Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Sucuriju Gigante, original photo!
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Cryptozoology, Myths and Legends
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
the14u2cee
QUOTE(psyche101 @ May 18 2006, 06:17 PM) [snapback]1195394[/snapback]

How long is you opinion?

Some in the thread have claimed 100 feet!! Some 50 and some 40. I think that is half the arguing in this thread, so many views have been put forward that it can get confusing working out what exactly is being disputed.


Over 50' to me is absurd, right at 40' or a bit under i can see, that's all i have been saying, but myself and other's get ridiculed because science doesn't agree with such a snake.

I really don't think me or aroces will run anybody away, this forum is for discussing thing's that could be or might if's and allot of UM topic's are outrageous and some make me laugh historically but there is nobody in hear that would make me leave because they don't see things the way i do.
AROCES
The bigger the more it is not possible. My point has always been we can't really know how big ANY species can get. We can calculate but does not make it a fact.
the14u2cee
QUOTE(rapid7 @ May 18 2006, 06:22 PM) [snapback]1195402[/snapback]

Actually Yes, he could spring wings. It could just happen. Also there is an infinite amount of possible scenarios why this could happen.

‘Anything is possible’ is a true yet abused statement, which really needs its side cousin ‘but is it probable?’

Good old Probability.

The chances of him just sprouting wings are extremely low, yet still possible.

I understand why people find the statement ‘anything is possible’ annoying but it’s kinda used as a antidote to ‘Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence’ made by the late great Carl Sagan. Although a true statement, I feel it has been abused to the point of creating a dogmatic scientific approach which can actually lead to a kind of static ignorance.


Carl Sagan is on my shelf a couple time's,
psyche101
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 11:03 AM) [snapback]1195366[/snapback]

Sure, I'm listening. But don't get upset again if I find something questionable.



Question away, ask away. Don't telll someone what they study is wrong and they are probably lying about it and their level of study.
If you can dispute a fact, please provide links, proof, etc. Should you provide hard evidence, I will be your first supporter. yes.gif

What we have been presented with is not so questionable. We were provided with likely maximum length of any snake species. Your view contradicts the facts provided. That is all. No ridiculous hard to believe stories have been presented. This argument ihas become opinion vs fact. Sorry, fact is the heavyweight here.
robbieb
we KNOW that ball pythons get at a maxium of 6 feet whic is the longest one ever recorded. we know how much an elephant can weigh. u make science seem so off the wall. u get real science confused with fake ones like cryptozoology. heres an idea for u maby ud learn something if u stoped listneing to rich boys who uses there daddies money ot go look for big foot for the summer. or people in the back woods who are to stupid to realise there coyotes out there that howl the exact same way ther suppsoed bigfoot howls. or that things getting smacked together in the woods is not anything new bucks rut and makes banging sounds bear knock over trees. this stuff happens. i have never seen any evidence that made me think hmm maby bigfoot is real or hmm maby nessie is real.
AROCES
QUOTE(psyche101 @ May 19 2006, 01:31 AM) [snapback]1195420[/snapback]

Question away, ask away. Don't telll someone what they study is wrong and they are probably lying about it and their level of study.
If you can dispute a fact, please provide links, proof, etc. Should you provide hard evidence, I will be your first supporter. yes.gif

What we have been presented with is not so questionable. We were provided with likely maximum length of any snake species. Your view contradicts the facts provided. That is all. No ridiculous hard to believe stories have been presented. This argument ihas become opinion vs fact. Sorry, fact is the heavyweight here.


- Did you even look back what the debate is really? One side said 40 foot snake impossible because of facts? Like calculation and studies how heavy and big it will get, right?
- Now is calculation based on facts a fact? No right? It is still a calculation and we won't know until an actual species is there and we can see that the calculation is correct and it does dies when it reach 40 feet.
So my conclusion is we don't really know.
the14u2cee
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 18 2006, 06:34 PM) [snapback]1195422[/snapback]

we KNOW that ball pythons get at a maxium of 6 feet whic is the longest one ever recorded. we know how much an elephant can weigh. u make science seem so off the wall. u get real science confused with fake ones like cryptozoology. heres an idea for u maby ud learn something if u stoped listneing to rich boys who uses there daddies money ot go look for big foot for the summer. or people in the back woods who are to stupid to realise there coyotes out there that howl the exact same way ther suppsoed bigfoot howls. or that things getting smacked together in the woods is not anything new bucks rut and makes banging sounds bear knock over trees. this stuff happens. i have never seen any evidence that made me think hmm maby bigfoot is real or hmm maby nessie is real.


See, i agree with you, BUT, why is it that Science need's a body for real evidence? i know that anyone can fake a picture and even a film, and it sad that i don't have Daddy's money because i would be one of the first Idiots in line to help look. Does that make me stupid? or should i get black balled because i would like to try and prove one way or the other? because if You were in charge of UM then 99.9% of the people that post topic's on here would be banned and kicked off.

Its called UNEXPLAINED MYSTERIES for a reason not EXPLAINED FACTS AND PROVEN SCIENTIFIC THEORYS. thumbsup.gif
robbieb
haha exactly its unexplained mysteries not debunked nonsence
the14u2cee
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 18 2006, 06:52 PM) [snapback]1195442[/snapback]

haha exactly its unexplained mysteries not debunked nonsence


robbieb, what do you think the Holy Grail is?
robbieb
irevalant to the topic at hand now isnt and im jewish
the14u2cee
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 18 2006, 07:00 PM) [snapback]1195455[/snapback]

irevalant to the topic at hand now isnt and im jewish


I respect that. You said that you have some view's on Religion, i was just asking.
psyche101
QUOTE(the14u2cee @ May 19 2006, 11:22 AM) [snapback]1195403[/snapback]

Over 50' to me is absurd, right at 40' or a bit under i can see, that's all i have been saying, but myself and other's get ridiculed because science doesn't agree with such a snake.


Noooooo, back in post 228, robbieb said an asian python could possibly reach that.
Reading back, we all agree with robbieb and Frogfish, it is just that the issue has become clouded by the meandering nature of the debate. Mathematically, when the bones are that long and the weight of the organs leaves the water, gravity will cause such weight to break a bone never intended to span so far. Tensile strength.
Just maths, no big theories or other needed, even though many other factors for seeing such a growth as unlikely math alone has shown 'why not'
Please, it is not ridicule. It is pointing out error and helping to enlighten and share. Not the same thing. no.gif

QUOTE(the14u2cee @ May 19 2006, 11:22 AM) [snapback]1195403[/snapback]

I really don't think me or aroces will run anybody away, this forum is for discussing thing's that could be or might if's and allot of UM topic's are outrageous and some make me laugh historically but there is nobody in hear that would make me leave because they don't see things the way i do.


I am pleased you wont leave, because as you said, you provide links and many. Bringing things in here is what it is all about - sharing grin2.gif. You willl not run anyone away as you are not rude and you give to the UM community.

I have not seen pilgrim for ages, I would hazzard that some of the ridiculous statements made by another member made him shake his head in disbelief and go away. What a shame, such a great and logical mind with eloquent grammar. Was a pleasure to read his posts.
The serpent thread was another one I ended up enjoying thouroughly. It was closed by rude members who refused to accept that their "view" was not only old but incorrect and it would take a better person than them to debunk those fellows. They said similar things. Got the thread closed though. Now information from those fellows is much slower.

All these two (well 3 really) members tried to do was share and got hammered by people with 'opinions'. I hope we can not only keep people like Frogfish and robbieb around, but entice more in here. With that sort of Worldwide mindpower, in conjunction with intelligent objective views based in fact UM could indeed take the Unexplained out of many of these titles.
Some prefer the mystery to fact I guess.
the14u2cee
QUOTE(psyche101 @ May 18 2006, 07:03 PM) [snapback]1195460[/snapback]

Noooooo, back in post 228, robbieb said an asian python could possibly reach that.
Reading back, we all agree with robbieb and Frogfish, it is just that the issue has become clouded by the meandering nature of the debate. Mathematically, when the bones are that long and the weight of the organs leaves the water, gravity will cause such weight to break a bone never intended to span so far. Tensile strength.
Just maths, no big theories or other needed, even though many other factors for seeing such a growth as unlikely math alone has shown 'why not'
Please, it is not ridicule. It is pointing out error and helping to enlighten and share. Not the same thing. no.gif
I am pleased you wont leave, because as you said, you provide links and many. Bringing things in here is what it is all about - sharing grin2.gif. You willl not run anyone away as you are not rude and you give to the UM community.

I have not seen pilgrim for ages, I would hazzard that some of the ridiculous statements made by another member made him shake his head in disbelief and go away. What a shame, such a great and logical mind with eloquent grammar. Was a pleasure to read his posts.
The serpent thread was another one I ended up enjoying thouroughly. It was closed by rude members who refused to accept that their "view" was not only old but incorrect and it would take a better person than them to debunk those fellows. They said similar things. Got the thread closed though. Now information from those fellows is much slower.

All these two (well 3 really) members tried to do was share and got hammered by people with 'opinions'. I hope we can not only keep people like Frogfish and robbieb around, but entice more in here. With that sort of Worldwide mindpower, in conjunction with intelligent objective views based in fact UM could indeed take the Unexplained out of many of these titles.
Some prefer the mystery to fact I guess.


I believe that its the what if that bring people to UM. thumbsup.gif
robbieb
you knwo whats funny im sitting here holding my yellow anaconda (hoping he doesnt bite me cause hel ieks to do that) and thinking to myself how i bet if this snake coudl tlak hed tell u haw his bigger cousin isnt gonn get to be 40+ feet.
psyche101
QUOTE(the14u2cee @ May 19 2006, 12:06 PM) [snapback]1195464[/snapback]

I believe that its the what if that bring people to UM. thumbsup.gif


Yeah, true, I think that the natural curiosity humans are born with though drives us to solve these mysteries, and that is why we stay here. thumbsup.gif
Each mystery solved lets us get on with the next one. Personally, I like resolution and knowing why something does what.
psyche101
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 11:12 AM) [snapback]1195384[/snapback]

- Me chase members away? You think I have the capability? Gee, I don't know if I would take that as an insult or compliment.


It was intended as neither.
Yes, I do think you have the capability. If I was a Zoologist and offered to share my knowledge and was called a liar and told my study was erroneous. I'd go.
Amazing I don't tuck My Zoologist inder my arm and leave right now LOL.

QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 11:12 AM) [snapback]1195384[/snapback]

- YUP, your Zoologist, for you the only one he is a Zoologist to. Oh, Frogfish too. I was wrong.


Dammn I find that hilarious.
What about the Uni that wrote his degree? Bet they see him as a Zoologist too. Bet the scientific community give him some creedence too, seeming as he has a degree and all.......

Can I have Frogfish too......
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 11:12 AM) [snapback]1195384[/snapback]

- If you enjoy them really, then go to emailing. This is a public forum.


Here's a better idea. Your point of view is in contradiction with everyone elses. You are the one everyone in this thread has disagreed with. You have been hurling the insults at proffesionals. You have provided no facts or links to back up your statements. You have sugested math is incorrect and your view is correct. You are the one questioning science.

I am a member of this forum as well. I don't think your behaviour toward the proffesional people in this thread has been appropriate, and you manner abrupt.

Why don't you leave?

QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 11:12 AM) [snapback]1195384[/snapback]

- Frogfish? Palentology? He said he studied Genetic engineering. Is that the same?
- I'm sure they are good individual, they just don't like anyone challenging what they post ere.


No, it is not the same. Don't think I have the patience, maybe Frogfish will explain the difference to you.
That is right, as Palenetology is his passion, as a result his posts are very well written and extremely interesting.
He studies too, what is wrong with having an itellectual hobby and sharing that as well?
He happens to have access to excellent resources concerning this very subject. Versatile fellow that Frogfish.
AROCES
QUOTE(psyche101 @ May 19 2006, 02:46 AM) [snapback]1195495[/snapback]

It was intended as neither.
Yes, I do think you have the capability. If I was a Zoologist and offered to share my knowledge and was called a liar and told my study was erroneous. I'd go.
Amazing I don't tuck My Zoologist inder my arm and leave right now LOL.
Dammn I find that hilarious.
What about the Uni that wrote his degree? Bet they see him as a Zoologist too. Bet the scientific community give him some creedence too, seeming as he has a degree and all.......

Can I have Frogfish too......
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Here's a better idea. Your point of view is in contradiction with everyone elses. You are the one everyone in this thread has disagreed with. You have been hurling the insults at proffesionals. You have provided no facts or links to back up your statements. You have sugested math is incorrect and your view is correct. You are the one questioning science.

I am a member of this forum as well. I don't think your behaviour toward the proffesional people in this thread has been appropriate, and you manner abrupt.


Why don't you leave?
No, it is not the same. Don't think I have the patience, maybe Frogfish will explain the difference to you.
That is right, as Palenetology is his passion, as a result his posts are very well written and extremely interesting.
He studies too, what is wrong with having an itellectual hobby and sharing that as well?
He happens to have access to excellent resources concerning this very subject. Versatile fellow that Frogfish.


- So far no one is agreeing with you or taking your advise. They are still here, maybe it is not as bad as you think it is.
- Why don't you provide then links that my statement is incorrect?
- I suggested math is incorrect? I said, mathematical calculation in determining something that does not exist can't be considered a fact until proven or tested.
- So, I question science? Is Science to you a sort of a religion that can't be questioned?
- I highly doubt it that a professional would be spending much time and effort here to prove and use their hard work in college. THINK ABOUT THAT.
- I never called anyone here in this forum ignorant or stupid. And you want me to leave?
I don't disagree with everything they post, just with certain things. And you want me to leave?
- Now who is being rude?
robbieb
dude u told me that my conversions were wrong when they were 100% acurate u did say math was wrong at one point obviously
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 04:33 AM) [snapback]1195580[/snapback]

dude u told me that my conversions were wrong when they were 100% acurate u did say math was wrong at one point obviously


I said, your conversion can't be proven correct until we actually have a living specimen.
When you build an aircraft, you test fly it after. Then you know it can fly.
robbieb
dude when i told u what 15 meters what in feet u were like no blah blah blah dont even say u didnt
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 05:23 AM) [snapback]1195597[/snapback]

dude when i told u what 15 meters what in feet u were like no blah blah blah dont even say u didnt


Really, you are the one writing books and novels. Show it to me then and don't just blah blah blah.
robbieb
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 8 2006, 03:35 PM) [snapback]1179666[/snapback]

1 meter is equivalent to about 3.2 feet, do the math.



QUOTE(robbieb @ May 8 2006, 06:11 PM) [snapback]1179807[/snapback]

No u do the math. 15 meters isi what u siad it was ok here we go. first of it wasnt 15 meters at all but lets say it was. 1 meter is 100 cm 2.54 cm's is 1 inch and 12 inches in one foot so now using that ill prove u wrong. 1x100=100/2.54=39.37/12=3.281x15=49.2125ft that is one meter turned into 100 cm divided by 2.54 to get u to inches now divide that by 12 to get u how may feet are in a meter now multiply that by 15 to get u how long it is 49.2125-45=4.2125ft and this ladies and gentelmen is how an average size snake can get to be well out of proportion. now the true legeth of this imfamous snake is 11.5 or very close to that the 15 meters was an exageration still larger the the 32'9'' reticulated python. this rock python was 37.7feet massive yes not 49 feet nor 45 feet



QUOTE(robbieb @ May 8 2006, 07:23 PM) [snapback]1179875[/snapback]

mine is exact where as urs is rounding. 1 inch is exaclty 2.54 cm and there are exactly 100cm in 1 meter and exactly 12 inches in one foot u proved me right the second u said that 1 meter is about 3.2 feet. ur right its lcose but i used exacts where as u didnt. its simple chemistry conversions man. u have meters and ur trying to get to feet so u know how many cm's are in a meter and u know how many cm's make up n inch and u know how many inches are in a foot so u go by it that way and u will get exacts by saying 1 meter is about 3.2 feet u open the door for an inacurate answer. anf thus u are wrong congrats.



QUOTE(AROCES @ May 8 2006, 07:25 PM) [snapback]1179880[/snapback]

YUP! Mine is rounded of while your is exactly how you want it to come out.



QUOTE(robbieb @ May 9 2006, 02:09 AM) [snapback]1180642[/snapback]

way to be a little u know what about it all i was saying is ur math was not accuate as mine is. mine gave exact conversions where as urs gave a rounded answer. in the world of science exact measurments are needed that why i know how to do the conversions



QUOTE(robbieb @ May 9 2006, 03:10 PM) [snapback]1181249[/snapback]

no dude u said 1 meter is about 3.2 feet. yea thst is close but the exact conversion is 1 meter equals 100 cm and 1 inch is exactly 2.54 cm the text book defination of an inch is 2.54 cm. now by knowithng this knowlede u can say 1 meter is 100 cm. 100 cm divided by 2.54 will giv us inches the answer is 39.37007874015748031496062992126 this is how many inches are in 1 meter exactly. now take 39.37007874015748031496062992126 and divide that by 12 and u will get ur feet 3.2808398950131233595800524934383 so in reality the closer measurment would be 1 meter is 3.3 feet. and now it u multiply 3.2 times the 15 meters the snake was said to be u get 45 in reality its 48 now multiply the actualy conversions and u get 49.212598425196850393700787401575

slightly over a foot is kinda a big deal when talking aobut sankes legenth

15 metes even if u sues it as 1 meter being 3.2 feet is not 45 feet. the conversions i gave u are 100% acurate if u would liek to learn how to do it its realy easy and ill teach u but belive me there correct



QUOTE(robbieb @ May 9 2006, 04:16 PM) [snapback]1181331[/snapback]

i used a calculatro to do that and if u read the earlier post i made that fossi snake was not 15 metres it was a media exageration it was 11.5 meter i belive still a huge snake not denying that but it isnt a 49foot snake, remeber the 3.3 is a round up justl ike 3.2 is a round down so 3.2 is smaller then the actualy one and 3.3 is bigger thne the actualy conversion 3.2808398950131233595800524934383 is the 100% acurate one. that is exactly how mny feet are in one meter no smaller no bigger that is it my friend. im not trying to decive u im trying to teach u some new tool i never though i woudl use this stuff before but once u learn it u can use it all the time and its amazingly easy. the hardesty thing to remember is 1 inch is 2.54 cm and afteru have thatu can convert 1 mile into km or m or anything or vis versa i can convert 1 cm in to miles 100% acuratly using this.
haha u def need a calculator to do this do u realy think i cna get a number to 32 decimal points in my head or on paper thats entirely to much work lol u plug it in to the calculator very easiy look heres one il lmae 5 feet into cm. 1 foot times 12 inches times 2.54 cm so u put it in the calculator liek this 1 times 12 equals 12. 12 times 2.54 equals 30.48 there are exactly 30.48 cm in 1 foot. now multiply that times 5 (because u have 5 feet) and u get 152.4cm in 5 feet its 100% acurate. its realy easy



QUOTE(AROCES @ May 9 2006, 04:34 PM) [snapback]1181349[/snapback]

The report say it is 15 meters, go to Scenic City Reptiles and tell them that their info is wrong and that you know that is is not. By the way, how did the fossil look like since you seem to know more about it?



here u go proof that i gave u accurate calculations and u told me that they were wrong go ahead and chaceck them anony here check my calculations and tell mei f there off. haha tell me again how were the ones that change the stories. ur the one who doesnt show proof of anytihng u say and apparently u forgot all aobut this day when we did conversions. ur a liar and a fake and ur the reason real science is hinders be moronic accusations liek the ones u make. im almost sickened to think that there are people as aragont and ignorant as u out there.
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 05:52 AM) [snapback]1195616[/snapback]

here u go proof that i gave u accurate calculations and u told me that they were wrong go ahead and chaceck them anony here check my calculations and tell mei f there off


OK, prove to me that your calculation is correct about a 40 foot snake. Where is your living specimen that it is correct,? Well? Since you use a calculator your numbers maybe right, but how would you know the numbers really will crush a big snake?
Like I said, you test fly a plane before you can say it can fly.
robbieb
haha ar u on crack? only the right brothers did that. no one is building a jumbo jet or new fighter plane and sending it off and hoping it gets off the ground there is a vast amount of research done. they use light weight but strong material. so it can function because if the matertial is to heaven then it goes nowhere just like if a snake it to heavy. i don't even understand how i can explain it ant easier to u. the bones of these snakes are unable to maintain this masisve amount of weight on there ribs they get crushed. now another tihng to remember is that the muscles u have are different in structure to the muscles a snake has u have to remember that. their body as it is now wouldn't be able to support them if the got past a certain legenth. they would need to have thee bones and muscles revamped before they could do it. and its not possible. i gave u an example of this using the gila monster and u decided to brush it off. but it was entirely revelant. you cant get to be ten feet tall and survive. your bones are not set in proper positions muscles aren't structural desigined for it. and ur internal body sytstems are not set to run on a system that big. the homeostasis in the body breaks down because once one system breaks down the rest go to. ususaly starting with cardio. from there urinalry and repritary from there nervous and immune and digestive and form there sekletal and integumentary and of course reproductive system is gone
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 06:10 AM) [snapback]1195630[/snapback]

haha ar u on crack? only the right brothers did that. no one is building a jumbo jet or new fighter plane and sending it off and hoping it gets off the ground there is a vast amount of research done. they use light weight but strong material. so it can function because if the matertial is to heaven then it goes nowhere just like if a snake it to heavy. i don't even understand how i can explain it ant easier to u. the bones of these snakes are unable to maintain this masisve amount of weight on there ribs they get crushed. now another tihng to remember is that the muscles u have are different in structure to the muscles a snake has u have to remember that. their body as it is now wouldn't be able to support them if the got past a certain legenth. they would need to have thee bones and muscles revamped before they could do it. and its not possible. i gave u an example of this using the gila monster and u decided to brush it off. but it was entirely revelant. you cant get to be ten feet tall and survive. your bones are not set in proper positions muscles aren't structural desigined for it. and ur internal body sytstems are not set to run on a system that big. the homeostasis in the body breaks down because once one system breaks down the rest go to. ususaly starting with cardio. from there urinalry and repritary from there nervous and immune and digestive and form there sekletal and integumentary and of course reproductive system is gone


- Not all airplanes are designed like the Wright brother airplane, so they continue testing each model.
- Boeing does not build an aircraft and just send it to the airlines and say, "don't worry it will fly".
- I already get it with your calculation a long time ago.... The thing is, it is a calculation. Even by a genuis like you, we can't be totally be 100% sure until an actual specimen is 40 foot and it did actually dies. Factor in that like humans, bone and muscle strenght differs with each individual.
robbieb
u were the one that siad aobut the planes just oing and seeing if they work i was showing u how stupuid that made u seem. no one is going to risk a mulit million dollar plane to see if the design works. u said u test fly a plane before u say it can fly. wrong u do math and use physics to see if ity can fly then u go from there. same way u can factor in size weight and tincle stregenth of a snake to see if it can work or any animal for that matter.
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 06:36 AM) [snapback]1195639[/snapback]

u were the one that siad aobut the planes just oing and seeing if they work i was showing u how stupuid that made u seem. no one is going to risk a mulit million dollar plane to see if the design works. u said u test fly a plane before u say it can fly. wrong u do math and use physics to see if ity can fly then u go from there. same way u can factor in size weight and tincle stregenth of a snake to see if it can work or any animal for that matter.


YUP! You do the math, use physics and then you go from there.
Same with your theory about a 40 foot snake, you do the math, physics and you go from there. But you don't have a finish product, so how do you know it is as you thought?
Feanor
QUOTE(dreamhunter @ Apr 28 2006, 10:09 PM) [snapback]1167538[/snapback]

OMG, that's huge, it's probably becuase of some weird unreasonable cause.
Or it's just gods way of saying, theres snakes out there that are bigger then we thought.



No, its just a normal Sucuri! Its a snake that inhabits Manaus, Amazonia, the rain forest and swamp areas of Brazil.

I can say for sure because I live in Brazil. We grow up here learning about our fauna and flora. There is a army division, PELOPES, here in Brazil, they train Savage Pumas (Onça Pintada) I don´t know how this would be in english. They dwell with those snakes in the jungle.

Weird, huh!? wink2.gif

Bellow some photos of sucuris caught near villages by police or locals.

user posted image

user posted image

And some photos about army training Onças, so I don´t look so crazy! wink2.gif

user posted image

user posted image
robbieb
that top pic is a leopard in africa. the bottom one is a jaguar. and once again a person FROM brazil backs us up too. u have no followerd its everyone verus u right now.
AROCES
Huh? Seen these pictures before, just with the number of people holding it you know very well it's no monster snake. And it would have been all over the internet if so. Pretty obvious this is common for no big excitement, didn't even make it to any science news site. Common sense, right? And I too think there is no monster snake out there, maybe.
I have no follower? I'm not trying to be a Prophet here or something.
I give opinion and if people disagree, I have no problem with it.
AROCES
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 03:23 PM) [snapback]1195970[/snapback]

that top pic is a leopard in africa. the bottom one is a jaguar. and once again a person FROM brazil backs us up too. u have no followerd its everyone verus u right now.


Leopard in Africa? You sure about that? Those two looks to me like South American soldiers.
Feanor
QUOTE(robbieb @ May 19 2006, 12:23 PM) [snapback]1195970[/snapback]

that top pic is a leopard in africa. the bottom one is a jaguar. and once again a person FROM brazil backs us up too. u have no followerd its everyone verus u right now.



Both pics were from Brazilian Army man, How the hell you can afirm its African leopard?

Wanna the link? No problem posting!
Feanor
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 01:16 PM) [snapback]1196029[/snapback]

Leopard in Africa? You sure about that? Those two looks to me like South American soldiers.



Hes dreaming!

Just to clarify!

I am FROM Brazil. I was a mariner for 2 and a half year. I visited PELOPES, this in english is something like Special Operation Division.

Both images are from our Site, army site. I will put the link here, feel free to surf it.

Brazil Army - Exercito Brasileiro

Link with the image he thinks is African!

Just a back ground on Brazil: We have many etinics/cultures in our country. African, german, sweden, portuguese because we were Portugal colony etc...
Judge that the guy with that Onça is from Africa just because his apearance is ignorance.

Africa! OMG! rofl.gif rofl.gif
Feanor
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 01:04 PM) [snapback]1196020[/snapback]

Huh? Seen these pictures before, just with the number of people holding it you know very well it's no monster snake. And it would have been all over the internet if so. Pretty obvious this is common for no big excitement, didn't even make it to any science news site. Common sense, right? And I too think there is no monster snake out there, maybe.
I have no follower? I'm not trying to be a Prophet here or something.
I give opinion and if people disagree, I have no problem with it.



You are right...

Sucuris are common here in Brazil. They are fewer considering that many ppl huntthem down and kill them...

Ppl loves to creat miths over issues that they don´t really know.

AROCES
What would you is the longest verifiable( with a specimen) snake ever found in Brazil?
Feanor
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 01:34 PM) [snapback]1196052[/snapback]

What would you is the longest verifiable( with a specimen) snake ever found in Brazil?



The biggest one ever found was 11,2 meters. I have no idea how much is this in feets...

Follow the link bellow to some images. (Graphic images - Beware)
Sucuri - Anaconda

Some call them Anacondas. I personally dont like this.

The history in the link above tells how some guys went to fish on an Amazonian river and got eaten by the snake.

Big sucuri ever found.
AROCES
Is there a specimen of the 11.2 meter snake? I mean like a skin or a skeleton?
Feanor
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 01:57 PM) [snapback]1196084[/snapback]

Is there a specimen of the 11.2 meter snake? I mean like a skin or a skeleton?


Did you accessed that link. Than one, is the subject.
I will see if I can find the specimen!
AROCES
QUOTE(Feanor @ May 19 2006, 04:59 PM) [snapback]1196088[/snapback]

Did you accessed that link. Than one, is the subject.
I will see if I can find the specimen!


Yes, but sorry, no abla espanol. Saw those pictures before. Poor boy, what a way to die.
Feanor
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 02:04 PM) [snapback]1196098[/snapback]

Yes, but sorry, no abla espanol. Saw those pictures before. Poor boy, what a way to die.



Ehehe thats no espanol/spanish. Its portuguese. Don´t worry thought.

Heres the best image to represent it size.

user posted image
AROCES
Seen this too before, but this is the clearest and best quality. Wow! Now that really looks damn BIG!
Feanor
Suciris reach no more than 12 meters, there is an African pyton that can reach up to 15 meters... I think its the biggest one.

Sucuris usually don´t attack humans, but sometimes, humans cross its path... then bad things may happen.
AROCES
QUOTE(Feanor @ May 19 2006, 05:28 PM) [snapback]1196134[/snapback]

Suciris reach no more than 12 meters, there is an African pyton that can reach up to 15 meters... I think its the biggest one.

Sucuris usually don´t attack humans, but sometimes, humans cross its path... then bad things may happen.


Where is the remains of that snake now, do you know?
That was base on an African Rock Python Fossil, quite a long time ago then. They don't grow that big anymore.
Feanor
I don´t know if they have the remais of that snake... I will try to find something.
frogfish
Thanks psyche grin2.gif

The largest Andaconda (both green and yellow) was just 30 feet yes.gif never 11.5 meters. Those claims are from stretched out snakes skins. Snake skins have high elasticity, and be be stretched very far.

The largest snake in Africa are Rock Pythons, which don't grow over 25 feet (during this past two millenia)
AROCES
QUOTE(frogfish @ May 19 2006, 07:01 PM) [snapback]1196264[/snapback]

Thanks psyche grin2.gif

The largest Andaconda (both green and yellow) was just 30 feet yes.gif never 11.5 meters. Those claims are from stretched out snakes skins. Snake skins have high elasticity, and be be stretched very far.

The largest snake in Africa are Rock Pythons, which don't grow over 25 feet (during this past two millenia)


What 11.5 meters? What claims? The one in the pic is said to be 11.2 meters. Hard to say, but base on the people around it and the truck bed, quite near 11.2 meters.
frogfish
QUOTE
What 11.5 meters? What claims? The one in the pic is said to be 11.2 meters. Hard to say, but base on the people around it and the truck bed, quite near 11.2 meters.

How do you even know that's an authentic picture? Or the witnesses are not lying?
AROCES
QUOTE(frogfish @ May 19 2006, 10:28 PM) [snapback]1196582[/snapback]

How do you even know that's an authentic picture? Or the witnesses are not lying?


Looks Authentic to me. If you think otherwise, I got no problem with that.
But you can check the links the fellow from Brazil(FEANOR) provided and maybe ask him why he is sending links that is not real, with full of people in the picture lying.
the14u2cee
QUOTE(AROCES @ May 19 2006, 03:41 PM) [snapback]1196610[/snapback]

Looks Authentic to me. If you think otherwise, I got no problem with that.
But you can check the links the fellow from Brazil(FEANOR) provided and maybe ask him why he is sending links that is not real, with full of people in the picture lying.


which picture are we talking about?
AROCES
QUOTE(the14u2cee @ May 20 2006, 12:43 AM) [snapback]1196752[/snapback]

which picture are we talking about?


Post #340
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.