QUOTE(AdvocateCR @ May 2 2006, 04:01 PM) [snapback]1171523[/snapback]
And further more, because YOU don't want to research it, and just insult it, then I'll research each condition, providing the required links and articles. Not only that but my kid has an appointment with a urologist as a followup to his circ, and I'll ask him too just how common it is. AND I'll ask a zoologist about it too about how common it is in primates. If you want to provide some REAL material that supports your refuting arguments about my own research results, I'd really like to see it. I'm sure as seen as you are in the medical profession or whatnot that you can supply it.
Well, here you go folks...my research.
And as a side note to the BFF groupies on here, at least I get out of my chair, get in the woods no matter the weather, and expose myself to real field research and keep an open mind while out there. Did you guys even bother to read Jan's book, or are you borrowing others' opinions? There are no gods out there on this subject. You are neither 100% right about BF and neither am I, but at least I work very hard to prove what I believe, and if I feel the need to disprove something I work equally hard to do so. Either way, comments of the blue urine were taken out of text and mis-stated, but I researched it anyway to see if there was something to it. Try getting out of BFF and looking at other research sites and forums to broaden your view some. Get all perspectives instead of just that of a particular group. I've been to BFF, and also on pro-kill sights, and mixed. I get the spectrum and you'd be surprised at how much information you can gather by doing this as well as going into the field. Think of it as supplimental. I know alot of you think I'm being hateful and so forth, you're right, I am because I'm a little sick and tired of people berating me and putting me down for something EVEN when I supply links and decent arguments for my points without them having anything to back their caustic remarks. Sure, if someone said, "oh, but I have other information that refutes this, here is my link, and the article done by so and so professional, and here is yet another and another" I think I could really accept that, but to have someone act like they have in here is just insulting. Why would I not be irritated? I've now submitted how many links? Nine in this post alone. How many have the hecklers provided? NONE. AND they said I didn't know how to research either, yet they don't take into account what I've provided for them to refute one point. It's ridiculous.
http://journals.endocrinology.org/joe/165/.../joe1650173.htmhttp://batzerlab.lsu.edu/Publications/Dein...0Metabolism.pdf(Indicates that Familial Hypercalcemia can also be present in primates. Please refer to first bold paragraph)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.f...8&dopt=Abstract(and in mice)
http://www.diaglab.vet.cornell.edu/clinpat...em/hypercal.htm(and in various animals)
Therefore, this genetic disorder can be in humans and animals. My initial argument did not indicate I think the Sas are human, however I do. BUT…I am pointing out that Familial Hypercalcemia is not a “human-exclusive” disorder. Now, let’s move on to the next disorder, Indicanuria AKA Blue Diaper Syndrome (BDS)
http://www.emedicine.com/derm/topic713.htmI remark about frequency, by quoting the article:
• In the US: Levy et al found that the incidence of Hartnup disease in Massachusetts is 1 case per 14,219 births, approximately the same incidence as that of phenylketonuria.
• Internationally: Hartnup defect, with an overall prevalence of 1 case per 24,000 population (range, 1 case per 18,000-42,000 population), ranks among the most common amino acid disorders in humans.
http://www.oldandsold.com/articles17/colon-17.shtml(Indicates that urine will be blue during testing by mixing it with other things…thus probably the reason it was called Indicanuria for the indigo color. So, this would not indicate blue urine, but a urine test that showed blue as denoting excessive toxicity). Now, on to the next one, a bacterial subject called Pseudomonas.
http://medic.med.uth.tmc.edu/path/00001519.htmhttp://www.cehs.siu.edu/fix/medmicro/pseud.htmhttp://textbookofbacteriology.net/Pseudomonas.etc.html(also found in animals, plants, and humans)