QUOTE(PLO @ May 15 2006, 07:16 PM) [snapback]1190192[/snapback]
no probs man, if you can track down Jazz Thing, you see to have a thign for jazz music, so if you listen to that itll proabbly draw a wry smile or two about hip hop. Or if u want man if you MSN ill just send you some, up to you though mate, i know what folk are like about sh** like that.
Got it all.
I can see where you would think I'd get a wry smile or two at Jazz Thing. I did.
I also listened to a bunch of Gang Starr, Immortal technique, and even Rage Against the Machine.
The latter seems to be considered a hip-hop/metal hybrid, which I can see. However, it's unappealing musically...to me.
I do have a thing for jazz. I would, as a drummer, say that if one wishes to see where the progressive happenings are in drumming, jazz is where one goes to find it. That's where the most innovative, burning things happen. Of course, I grew up on Motown and R&B and rock, and gravitated into musical studies that sat me in a progressive musical environment; fusion, and other related things.
I approach music from a musician's standpoint, and look at the innovativeness of the instrumentalists and their expression and of course, technique. And, when vocals come into play, I look for singing, and, depending on the musical format, lyrics.
In something like Rage...I am bored with the musicianship, and singing is not exactly necessary there. It appears to me that when alot of people talk about "good" in music, they're focused on one aspect, the message of the lyrics. In hip-hop, I think you'd better be able to hear the lyrics and make out what's being said very clearly, because, even in this material I've listened to, instrumentally it's simply a banal backdrop for the words, and contains nothing in the form of compelling musicianship.
For instance, I don't think anyone could possibly listen to "Dear Mama" and say, "what a great piece of music!" Sure, they could be emotionally affected by the lyrics, but beyond that, musically it is quite frankly bereft. And vocally, well, it's rap. Fine. If you like monotonic chanting as opposed to singing, then you like it.
Another aspect I didn't mention before, but which is highly irritating is the complete copping of someone elses tune. While I'm sure there's a royalty arrangement involved in this stuff (there'd better be, otherwise plagiarism comes into play), a thing like "Changes", which is a rap based off of Bruce Hornsby's main piano line in "The Way It Is", is ludicrous to me. It uses the verbatim piano riff.
That drives me nuts.
...and I thought that early effort suffered for Bruce because of a metronomic drummer who didn't feel or flow with the piece (in other words, he played like a machine, which is the basis of most hip-hop drum tracks). Today, that's alot different as Bruce is really an exceptionally gifted improvisor, especially in concert.Bottom line is, no matter what I hear in the genre, I see a decided lack of singing (which is of course part of the genre), and thus pertinent melodic structure, I see 4/4 droning beats, mostly "played" by a machine, simplistic, equally droning bass lines, a few melodic embellishments thrown in, typical effects, virtually no structure other than ABAB...nothing innovative rythmically (I am not at all certain that any rap artist knows what I would mean if I asked them about a 5/4 or 7/8 time signature) and a certain lyrical expression which from my perspective and training is minimalistic, quirky, and is designed to convey a particular attitude rather than a musical expression.
I think hip-hop is an infinitely popular urban expression, and I can see where it leaves an impression on people, and even garners a bit of idol worship and such. But it does nothing for the musician in me.
This of course doesn't mean it's "bad" or "wrong" or anything like that. It's there, and it's successful. Enough said. That says an awful lot, actually.
But this thread was originally about Tupac Shakur being alive, I think.
And that's what I question. How could anyone actually place credence in these legends, based upon some lyrical content, it seems, that this guy is alive?
He was a rapper. He took his urban lifestyle, and his propensity to get into legal trouble, and its pain and its undesirable aspects and brought them with him into the arena of some sort of fame. It followed him, and like so many other such "role models" of the genre, it got him.
Of course, that isn't the exclusive pervue of rappers. After all, Elvis lives

, you know, and he wasn't exactly a hip-hop star.
It is of course as equally ridiculous to think that Elvis is alive--that Paul McCartney is dead-- as it is to think that Tupac is alive.