QUOTE(Brian McMalley @ May 31 2006, 10:50 PM) [snapback]1213182[/snapback]
Well, they did mention right off the bat that when they merge, it will be capable of swallowing material equal to billions of stars. To me that sounds like a threat to mankind. I know there are nearly an infinite amount of stars out there, but with a power like that you'd think it would get to us eventually. I may have been out of hand by pointing the finger at NASA based off of a CNN article. I do admit that. I just didn't like how they composed the article. They start off by telling it's capabilities when merged, and draw out the tension by explaining black holes. Then, at the very end of the article, they say that it'll take millions of years. That's bad journalism. From their point of view it's good because it keeps the reader drawn in, but only by making them think that it's something important.
Anyway, about the asteroids. Calculations are interesting aren't they? Perhaps they're too anxious about things like that? Then again, it would be good to know if a meteor would actually collide with Earth while we still had time to safely do something about it.
In my brief experience, more often than not, it's the journalist her/himself who inevitably pulls themselves out of the article at the very end in order to maintain a certain 'dignity', let's call it.
Everyone's looking for a story to conjure up, run through and print by the end of the week, but no one wants to look like a conspiring lunatic with nothing better to do than to spread news of doom to us all, either.
As for black holes themselves, I'm not understanding the chatter about it. It seems to me that humans as a whole have a tendency to stick ourselves into useless debates, that really have nothing to do with our own fate (unless that is the human's karma, which wouldn't at all surprise me).
Perhaps our best course of action at this point is to start looking for the reasons on a more metaphysical level, if you're into that kinda thing.
Carey.