No, because they don't agree with science

I won't be here if I don't like science. But it is not perfect.
Even the Scientist have disagreement among them????

That's all science is though, really. Isn't it? To challenge accepted theories and facts in the quest for knowlege.

RKD

Damn Straight


From how I understand it all

A theory is something we are not sure of

A law is something we are sure of.

Theories are constantly revised until stabilised into a law.

A law is our best understanding. Not always absolute, but that is the nature of humans. We can make errors.

If a law is proven incorrect, it is ammended.

As far as our little species goes, this is the best and most accurate information regarding what is around us and how it works. It is as perfect as we have.

some what true. science is the search fo the truth. weither it was proving the earth was round or what have u. now the truth is that if seprate species were willing to inter breed in the wild we would have a few species of animals meaning wolves coyotes jackles would all be one mix species belugas and narwhales would be one species sub species would be absolutly unheard of there would be ONE species of big cat ONE species of canus ONE species of toothed whale ONE species of baleen whale One species of bat ONE species of mecaw ONE species of eagle. are u getting the picture yet? its the fact that these animals dont interbreed that genes get isolated and mutations get isolated and that these animals get to become new species. if they kept breeding within eachother there wouldnt be genetic isolation that makes them diffrent.

So what about Schroedinger's law about his dead/undead cat in a box? Yay, 'mon the nitpickers!!

Sorry dude I'm just pulling yer leg, bud.

RKD

Schroedinger's cat is a paradox. Those are difficult...

ex-ACTLY!

Therein lies my point.

RKD