Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: GEORGE come out of the white house
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Sunofone
The truth movement broke new ground today and sent shock waves out as a standing room only event in wisconsin broke through the lies,omissions and spin sending a clear message to those who have yett o come clean-- the gig is up and the time is now for the would be accomplices to surrender and come clean before they too are prosecuted and hung for high treason!
***********************************************************************
Reynolds: “Come Out of the White House with Your Hands Up!”

Kevin Barrett, 07.05.2006 13:06

Ex-Bush Official Busts 9/11 Perps at U.W. Historical Society

Madison, WI
Saturday, May 6, 2006

An enthusiastic standing-room-only crowd packed the Wisconsin Historical Society auditorium Saturday to hear ex-Bush Administration insider Morgan Reynolds prosecute top administration and military officials for the 9/11 inside job.

Reynolds to Cheney: "You're BUSTED!"

Reynolds indicted Richard Cheney, George W. Bush, former Joint Chiefs Chairman Richard Meyers, confessed WTC demolisher and insurance-fraudster Larry Silverstein, and others for mass murder, conspiracy, and other charges including high treason. The enthusiastic response from the overflow crowd was a de facto vote for conviction on all counts.

The former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis, showed that the defendants conspired to create a false cover story of suicide hijackings in order to “blow the World Trade Center to kingdom come” with explosives—a shock-and-awe psy-op designed to coerce the American people into supporting a pre-planned “long war” in the Middle East, massive increases in military spending, and the rollback of Constitutional civil liberties.

Reynolds stated that everyone in the worldwide intelligence community knew that 9/11 was an inside job as soon as it happened, with the obvious stand-down of US air defenses, controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and non-protection of the President in Florida being the biggest tip-offs. The head of the Russian equivalent of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the former head of the German intelligence service Andreas Von Bulow, former National Security Agency official Wayne Madsen, and former MI-6 agent David Schayler have all openly called 9/11 an inside job, while former CIA official Ray McGovern has confirmed this directly in private, and indirectly in public by way of his ringing endorsement of David Ray Griffin’s work on 9/11.

Reynolds, who served as George W. Bush’s Labor Department Chief Economist in 2001-2002, believes that a 9/11 truth victory is looming on the near-term horizon. He predicted that one or more of the 9/11 insiders will soon “give it up” and come forward with what they know, saying “Remember, you heard it here first.” He said that most of those complicit in the attacks did not realize how over-the-top the plot was, due to the need-to-know compartmentalization of such covert operations, and that some semi-complicit individuals will probably be coming forward. Reynolds said that most of his email acquaintances are now worried that the 9/11 truth movement is going to win, triggering the greatest Constitutional crisis in U.S. history. For Reynolds, this is less a cause for worry than for rejoicing: “We need a Constitutional crisis!”

Reynolds argued that 9/11 truth is a matter of extreme urgency, since the perpetrators seem to be preparing another 9/11-style terror hoax as a pretext for attacking Iran with nuclear weapons. He said that exposing the 9/11 fraud is the best way to stop Cheney’s plan to stage an unprovoked nuclear attack on Iran, and the military draft and Pinochet-style prison camps and death squads for dissenters that might accompany it.

Reynolds urged the audience to help educate the American public about the 9/11 inside job. Personal contact with family and friends, the internet, alternative media, and public events like this are all good educational strategies, he said, adding that a demonstration of 100,000 9/11 truth supporters at Ground Zero next year would be hard for the media to ignore.

Politicians and the media will help expose the 9/11 inside job, he said, only after the growing grassroots movement reaches critical mass. The organizers of Reynolds’ talk urged audience members to come to the upcoming international 9/11 truth conference in Chicago, 9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future, June 2nd-4th, 2006: http://911revealingthetruth.org

* * *

Introduction to Dr. Reynolds Presentation continued
RedEyeJedi
Let's hope he's right. I hope so but I can't see them going without fighting tooth and nail. Ie: more staged terror attacks.
Celumnaz
What do they mean by “We need a Constitutional crisis!”?

We already have several we haven't yet dealt with for various reasons.
Gmac1000
I really don't think it matters anymore.....whats done is done and now the house has't to be knocked down to be rebuilt properly....we have the ability to change the earth so we need to get off our major finger pointing, high horse and into preparation whether it's learning to become more detactched from material things, cause those types of things cloud judgment and does not allow proper spiritual growth...No Offence to Sunofone's post I always appreciate your perspective on these posts, these ones inpaticular...but there is a bigger problem at hand here folks and together we need to figure out what to do...


Be Strong on what you decide, the rest takes care of itself.


Gmac1000
Dennison
It matters a lot ! To have the nation KNOW that the government was in on 9/11 would be HUGE. Everyone would understand there was no point to invading Iraq, much less Afghanistan. Everyone would rise up and impeach Bush's Administration for the lies and deceit.
DR. YO
I watched the movie Loose Change.....it deals with the World Trade centre attacks.

Makes sense. dontgetit.gif dontgetit.gif
PLO
i posted somethign about this before, but look into the stock trading of over 100 million dollars done during the 9/11 attack and just two days prior, most of the shares that were dumpd were done so by ex-cia who are now company directors with affiliations to banking firms. Prison planet have some pretty big articles on it.
DR. YO
QUOTE(PLO @ May 10 2006, 01:42 PM) [snapback]1182933[/snapback]

i posted somethign about this before, but look into the stock trading of over 100 million dollars done during the 9/11 attack and just two days prior, most of the shares that were dumpd were done so by ex-cia who are now company directors with affiliations to banking firms. Prison planet have some pretty big articles on it.


Yeah they shorted the American Airlines stock. There are still unclaimed profits from that day. yes.gif yes.gif
Dennison
http://www.911review.com/index.html - Lots of Info on all the cover ups of 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job, our government was behind it.
Reincarnated
QUOTE(Dennison @ May 10 2006, 06:16 PM) [snapback]1182981[/snapback]

http://www.911review.com/index.html - Lots of Info on all the cover ups of 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job, our government was behind it.
DURRRRRRRRRRRR, you have a lot to learn from us. we are way ahead of you pal
scoobysnack
I went to the speech. I live in Madison. I skipped the movie as I've already seen it. It was nice to see someone who was in federal government (now retired, and free to speak his mind without fear of being fired) agreeing with the smart ones like myself when it comes to the truth about 9/11.

The problem is that the people who did this really think they are doing the right thing. 9/11 was a necessary step leading to WW3 which is needed to change the way people think. Just like WWI and WWII was planed and needed according to the occult new age beliefs. Christianity is the barrier that must be overcome in order to bring enlightenment to the masses in order to prepare them for the emergence of the new fifth world in the age of Aquarius (involving group oriented think) as we move out of the age of Pisces which was dominated by individualism and Christianity. These people are big into these beliefs and are making decisions based on those beliefs that affect our lives. So for example one can say well I don't believe in that stuff, well the leaders of the world do, and what they do will affect you, so wake up America.

QUOTE
Some New Age leaders believe that the Fall (in garden of Eden) was really man's ascent into knowledge, assisted by Lucifer - whom they hail as the bringer of light and wisdom. These New Age teachers expect an imminent, apocalyptic transformation that will lead humanity into the New Age. By acts of men or by an act of "spirit," earth will be cleansed of those who refuse to evolve. In the New Age, there will be world government; the economy will be remade to Promote "sharing." Traditional morality and traditional families will disappear. Orthodox religions - especially Christianity and Judaism - are considered "separative" and "obsolete"; in the New Age, they too will vanish.

Theosophists make it clear that in the contest between God and the Devil, they side with the Devil. Blavatsky says, "It is but natural ... to view Satan, the Serpent of Genesis, as the real creator and benefactor, the Father of Spiritual mankind. For it is he who was the 'Harbinger of Light,' bright radiant Lucifer, who opened the eyes of the automaton created by Jehovah."[50] According to Alice Bailey, the revolt of the angels against God was part of "the divine plan of evolution;" the fallen angels "descended from their sinless and free state of existence in order to develop full divine awareness upon earth."[51] Spangler, like Blavatsky, praises Lucifer as "the angel of man's evolution. He is the angel of man's inner light."[52] He says that "Lucifer comes to give us the final gift of wholeness,"[53] and "as we move into a new age", "each of us in some way is brought to that point which I term the Luciferic initiation."[54] Spangler sees this as "an initiation into the New Age. It is an initiation of leaving the past and moving into the new, shedding our guilts and fears ... and becoming whole and at peace because we have recognized our inner light and ... the light of God."

Spangler says, "Christ is the perfect balance to Lucifer."[62] Like Matthew Fox, Spangler proposes to replace Jesus with the "cosmic Christ;" "any old Christ will not do, not if we need to show that we have something better than the mainstream Christian traditions. It must be a cosmic Christ, a universal Christ, a New Age Christ. ... The Christ is universal. It is cosmic.

With the New Religion, there will be spiritual totalitarianism. New Age leaders agree that the last 2,000 years - the Age of Pisces - were a time for development of individual identity and personality. According to occult thought, the Piscean Age has as its foundation the male-centered energies that characterize Christianity. The Aquarian Age, on the other hand, is an attempt to bring balance back into the evolutionary process by introducing female energies into our understanding. Those who have embraced this new-age understanding of humanity believe that all of the problems that man faces are a direct result of Christianity and its perceived male- centered belief system.

Therefore, a change in man's thinking must occur to bring about a more equal system that will allow feminine energies to govern humanity. This female-centered system will be based on intuition and experience rather than logic and rational thought, the latter being seen as male characteristics.

In the coming Age of Aquarius, this will change. People will happily let go of individualism and merge their own goals and identity into that of the whole race. As Alice Bailey said, "Selfishness, as we now understand it, will gradually disappear, for the will of the individual will voluntarily be blended into the group will."[
The New Age avatars proclaim their commitment to democracy and tolerance. However, they propose totalitarian solutions to mankind's urgent, undeniable problems. The sacrifice of freedom and the acceptance of unlimited government power will - as always - be for our own good; necessity will be the excuse of tyrants. The New Age movement uses the theory of evolution - a theory of inevitable and desirable Progress - as a justification for whatever policies are needed to drive humanity and the planet to the next great leap upward.
(Can anything good ever come from applying Darwinism to society?)

Alice Bailey and her followers at the Lucis Trust have repeatedly praised revolutions and dictatorships, approving them as part of the workings of "the Plan." She viewed the dictatorships of her time as a positive part of human evolution, fostering humanity's "power to regard himself as part of a whole.
After all, according to Walsch's incubus, Hitler was doing his victims a favor by killing them; his deeds were "mistakes," not crimes: "The mistakes Hitler made did no harm or damage to those whose deaths he caused. Those souls were released from their earthly bondage, like butterflies emerging from a cocoon.

"Birth itself is a death, and death a birth. For in birth, the soul finds itself constricted within the awful limitations of a body, and at death escapes those constrictions again." This is, almost word for word, what Alice Bailey wrote: "Birth establishes the soul in the true prison, and physical death is only the first step toward liberation."

When you see the utter perfection in everything - not just in those things with which you agree, but (and perhaps especially) those things with which you disagree - you achieve mastery." The price of "mastery" is to see "utter perfection" in Auschwitz and Treblinka. "John," the disembodied spirit which Spangler has channeled for over 20 years, likewise said, "We naturally do not identify life with the physical body, consequently, to us, the loss of your physical form is not a tragedy.... The death of millions of people in itself is not a tragedy for us, for it simply means their birth into our domains."
Walsch's "God" says that Hitler does not deserve blame for his acts - the rest of humanity is responsible for allowing them to happen: "The purpose of the Hitler Experience was to show humanity to itself."

"Blame not the personalities involved.... They are only the product of the past and the victims of the present. At the same time, they are the agents of destiny, the creators of the new order and the initiators of the new civilisation; they are the destroyers of what must be destroyed before humanity can go forward along the Lighted Way. They are the embodiment of the personality of humanity. Blame yourselves, therefore, for what is today transpiring."

Nevertheless, these radical New Age leaders believe that the two World Wars were necessary for human evolution, and that the birth pangs of the New Age began with the atomic explosions in 1945. They also advocate sending those people who are unwilling to enter the New Age into oblivion, and reducing world population to 2 billion - or less. Such is the blood lust of the "compassionate."

"Nature is less concerned about individual survival, than with the evolution of the whole to ever higher degrees of freedom, union, and consciousness of God."

From the start of World War II until her death in 1949, Alice Bailey wrote that the war was necessary for the New Age to come. She believed that the New Age would be preceded by a "destructive cycle, wherein the old order passes away" and "human civilization with its accompanying institutions - is destroyed."[202] She gives credit to the "Hierarchy" of ascended spiritual masters for "their decision, taken early in this century, which precipitated ... that major destructive agency, the world war (1914-1945). (The hierarchy is the Illuminati)

"This is a time of preparation not only for a new civilisation and culture in a new world order, but also for the coming of a new spiritual dispensation.

Humanity is not following an uncharted course. There is a divine Plan in the Cosmos of which we are a part. At the end of an age human resources and established institutions seem inadequate to meet world needs and problems. At such a time the advent of a Teacher, a spiritual leader or Avatar, is anticipated and invoked by the masses of humanity in all parts of the world.

If evil always appeared as evil, the enticement to evil works would not be as easily "sold" to an unsuspecting population. However, if the plan of Lucifer was "sold" as a plan to develop a human community by establishing unity in diversity, how much more successful could this plan become? Furthermore, if one were aspire to create globalistic unity in diversity, what strategy would serve to unify those of diverse backgrounds, religions, and cultures?

The solution to this question is really quite simple (the implementation of the solution is not so simple, but the solution itself is very simple): seek common ground among the diverse and cultivate it. Once common ground is found, build upon this common ground with a system of common values, and thus establish unity. Once common values are established, those whose values are in opposition to the majority must be changed (or else).

These are excerpts from various articles

http://www.mdep.org/NewAgeComplete.html
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/newsupdatemain.html
beatle boy
WWI was started becuase some dude wanted siberia to join with austria, so he assasinated an archduke.....


anyway, this is good! now when i tell people i can add that a top officialadmitted it!
RamboIII
9/11 was not an inside job, all you you need to shut the hell up and stop being so disgraceful
A+Certified
rambo have you ever seen the FULL video of loose change? i bet not


how can you deny it when 1) the video explains EVERY question you have
ans 2) a top admin official admitted it
RamboIII
please give me a link to the video then, and who cares if a top adimn said something. He probably hates Bush and will do anything to get him in trouble (like about 70%of the US would)
dmgspycat
Sunofone great post...I forgot about Reynolds doing that speech...I remember thinking they'll never let him make it. Glad to hear he did...Ill watch the vid tonite.

Scoobysnack, I agree with you that there are a lot of complicit individuals in on 9-11 for reasons of change that they want to bring on us. For these people to use massive wars to conduct their change means that we the people have no say meaning our elected government as it is now is a sham. We want a say in the great change....we want to find a way to live together during the process. Peace and living harmoniously are solutions. As it is now we seem to be tools in a larger game. Id like to see Americans take back their sovereignty and change for the better with our constitution intact.
dmgspycat
Rambo....I didn't know about the Bush family and Nazi germany till after 1997. I voted for the old man in 1988 because I didn't know any better. I have learned a lot since then about the assassinations and coup d'etats in the world they stand behind. It goes way back too, like WW1. These guys families were called the " merchants of death" at that time.

Bush, Rockefeller, Morgan, Harriman....these families have more in common with the Federal Reserve Bank which is privately owned than they do with the US government as a sovereign authority. I had a tough time believing it all at first and I wanted to make sure what I was reading wasn't just made up news so I checked history books and FOIA articles to cross reference everything. It all added up in the end and I was forced to change the way I believe in politics, religion etc.

No one should expect you to believe us about 9-11 but i have a feeling once you learn the history of these families you will come around. You will see the pattern in wich they operate making 9-11 look like just another day in the office for this bunch. Plus there are so many good points other people are making about certain physical attributes of the attack that never got mentioned in the 9-11 report.
PLO
all people really need to do is just paying attention to history, and specificaly as spycat says, the histories of these familys.
RamboIII
so you are telling me you have no proof of 9/11 being an inside job, you are just assuming it is due to the history of these families.
PLO
many people have actually posted evidence of this, just scroll through them.
RamboIII
do you believe it was an inside job?
PLO
i beleive the american goverment knew it was going to happen, and allowed it to happen, how much actual direct involvement they had in planing it, i couldnt really say i havent actually found any evidence that indicates specific people brokered a deal with the Saudi Royals to make this happen, so i cant say. However the facts of a certain complicity in it are pretty over whelming. And given that they allowd it to happen, then you can pretty much assume they had a hand in planning it too.
Sunofone
even though there is an on-going plame-gate scandal being suppressed thanks to one of he two federal prosecutors responsible for keeping the evidence of fbi involvement from surfacing in the 93'wtc bobmbing case-- fitzgerald is a traitor and was working with micheal chertoff in suppressing the evidence but it seems the bush rime family is running out of resources--
***********************************************************************
QUOTE

Bush White House to be subpoenaed by wiretap lawyers

RAW STORY
Published: Tuesday August 29, 2006

Print This Email This

Two attorneys representing claimants in a lawsuit over wiretapping by the National Security Agency will subpoena the White House today, RAW STORY has learned.

Bruce Afran and Carl Mayer, who represent hundreds of plaintiffs in lawsuits against Verizon, AT&T, and the US Government, will announnce today that they are serving both the Bush administration and Verizon with subpoenas.

The announcement is due to arrive at 4:30 PM, outside of Verizon headquarters in New York, RAW STORY has confirmed.

The subpoenas come on the heels of two federal court decisions that were seen as blows to the Bush Administration warrantless spying program.

Earlier this month, federal judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled the entire program unconstitutional and illegal; another federal judge in San Francisco rejected the Bush Administration's attempt to dismiss these lawsuits by claiming they breach national security.

Mayer explained that the subpoena seeks to learn "whether the Bush administration has unlawfully targeted journalists, peace activists, libertarians, members of congress or generated an 'enemies list.'"

cont...
itsnotoutthere
Lee Harvey Oswald.....where are you when your country needs you? wink2.gif
Otacon
QUOTE(itsnotoutthere @ Aug 29 2006, 05:11 PM) [snapback]1327180[/snapback]

Lee Harvey Oswald.....where are you when your country needs you? wink2.gif


He's around, definately under another name, but the time will come again when someone will stand up for all those who could care less...
TK0001
QUOTE(itsnotoutthere @ Aug 29 2006, 06:11 PM) [snapback]1327180[/snapback]

Lee Harvey Oswald.....where are you when your country needs you? wink2.gif


To be clear - did you just wish for the assassination of the president? How far gone are you, exactly?

As for Mr. Reynolds, do you realize that he honestly believes that no planes were involved in 9/11? Read that again. The man honestly thinks we were all tricked on 9/11 to see the planes crashing into the towers!!! This is the man indicting our government. This is the man Sunofone wishes to align himself with.

How far do you go down this conspiracy trail until you realize how absolutely ridiculous it is?

NO PLANES!!!!

Here's Reynolds' theory on how the government tricked us on 9/11, written by Reynolds himself:

http://www.nomoregames.net/index.php?page=...lane_trick_wtc2

Some exerpts:

QUOTE
Caution is in order, of course, since physical evidence trumps eyewitness reports (so, it doesn't matter what people see, it's what geniuses like Reynolds believe they saw - TK) and testimony in lower Manhattan was all over the place. A damning example of conflicting testimony and central mind control at work was ABC News anchors overruling their reporter on scene at WTC who never heard or saw a plane coming into the south tower.

Reporter: “…Oh my God.”
Anchor Charles Gibson: “That looks like a second plane has just hit…
R: “I did not see a plane go in. That, that just exploded. I…”
A: “We just saw another plane coming in from the side.”
R: “You did? That was out my view.”
A: “You could see the plane come in just from the righthand side of the screen…”


To Reynolds, that's government mind control. Whereas I might actually entertain the idea that the reporter was maybe not standing on the side of the building that was hit, or, gosh, maybe he wasn't even looking at the South tower at all when the second plane hit. Silly me.

This is a 9/11 conspiracy hero, remember.

Another exerpt:

QUOTE
Marcus Icke considered 41 eyewitness reports from the south tower who claim to have seen an aircraft collide with WTC 2. Many were interviewed that day (more reliable) while others were interviewed later. No one reported seeing a Boeing 767-200 series with United Airlines livery crashing into the tower, an extremely strict standard, but all seemed to report some type of aircraft crashing into the tower. Many reported an aircraft vanished inside the tower. Since this is physically impossible for a real plane, these witnesses were lying or deluded. Some lied (I have my nominees) and some may have been duped. A delusion would be the result of some kind of trickery that remains hidden from researchers. The range of possibilities runs from an airplane fly-by of some kind coordinated with timed explosions inside the tower to David Copperfield on scene. No kidding. He has “disappeared a train” and the Statute of Liberty so maybe he put his mind to work on “disappearing a Big Boeing.”


Yes, one of his theories is that DAVID FRICKING COPPERFIELD magically made everyone on the ground think they saw the planes fly into the towers!!! To him, this is more plausible than actual people seeing actual planes flying into actual buildings. Sunofone, please tell me you regret aligning yourself with this guy at this point. Please. Even you can see the nonsense, right? Right?

But wait there's more!!!!

QUOTE
A promising solution to our dilemma is that the military may have cloaking or stealth technology that allows it to temporarily “disappear” a plane from optical view. Essentially, there would be two ways to turn a plane to “blue sky” at the touch of a button, making the plane invisible to those on the ground and perhaps those at higher levels:

1. flexible liquid crystal display screens on the aircraft itself that display the background image (cloudless blue sky)
2. external sources projecting a background image in so-called stereoscopic form to a camouflaged aircraft covered by a retro reflector.

It would be easier to turn a plane “invisible” on a beautiful, cloudless day and I believe that is why they chose a day like September 11. It was perfect. If the plane had no stealth anti-radar technology, however, the plane would be visible on radar and FAA and military radar records will be forever sealed


INVISIBLE PLANES!!!! This is his "promising" solution???

So, at the same time the government was flying invisible planes around, David Copperfield was on the ground tricking people into thinking they saw planes hit the towers.

You'll have to excuse Dick Cheney for not shaking in his boots when this idiot "indicted" him.

Sunofone
QUOTE(TK0001 @ Aug 30 2006, 12:18 PM) [snapback]1328658[/snapback]


You'll have to excuse Dick Cheney for not shaking in his boots when this idiot "indicted" him.

umm ...reynolds did not indict anyone-- the constitution is what is indicting the administration-- his theories may seem outlandish to those that are unaware of the current technologies available but,above and beyond his personal opinion about how they did it,the important fact to consider is that a former bush administration official believes his former employers are complicit --
TK0001
QUOTE(Sunofone @ Aug 30 2006, 01:47 PM) [snapback]1328707[/snapback]
his theories may seem outlandish to those that are unaware of the current technologies available


So, you're saying that you also believe invisible plane technology exists? And it was used on 9/11?

How are you on the Copperfield issue?

QUOTE(Sunofone @ Aug 30 2006, 01:47 PM) [snapback]1328707[/snapback]

but,above and beyond his personal opinion about how they did it,the important fact to consider is that a former bush administration official believes his former employers are complicit --


Really? The fact that he used to work in some obscure branch of government under Bush trumps his utterly insane theories? This is pretty shaky ground on which you choose to stand...
Sunofone
boy this guy could really use some sort of catalyzing event designed to distract from iraq and the coming retribution for his criminal treason--
***************************************************************************
QUOTE

Resolved, That George Walker Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following Articles of Impeachment be exhibited to the... (Introduced in House)
HRES 1106 IH

109th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 1106

Articles of Impeachment against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

December 8, 2006

Ms. MCKINNEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Articles of Impeachment against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Resolved, That George Walker Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following Articles of Impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:

Articles of Impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of all the people of the United States of America, against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled that:

ARTICLE I. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION

In violation of the oath of office, which reads: `I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States', George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States has demonstrated a pattern of abuse of office and of executive privilege, and disregard for the Constitution itself.

This conduct includes the following:

Manipulating Intelligence and Lying To Justify War

In violation of the separation of powers under the Constitution and his subsequent obligation to share intelligence with the Congress, George Walker Bush, while serving as President of the United States of America, in preparing the invasion of Iraq, did withhold intelligence from the Congress, by refusing to provide Congress with the full intelligence picture that he was being given, by redacting information by, for example, removing portions of reports such as the August 6, 2001, Presidential Daily Brief, and actively manipulating the intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons programs by pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies to provide intelligence such that `the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy' as revealed in the `Downing Street Memo'. To this end, President George Walker Bush and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld created the Office of Special Plans inside the Pentagon to override existing intelligence reports by providing unreliable evidence that supported the claim that Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat to the United States of America. By justifying the invasion of Iraq with false and misleading statements linking Iraq to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and falsely asserting that Iraq had a nuclear weapons program for which it was importing aluminum tubes and uranium, these assertions being either false, or based on `fixed' intelligence, with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

ARTICLE II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

In violation of his oath to `faithfully execute the office of President of the United States', George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States, has consistently demonstrated disregard for that oath by obstructing and hindering the work of Congressional investigative bodies and by seeking to expand the scope of the powers of his office.

This conduct includes the following:

Failure To Uphold Accountability

In abrogation of his responsibility under the oath of office to take care that the Laws be faithfully executed, by which he agreed to act in good faith and accept responsibility for the overall conduct of the Executive Branch, a duty vested in his office alone under the Constitution, George Walker Bush, failed to take responsibility for, investigate or discipline those responsible for an ongoing pattern of negligence, incompetence and malfeasance to the detriment of the American people.

Those whom George Walker Bush, as President of the United States of America, has failed to hold to account include but are not limited to the following top-level officials in his administration:

(a) RICHARD CHENEY- In violation of his oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States of America, played a key role in manipulating intelligence in the interest of promoting the illegal invasion of Iraq by pressuring analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency to `fix' their intelligence estimates of the danger posed by Iraq in relation to weapons of mass destruction, whereby Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

(cool.gif CONDOLEEZZA RICE- In violation of her Constitutional duty to share and provide accurate and truthful intelligence information with the Congress, as former National Security Advisor to the President, did play a leading role in deceiving Congress and the American public by repeating and propagating false statements concerning Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction program, including false information that the purchase of aluminum tubes demonstrated that Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapons program, false information that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium and false information that Iraq sought help in developing a chemical and biological weapons program; whereby Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State of the United States of America, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.

By neglecting to superintend the conduct of these officials and to hold members of the Executive Branch responsible for their negligence or violations of law, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.

Wherefore, by their aforementioned conduct, George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, and Condoleezza Rice warrant impeachment, trial, and removal from office.

ARTICLE III. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED

In violation of his duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America to `take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed', George Walker Bush, during his tenure as President of the United States, has violated the letter and spirit of laws and rules of criminal procedure used by civilian and military courts, and has violated or ignored regulatory codes and practices that carry out the law.

This conduct includes the following:

Illegal Domestic Spying

In violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [50 U.S.C. Chapter 36], George Walker Bush did clandestinely direct the National Security Agency and various other intelligence agencies, in secret and outside the lawful scope of their mandates, for purposes unrelated to any lawful function of his offices, to conduct electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States on U.S. soil without seeking to obtain, before or after, a judicial warrant, thereby subverting the powers of the Congress and the Judiciary by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courts established by Congress, whose express purpose is to check such abuses of executive power, provoking the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to file a complaint and another judge to resign in protest, the said program having been subsequently ruled illegal (ACLU vs. NSA); he has also concealed the existence of this unlawful program of spying on American citizens from the people and all but a few of their representatives in Congress, even resorting to outright public deceit as on April 20, 2004, when he told an audience in Buffalo, New York: `any time you hear the United States Government talking about wiretap, it requires . . . a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so', whereby said George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.

In all of this, George Walker Bush has repeatedly and unapologetically misled the American people and has sought to undermine the system of checks and balances established by the Founding Fathers. Wherefore George Walker Bush, by such conduct, and in the interest of saving our Constitution and our democracy from the threat of arbitrary government, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

link
Falco Rex
QUOTE
but,above and beyond his personal opinion about how they did it,the important fact to consider is that a former bush administration official believes his former employers are complicit --


I don't think so, myself...
Almost any former employee of anywhere has some smack to talk about the jerks that they "Used" to work for...
Now if a current employee wants to say something; that would be much more interesting..

And frankly; ranting about invisible planes pretty much says something to me..It says the Administration has at least some talent in weeding out the loops..
joc
QUOTE
...No Offence to Sunofone's post I always appreciate your perspective on these posts, these ones inpaticular...but there is a bigger problem at hand here folks and together we need to figure out what to do...


What 'bigger' problem might that be?

If all the particulars of the videos concerning this 'inside job' are correct...they do lead to some very interesting speculation...but are they correct? How many of you have done any 'homework' regarding some of the 'facts' in these videos? I haven't...but I am not the one making wild accusations either.

Homework Assignment:

1. Show me factual evidence (and please spare me pages of internet search engines 'saying' something is true...show me factual evidence of the following:

a. The Video says W's little brother headed the Security Company that 'rewired' both buildings for security during the two years prior to nine-eleven. Evidence please.
b. The Video says that a complete shutdown of electrical power to both buildings occured in the days immediately preceding nine-eleven. That the occupants were told 3 weeks in advance. And that during this time...people were going in and out stringing wire everywhere...without security cameras, because there was no electricity in either building. Evidence please.

c. The Video says the Banker at the top of one tower took the day off (nine-eleven) to recover from the rigor of getting his computer system up and running after the power shutdown. He also says in the video that a fine dust covered everything in the tower in the days prior to the planes hitting the towers. He says in the video that 'strange noises' were heard on a floor just above him and when he investigated he found nothing...nothing!..on that floor...no furniture, carpet...nothing. Evidence please.

I find the entire video to be full of Ripleys Believe it or nots. There is something very strange about nine-eleven. I find it very hard to believe that all 3 buildings were completely and totally destroyed. And yet...some of the 'facts' of the video are very much in question.

Show me some evidence...not internet search engines relating the same story...but real factual evidence that one could present in a court of law. Other wise....I tend to side with Rambo...just sthu about it.

Evidence please.

I mean really...are you just going to believe a video without checking into some of their facts? That requires more blind faith than what the Christians are accused of having.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.