QUOTE
I may have worded my topic wrong, I’m sorry.
Let me clear this up. To all the kids out there, who claim they can perform pyrokiniesis, cryokiniesis and all the other X-men powers they claim to have, I would like to see proof of these abilities. To all the people out there who claim psiwheels as proof, don't present that to me as evidence. Psiwheel have, many times over, been debunked.
Durnut your birthrate is 5 December 1983 which then means you are an adult, you have identified yourself as a male and so, I will draw the conclusion that this information is correct. In the first place, a question put to you was clear and despite the fact you have
as of yet not responded, to it let me again present the same issue.
Triad states Jun 29 2006, 11:39 PM Post #6....
QUOTE
What to you would constitute absolute proof??
It is a simple question durnut and the teenagers who post in this forum in all probability would want to know what your answer is....It is not a difficult question to answer and to be clear just because an adult asked the question, given my past experience working with teenagers, I would think it reasonable you provide an answer.
Now let’s continue....
QUOTE
As for my electric coin tosser comment, that you felt the need to post unnesessarily, to which has no relation to this topic, but I will comment on anyway. After careful deliberation, I realized that it is nothing more then chance
It has every relation to the topic you asked for proof and I provided proof, now the truth be known I am not a teenager, but lets be honest here......what exactly is the basis of your conclusion, as a result of your deliberation and can you provide (given the fact you understood the statistical analysis) a mathematical conclusion which negates your prior response (especially given the fact your response addresses the mathematical components of the data presented)?????????????????
QUOTE
To all the believers out there. All I am asking is if you claim to be able to perform any kind of telekinesis, to please provide proof, with the exception of [b]psiwheels. I feel my request is very reasonable. Thank you all.
Now again lets compare that to you most recent statements....
QUOTE
I may have worded my topic wrong, I’m sorry.
Let me clear this up. To all the kids out there, who claim they can perform pyrokiniesis, cryokiniesis and all the other X-men powers they claim to have, I would like to see proof of these abilitys. To all the people out there who claim psiwheels as proof, don't present that to me as evidence. Psiwheel have, many times over, been debunked
Wow, what a big difference and that you say you
may have worded the topic wrong??? This is a substantive difference, not only do you not only want to talk to adults, you no longer with to discuss
telekinesis.
QUOTE
This is the end of that topic, if you feel the need to address me directly about that post, please pm me and I will be more then happy to share my ideas with you.
As soon as pigs fly and/or you provide what has been requested above, I can assure you sir, that just as soon as hell freezes over, I will be more than happy to send you a PM.
Durnut states....
QUOTE
And yet, even with the million dollar offer, nobody has gotten the money.
Megalomania states....
QUOTE
Or maybe you should read implications better...
To dismiss is to give little attention to.
He finished that sentence with no further questions, or reason to talk about it.
He ended the Randi talk, until you brought up again
QUOTE
Main Entry: and
Function: conjunction
Pronunciation: &n(d), (')an(d), usually & n(d) after t, d, s or z, often & m after p or b, sometimes & [ng] after k or g
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German unti and
1 -- used as a function word to indicate connection or addition especially of items within the same class or type -- used to join sentence elements of the same grammatical rank or function
2 a -- used as a function word to express logical modification, consequence, antithesis, or supplementary explanation b -- used as a function word to join one finite verb (as go, come, try) to another so that together they are logically equivalent to an infinitive of purpose <come and see me>
3 obsolete : IF
4 -- used in logic to form a conjunction
- and so forth/&n-'sO-"fOrth, -"fo rth 1 : and others or more of the same or similar kind 2 : further in the same or similar manner 3 : and the rest 4 : and other things
- and so on/&n-'sO-"o n, -"än : and so forth
Main Entry: 1yet
Function: adverb
Pronunciation: 'yet
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English gīet; akin to Old Frisian ieta yet
1 a : in addition : BESIDES <gives yet another reason> b : EVEN 2c <a yet higher speed> c : on top of everything else : no less <had wells going dry. Between two large lakes, yet -- J. H. Buzard>
2 a (1) : up to now : so far <hasn't done much yet> -- often used to imply the negative of a following infinitive <have yet to win a game> (2) : at this or that time : so soon as now <not time to go yet> b : continuously up to the present or a specified time : STILL <is yet a new country> c : at a future time : EVENTUALLY <may yet see the light>
3 : NEVERTHELESS , HOWEVER
- as yet : up to the present or a specified time
- yet again : one more time <arrived late yet again>
Main Entry: 2yet
Function: conjunction
: but nevertheless : BUT
To be honest Megalomania, if you want me to, we can address the rest of durnut sentence, but given the above, I hope you realize, it will only confirm that words and there meaning can be identified....and in is respect to this case, the words and there definition, point to the fact, that you need to read the comments more carefully....Seriously dude you need a reality check…..
Ericraven2003 states.....
QUOTE
People that have these abilities would have no problem finding a scientist willing to prove it. That scientist would be famous.
Dean Radin of Princeton's Psychology Department and Roger Nelson of the PEAR lab are famous, they have proven beyond any shadow of doubt, that, not only is telekinesis is valid, but, as well, is the paranormal as a whole, worthy of serious investigation. What is it that you want
ericraven2003 that Radin and Nelson appear at the tonight show?????
Personally I, feel that given the fact that John Bell was not invited to talk to Johnny Carson, it would actually be inappropriate, to invite Dean Radin to do the same (equivalent, as J. Leno now is in charge of the show).
Any thoughts?