QUOTE(Gwyny @ Apr 14 2006, 11:34 AM) [snapback]1147466[/snapback]
YOU my friend have alot to learn...you can violate these laws because they are not fact! Not even gravity is fact....its a theory because nobody can explain anything on earth 100% because the person who made earth doesnt have to explain himself to you...you where the one who was supposed to follow...
First of all, I was never talking about theories to begin with. Sweetie - you are an interesting character. Please don't have any children; I don't want our beautiful planet to be populated by potential failures.
However, that would be mean of me to say. If you have kids, I really hope that they have the necessary logic and intelligence to break away from these values you hold dear, and find their own truths . . . . .
But I digress. So, shall my counter argument begin? Of course.
==================================
1. What I presented are not a set of theories. Go and read the differences between theories, theorems, and axioms.
2. Axioms are absolutes -- you cannot break them in any way, shape, or form.
3. The laws of physics and mathematics proves for the existence of Gravity -- it is quantifiable, and can be empirically proven to exist. God is a thing made of faith -- Faith is something not quantifiable, not empirical, and illogical. God cannot be prove by anything -- he can only be DISPROVEN via the axioms of logic and laws of physics and mathematics which govern our universe.
4. Did I ever say God had to explain himself to me? No. But if he's not going to show himself, why should I believe? Because a book called the "Holy Bible" says that God exists? A book written, inked, bound, printed, mass produced, and distrubuted by other Human Beings. How divine. . . . is that. And don't give your argument of "God inspired him." That's not an argument.
5. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO REFUTE ANYTHING WITHOUT A LOGICAL OR EMPIRICALLY PROVABLE ARGUMENT. Otherwise, it's called "Faith" which cannot be proved, measured, seen, or quantified in any way, shape, or form.
6. Do not use someone else's argument as your own. You don't see me falling and drooling over Steller's points -- I am making my own points based off of logic and reason. You, on the other hand, are giving false scientific points, and doing nothing but agreeing with someone else's ideology in which you find to be similar to your own. Develop some logic and rationality. Your reasoning is so flawed that I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry.