QUOTE(frogfish @ Aug 29 2006, 10:46 PM) [snapback]1327259[/snapback]
"Supernova Remnant E0102, and the bright N76 star forming region in our neighboring Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) galaxy..."
This news group is not the place for this kind of post, but I was elevating an injured left foot, and this is the result.

If you think Sne produce excess amounts of very small grain dust, namely hydrocarbons, think again. The progenitor of Sn E0102 was a 20 solar mass Wolf-Rayett star. It may have shed its outer envelope in high stellar winds. When the core blew, the blast obliterated a sizeable bulk of the local stellar dust which it did form, prior to the supernova.
What it left behind was largely ionized elements like O, Ne, Mg, but curiously, little hydrogen. Type Ia supernovae lack H in their spectrum, for instance, but they are when a white dwarf binary explosion takes out the white dwarf (lack of H).
Hydrogen is found in the residual material of Type II Sne, of progenitor stars mostly larger than 5 solar masses. But, how to account for this apparently large 2000 year old remnant leaving little dust, and little hydrogen? Aren't we told that supernovae from massive and supermassive stars produce dust, as well?
The answer might be a Type Ib, which is when a supermassive Wolf-Rayet star, of 20-25 solar masses, sheds material through intense winds, later followed by a collapse and explosion. In the end, little residual hydrogen remains.
Normally, anything that large will also leave a black hole. The Sn E0102 in the SMC, may have shed enough pre-supernova material from its outer envelope to allow a neutron star to remain after the star collapsed.
If you look at the frequencies where neutron stars can be detected (radio and x-ray), E0102 may appear to have a central bright spot, i.e. neutron star. As well, there may be a black hole, which I illustrated in the in Hubble Telescope image. There may be traces remaining from a Sn driven bi-polar jet.
BTW, the HST image from APOD is west-up. I had to change it to north-up for my comparison images. They show the SMC featuring H-alpha, OIII, and SII; the supernova remnant (SNR) in infrared (where the SNR does not show in 3-8 microns, but apparently does at 24 microns as mostly interstellar medium swept up in the explosion); an images in radio, optical, and x-ray.
The optical images show the SNR is oxygen rich, but not H rich. The HST image does include an H-alpha filter, but none shows up in the SNR. H-alpha is found in the outer layer of the nebula, however, as is natural to that region.
The x-ray image largely shows elemental O, Mg, S, at millions of degrees- not dust. The darker blue material is "blue shifted", and the lighter colored material is from a reverse shock (false color is used in radio, IR, and x-ray images). There are two final x-ray images of remnants with neutron stars. No neutron core is so obvious in E0102.
Perhaps E0102 will produce a pulsar, or a black hole. But, where the dust in galaxies comes from, may not be so much supernovae, but the stellar winds preceeding a supernova; as well as planetary nebulae from red giants.
http://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i287/shunastronomy/SMC1/