Alisa
Apr 23 2006, 11:29 AM
I am looking forward to opinions of what others see within the anomaly of this photo (bottom is enlargement of anomaly).
For clarification (thanks for pointing this out, alchemistic),
I took the photo. I frequently take photos at dusk looking to capture spirits, spirit orbs, fairies, etc. I know this anomaly is not a camera smudge because I took many photos before and after without it appearing. However, this anomaly is of the type that occurs with great frequency in my photos. I see a very specific image within it, but my hope is to find out what others see for comparison.
magik boi
Apr 23 2006, 11:36 AM
soz i perosnalyy think it wos the camera that made that or something it doesnt look very paranormal but that my opionion
alchemistic
Apr 23 2006, 11:52 AM
Who took the picture?
Did you or do you know if they took it because they saw whatever it is, or was it not there while the picture was being taken? Because you or they wanted to get a shot of this thing...
Kind of important questions. Because of what is mentioned above.
If the photographer took the pic of this object, then it isn't the camera.
If it wasn't there while the picture was being taken, then I would agree it was the camers lenz....most likely like a finger print on the lenz
Spunned
Apr 23 2006, 01:07 PM
I gotta be honest with you, I don't think it's something paranormal...
I think it's produced by the camera :/
BellaMorte
Apr 23 2006, 01:14 PM
Where I stare at it for a really long time, i see 2 bulging eyes and a beak like nose or a snout- like a bear or a dog's snout, but I don't think it's paranormal.
Pigmonkey
Apr 23 2006, 03:00 PM
QUOTE(Spunned @ Apr 23 2006, 02:07 PM) [snapback]1160100[/snapback]
I gotta be honest with you, I don't think it's something paranormal...
I think it's produced by the camera :/
gotta agree with thty guy soz
jonb
Apr 23 2006, 05:43 PM
the only thing making up what you might consider to be the inside ofthe anomoly,
Image Noise.. because the camera has boosted the iso sensitivity to get an ok exposure.
if you keep getting this anomoly you may want to try another camera.. different make etc and see if you still get it
MichaelS
Apr 23 2006, 09:15 PM
I'm wary of the authenticity of orb pics in general. Some of the things I have to take into consideration for this particular are as follows;
1. Resolution- The picture is rather grainy- as if done at a low resolution creating a pixelized image. This could create such visual anomalies because it's "focusing" the colours of any light sources correctly.
2. Reference Point- This anomally could be incredibly close to the camera to account for it's size in the picture, or could be the moon behind the tree and a deep layer of cloud cover.
3. Amount of Light- There isn't enough contrast between the anomaly and the rest of the picture to get an accurate idea of it's size, location, illumination, or transparancy.
Sorry, I'm still wary of orb pics.
Lady_Anvilabeel
Apr 23 2006, 09:32 PM
It's shape takes on the form of a bear or large cat
Nadia Blue
Apr 23 2006, 10:25 PM
I think it's either your camera or something wonky in the developing. Since you said your cam often creates anomolies like this, I'll go for the former. It really could be anything, but I seriously doubt it's paranormal.
MichaelS
Apr 23 2006, 10:30 PM
WBS- Are you aware, your profile quote is wishing everyone a happy holiday?
Nadia Blue
Apr 23 2006, 10:37 PM
Woops. Fixing it now.

EDIT: Better?
MichaelS
Apr 23 2006, 10:40 PM
I love it.
exeller
Apr 23 2006, 11:38 PM
Anyone else see an over active imagination ? Any nothing paranormal
MichaelS
Apr 23 2006, 11:40 PM
Well, I did point some factors against it being an actual "orb"...
Nadia Blue
Apr 23 2006, 11:53 PM
Er, me too? Read man, read.
exeller
Apr 24 2006, 12:13 AM
Yup yup yup, I agree, and even though there's nothing paranormal, when you look at the second picture for a long time, it looks like a retarded bear
crouton
Apr 24 2006, 12:54 AM
Looks like a light source behind a cloud of mist to me.
frogfish
Apr 24 2006, 01:05 AM
looks like a smudge, but the bottom does have a resemblance to an animal face..
Like Alisa said, pareidolia
Taka
Apr 24 2006, 01:11 AM
^^^ Wait, does that mean Frogfish actually sees something?

!
...I see Scar, from The Lion King.

As for what could have happened in the picture, could have been anything.
darrenm
Apr 24 2006, 02:54 AM
looking at it i see a wolf or a fox, but then again i used to see faces in the curtains
HazelGreenHaunter
Apr 24 2006, 03:19 AM
If you close ur left eye, squint with ur right, hang up side down, down a beer and swing back and forth.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.it kinda looks like ELVIS in full cape @ the LAS VEGAS ARENA in 56!!!!
artymoon
Apr 24 2006, 03:38 AM
Aurora Borealis?
Nipheliem
Apr 24 2006, 03:56 AM
Actually I don't think the camera did produce it. If you take a good look at the spot in the sky I presume is a star, and if u look at the grass, the three are like the same colors. So obviously it has to be something with color. I assume it could possible be northern lights, or even some kind of reflection.
akiraone
Apr 24 2006, 03:56 AM
Hi Everyone!!
Dear Alisa, in the moment that you titled your post as "pareidolia" you`re assuming that the object photographed is only an illusion! let`s see:
[i]Pareidolia (from Greek para- amiss, faulty, wrong + eidolon, diminutive of eidos appearance, form) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (usually an image) being mistakenly perceived as recognizable. [/i]
Well people, wikipedia has spoken.
Putting together the word "spirit" and the word "pareidolia" in the same sentence, makes that the discussion becomes a little bit vague and ambiguous.
Then we must discuss, in the first place, the idea of "what`s anomalous on a photo", is`nt it?
Later!
Alisa
Apr 24 2006, 10:46 AM
QUOTE(akiraone @ Apr 24 2006, 01:56 PM) [snapback]1161041[/snapback]
Hi Everyone!!
Dear Alisa, in the moment that you titled your post as "pareidolia" you`re assuming that the object photographed is only an illusion! let`s see:
[i]Pareidolia (from Greek para- amiss, faulty, wrong + eidolon, diminutive of eidos appearance, form) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (usually an image) being mistakenly perceived as recognizable. [/i]
Well people, wikipedia has spoken.
Putting together the word "spirit" and the word "pareidolia" in the same sentence, makes that the discussion becomes a little bit vague and ambiguous.
Then we must discuss, in the first place, the idea of "what`s anomalous on a photo", is`nt it?
Later!
I titled this topic "Spirit Pareidolia" based on many previous topics regarding what I view as spirits and others view as pareidolia. While I agree that humans have a strong tendency to see faces and meaning in patterns (pareidolia), what I don't agree with is the assumption that the faces seen are meaningless. I believe face recognition in many instances is intentional spirit manifestation.
What I meant by the title is for others to have a look at the photo and to see what meaning they make of the anomaly whether they consider the image they see a coincidence within a meaningless pattern, or whether they consider the image they see as a spirit manifestation.
I should have made it clearer. Sorry.
captain pish
Apr 24 2006, 06:12 PM
Looks like the moon or moonlight filtering throught the clouds. Its anything but paranormal. Why do people constantly post anything they see on a photo as paranormal. I mean it doesnt even look like anything. No body no head just a blur! Terrible excuse for a post and a very good imaginnation.
NME_locus
Apr 24 2006, 06:21 PM
QUOTE(alchemistic @ Apr 23 2006, 11:52 AM) [snapback]1160053[/snapback]
Who took the picture?
Did you or do you know if they took it because they saw whatever it is, or was it not there while the picture was being taken? Because you or they wanted to get a shot of this thing...
Kind of important questions. Because of what is mentioned above.
If the photographer took the pic of this object, then it isn't the camera.
If it wasn't there while the picture was being taken, then I would agree it was the camers lenz....most likely like a finger print on the lenz
Good photo Alisa, but I have to agree with Alchemistic. Also, you metioned seeing an interesting pattern in the anomoly. But how is that so if the tree in front of it is manipulating the image. With if some of the branches blending in with the anomoly is what's creating the 2 demensinal image that you see?
Ichigo
Apr 24 2006, 06:23 PM
To me it looks like a head of a bear or a lion but doesnt look something paranormal
Alisa
Apr 25 2006, 05:41 AM
Below is the photo taken just prior to the one I have posted for this topic.
The grimacing face is just one example of the spirits I see in this photo. My hope was to explain how I am approaching my photographs which in turn might make it easier to base your analysis. This photo shows where the moon was, other types of anomalies that showed up, and orbs of varying brighteness and densities. The night sky is, in my observation and opinion, chockfull of spirits/entities that anyone can photograph if they wish. Learning to use a good photo program is an important tool in seeing and analyzing what is captured.
I find taking and analyzing evening photos to be really enjoyable. As always, I am happy to look over anyone's photos if you want my help, suggestions, or point of view.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.