Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Atlantis
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality, Religion and Beliefs
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Pax Unum
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 22 2006, 07:41 PM) [snapback]1317850[/snapback]

So, you are pretty much making these things up. You don't really have any sources for any of this.

no.gif
boorite
Guys, the, uh, payphone is out of order, if you take my meaning.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 23 2006, 12:41 AM) [snapback]1317850[/snapback]

So, you are pretty much making these things up. You don't really have any sources for any of this.



laugh.gif his source is BIBLE u need to read morre original.gif btw he admited he is illiterate so how do you read bible lol w00t.gif or my posts jajjaahahaha
S.A leon
ok guys...........here my new findings who build the pyramid of giza in egypt,
i got this clue and nobody else does and u never believe it.......

Rocks and sand taken from Planet Mars.
[attachmentid=27787]

Atlantis build this pyramid only uses this 3machine.

1) Atlantis build a factory at planet Mars to process those rocks:-
[attachmentid=27788]

2) Cargoship later transport back the rocks to planet earth, the 2machine start working to build the pyramid in Egypt.
[attachmentid=27789]

3) One machine clearing up the sand and flattening up the land.
[attachmentid=27790]

So Atlantis just need 3machine to build the pyramid within few hours only and human had
figured it years and decade taken to build the pyramid!















AtlantisRises
Oh god, its contagious
S.A leon

Back 2006, present time.

Research finding in ANTARCTICA during the war time.

Interesting synchronicity: USN Rear Admiral Donald Baxter MacMillan (1874-1970) was an Arctic explorer and scientist who organized the personnel for the 1908-09 Robert Peary expedition to the North Pole. He personally led 29 Arctic expeditions between 1913 and 1954, searching for (but not explaining what he meant by) "The Arctic Atlantis". So the Germans were not alone in esoteric Polar fascinations. MacMillan's anthropological research among the Eskimo remains seminal work in that field of study.


Operation Highjump:

The references to Operation Highjump on ".gov" websites tend to be mere passing mentions, a paragraph or two in the overall chronology of Antarctic exploration. Even the NASA site has that much, and no more. Small coverage for the reputed largest Antarctic expedition in history. To be fair, many books have been written by and about the men involved- but that tends to happen for almost any military exercise. It really does feel like there might have been a secret agenda mixed into this operation. There are countless other records covering the individual ships that participated, and an even greater number of independent books and sites detailing the Wild Theories. I even found one website that draws a connection between Operation Highjump and the JFK assassination! When I run into a level of confusion that implies the possibility of disinformation, I start to become suspicious. Fortunately, there is an authoritative and comprehensive chronicle of the mission (minus the Wild Theories) at www.southpole.com , from which I take this quote:
"How the navy high command convinced Congress to fund the expensive expedition is a mystery to this day. The navy had not been in charge of a South Polar expedition since the exploration by Charles Wilkes a hundred years earlier."

http://www.rongtolas.com/chap_17.htm
Bosanchero
How do we explain this,
IMAGINARY PEOPLE, WENT TO MARS AGES AGO, AND BUILD ROCKS !!!

wtffffff ??? why would you go somewhere so far to make a ROCK !!!

thats like you sitting at home, wanting to go to bathroom and decide to go to bathroom in some other country lol,

First what we need is PROOF atlantis existed,
Second WE ALREADY KNOW EGYPTIANS BUILD THE PYRAMIDS (yes we KNOW IT)
3rd STOP REPEATING YOURSELF 99% of us dont belive you for second, your worst than MAD original.gif

4th i bid you GOOD DAY
Pax Unum
QUOTE(S.A leon @ Aug 23 2006, 01:09 AM) [snapback]1318053[/snapback]

ok guys...........here my new findings who build the pyramid of giza in egypt,
i got this clue and nobody else does and u never believe it.......

Rocks and sand taken from Planet Mars.
[attachmentid=27787]

Atlantis build this pyramid only uses this 3machine.

1) Atlantis build a factory at planet Mars to process those rocks:-
[attachmentid=27788]

2) Cargoship later transport back the rocks to planet earth, the 2machine start working to build the pyramid in Egypt.
[attachmentid=27789]

3) One machine clearing up the sand and flattening up the land.
[attachmentid=27790]

So Atlantis just need 3machine to build the pyramid within few hours only and human had
figured it years and decade taken to build the pyramid!

you ARE joking... right?
boorite
Yes, he's joking.

The other one-- his thinker is busted. Let's say that certain posts here should be looked at by a professional.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(boorite @ Aug 23 2006, 04:44 PM) [snapback]1318626[/snapback]

Yes, he's joking.

The other one-- his thinker is busted. Let's say that certain posts here should be looked at by a professional.

u sure hmm.gif huh.gif
boorite
QUOTE(Bosanchero @ Aug 23 2006, 05:27 PM) [snapback]1318698[/snapback]

u sure hmm.gif huh.gif


God, I hope so.

Edit: Criminy, I could be wrong. Er, let's see... how to explain that Industrial Light and Magic is not a source of historic replicas...
designer
I believe.
The Greek
Antlantis & greece had a war ,this was estimated 40.000 years before and they had better technology than today.Atlantian nuke Aegean (and it sunk and become sea) destroynig the greek army wich they respond with nukes as a result sink atlantis.It is belived that is at the center of antlanic ocean who tooked his name from.
ivytheplant
Whoa whoa whoa here. Now how did the Greeks and Atlanteans having nuclear weapons come into this? Did they also have a particle accelerator? Made out of...stone...
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 23 2006, 12:41 AM) [snapback]1317850[/snapback]

So, you are pretty much making these things up. You don't really have any sources for any of this.


i know the make of rocks that make cape breton island the mira terrane,br'dor terrane ,precambrian shield,aspy terrane and because of these comming together put cape breton island right in the middle of the atlas mts and the appalation mts for they run 1500 miles either way, and was at a hight of atleest 35 km.

but at this time the cape breton island of then was the capstone of,not the mer island of 3000 + sm
and a average hight of 1700 ft give or take.
but that would of been when the world was one.

before north america and south america divided and the atlantic oceian got bigger well it was'nt even there,but when the mid -atlantic ridge becane to protuse new rock like a great big convaer belt two running east and west.

at aboat 10 cm a year ,but the first time it opand up the capstone which is cape breton fell
and the location of this new island was just beyond the pillars of hercules ,because that is were the urasia plate and african plate meet .

how far it fell well thats a hard one but i gess you can compare it to that one down off north west africa ,the two volcanos ones dorment ones not if the one of them falls it would kill 200,000,000 through out the atlantic ocean but this happend many ,many times because it took 200,000,000 years to get from there to here.

now there is fossels that were found that show that there was a tropacol climat on cape breton at one time.
and you can see if this mt which cape breton island is the cap stone of.

was not here, north america would have gone straght in staide of counter clock wise.kinda like south america with out the sweril.

anyway this is how the rockeis were formed because this is were the pacific plate meets the north american plate and it to will fall and this is documented they call them ophan suenomees the chines or japanes can't remember right now to much canabie i geass.

back to the story of atlantis not egypt for those that setteled there came from here remember the capital island of, and plus if you were to look for a civilisation which used the bedrock as a medeam of work and live in.

because they carved the stone it is told by plato each generation tryed to out do the next, that came along .so why not look at the geoligy and cross it with mytholigy.

my fathe in the book of life and the i 'am in me and how i relate to god our father is in the spiritual beleifs thread not atlantis i know ,but plato gives us that city that pertains to the mother to me for its a queenly city and is in the east on this island.

and funny thing wasn't sophiea (wisdom)in myth that made the man that is greek.

but that is in the east and now i'm in the west and the only place that talks about the father or a family setting and a man with a boat who had to built because of a great flood is the bible for me and i'm sure the old test goes back far anuf to plato's time.

but here on cape breton island i can bring you or whome ever and show you that boat ,and
what i mean when i say that is the mic-mac in eastern canada have a story of in the el-time(old test i geass)but it talks of a man named sabanees were he would think long and hard by a small lake the story is on this web site somewere about an ark.

the place were you can see p.e.i. and it looks like a boat that looks like its wieghd heavy in the water is on my fathers land and thats the name the mic-mac of today have named it.

it just so happans that, that land is also the tomb of the first father for it is on the west ,
i wanna show the truth that lies on the right hand side.


Pax Unum
QUOTE(The Greek @ Aug 23 2006, 05:43 PM) [snapback]1319240[/snapback]

Antlantis & greece had a war ,this was estimated 40.000 years before and they had better technology than today.Atlantian nuke Aegean (and it sunk and become sea) destroynig the greek army wich they respond with nukes as a result sink atlantis.It is belived that is at the center of antlanic ocean who tooked his name from.

According to the story written by Plato, Atlantis, lying "beyond the pillars of Hercules", was a naval power, having conquered many parts of western Europe and Africa. Soon after a failed invasion of Athens, Atlantis sank in the waves "in a single day and night of misfortune" after a natural catastrophe happened 9,000 years before... where did you get 40.000 years and nukes from?
AtlantisRises
QUOTE(Pax Unum @ Aug 24 2006, 11:58 AM) [snapback]1319587[/snapback]

According to the story written by Plato, Atlantis, lying "beyond the pillars of Hercules", was a naval power, having conquered many parts of western Europe and Africa. Soon after a failed invasion of Athens, Atlantis sank in the waves "in a single day and night of misfortune" after a natural catastrophe happened 9,000 years before... where did you get 40.000 years and nukes from?



He probably made it up or saw it in a cartoon.
Pax Unum
QUOTE(AtlantisRises @ Aug 23 2006, 09:30 PM) [snapback]1319589[/snapback]

He probably made it up or saw it in a cartoon.

LOL, more like Stargate Atlantis... thumbsup.gif
ivytheplant
QUOTE(Pax Unum @ Aug 23 2006, 08:32 PM) [snapback]1319592[/snapback]

LOL, more like Stargate Atlantis... thumbsup.gif


Those weren't nukes. Those were these probe-like squidy things that...

Erm...nevermind
S.A leon
QUOTE(boorite @ Aug 23 2006, 04:44 PM) [snapback]1318626[/snapback]

Yes, he's joking.

The other one-- his thinker is busted. Let's say that certain posts here should be looked at by a professional.



From BBC New, 2006

"Dark matter and dark energy are not what anyone would have expected starting from the perspective of what the Universe should be like," said Sean Carroll, a cosmologist at the University of Chicago, who was not involved with the study, "but we're trying to understand why it's like that and this result puts us on that path."

Marusa Bradac, at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (Slac) in California, added: "We had predicted the existence of dark matter for decades, but now we've seen it in action. This is groundbreaking."

AND NOW THE ATLANTIS ONLY CAN BE SEEN BY SPECIAL KIND OF PEOPLE, AS ATLANTIS
EXISTED 300 million yrs ago not even the age of troy, and those who believe will be able
to search for the truth and those who not believe and just blindly digging up
some nuts historians will be forever loss in the air and ATLANTIS does not belong
to this civilisation and nothing to do with this civilisation.
Their civilisation had gone, varnish, destroy long long time ago, they made us with
their genetic engineering u can call that, and they want a good civilisation, harmony
and peaceful civilisation but sadly it turn out the other way round and being explain in the
bible Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden.

GOD/ Heaven= ATLANTIS, the advance civilisation.
REVELATION= Rising of Atlantis.
666= Bomb, or invaders.

So open up your eyes everyone of you, what is the world having now?? Conflict?? About what conflict? Religion conflict, believe, GOD?? GOD?? GOD?? My god?? Jesus mention GOD, god= Atlantis
GOD had a plan for us, he mention many many times and all pastor in the church as well!!!
Plan= Of course Atlantis had plan for human being, as all human being program when
they will end their life and this is call faith.

DO YOU ALL GET IT NOW!!!!!!!




aquatus1
Where are you getting your Atlantis info from?
AtlantisRises
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 24 2006, 01:23 PM) [snapback]1319674[/snapback]

Where are you getting your Atlantis info from?



Well there are only three reputable was to get info on atlantis.

One by a psychic experience

two be told by a god/higher being/ pleidian etc

three make it up and then refuse to admit its made up.

God forbid that any real study or research go into your answer
Bosanchero
QUOTE(AtlantisRises @ Aug 24 2006, 04:10 AM) [snapback]1319689[/snapback]

Well there are only three reputable was to get info on atlantis.

One by a psychic experience

two be told by a god/higher being/ pleidian etc

three make it up and then refuse to admit its made up.

God forbid that any real study or research go into your answer


unsure.gif dontgetit.gif unsure.gif dontgetit.gif
u must understand something my friend FIRST TWO ARE MADE UP 2 laugh.gif grin2.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif
AtlantisRises
QUOTE(Bosanchero @ Aug 24 2006, 10:52 PM) [snapback]1319964[/snapback]

unsure.gif dontgetit.gif unsure.gif dontgetit.gif
u must understand something my friend FIRST TWO ARE MADE UP 2 laugh.gif grin2.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif thumbsup.gif



I am sure they are true to the gullible fools i mean people who have them laugh.gif
Bosanchero
QUOTE(AtlantisRises @ Aug 24 2006, 01:26 PM) [snapback]1319969[/snapback]

I am sure they are true to the gullible fools i mean people who have them laugh.gif


yes, yes i forgot about them grin2.gif laugh.gif grin2.gif laugh.gif user posted image
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 23 2006, 12:41 AM) [snapback]1317850[/snapback]

So, you are pretty much making these things up. You don't really have any sources for any of this.


i understand the consept of plate tectonics and the movement of the earth the geoligy i got from the local unaversaty and the many books i had to read and try to learn as i live my life.but the truth is that not one out there can give a exacked location just thieores.

and to say to me if i have any creatible sources,who out there does , you all can try to say that i'm wrong but it won't change the fact that i'm not, the souce is plato ,all others well there JUST GUESSES.
but when you take out the guesses you are left with the truth ,and that is that the geoligy of cape breton makes it the one because it is the only island that can be placed at that spot that plato talks about just beyond the pillars .

as for time that don't matter ,how maney times has it been changed in the last 2000 years,so it just don't matter.

i look for anwsers that are writen in stone for they withstand the passedge of time and that anwser is writen in the bedrock of cape breton island ,and in the highlands the earth is not so deep so the diggen ain't so hard.



aquatus1
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 25 2006, 07:56 PM) [snapback]1321945[/snapback]

i understand the consept of plate tectonics and the movement of the earth the geoligy i got from the local unaversaty and the many books i had to read and try to learn as i live my life.but the truth is that not one out there can give a exacked location just thieores.

and to say to me if i have any creatible sources,who out there does , you all can try to say that i'm wrong but it won't change the fact that i'm not, the souce is plato ,all others well there JUST GUESSES.


I am not saying that you are wrong. What I am saying is that unless you are able to support your ideas, then they cannot be called theories. Theories ahve support. Theories acan be independantly confirmed. Unless you can present something to support your claims, there is no way to verify that you have done anything other than make up your antire claim.

Tell you what: why don't you start by simply explaining how you decided that Atlantis was a paradise? What were your sources? How did you come to your conclusion?
M.A.D
atlantis was the first right ,the first garden i'll say that humans on this planet, that were in harmonie with the land and sea.
and if one is in harmonie with there seroundings, than there are in paradice ,arnt they?
and when i say that cape breton is one with the land and sea ,you can see by the peaple that live here and i do ,for we have plenty of fisherman,and we have plenty of farmers,and our festavals our quite inlightening to and if you went around the cabot trial you would see this paradise for youself.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 25 2006, 09:20 PM) [snapback]1322096[/snapback]

atlantis was the first right ,the first garden i'll say that humans on this planet, that were in harmonie with the land and sea.
and if one is in harmonie with there seroundings, than there are in paradice ,arnt they?
and when i say that cape breton is one with the land and sea ,you can see by the peaple that live here and i do ,for we have plenty of fisherman,and we have plenty of farmers,and our festavals our quite inlightening to and if you went around the cabot trial you would see this paradise for youself.



hahah u call paradise someone beeing one with nature original.gif than i have been in so many paradises i dint need to go to heaven original.gif
go to some villages in china and you will see paradise original.gif

take my country for example (Bosnia) i consider it to be the most beautifull place in the world original.gif why because i have been all over the world and only place that came close to compare to bosnias natural beauty was switzerland mostly because of the mountains wink2.gif
i suggest you take look at pics argon posted in Bosnian Pyramid thread original.gif

in other words we all think that where we are from is most beautifull and it useally has nothing to do with true beaty it just has alot to do with who we are and things we stand for,
if you are tully looking for paradise, our planet is it, and you might be religious and not take this as an answer but your "THEORY" on atlantis has as much proof as "AFTERLIFE" or "HEAVEN" Theory's NONE yes.gif wub.gif wub.gif wub.gif
aquatus1
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 25 2006, 09:20 PM) [snapback]1322096[/snapback]

atlantis was the first right ,the first garden i'll say that humans on this planet, that were in harmonie with the land and sea.
and if one is in harmonie with there seroundings, than there are in paradice ,arnt they?
and when i say that cape breton is one with the land and sea ,you can see by the peaple that live here and i do ,for we have plenty of fisherman,and we have plenty of farmers,and our festavals our quite inlightening to and if you went around the cabot trial you would see this paradise for youself.


Been there. It's nice, but it's hardly unique. I've been to alot of places like this, actually.

More to the point, however, can you see that your response does not address any of the things I requested from you?

QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 25 2006, 08:02 PM) [snapback]1321955[/snapback]

Tell you what: why don't you start by simply explaining how you decided that Atlantis was a paradise? What were your sources? How did you come to your conclusion?


All you are doing is claiming that the first right (whatever that means), the first garden (again, no idea what that refers to), and that the people were in harmony with the land and sea. Where are you getting any of this from?
Phowl
Can someone link me to some interesting documentaries on this topic?
aquatus1
Shoot...wish I had the info for you. Saw a fantastic docu on The Discovery Channel where one professor was convinced that he found the original story shown to Solon in Egypt that inspired the legend of Atlantis. The egyptian story talked about Thera and the Minoans (if I recall correctly) within the story.
S.A leon
Nibiru is often mentioned as Planet X in modern times. As far as we know now it really exist and is often discussed by Astronomers all over the world, including NASA.

[attachmentid=27875]

The Egyptians pride themselves on being the most ancient people in the world. In their authentic annals ... one may read that since they have been in existence, the course of the stars has changed direction four times, and that the sun has set twice in that part of the sky where it rises today."

The real story of Nibiru (Planet X)

First we go once again back to the creation story of Mesopotamia

The SUMERIANS always described their Gods as planets starting with Pluto, then Neptune, Uranus, etc., as if they were seeing the planets from a heavenly body (or spacecraft ?) that was entering our solar system from the outside.

The Sumerian seal (below), with the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Moon, Mars, Unknown ( about size of Uranus / Neptune), Jupiter, Saturn, Indeterminate (about size of Mercury), Uranus, Neptune, Pluto.
[attachmentid=27876]

History of our solar system

When we read the stories of Mesopotamia we can see that what I wrote down in this part can be checked with several creation stories and other ancient tablets. From these tablets I reconstructed the history of our solar system and the history of Mankind as follows :

About 200 Million years ago our solar system consisted of the Sun with its planets Mercury, Mars, Tiamat, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Unknown, Neptune and Pluto, a total of nine planets with their moons. Than something happened somewhere in the direction of the Star Osiris which should change our solar system forever. Tiamat (a planet two to three times the size of Earth) was one of the greatest planets in our former solar system and had several moons.

Tiamat was a giant planet who's orbit laid between Mars and Jupiter. Tiamat had an atmosphere with more oxygen and less nitrogen and a life forms of giant proportions who ruled the whole planet (Dinosaurs). Tiamat consisted of two great landmasses surrounded by water. The neighboring planet of Tiamat, Mars, was also a planet filled with life forms. Because of its atmosphere Tiamat had already a evaluated life form with several forms of Mammals and a rich vegetation.

Than far away a planet called Nibiru was smitten out of its former orbit around the Star Osiris by a cosmic collapse between several heavenly bodies. Due to this cosmic catastrophe Nibiru was forced in a new orbit and came in the direction of our solar-system and would later permanently be captured by the gravity of the Sun.

[attachmentid=27877]
Essan
QUOTE(S.A leon @ Aug 26 2006, 05:45 AM) [snapback]1322673[/snapback]

Nibiru is often mentioned as Planet X in modern times. As far as we know now it really exist and is often discussed by Astronomers all over the world, including NASA.


We know that it does not exist (although numerous dwarf planets beyond Pluto do exist) and it is never discussed by astronomers anywhere in the world (except in terms of derision over a few pints in the pub)


Sitchin's interpretation of the Sumerian Seal (which actually depicts the Pleiades) is complete rubbish.
ivytheplant
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 25 2006, 01:56 PM) [snapback]1321945[/snapback]

i understand the consept of plate tectonics and the movement of the earth the geoligy


Yes, but you seem to have a problem using the material in a coherent manner. As far as I can tell, you think Cape Breton is the cradle of human life as well as Atlantis and Eden, though Africa is the cradle of human life. You also quoted the movement of the continental and oceanic plates, but got it backwards. You've quoted date ranges that don't fit the formation of the earth at the time and then there's something about mothers and fathers I'm still trying to figure out.

Just because I looked up particle accelerators on the internet doesn't mean I can build one. Just because you looked up a golden book on plate tectonics doesn't mean you understand the concepts. Which I think we've already established. Over and over.
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 25 2006, 10:21 PM) [snapback]1322156[/snapback]

Been there. It's nice, but it's hardly unique. I've been to alot of places like this, actually.

More to the point, however, can you see that your response does not address any of the things I requested from you?
All you are doing is claiming that the first right (whatever that means), the first garden (again, no idea what that refers to), and that the people were in harmony with the land and sea. Where are you getting any of this from?


been there .it's nice,but hardly unique,i'm shore you been to alot of places but nowere like here.i'm shore the buddest monks think it's not unique,theres not many temples to him in north america and one is here,think there building a 3rd out west somewere.and of course that doe's not make it speaicel, no by no means.
of course the fossels at piont acoine didn't spark some uniqueness from you i see that in what you say,,but all you have to do ones there is stroll down the beach by'e.

or how about the largest historical reconstruction site in north america louiseberg i would say that was when the english and french were fighting ,over the new world,
when nepoleane
was douen his take over there where man protecting the port of sydney, thats not intresting

or how about bell where do you think the man got his insperation from when he was contaplating his ideas, looking over the brad'or lakes,or did you drive right on by in baddek
come on you must of stoped at the bell museam?

it would have been alot harder to get to inganish island they foud errow heads that date back to atleest 9000 years there, i think its still up for sale.

or how about the distinct color of the granite red,black and grey that might even be mentioned by plato in his story i think .

even the first coal mine in north america is here but you allready know that.

now there is diggen going on at an old church in down town sydney that has templer or masonic tyes,you out there can digg into that
aquatus1
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 27 2006, 01:20 PM) [snapback]1323864[/snapback]

been there .it's nice,but hardly unique,i'm shore you been to alot of places but nowere like here.i'm shore the buddest monks think it's not unique,theres not many temples to him in north america and one is here,think there building a 3rd out west somewere.and of course that doe's not make it speaicel, no by no means.
of course the fossels at piont acoine didn't spark some uniqueness from you i see that in what you say,,but all you have to do ones there is stroll down the beach by'e.

or how about the largest historical reconstruction site in north america louiseberg i would say that was when the english and french were fighting ,over the new world,
when nepoleane
was douen his take over there where man protecting the port of sydney, thats not intresting

or how about bell where do you think the man got his insperation from when he was contaplating his ideas, looking over the brad'or lakes,or did you drive right on by in baddek
come on you must of stoped at the bell museam?

it would have been alot harder to get to inganish island they foud errow heads that date back to atleest 9000 years there, i think its still up for sale.

or how about the distinct color of the granite red,black and grey that might even be mentioned by plato in his story i think .

even the first coal mine in north america is here but you allready know that.

now there is diggen going on at an old church in down town sydney that has templer or masonic tyes,you out there can digg into that


This is actually a first...

I can re-post my entire previous message, because every word of it still applies:

"Been there. It's nice, but it's hardly unique. I've been to alot of places like this, actually.

More to the point, however, can you see that your response does not address any of the things I requested from you?
All you are doing is claiming that the first right (whatever that means), the first garden (again, no idea what that refers to), and that the people were in harmony with the land and sea. Where are you getting any of this from?"
Bosanchero
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 27 2006, 04:20 PM) [snapback]1323994[/snapback]

This is actually a first...

I can re-post my entire previous message, because every word of it still applies:

"Been there. It's nice, but it's hardly unique. I've been to alot of places like this, actually.

More to the point, however, can you see that your response does not address any of the things I requested from you?
All you are doing is claiming that the first right (whatever that means), the first garden (again, no idea what that refers to), and that the people were in harmony with the land and sea. Where are you getting any of this from?"



he just loves his home litte bid to much my friend, we should not judge him for that original.gif

i dont know what budist monks, bells, museums or gardens have to do with atlantis ???

i also dont think that this guy has ever left his home so he has nothing to compare it to yes.gif

and thats why he thinks its heaven original.gif
aquatus1
There is a Buddhist temple in that area. It's pretty neat.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 27 2006, 07:15 PM) [snapback]1324183[/snapback]

There is a Buddhist temple in that area. It's pretty neat.


onca again that has NOTHING to do WITH ATLANTIS, and it PROVES NOTHING except that there is AMAZING TEMPLE THERE original.gif
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 27 2006, 04:20 PM) [snapback]1323994[/snapback]

This is actually a first...

I can re-post my entire previous message, because every word of it still applies:

"Been there. It's nice, but it's hardly unique. I've been to alot of places like this, actually.

More to the point, however, can you see that your response does not address any of the things I requested from you?
All you are doing is claiming that the first right (whatever that means), the first garden (again, no idea what that refers to), and that the people were in harmony with the land and sea. Where are you getting any of this from?"


the reson i saide that cape breton is the first is becaues when the dry land came together befor the seperation that first time and pushed cape breton to a hieght of 35km give or take which is the capestone of that pillar,this is were the first garden was ,at a height of 35 km or so.

this is were man first canned the enlightenment of onenness the first time, number one ,uno.

about the harmonie aspect i think it was plato that told us that they lived in harmonie with nature.he was describing that paradise and how life flowed as one


M.A.D
i went to the origanal story from plato i DID NOT take any of the educated idiots theiors in to consideration ,why?
because there is to much clutter in those 20,000 plus books that are on the subject.

so why not get the story from the horses mouth,instead of all the monkey's that came after.

and all i did was cross the myth from plato with the geoliogical makup of cape breton.
and i used my mind and continplated the idea .
the books that i read and got the jist of ,helped because it was the comming together of all these knowledges thinking as one,the harmonie of the all ,being as one.
in the end ,getting the truth.
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 24 2006, 03:53 AM) [snapback]1319674[/snapback]

Where are you getting your Atlantis info from?


i'd like to know is were do you get your stuff from ,because a great man said once ,blind leading the blind you both end up in the ditch.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 11:59 AM) [snapback]1325008[/snapback]

i went to the origanal story from plato i DID NOT take any of the educated idiots theiors in to consideration ,why?
because there is to much clutter in those 20,000 plus books that are on the subject.

so why not get the story from the horses mouth,instead of all the monkey's that came after.

and all i did was cross the myth from plato with the geoliogical makup of cape breton.
and i used my mind and continplated the idea .
the books that i read and got the jist of ,helped because it was the comming together of all these knowledges thinking as one,the harmonie of the all ,being as one.
in the end ,getting the truth.


no offence my friend but you really should relly on that mind so much, innocent.gif
ideas you put forward are crazyest i ever encountered wacko.gif
M.A.D
QUOTE(Bosanchero @ Aug 28 2006, 01:13 PM) [snapback]1325058[/snapback]

no offence my friend but you really should relly on that mind so much, innocent.gif
ideas you put forward are crazyest i ever encountered wacko.gif



sometimes crazy needs a littel reality in order to see the truth in things one says.
aquatus1
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 11:39 AM) [snapback]1324994[/snapback]

the reson i saide that cape breton is the first is becaues when the dry land came together befor the seperation that first time and pushed cape breton to a hieght of 35km give or take which is the capestone of that pillar,this is were the first garden was ,at a height of 35 km or so.
this is were man first canned the enlightenment of onenness the first time, number one ,uno.


But you aren't tellings us why this is so. All you are doing is saying that it is. We understand what your claim is. What we are asking for is support for that claim.

QUOTE
about the harmonie aspect i think it was plato that told us that they lived in harmonie with nature.he was describing that paradise and how life flowed as one


Are you sure about that?

QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 11:59 AM) [snapback]1325008[/snapback]

i went to the origanal story from plato i DID NOT take any of the educated idiots theiors in to consideration ,why? because there is to much clutter in those 20,000 plus books that are on the subject.
so why not get the story from the horses mouth,instead of all the monkey's that came after.


Monkeys? What arrogance. Do you really think that you are the only one who could possibly be able to figure something out? That no one but you might be able to come up with a decent idea? Just because so many people have thought about Atlantis, you call it all clutter and dismiss all other people's work and efforts as the actions of monkeys?

Educated idiots indeed. Does that make you and un-educated idiot?

QUOTE
and all i did was cross the myth from plato with the geoliogical makup of cape breton.
and i used my mind and continplated the idea .
the books that i read and got the jist of ,helped because it was the comming together of all these knowledges thinking as one,the harmonie of the all ,being as one.
in the end ,getting the truth.


In other words, you just read everything that you could and came up with a compromise in your head. You didn't figure anything out for yourself, you didn't research your position, and you have never bothered to support it with imperical evidence. You are, in short, guessing.

QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 12:06 PM) [snapback]1325012[/snapback]

i'd like to know is were do you get your stuff from ,because a great man said once ,blind leading the blind you both end up in the ditch.


The great man didn't understand that the best person to teach a blind person to walk is another blind person. Experience is invaluable when it comes to research. Assuming that experience is a handicap is foolish.

You ask where I got my stuff from? What stuff? I haven't made any claims that cannot be found directly in the original accounts of Atlantis. There is no speculation involved. The only faith that I am using is that placed in those who can translate Greek into English. Could I be wrong? If I am, it is because those who translated the account got it wrong, which is unlikely. Could you be right? Possibly, but you will first have to show some evidence that your claim is accurate, instead of just repeating it over and over again.
boorite
Dudes, his ponies are hitched up, but they ain't all pullin'. K? Might as well argue with a broken watch.
Bosanchero
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 02:06 PM) [snapback]1325091[/snapback]

sometimes crazy needs a littel reality in order to see the truth in things one says.



like seriouslly WTF does that mean ??? w00t.gif
M.A.D
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Aug 28 2006, 03:20 PM) [snapback]1325152[/snapback]

But you aren't tellings us why this is so. All you are doing is saying that it is. We understand what your claim is. What we are asking for is support for that claim.
Are you sure about that?
Monkeys? What arrogance. Do you really think that you are the only one who could possibly be able to figure something out? That no one but you might be able to come up with a decent idea? Just because so many people have thought about Atlantis, you call it all clutter and dismiss all other people's work and efforts as the actions of monkeys?

Educated idiots indeed. Does that make you and un-educated idiot?
In other words, you just read everything that you could and came up with a compromise in your head. You didn't figure anything out for yourself, you didn't research your position, and you have never bothered to support it with imperical evidence. You are, in short, guessing.
The great man didn't understand that the best person to teach a blind person to walk is another blind person. Experience is invaluable when it comes to research. Assuming that experience is a handicap is foolish.

You ask where I got my stuff from? What stuff? I haven't made any claims that cannot be found directly in the original accounts of Atlantis. There is no speculation involved. The only faith that I am using is that placed in those who can translate Greek into English. Could I be wrong? If I am, it is because those who translated the account got it wrong, which is unlikely. Could you be right? Possibly, but you will first have to show some evidence that your claim is accurate, instead of just repeating it over and over again.



if you have a civilation with the oneness that atlantis had you would build that civilation,
were the world is repesented as being one and that is cape breton island .
because it took the world to make it .by the comming together of the dectonic plates.
but we are talking today right 400,000,000 years later give or take.

by the seperation of these plates some 200,000,000 years ago and dectonic drift the island of cape breton ended up were she is today.

today that capestone of yesterday has fallen from atleast 35 km to a height of on average 1700 ft,because the cape breton highlands have a greater variety of igneous rocks-
plutonic rocks that were once magmas,than any weres els in north america only the himalayans or alps have this to give proof of height.and they are only in the 20's or one is.

i geass what i'm trying to say is that if it was at such a great hieght in the past and being a island and through dectonic drift backwards in time cape breton would end up just beyond the pillars of herculise,because that is were she was when the seperation happened .

the key word i'm looking for is JUST beyond the pillars,because of the counterclock wise motion of north america and the dectionic drift .
north america is the only one that doe's this.

that is from the geoligy ,to understand about the oneness of the people that in hapitated the island inbetween the time pierods one must look to the harmonie


aquatus1
QUOTE(M.A.D @ Aug 28 2006, 06:29 PM) [snapback]1325367[/snapback]

if you have a civilation with the oneness that atlantis had you would build that civilation,
were the world is repesented as being one and that is cape breton island .


No, you would build it wherever the heck it's been for the past several decades or centuries that it took to become a civilization.

You need to provide evidence that Atlantis had "oneness" (to say nothing of explain what "oneness" is), and evidence that they built on Cape Breton Island. Just because you think that's a dandy place isn't evidence.

QUOTE
because it took the world to make it .by the comming together of the dectonic plates.
but we are talking today right 400,000,000 years later give or take.


Enough with the plates, already! The plates meet in millions of places around the world. Cape Breton is hardly the only place.

QUOTE
that is from the geoligy ,to understand about the oneness of the people that in hapitated the island inbetween the time pierods one must look to the harmonie


Are you saying that, after all these incredibly difficult to understand posts you have made, you are ultimately only saying that and island might have existed there and you think Atlantis may have been built there?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.