Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: a great bigfoot sighting
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Cryptozoology, Myths and Legends
aliennobasoure
http://www.gcbro.com/CAhumb001.html



i am amazed at this report im am also strangly deppresed becouse the way the guy described the "creature" it makes me realize how how misunderstould(sp?) bigfoot\bigfeet are, this is the only bigfoot report i've ever read that made me want to be in the witnesses place it makes my heart burst! *sniff* crying.gif





alien original.gif
Pilgrim_Shadow
QUOTE(aliennobasoure @ Apr 24 2006, 05:13 PM) [snapback]1161912[/snapback]

http://www.gcbro.com/CAhumb001.html
i am amazed at this report im am also strangly deppresed becouse the way the guy described the "creature" it makes me realize how how misunderstould(sp?) bigfoot\bigfeet are, this is the only bigfoot report i've ever read that made me want to be in the witnesses place it makes my heart burst! *sniff* crying.gif
alien original.gif


I remain unimpressed. The website requires only a minimum of contact information (name and email) and the follow-up appears to have consisted of little more than emailing the witness. There is no way whatsoever that any report collected in such a way could be verified. This could be a genuine bigfoot sighting, or it could be a case of misidentification, or it could be a hoax. Given how easy it would be to perpetrate such a hoax, I should think that this account cannot be considered reliable.

Further complicating matters is the fact that the date shown is the date of the encounter, not the date of the submission. If this was in fact submitted only recently, then it was already 20 years old at the time of writting. Memories that old are highly unreliable. I know that in my own experience I have confused dreams with real events and real events with dreams when dealing with things that happened that long ago. Thus, even if the witness is sincere, they may still be mistaken about the whole thing.

All in all, this account is too questionable to have much weight.

-Pilgrim
Master Sage
Huh, well, I dunno, that quail blew the thing out of the water 4 me.
Piney

The fact that the report itself was submitted by Mary Green ( who I know) gives me doubt to the credibility of it. Mary is very "imaginative" and she has made a fool of herself on more than one occasion.

Lapi'che
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(Piney @ Apr 25 2006, 01:08 AM) [snapback]1162129[/snapback]

The fact that the report itself was submitted by Mary Green ( who I know) gives me doubt to the credibility of it. Mary is very "imaginative" and she has made a fool of herself on more than one occasion.

Lapi'che



Credibility is in the eyes of the beholder. As is what is perceivable as being "imaginative". How well do you know her?
This report is quite credible on many levels. One, description of features, skin coloring, behavior...especially the quail part, contrary to what the previous poster has stated.
I research these beings and have had many contacts with them as they live on my property.
Submission by Mary does not imply that the story itself is not credible. Mary lost credibility for backing Jan Carter's story, and it's a sad sad thing too that she lost credibility considering the fact that Jan's story is 100% true because her story correlates with what I know about these beings.
Just because things Mary observes are contrary to the general notions of what a sasquatch should behave like does not imply that Mary is either imaginative or lacking credibility. She is very respected by many researchers, and her credibility still considered untarnished.

To first poster...I agree, it was a touching story.
Vold
It's a classic cliché sighting isn't it?

One glance at the site, it's colours and layout is not going to make me believe in it any better. The man goes into much detail. If *you* had really been that scared, you wouldn't remember a damn thing.
SLGena
It's a Mary Green report. Runnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn!
Piney
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 25 2006, 04:11 PM) [snapback]1163302[/snapback]

Credibility is in the eyes of the beholder. As is what is perceivable as being "imaginative". How well do you know her?
Submission by Mary does not imply that the story itself is not credible.
Just because things Mary observes are contrary to the general notions of what a sasquatch should behave like does not imply that Mary is either imaginative or lacking credibility. She is very respected by many researchers, and her credibility still considered untarnished.


Like with that ball of regurgitated cow cud she was trying to pass off as a "Bigfoot ball"...................... huh.gif

Lapi'che

Edit: ....and that spaz out she did on the GCBRO in the Bigfoot forums and on Paltalk. I pictured her buddy Dallas Gilbert huddled in the corner one night..................
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(Piney @ Apr 26 2006, 01:43 AM) [snapback]1163674[/snapback]

Like with that ball of regurgitated cow cud she was trying to pass off as a "Bigfoot ball"...................... huh.gif

Lapi'che

Edit: ....and that spaz out she did on the GCBRO in the Bigfoot forums and on Paltalk. I pictured her buddy Dallas Gilbert huddled in the corner one night..................



Did you do an analysis on the ball to see what its contents contained? Hmmm...probably not, therefore you're speculating. I'll email her and ask her what it contained. Or I'll contact Igor or Jan. Maybe Henner would know, or Will Duncan. I'm sure someone analyzed it. Oh...but wait...sasquatch can't possibly have children that like to play, so I guess there's not any use in bothering, right? Huh.

I didn't see her spaz out on BFF, but given the ridiculous pack mentality and arrogance, and narrow minded childish behavior displayed in that particular setting, I don't blame her one bit if she did. I would get a little irrate if I wasted my time in there with a group of armchair researchers too.
truth seeker
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 26 2006, 09:39 AM) [snapback]1164279[/snapback]

I didn't see her spaz out on BFF, but given the ridiculous pack mentality and arrogance, and narrow minded childish behavior displayed in that particular setting, I don't blame her one bit if she did. I would get a little irrate if I wasted my time in there with a group of armchair researchers too.

By ridiculous pack mentality and arrogance you mean what showing some common sense and being in touch with reality by questioning claims that bigfoot is a telephatic, garlic eating, rapeist creature that pees blue and speaks or was it when they questioned some the assumptions made in the book like the part were it's assumed the China was definetly taken by bigfoot and placed outside in the woods and not by the childern. So your definition of childish behavior is questioning fanatsy stories about bigfoot.
Dennison
Eyewitness reports only give so much. If there were a video or something, you might have caught my attention.
truth seeker
QUOTE(Dennison @ Apr 26 2006, 01:45 PM) [snapback]1164630[/snapback]

Eyewitness reports only give so much. If there were a video or something, you might have caught my attention.

The reason Mary gave that they supposedly haven't been able to get a video or a picture of it is because there telepathic power enable them to read the people in areas minds so they know where the cameras are.
BigfootForever
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 25 2006, 04:11 PM) [snapback]1163302[/snapback]

Credibility is in the eyes of the beholder. As is what is perceivable as being "imaginative". How well do you know her?
This report is quite credible on many levels. One, description of features, skin coloring, behavior...especially the quail part, contrary to what the previous poster has stated.
I research these beings and have had many contacts with them as they live on my property.
Submission by Mary does not imply that the story itself is not credible. Mary lost credibility for backing Jan Carter's story, and it's a sad sad thing too that she lost credibility considering the fact that Jan's story is 100% true because her story correlates with what I know about these beings.
Just because things Mary observes are contrary to the general notions of what a sasquatch should behave like does not imply that Mary is either imaginative or lacking credibility. She is very respected by many researchers, and her credibility still considered untarnished.

To first poster...I agree, it was a touching story.

jan carter the one on that national geographic is it real episode? the one that claims she talks to bigfoot and they ask for garlic? are you freaking kidding me? this is the kind of crap that makes people think bigfoot is just a dumb fairy tale. As someone who really believes in it, believe it is real, her and her stories are sad and disgusting.

QUOTE(truth seeker @ Apr 26 2006, 02:07 PM) [snapback]1164666[/snapback]

The reason Mary gave that they supposedly haven't been able to get a video or a picture of it is because there telepathic power enable them to read the people in areas minds so they know where the cameras are.

sad.
ancondatm
QUOTE(BigfootForever @ Apr 26 2006, 04:34 PM) [snapback]1164843[/snapback]

jan carter the one on that national geographic is it real episode? the one that claims she talks to bigfoot and they ask for garlic? are you freaking kidding me? this is the kind of crap that makes people think bigfoot is just a dumb fairy tale. As someone who really believes in it, believe it is real, her and her stories are sad and disgusting.
sad.



... think sasquatchs smell because they've had too much garlic?

I think we're onto something here grin2.gif
BigfootForever
QUOTE(ancondatm @ Apr 26 2006, 05:04 PM) [snapback]1164873[/snapback]

... think sasquatchs smell because they've had too much garlic?

I think we're onto something here grin2.gif

yeah, its just so stupid, and the sad part is there are people even on here that believe that lunatic.
truth seeker
BigfootForever don't forget the con job that is Carter Farm Habitation project were they ask people to give them money to bigfoot in garlic.
Bigfoot_Is_Real
well we know Bigfoots can be attacked by Vampires if this is true lol laugh.gif
Piney
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 26 2006, 09:39 AM) [snapback]1164279[/snapback]

Did you do an analysis on the ball to see what its contents contained? Hmmm...probably not, therefore you're speculating. I'll email her and ask her what it contained. Or I'll contact Igor or Jan. Maybe Henner would know, or Will Duncan. I'm sure someone analyzed it. Oh...but wait...sasquatch can't possibly have children that like to play, so I guess there's not any use in bothering, right? Huh.


When you have cows near cedar or cypress swamps they chew the bark on the trees. They keep regurgitating this bark (or make "cud" of it) because they can't digest it into the next stomach then they spit it out in balls. Our milking cow pen bordered a cedar swamp and we had those stupid balls all over. Gimme a break laugh.gif I have yet to see Bigfoot playing with one. Oh! for that matter I live right on the border of Bear Swamp. Which is Pine Barrens Bigfoot Heaven. I haven't had one yet ask for a cup of garlic or a can of beer........

Lapi'che wacko.gif
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(truth seeker @ Apr 26 2006, 05:33 PM) [snapback]1164521[/snapback]

By ridiculous pack mentality and arrogance you mean what showing some common sense and being in touch with reality by questioning claims that bigfoot is a telephatic, garlic eating, rapeist creature that pees blue and speaks or was it when they questioned some the assumptions made in the book like the part were it's assumed the China was definetly taken by bigfoot and placed outside in the woods and not by the childern. So your definition of childish behavior is questioning fanatsy stories about bigfoot.


No, I mean in general, really. I've been in there and have observed people attacking in groups others who dared to touch any subject that was remotely different or new.
I've not actually read Jan's book yet, but I've spoken to both women. The only part of what you say that makes me pause is blue pee and it's possible there may be a reason for it, who knows. As I don't know what was mentioned in the book I won't speculate. As for the rest, entirely believable. And there are photos taken, and recordings of Fox talking made that weren't released to the public. You can't prove any of it didn't occur, and there are many eyewitnesses who have not only seen them, but heard them talk. I've heard mine talk, but they were far enough away I couldn't make out words. So, that's not beyond belief. As for telepathy, some people are more sensitive to such things than others, so go learn about telepathy before you judge too harshly. I do know that there was alot left out of that book that could probably explain some of the questions.
BigfootForever
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 27 2006, 05:51 PM) [snapback]1166267[/snapback]

No, I mean in general, really. I've been in there and have observed people attacking in groups others who dared to touch any subject that was remotely different or new.
I've not actually read Jan's book yet, but I've spoken to both women. The only part of what you say that makes me pause is blue pee and it's possible there may be a reason for it, who knows. As I don't know what was mentioned in the book I won't speculate. As for the rest, entirely believable. And there are photos taken, and recordings of Fox talking made that weren't released to the public. You can't prove any of it didn't occur, and there are many eyewitnesses who have not only seen them, but heard them talk. I've heard mine talk, but they were far enough away I couldn't make out words. So, that's not beyond belief. As for telepathy, some people are more sensitive to such things than others, so go learn about telepathy before you judge too harshly. I do know that there was alot left out of that book that could probably explain some of the questions.

you are saying that you have a bigfoot? it is not yours even if by some miracle you were not making this crap up because anyone who believes this lunatics story is crazy. bigfoots do not go around asking for garlic, just even believing this for a second makes you lose all credibility, just total craziness.
Piney
QUOTE(BigfootForever @ Apr 27 2006, 08:03 PM) [snapback]1166422[/snapback]

bigfoots do not go around asking for garlic


LMAO w00t.gif But Mary Green said he had worms....................


Lapi'che
Bigfoot_Is_Real
wacko.gif <---Mary Green

Well if bigfoots do go asking for garlic why don't we dump a huge load of it in New York city They should come and they'll be plenty of people to see it rolleyes.gif
indeed
QUOTE(Piney @ Apr 28 2006, 10:08 AM) [snapback]1166429[/snapback]

LMAO w00t.gif But Mary Green said he had worms....................
Lapi'che


That might explain the blue pee w00t.gif

All I can say is after 10 years of them living in her barn, not one hair or physical trace. Not one pic or video shown nothing but stories.

I don't know who's worse Mary, Janice or the people that believe them rolleyes.gif
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(BigfootForever @ Apr 28 2006, 01:03 AM) [snapback]1166422[/snapback]

you are saying that you have a bigfoot? it is not yours even if by some miracle you were not making this crap up because anyone who believes this lunatics story is crazy. bigfoots do not go around asking for garlic, just even believing this for a second makes you lose all credibility, just total craziness.



I am saying that I habituate a large group, yes. As for garlic, they've not accepted any I've left out so far, either in mince or raw form.
When I say they're "mine" I don't mean in a possessive nature, BIR...I mean it as if I were referring to my neighbors or classmates. My neighbors, my classmates, my bigfoot. Get it? Of course I don't own them, good lands! I would never deign to try to capture one or harm one of them...I am on THEIR land. You know what...I believe Jan, and if simply believing something means others don't believe the reality of my experiences, then that's tough. I'm not Jan, I can't sit in here and defend every statement against her, but I can honestly say she's a genuine person with a good heart and I like her. Same for Mary.
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(indeed @ Apr 28 2006, 04:32 AM) [snapback]1166607[/snapback]

That might explain the blue pee w00t.gif

All I can say is after 10 years of them living in her barn, not one hair or physical trace. Not one pic or video shown nothing but stories.

I don't know who's worse Mary, Janice or the people that believe them rolleyes.gif



For one, there have been, from that farm, more hair samples obtained than from any other Sasquatch site to date...that and scat, and there were found also bedding areas, and so forth, along with other witnesses as well. Jan's sister, her ex, her uncle, neighbors, and so on. I think you are not very informed on the case. I do know that Jan and her family HAVE tried to photograph many times, and film. But you don't take into account that much activity with these guys happens at night, happens with great speed, or a camera/camcorder isn't readily handy during these close encounters, see? You don't understand the speed in which they can move, how they blend into the shadows, how very close one can be and you can't find them. I've had that happen to me too. Jan has a recording of Fox speaking though. Jan has alot more in the way of proof than any of you could ever offer up, myself included and I've been at it for a while. I have hair samples too, and they are also being analyzed. I have a new sample that has yet to be sent as well. You all should be out there researching in the field, instead of criticizing what you don't know about.
truth seeker
They move to fast to get picture of them how convinent for you and others who like to make similar wild claims AdvocateCR. Although even if we did believe you on there speed 50 years though her family has been interacting with them and for quite a few of those they had been returning to the same spot because that's where they're leaving food for them it's a very long time not to have any hard proof.
Acouple of questionable hair and scatt samples which really isn't anything given the amount of time she claims to have spent with them.
Althought no one should really be surprised it's just same as with all of you self proclaimed field researchers you talk real big about all the work you do out in field but have no proof to back it up. Anyone who has had half the encouters you have claimed, remember in one of the other threads on this board guys Advocate claimed to have gotten a blood sample but yet your unable produce one decent picture of it.
AdvocateCR
QUOTE(truth seeker @ Apr 28 2006, 07:18 PM) [snapback]1167165[/snapback]

They move to fast to get picture of them how convinent for you and others who like to make similar wild claims AdvocateCR. Although even if we did believe you on there speed 50 years though her family has been interacting with them and for quite a few of those they had been returning to the same spot because that's where they're leaving food for them it's a very long time not to have any hard proof.
Acouple of questionable hair and scatt samples which really isn't anything given the amount of time she claims to have spent with them.
Althought no one should really be surprised it's just same as with all of you self proclaimed field researchers you talk real big about all the work you do out in field but have no proof to back it up. Anyone who has had half the encouters you have claimed, remember in one of the other threads on this board guys Advocate claimed to have gotten a blood sample but yet your unable produce one decent picture of it.



Why don't YOU go out there and gather a bunch of proof if it's SO easy. You sure like to put in your two cents but you obviously have no desire to try to find proof yourself. Talk to any researcher out there and you ask them how easy it is to get proof. And, I didn't claim to have a blood sample. I sited an instance of someone getting one and sending it in. The results came back unknown primate. If you're going to quote, do it right.
One: hair samples cannot produce DNA if the "root" isn't present, which with them it isn't, just like our blonde hair.
Two: unless scat is fresh, it's useless
Three: YOU try cutting a Sasquatch to get a blood sample and see just how long you last before they thrash you. Sheesh...
Four: You try getting a photo of them, at night, in the brush, on the move.
Five: You try getting a photo of them (even in a regular spot) where they're out in the open enough, don't see you coming with your aiming camera FIRST.

Even people who have been putting up tons of surveillance equipment and game cams for YEARS have the same problem. The Sas know where the stuff is and avoid it like the plague. Or if a shot is managed, it's too blurry to be anything but a blobsquatch anyway.

It's not that easy, so stop knocking it until you try it.
Bigfoot_Is_Real
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 28 2006, 08:00 AM) [snapback]1166889[/snapback]

I am saying that I habituate a large group, yes. As for garlic, they've not accepted any I've left out so far, either in mince or raw form.
When I say they're "mine" I don't mean in a possessive nature, BIR...I mean it as if I were referring to my neighbors or classmates. My neighbors, my classmates, my bigfoot. Get it? Of course I don't own them, good lands! I would never deign to try to capture one or harm one of them...I am on THEIR land. You know what...I believe Jan, and if simply believing something means others don't believe the reality of my experiences, then that's tough. I'm not Jan, I can't sit in here and defend every statement against her, but I can honestly say she's a genuine person with a good heart and I like her. Same for Mary.


I never said that we call bigfootforever BFR
MadEyePixie
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 28 2006, 09:00 AM) [snapback]1166889[/snapback]

I am saying that I habituate a large group, yes.


And Nessie vacations in my swimming pool when she feels like taking a holiday.
indeed
QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ Apr 28 2006, 11:23 PM) [snapback]1166901[/snapback]

For one, there have been, from that farm, more hair samples obtained than from any other Sasquatch site to date...that and scat



Please show just 1 case that has been sent to an independant scientist thumbsup.gif

QUOTE
You all should be out there researching in the field, instead of criticizing what you don't know about.


You assume I dont ? sleepy.gif


Keep up the stories er I mean good work thumbsup.gif
ivytheplant
If bigfoot really is a connoisseur of Allium sativum, then why in the world would he bother with garlic left out in bowls on someone's back porch? The areas he's been sighted in have garlic growing rampantly wild. All he'd have to do is take two steps in the forest and find himself some munchies.

I'm more glad than ever that I stay as far away from garlic as I can. It's bad enough having telemarketers calling all the time, but the last thing I need is bigfoot coming over and asking to borrow a cup of garlic.
Bigfoot_Is_Real
lol laugh.gif
Piney
QUOTE(indeed @ Apr 27 2006, 11:32 PM) [snapback]1166607[/snapback]

I don't know who's worse Mary, Janice or the people that believe them rolleyes.gif


w00t.gif Hey now! That's two of your favorite people, bushman.......................


Lapi'che
wolfspirit
Hello Friends:

I belive there is a bigfoot out there, but this
story I don't know it give me the feeling that
is carefuly prepared and may not be factual. unsure.gif
Touch of Evil
Blah, it's just another bigfoot sighting to me.. nothing new.

Like Wolfspirit said.. There is a bigfoot out there but this sighting is a little untrue sounding, it gives me the feeling it's been put together.
isis-999
It well wrote...but no more so then many other's i have read...I fear it prove's nothing... hmm.gif
Piney
QUOTE(wolfspirit @ Apr 30 2006, 03:26 AM) [snapback]1168837[/snapback]

Hello Friends:

I belive there is a bigfoot out there, but this
story I don't know it give me the feeling that
is carefuly prepared and may not be factual. unsure.gif


........which is what Mary Green is notorious for. hmm.gif


Lapi'che
BigfootForever
QUOTE(Bigfoot_Is_Real @ Apr 28 2006, 10:07 PM) [snapback]1167590[/snapback]

I never said that we call bigfootforever BFR

thank you, and really, anyone who believes this Jan Carter garbage is a disgrace to the intelligent, thats all there is to it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.