i can not tell you what this other information is as i have been bound to secrecy.
[right][snapback]559415[/snapback][/right]

Future Man kind built the Pyramids, they traveled back in time. the pyramids hold information for man kind to evolve faster. the reason the pyramids are so advanced is that so mankind will not be able to get this information until our technology is ready to use it. the pyramids hold other vital information on how to prepare us for what lyes ahead, i can not tell you what this other information is as i have been bound to secrecy.
[right][snapback]559415[/snapback][/right]

I voted YES. Because it is possible that there once were big humanoids, likte there were Neaderthals.

Odin S. :s9
[right][snapback]10211[/snapback][/right]

Hello
 
  This is my first post on these fourms, but this is something I have a pretty strong feeling about.  Oh, yeah I've been one of the lurkers peeking in everyday for awhile.  But, yes yes, I tool the plunge and registered lol. Anyway back to the topic at hand.

Now this is how I think this all happened.  There was a water/vapor/ice shell around the earth for the first part of the earths life, that not only allowed for larger humans, explains how Dino's could breath as well.  Most dino's didn't have very large nostrils, about the size of a horse if I remember right, so there had to be something that allowed them to get the oxygen they needed to live.  Well the w/v/i shell would have done this and more. 

The w/v/i shell would have increased the atmospheric pressure maybe upto 2x what it is today, that would have made it much easer to not only breath, but it has many many other good side effects as well.  Some of these would have been growth. 

You would live longer, some parts of your body very stop growing till you die.  If you live to be 300,700, or 900 years old, you could get pretty big.  Think about the bugs that breath through their skin.  Alot more oxygen would have been forced into there blood stream and they two could have lived longer.  Imagen seeing a dragonfly with 10' wing span or beetles 2 feet long.  well if you where 13' tall it kinda keeps things in prospetive i guess

anyway I wont bore you any longer, just wanted to jump on and post a few words real quick.
[right][snapback]559677[/snapback][/right]

MEXICO's GIANTS

In 1944 an accidental discovery of an even more controversial nature was made by Waldemar Julsrud at Acambaro, Mexico. Acambaro is in the state of Guanajuato, 175 miles northwest of Mexico City. The strange archaeological site there yielded over 33,500 objects of ceramic;stone, including jade; and knives of obsidian (sharper than steel and still used today in heart surgery). Jalsrud, a prominent local German merchant, also found statues ranging from less than an inch to six feet in length depicting great reptiles, some of them in ACTIVE ASSOCIATION with humans - generally eating them, but in some bizarre statuettes an erotic association was indicated. To observers many of these creatures resembled dinosaurs. Jalsrud crammed this collection into twelve rooms of his expanded house. There startling representations of Negroes, Orientals, and bearded Caucasians were included as were motifs of Egyptians, Sumerian and other ancient non-hemispheric civilizations, as well as portrayals of Bigfoot and aquatic monsterlike creatures, weird human-animal mixtures, and a host of other inexplicable creations. Teeth from an extinct Ice Age horse, the skeleton of a mammoth, and a number of human skulls were found at the same site as the ceramic artefacts.

Radio-carbon dating in the laboratories of the University of Pennsylvania and additional tests using the thermoluminescence method of dating pottery were performed to determine the age of the objects. Results indicated the objects were made about 6,500 years ago, around 4,500 BC. A team of experts at another university, shown Jalrud's half-dozen samples but unaware of their origin, ruled out the possibility that they could have been modern reproductions. However, they fell silent when told of their controversial source. In 1952, in an effort to debunk this weird collection which was gaining a certain amount of fame, American archaeologist Charles C. DiPeso claimed to have minutely examined the then 32,000 pieces within not more than four hours spent at the home of Julsrud. In a forthcoming book, long delayed by continuing developments in his investigation, archaeological investigator John H. Tierney, who has lectured on the case for decades, points out that to have done that DiPeso would have had to have inspected 133 pieces per minute steadily for four hours, whereas in actuality, it would have required weeks merely to have separated the massive jumble of exhibits and arranged them properly for a valid evaluation. Tierney, who collaborated with the later Professor Hapgood, the late William N. Russell, and others in the investigation, charges that the Smithsonian Institution and other archaeological authorities conducted a campaign of disinformation against the discoveries. The Smithsonian had, early in the controversy, dismissed the entire Acambaro collection as an elaborate hoax. Also, utilizing the Freedom of Information Act, Tierney discovered that practically the entirety of the Smithsonian's Julsrud case files are missing. After two expeditions to the site in 1955 and 1968, Professor Charles Hapgood, a professor of history and anthropology at the University of New Hampshire, recorded the results of his 18-year investigation of Acambaro in a privately printed book entitled MYSTERY IN ACAMBARO. Hapgood was initially an open-minded skeptic concerning the collection but became a believer after his first visit in 1955, at which time he witnessed some of the figures being excavated and even dictated to the diggers where he wanted them to dig.

Adding to the mind-boggling aspects of this controversy is the fact that the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, through the late Director of PreHispanic Monuments, Dr. Eduardo Noguera, (who, as head of an official investigating team at the site, issued a report which Tierney will be publishing), admitted "the apparent scientific legality with which these objects were found." Despite evidence of their own eyes, however, officials declared that because of the objects 'fantastic' nature, they had to have been a hoax played on Julsrud!

A disappointed but ever-hopeful Julsrud died. His house was sold and the collection put in storage. The collection is not currently open to the public

source http://www.burlingtonnews.net/giantsmexico.html
[right][snapback]563304[/snapback][/right]

http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-acambaro...srud-museum.htm
site with hundreds of photos
its cool
[right][snapback]564709[/snapback][/right]

http://ancientamerican.com/article28p1.htm

This is a very intresting story....

Its not the first time I read about Giant Skeletons found.
Personnaly I think that it is possible..... why not.
[right][snapback]10209[/snapback][/right]

Sweet Brigid, that looks so fake. I've studied historical linguistics and structural linguistics as a hobby for years. When I looked at the plates, I kept thinking of what I read on cuneiform, and how to spot forgeries. It doesn't follow the normal guidelines of cuneiform. It doesn't follow the guidelines of metal etchings. It doesn't follow the guidelines of "special text". It looks like someone did it in his garage with an etcher after reading a few books on Babylonian. Where is all the data and photos consistent with a good archaeological expedition?

Not even a good hoax.
[right][snapback]568534[/snapback][/right]