http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html <- Bush a Nazi?

Considering he terrorized an entire nation with 9/11, sent people to die in afghanistan for opium and oil, sent us to Iraq for oil.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/trinitite.html - Why we went to Iraq.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/goldstein.html - Wanted: Enemy to Justify $344 Billion War Budget

Terrorism - Definition - A system of government that seeks to rule by intimidation. Oh wow, that sounds like democracy in our great old country of the United States.

You read the magazines, you watch the news, its all lies. Its a huge coverup. The government screens storys before they makes it to you so the lie is kept in tact. There are a few select free press people out there that report the truth, so much they actually have been tortured by the CIA to release the truth to people. Those of you who believe our system in this country is hiding nothing, are being brainwashed.

Just goes to show you that all the facts are there, it just takes someone with the balls to put it all together so people get the truth. It also takes balls to believe something that isn't shoved in your face by the government and the media.

All hail Mr. Big Balls...

Whatever Dude!!!!

I like BUSH, maybe because I'm a republican from the Republic of Texas. I see how you Yankees think, as I am from Indiana raised.

So you got all these sources and believing it, and assuming these statements are true?

Also, keeping things confidential gets us where we are today. Why do people keep complaining if this country is so bad. Many other counties are worse and need help. Why don't they move away?.... like to Mexico.. LOL... you won't even have to pay taxes.

I'm not brainwashed, I agree with our gonernment doing cover ups.

The facts are all there, it just takes an open mind to even begin to unravel the lies.

If its a a conspiracy, Put it in the proper section.

-Moved-

Bush is weird, but personaly I`m more scared of that guy with the shotgun.

An open mind can also lead you believe anything, no matter how blasphemtic it is.

Stalingrad that sounds like something the Church tells people to keep them from having sex.

its gettin pretty tiring the people who just balatantly dont discuss anything thats atually posted in the thread or links but just repond with their godamn negativity, WTF IS THE POINT IN THAT?, it just shows utter ignorance and a complete lack of respect for understanding.

* Terrorism - Definition - A system of government that seeks to rule by intimidation. Oh wow, that sounds like democracy in our great old country of the United States. *

Nice definition...if your intended purpose was to make America look bad.

*Considering he terrorized an entire nation with 9/11, *

WHAT?!?No proof... Just a conspiracy...

*government screens storys before they makes it to you so the lie is kept in tact. There are a few select free press people out there that report the truth, so much they actually have been tortured by the CIA to release the truth to people. *

And where'd you get this from? The MEDIA maybe...? Why would you trust them when you say that the government is behind it, screening everything? Besides, the government screens for our benefit, because over half of America believes news coverages are downright DEPRESSING...
Don't blame the government, THANK IT!

Anyway, Bush a Nazi? Well, look at it this way... The Nazis were not bad people-besides a select few. So guess what??? Bush is a Nazi. Tricked into presidency, he is faced by people telling him what to do. It is not his choice what we do...This may be all a conspiracy but it is a higher intelligence that makes these desicions, not "The Decider". George Bus is more of a spokes-person than a "decider"...Remember this is conspiracy, not fact. Argue if you wish!

Wouldn't know, I don't go to Church, and If I do, it's always forced.



You want me to talk about it? Ok.

I bet all of you who are calling Bush a Nazi, don't even know what a Nazi is. All you think it Jew killer and black hater.

Even with the proper definition of a Nazi, bush is still not one.



By this I mean don't take the road of the mis-informed and corrupted. The ridiculous people pretty much that believe anything they're told or to just go along with the mainstream.

"don't even know what a Nazi is"

Your right in the fact that bush is not a member of the national socialist party.

"Even with the proper definition of a Nazi, bush is still not one"

He is however someone with extremely racist and authoritarian views, which qualifies him to be a nazi, this is based upon the goverment he represents and their foreign policies. Becuase thats what nazi means in the derogatory sense a person with extreme racist or authoritarian views. And you are more than welcome to actually discuss any of the links provided.

btw- terrorism isnt even a government, how stupid is that? Oh yes bin Laden is the leader of a terrorism government... wow that makes a lot of sense...

Um... not, Bush is niether to those, he is just really really REALLY bad at his job. It does not qualify him as a Nazi in the derogatory sense either. All the links are the same things I've seen posted before: BS that only has a biased agenda. It just makes a bunch of accusations and bends well known facts to fit their own goal. I actually did read all three. Same bs.

your saying american foreign policy isnt authoritarian?, or the laws that govern the "Patriot" Act, no matter if you think its for your defence, are they not authoritarian in nature?, perhaps in teh extreme?

"It just makes a bunch of accusations and bends well known facts to fit their own goal"

like what?

They are not authoritarian. Look the word up.



Read them... just read them.

Take special note to this one http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/trinitite.html

What am I saying this though, you'll believe in it all because you just have to make the government look bad or make it look like they have total evil and corrupt intentions.

"They are not authoritarian. Look the word up."

favouring or enforcing strict obedience to authority is basicaly what every legal system does, by nature and by definition they are authoratarian, to argue that point otherwise, well its kinda just wrong basicaly. And if your actually going to sit their and say the american goverments foreign policy is not authoritarian in nature [quite a lot of dictators they sponsered in their time eh?] then im not continuing this any further, as it is obvious to anyone. This is here is a good reminder of the authoritarian actions used by the american goverments.

http://www.killinghope.org/

"you'll believe in it all because you just have to make the government look bad or make it look like they have total evil and corrupt intentions"

no i beleive it becuase its true. The point of the article is that any other countrys weapons capacity is completely negated by americas massive nuclear arsenal. This is true, how can you argue against it? how it maek the goverment evil and corrupt is entirely subjective, some may consider massive stockpiling of weapons of mass destruction a bad thing. Some people might like the idea our goverments are horading and continualy building crazy super weapons that could annihilate our planet in a mtter of seconds. It depends on the person in that regard, however the article was not about the morality of weapons and their application, it was about how Iraq posed no threat no america, and neither does Iran in any way shape or form. Highlighting that anythin you read to the contrary was bulls*** propaganda to make you beleive there was some terrible enemy out there that needed to or needs to be crushed.

if you went to the links you would have realized the point of my topic, looook at them.

My point to posting "Bush is a Nazi?" with a question mark, was my reasoning behind how Bush is a dictator much like Hitler was. One was the Patriot Act, people hardly read it yet they can stand behind wire-tapping and the government going into personal email account to "check" for terrorist activity, when in reality, Bush is acting just like one would as a Dictator. He seems a lot like he wants to take over the world, going from country to country, making up storys for those to swallow as to why we went in there. Authoritarian, yes, he fits the bill. Oh sure, we say we have freedoms in this country, but what you don't know is those freedoms are controlled and spied on on a constant basis. You would probably say I have no proof, and that I do not. This is what I believe in my own heart, that you cannot trust the government for once second, you cannot go willingly to believe everything they have set on your plate as fact.

terrorism: "...the systematic use of terror or unpredictable violence against publics, or individuals to attain a political objective. Terrorism has been used by political organizations with both rightist and leftist objectives, by nationalistic and ethnic groups, by revolutionaries, and by the armies and secret police of governments themselves."

Terrorism is defined in the U.S. by the Code of Federal Regulations as: "..the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85)

source: http://www.terrorismfiles.org/encyclopaedia/terrorism.html

Terrorism can come from a government, but that definition on the page i earlier came from was miscontrued to someone's belief of what terrorism meant. Terrorism can me different things to different people.

Other arguments include that:
*There is no strict worldwide commonly accepted definition.
*Any definition that could be agreed upon in, say, English-speaking countries would be biased towards those countries.
*Most groups called "terrorist" deny such accusations. Virtually no organisation openly calls itself terrorist.
*Many groups call all their enemies "terrorist".
*There is no hope that people will ever all agree who is "terrorist" and who is not.
*The term as widely used in the West reflects a bias towards the status quo. Violence by established governments is sold as "defence", even when that claim is considered dubious by some; any attempt to oppose the established order through military means, however, is often labelled "terrorism".
*The word "Terrorist" is pejorative.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_terrorism

Thanks for the links. I want to know what the media never talks about.
The History Channels give the same old stories.

I had read about the Bush investment in Germany and getting them back.
I think the Hess family in Germany is big in oil but "Trading With The Enemy"
by Charles Higham mentions neither of them.


What happens to sand at a neutron bomb test?
History Channel or PBS (airing mostly UK concoctions) say Germany never came near
an atomic bomb. Some think that Germany developed the Neutron bomb and went
to North Africa to test it.

As for 9/11, the lack of any idea that funding for the 11/93 WTC bombing was going away
and that bombs on planes was no concern to the flying public after Soctland's incident
is hard to believe.
If more attention was given to who was using the airways, the 9/11 plot might
have been averted.

Arent Nazi germans who are ussualy bold or shaved head who wear a swastika and usually hate jews ect ect ect...... Nazi dosent mean evil....

I'm not brainwashed, I agree with our gonernment doing cover ups.
[/quote]

Brainwashing at it's best....

Silliness at its best.

He made the cover of Time! Wow! All Bush**es are making Bin Forgotten sound like an idiot. If he is an idiot, how could he have "masterminded" 9/11?

Wow. Your anti Bush statements are so clever.

he was being sarcastic

Nice way to ruin all of your credibility.

Please, make sure you look up a word in the dictionary, before you post its 'definition'.

that is a nice opinion, now how about giving us a source that states that in exact detail.