When I noticed that when Clinton said that he never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. I also realized that he actually never lied. TSince then I noticed Bush has never lied, including his statement over weapons of mass detruction. after all, the british did help to sell the stuff to Saddam.


A sexual relation is technically a birthed relation if you check the grammar, so they never did have children. He did gain huge public support from that stunt though and is still famous for his stunt. Perhaps his wife may get sympathy votes in her future campaign for leadership from that sex thingy scandal. But I am speculating heavuily.


Bush is soon to be put on sudo trial for stating so many times that `THERE ARE TOO MANY LEAKS IN WASHINGTON`

Nothing wrong with thAT statement. He said too many. And we know that government leaks are always planned properganda events. In fact He could mean that there are two many leaks. 2 symbolizing balance in numerology. but in truth, if he is on trial, he will prove to us the nature of the courts.



There is a gain in revealing secrets. Especially when you are guarenteed to survive the attacks from the supposed opposition. I have not worked it out yet. I suppose the reasons are months down the line. But I bet you every reader here from whatever country are witnessing new weekly government scandals in their country.


How deeply are people being fooled and why?


The real point is the lack of public debate even on the net.... nowhere are people talking, which proves the safety in governments being able to do anything they want.. hooray!!!!..... Of course, there is not yet enough blood to get people wild enough huh ?

The Revolution will not be televised. The kennedy shooting stunt is still big news, let alone 911.

Presidents can't just say everything or else we might not be here anymore.

Me thinks you noticed a little too much.
The "grammer" of the term "sexual relations"? Sexual relations means exactly what it means in the English language. A "birthed relationship"? What is that?

Oral sex qualifies. Besides, who actually cares about that silliness?


But your right. Bush did not lie about Hussein's WMDs. He had them, a well known fact.

Additionally, I think these issues have been debated and argued ad-nauseam, on the Web, and on other venues.

I'm a little unclear on what you're trying to say...as are very likely many others.

Actually Bush has lied on so many occasions its pretty much unreal, but it never actually gets reported in america, so its quickly forgotte, as has tony blair but fortuneatly enough for him he isnt stupid enough to keep doing it and doing it over and over again. Bush lies all the time.

During the 2004 campaign, Bush claimed “Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so.”

OH REALLY????

thats a lie.

"The NSA program is one that listens to a few numbers, called from the outside of the United States and of known al Qaeda or affiliate people," Bush has said. "[O]bviously I had to make the difficult decision between balancing civil liberties and, on a limited basis -- and I mean limited basis -- try to find out the intention of the enemy." "It is very limited in nature," Scott McClellan claimed

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA another lie.

During his Veteran’s Day 2005 address, Bush charged that “ . . more than a hundred Democrats in the House and the Senate -- who had access to the same intelligence -- voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power. "

AGAIN!, MORE LIES!!!!!!

President Bush said ”The United States and our partners have disrupted at least ten serious al Qaeda terrorist plots since September the 11th, including three al Qaeda plots to attack inside the United States.

he's lying you know.

Plus Iraq didnt actually posses any weapons of mass destruction, they used them all up on the kurds lol.

"No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq." Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (09.19.02)

"This man poses a much graver threat than anybody could have possibly imagined." President Bush (09.26.02)

"The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique urgency. . . . It has developed weapons of mass death" President Bush (10.02.02)

"There's a grave threat in Iraq. There just is." President Bush (10.02.03)

"There are many dangers in the world; the threat from Iraq stands alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place. President Bush (10.07.02)

"The Iraqi regime is a serious and growing threat to peace." President Bush (10.16.02)

"There is a real threat, in my judgment, a real and dangerous threat to America in the form of Saddam Hussein." President Bush (10.28.02)

"I see a significant threat to the security of the United States in Iraq." President Bush (11.01.02)

"Today the world is...uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq." President Bush (11.01.02)

"The world is also uniting to answer the unique and urgent threat posed by Iraq whose dictator has already used weapons of mass destruction to kill thousands." President Bush (11.23.02)

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ROFL AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. LIES. ALL LIES.

And just how would you know that.

your shaking head emote somehow sugests you know any better. Prove im wrong eh. Go on, do some research.

I would but it involves learning .

and of course you wouldn't be interested in that?

you better wake up smiley faced slave you're like the people who supported the nazis!

Maybe Bush ment a "leak" as in a Welshmen? Too many leaks in Washington! haha. im only playing.

The Bush is a lost soul; bathing in money.

How dare you!!! Attack my fartmonkey minions attack!!!!