? This goes to show what level of intelligence I'm facing here. This also goes to show your bias, youre bias against articles that potentially expose bad Jews - as if its agains the law or racist to state someone cultural background, or to note potential connections between similar bloodlines and cultural players involved in a case. Remember, being Jewish doenst stress religion, its stresses a culture. What, do you really think that all "Jews" follow Judaism faithfully? Ha.

Now if you would have actually read the entire article you would have noticed my section towards the end addressing thsi very issue. It's fun to put things like that towards the end to test whether critics actually read it entirely. This goes on to prove your bias against conspiracies and against things that challenge the norm. These factors seriously indicate bias, which is a tell tale sign of binary thinking - as mentioned in the skeptinazi flowchart. Further, the fact that you responded to the flowchart further hints tha tit doe sin fact apply to you.

1. "Make an absurd claim with no supporting evidence"-
Correction: I made an original claims, with tons of supporting evidence. So much that not one perosn has been able to build any sort of argument, just baseless insults. At the moment I get to use that fact as further supporting evidence.

2. "Whine"-
Where did I whine? I didn't, therefore you're absolutely wrong.

3. "Claim those who dont agree are ignorant blind sheeple"-
I didnt use the words ignorant or sheeple, not even in my flowchart that I can see/remember. Wrong again, probably even about yourself.

4. LOL! Hey you're right 1/4, but am I wrong about that? Highly unlikely.

Since it's obvious that youre biased and skeptinazi, I recommend you read that link above and also this one:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11009379/
Thats an article about a science study on bias. It's proven that biased people actually get a drug like rush from dismissing things that threaten their ideals and beleifs. LOL! How this buzz kill working out for you? I hate to be a buzz kill, biut we'll just call this tough-love as they say in the drug rehabilitation field. I've shown you your mental condition and norm-addiction, but will you will you deny your problem???

So far you werent right. These biological computers havent turned out to be the beast yet, have they?



Bingo. You admit that "nazi" is insulting, so that qualifies your post with the flowchart as trolling.



Oh really? How so?



Hmm... the I think that paragraph falls under boxes 2 and 3 in my flowchart...



Baseless insults? You're the one calling us nazis.



Throughout this post.



You accuse us of bias. That falls under the 3rd box in my flowchart.



Box 3.



Which you've been doing throughout your time on this forum... hmm...

IgnoranceIsntBliss,

Let's not inflame the issue by targeting the opposition with insulting labels. If you cannot carry on a civil conversation or disagreement without the derogatory comments, then don't participate in the discussion. Debate the topic and not the perceived personal attributes of your opponents.

MM

quote name='Stellar' date='Mar 23 2006, 12:21 AM' post='1116431'
"So far you werent right. These biological computers havent turned out to be the beast yet, have they?"

**How do you know? 8+ trillion dollar deficit, DoD admiting (just days before 911) that 1-2 trillion was anaccounted for. The fact that theyre public with their programs outa raise concerns, especially considering DARPA's history with witholding technologies from teh public. Do you need a history lesson on DARPA? How about DISA, I didnt even ge tinto that yet, and its all whats will be (or already is) tied into these AI systems. Why didnt you respond to that thread about it? Plenty of proof there, how can you deny its coming?


"Bingo. You admit that "nazi" is insulting, so that qualifies your post with the flowchart as trolling. "

**It IS insulting, and so are the comments that the flowchart was a response to. I didnt enter this thread with any bias or disrespectful behavior. The thread is even titled with a question mark. The comments i responded to were trolling, they even admitted no point in checking into it before they commented. Ad Hominem anyone? I could be getting real nasty pointing out both skeptinazi and common fallacies, but its really not worht my time. Considering the disrespectful (yet unfounded) skeptinazi insults and trolling here- I dont knwo why I go outta my way to even post at this juncture.


"Oh really? How so?"

**Because you wrote your flowchart in response to me, and in it you alleged nazism, which would indicate that you seen the mentioning of Jewish culture and decided to pull the nazi card.


"Hmm... the I think that paragraph falls under boxes 2 and 3 in my flowchart..."

**Again youre wrong. For starters the entire thing (that was obviously written to address me) was wrong from teh start. Box one was false. Boxes 2 and 3 didnt apply at all especially considering neither happened before I posted my flowchart. Moving on, that paragraph wasnt even whining, it was gloating at first, then it was more pointing out of your bias. Finally, I really must say that this is the most elaborate Straw Man attack I have ever seen - I do give credit where it's due - unlike my critics.


"Baseless insults? You're the one calling us nazis."

**No skeptinazi - BIG difference, read the link to the skeptinazi thread for a reality check.


"Throughout this post."

**Quote me or get lost, I seriously dont have time for this.


"You accuse us of bias. That falls under the 3rd box in my flowchart.
Box 3."

**No, I demonatrated bias, read the first 2 responses I recieved, and then your response to suppor theirs. Another tell tale sign is how you took offense to it (enough to try to make your own flowchart) even though it wasnt directed towards you.


"Which you've been doing throughout your time on this forum... hmm..."

** Quite the opposite.

Sorry, I was just responding to Ad Hominem insults that were geared for total disrespect. Nobody had anything to say to them, or my old AI thread (not the one above), but if I respond to insults in my own thread that counts as a warning to not participate in the discussion? Makes me wonder just how manypeople were offended by that flowchart, but then again WHY would anyone be offended by it unless it was directed towards them...

I've had previous experience in that older AI thread with steller on this level, so i didnt feel much reason to be any nicer than I was.

Ignorance, go argue those topics in the appropriate thread. This isnt the thread for them.

And it doesnt matter what you were responding to, you were insulting people, purposely. Thats not permitted.

Why wasnt a problem when they did it? Why did you join in? I'm not here (in my thread) to get into any of this, not one single thing that has been mentioned after my first post. Unfotunaty it was immediatly trolled by yourself included.

This is the thread for my first post. Where's the arguments, or am I right?

What?



Because I got tired of you calling people nazis because they dont share your beliefs.



I was trolling? Was I the one who went out and started calling people nazis?



I really dont even dignify your threads with a reply anymore, because you're right, there is no argument. I dont think you're right though.

"What?"

*The first 2 responses(the ones you condoned), the ones that said they wouldnt even read it, and then proceeded to insult me.

"Because I got tired of you calling people nazis because they dont share your beliefs."

*You speak as if I've been in here tearing up the scene calling everyone and your mother a bunch of nazi's. In reality I DIDNT EVEN CALL ANOYONE A NAZI, I simply posted my flowchart and you took offence to it, LOL, because it applies to you. Even if I had said they THEY were skeptinazis, that still isnt calling them nazis. It is YOU who called me a nazi.

"I was trolling? Was I the one who went out and started calling people nazis?"

*They were trolling, they insulted me, I turned the tables and you jumped on their bandwagon.

"I really dont even dignify your threads with a reply anymore, because you're right, there is no argument. I dont think you're right though."

You're nothing, please dont infect my threads with your ignorance and skeptinazi biased views, which have no goal in finding truth in a matter, but rather stench the air with adolescent grade scum.



They trolled, you backed them up, I got warned for firing back, noone has any sort of argument against my article - Nuff said.