I found this video on a private site where they uploaded later on youtube.com

This footage is believed to be a real alien body from the Roswell incident.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIj96WxR8wY...ted&search=

Not to be an ass, but I think I saw some tits and pubic hair in that footage. Dead serious. Is there any way I can save this video clip to my comp? Maybe try and clean it up a bit?

by clean it up he means play with himself,jk,how come the color is all wanky and wavy

When the film is done playing, put your cursor on the little tab that indicates the footage is moving, try and put it on the last part of the film. You cant. You can go through and pause it to a still frame on all the other parts, but not on the last part where there is something odd and if you could pause and brighten it, you would be able to see something. But you cant. So how do I save this to my comp? I want the feds knocking at my door, im lonely.

Because its old footage from 1947 and they didnt have high quality video cams like we do now. Looks like that might have been shot through an special 8 mm.

Well first of all that film style hasn't been used since they were making silent films I mean anyone who knows anything about film editing will be able to tell you that is a hoax simply from the lack of detail and poor film quality that hasn't been used since the about the 1890's in which they had used the 'Kinetoscope' among other devices. Like seriously in 1947 they had ten times the quality of this bad boy.

For this reason and the reason that the alien body is seems to be 'to human' I am going to have to say it was probably a hoax. Seriously if anyone beleives this to be the real thing i know for a fact it's not. Chances are it was probably a film project students did for film school. Just edited to look old etc.

You know that for a 'fact' do you? How? were you involved in making this Hoax?
If it is a hoax?
I personally think it's probably a hoax but I can't say I know this for a fact.

This has authentic style uniforms.

It has interesting action and tension.

It has an interesting corpse (which is human size- and tall).

If nothing else, the whole effect is one of an emergency, not a cold dissection of a rubber doll.

But, the quality indicates a likely deception.

But, it looks like a real event, into which they have substituted a CGI corpse.

If these were all actors, were they paid union wages? I mean, there must be a
cost/reward motivation, or else someone is out a few dollars and they have wasted their time.

Interesting.

Vdownload works on google only now, it has a youtube mode
but does not work for me.

Is this film considered part of the Roswell hoax?

Here is a frame, where we are shown a view of the region from below the knees.

The point of view has the feet located in the top of the frame, the right foot on the right.

There are what appear to be two pierced-through, completely penetrating wounds.

They do not look messy enough to convince me. I would expect a crash victim to be more mangled, or at least broken bones, with compound fractures- protruding bones, or bumpy surfaces.

The left leg looks broken, but no bones are rammed out.

And, what's with all the hash marks on the left leg? And, what looks like a ligature wound?

Art student, 101.

Probably a hoax

yeah, unfortunately i think ur right......*sigh*

I agree with the hoax theory. The camera quality was not that bad back in 1947. Think about it, if you're going to film alien remains you're going to use high quality, color film. Not the same film and camera they used to film Nosferatu. Makes no sense.

Yeah, but you don't always have a high quality cam corder on hand with you at all times waiting for a ufo to crash. Spur of the moment, maybe that was all they could grab.

Maybe they read "The day after roswell" by Philip J Corso before making this movie? Read the first couple of chapters of that and then watch the footage again.... its a very cool book and makes for an interesting read! This Phillip guy claims he was in charge of keeping the roswell crash files. Not only did he claim to see the bodies but, he also talks about the offical report written, describing the crash site! He describes the the spot lights which can be seen in this video. All the people, and the bodies.. dead and alive.

No they'd have had high tech cameras around to film with on the Base. They all have camera flights.

isnt it strange how any footage that supposedly contains images of bigfoot or aliens (or just about anything unsolved) is that grainy or obscured that nothing at all can be drawn from it? it screams hoax ,as do all the bigfoot films that track the bigfoot throught trees never getting an unobscured look at it. Its a typical fake trying to stir up a bit of contraversy. The footage is that crap it could have been a teddy bear and you wouldnt be able to tell. Is it that crap because time has took its toll on the film or is it that crap because its meant to be that crap so you cant see the rubber alien and the fake military suits? i think the latter!

the "alien" corpse has 4 fingers and a thumb on a very human looking hand.
I think from the the descriptions of the Roswell aliens they had 3 fingers and they were
"child size" . The thing in that video is a lot taller than that as well.

Even if it were crystal clear, people would just say "Come on! No way they could film it that clearly! The angles are too good, the alien looks too much like the one from the autopsy film and that soldier is standing in the way so you can't see it's head clearly. FAKE!"

Well although I've never seen a great white shark IRL I have seen great film quality of one and I do believe they exist. Aliens on the other hand....

The film is not as it seems. What you are seeing there is a telecine of a negative. It is someone running the film through a projector and filming it with a video camera. You can tell this by the fact that the image 'pulses' in bright areas, and is a trait with difference in frame rates between cine film and video (which is usually higher, at 25 or 29.9 frames depending on which tv system you use, and where you live) and also the projector bulb 'blinking' as the frames are pulled past it

The footage has an occasional black area which cuts over the screen, which seems to be either an issue with the negative running through the film gate (which shines light and directs the beam into a lens) OR someone actually putting something between the camera used to shoot the projection, and the projection screen.

However, what is interesting is that in the little time I had to look at the video, these black bits have some small dots in them. These might be artifacts due to compressing the already bad footage to fit on the internet, or if they are holes (which some better analysis could determine) they might be on the negative themselves, which would be a whole different ball game. From the look and aspect ratio of the film, it would appear to me to be 8mm or super8mm film, which was actually a very popular and widely used format in black and white AND colour even right up to the 80's, and you can still buy it in the store I work in. So the points of people saying 'it would be colour and better quality' are pretty much dead weight.

As far as the authenticity of the video is concerned, I cannot be too sure, it is very difficult to tell what is going on, but this thing is shot on video and sourced from screen by telecine... it's not going to be good quality. Getting the money to get the negatives scanned would cost a lot, and involve taking it to a pro lab, and I'm guessing anyone with supposedly authentic stuff like that would not take that path. I think it's worthy of a little more investigation, and as far as authenticity in terms of the accuracy of the film, or the video that appears on youtube, I hope my points have made what IS THERE a little clearer to understand,
As a filmmaker I have used 8mm a lot in the past, and used this process myself, although the results were better, its quite difficult to do when the film itself is old and damaged,
Chinnyboo

actually even if it was a hoax it was the better ones made.

Great post, Chinnyboo! Thanks for the info. I was ready to write it off as a hoax but now I am having second thoughts

Wow

I have seen your evaluations before, but this one takes the cake. I woud have been on the wagon with ColdEthyl on this one as a fake, obviously this film warrants further investigation as it is already not what it appears to be. I hold little faith in the conspiracy side, but still, I 'd love to know the origins of this film simply to satisfy my curiosity either way.

Thanks for that proffesional evaluation

So was it done like that to age it?

And you have to remember too, this is in the USA and on an Air Force Base. They do have whole squadrons dedicated to filmography and photography. Why would they not have the best equipment available for such a monumental task? Another thing too, where are the people taking pictures? For something like this to be documented it would be documented in every way. Seems pictures would have surfaced a long time ago.
Not to mention that the alien on the stretcher doesn't match the descriptions of the aliens given at the time of the incident. They supposedly were short with 4 fingers. That alien is tall with five.

Still not logical to me.

Looks like a human corpse exposed to severe heat or radiation to me, interesting though

This is an even less convincing hoax then the 'Alien Interview' video that came out a while back. It is such an obvious hoax from the video quality alone which clearly pre-dates 1947 era video equipment and almost as bad as silent movies shot in the 1890's early 1900's it's not even funny. Of coarse it wasn't actually shot with an old video recorder from that era but they did a good job of making it look old.

Thats about the worst footage I have ever seen. I think someone made it bad on purpose.That way it can't be conclusive.

Ok, well I Downloaded the video and encoded it so I could mess around with the brightness and slow the film down on my media player. Now, at a certain point in the film (a quick flash) the cameraman is getting a quick shot of IT from a distance. If you dim the light, you can see facial features. It creeped the hell out of me, for if I were to ever see a mangled alien corpse, that is what it would look like. Now, im going frame by frame, by the way. Then, they get to the part of the film where they do a close up of the alien lieing down, the camera man is kind of standing over the corpse, behind its head. What it seemed to look like at fist (watching it off of youtube) was that the film was too bright to see any facial features. So, I screwed around with this thinking ill get to see somethin, but it turns out that someone censored (more like blotched out) the alien corps' face and whoever was standing by it at the time. So, when you see a flash of this on the original film, it just looks like a faceless test dummy. Further on into the film they show close up of the wounds. From the feet and the hands, this creature, whatever it is, has feet and hands almost exactly like we do. The feet are the same, small though, and the hands are too, give or take a finger, its hard to tell. But the face...you can see the agonizing pain its in. You can see emotion in the face and thats what creeps me out. I dont know what to say about this film. I believe it's real.

I mean, if it were a hoax...why would they try to blotch the close up of the aliens face? If it were real I can see why and I can see why they didnt blotch out the limbs, because theyre just like ours. IF youre going to go through the trouble to make a hoax like this, I just dont see why they wouldnt want to show the face. Truly odd.

Why blotch the alien's face to begin with? They don't need to protect his identity. Know what I mean?

Yes, thats what im saying (if it were a hoax), but it would make more sense to blotch the face out if it were real. Do you not think that if this is real and the fbi or whomever has or had this footage at one time, that they would blotch it out knowing it just might leak into the public?

Just can't buy it.

Wait. What? Why do you need to blotch the alien's face? It's an alien. You wouldn't want to blotch it's face.....

Im just saying, think like the f.b.i. or whoever is in control of this sh**. If they had that sort of thing on film, I would think that they would censor the being thinking that it could leak into the public. And you know theyre all about secerecy, so it makes perfect sense to be why they would go that far. Paranoia.

Could you post some of these stills. I really do not think that it could be authentic for a multitude of reasons, other than those listed in this thread, the simple fact is has obviously been around for some time, yet nobody has picked this up in the media.

LMAO !! anyways is it real

Im just watching through the film is slow motion over and over and pausing it. I dont know how to save the still images.

Are you doing it on a PC - can you do screeen shots (i.e. press the PrtScr key and paste into word or a blank pic or something).

That doesn't make sense to me. Why take the video in the first place if you're just going to blot out the alien's face?

This is intriguing. I would give this one more credit than the "alien autopsy footage". This one has the element of realism; it's what you might expect near a busy UFO crash site.





Is there another link to a better quality version of this video ? Whats the source, are there any more clips?

Well there is nothing to say that this footage is of that incident anyway, so stating numbers of toes and fingers are not going to help. That you tube site might say where it's from, but it's not known for sure.

Also, the 8mm format is not bad quality because of the format itself... here, it is bad quality because of the condition of the negative. Bad storage, temperature changes and bad handling of the negatives can all attribute to that kind of damage. Negatives back then were made of nitrate, too, so they had to be kept in cool dark places to keep them from combusting. It is likely if it was real it was just left somewhere safe and never touched.

You can get very good, and what would have been considered professional results. with that type of film stock back then. 16mm and 35mm film cameras would have taken a lot of space and would have been a bugger to keep going (they would have been clockwork) back then, so smaller scale cameras which used smaller negatives would have been used instead, especially when out and about. In the 70's and 80's 8mm was used as a home format, but back in the 40's and 50's even negatives that size very much still a luxuary for professionals and strict enthusiasts. It is possible it could be 16mm, but even still the quality wuld degrade hugely if mistreated, to the kind of extent we see here.

To all those saying 'there would have been better video back then', there was no video back then. The 'video' look of this footage is because the film it was shot on has been loaded up to video, as mentioned in my previous post.

There is no doubt in my mind this footage is shot on some pretty old cine cameras, and due to the low availability of black and white stock (and how converting it from colour to black and white wouldn't look the same in terms of contrast and brightness) I would say it wasn't done recently even if it was a fake. If this was done now, some serious thought went into its production, much more than the usual fake video... even the alien autopsy.

Chinnyboo

Sorry, but the site where the footage were was closed like 3 or 5 years ago, i thought i would never see it again.

last year i found a site where they were several footages back in the 1940's of anomalies object and spacecrafts, but i couldn't see them because of the 404 error problem.

i dont remember the site but it had some cool vids too about a smal skeleton with 4fingers and 4toes.

bah, only if i could travel back 1 year and show that site D:!

but ill try my best to find it if its still exists.

There could be several reasons. Maybe they werent supposed to film it in the first place and got caught up in the midst of the excitement. Who knows.

I still don't buy it. It just is too grainy and too wobbly for me. And other reasons. It just doesn't do it for me.

Too grainy or wobbly must mean fake. Really i don't know how anyone in this world can sit there and bicker about weather a video is shot with good quality/bad quality back 60 years ago. Nor should a wobly video even get in the way with figuring out weather its real or not. The thing is, everyone in the world will shake/wobble as they video tape something given they arent holding a tripod.

Now think of it this way. If you were the one video taping this, knowing you can loose your job and reputation over it, you think you wouldn't be shaking a bit?

I think for any of us to get to the bottom of U.F.O's its to stop picking things that happen to everyone, not everyone is rich enough to afford a great camera, and believe it or not i think nobody else even knew the person was filming it.


At the very start of this clip, take a look at the blanket that you see infront of the camera. You can clearly see it flapping around as if someone is behind it, trying to get a better shot.





The video has alot of intresting points to it in my opinion including the man who bolts out over to the body soon as all the other men start to stand around it. The one guy on the left looks really confused and paces around also lifts up his hat or takes a picture , cant really tell.





Seems hes in a rush to get over there and then the clip changes from where it was filmed last after this.



Soon as it cuts into the next scene you see them all crowded around the body on a stretcher. Then that clip gets cut out after you see the people standing around, not much importance here.

And now the serious footage gets taken where we get to see the exhibit. I would like to take note it seems that there is not just one body, but two of them. If you look closely enough, it doesn't at all seem like the they are the same two. One of them was also before laying on a stretcher which was level with peoples hips, the next one is directly on the floor.
I could be wrong about the number, but the fact is that the two don't seem the same.
First up we have this one. For me to say it looks human is for me to say my family are monsters



The only human like quality i can see here is bodyshape, the rest of it doesn't seem at all like us including that there is not just 5 fingers but 6 from what i see. And just as you see at the end where they are looking at all the wounds, this other part shows the body without its right leg.





Then after the brief zoom around they get up closer for the shots of the flesh and bones. To me some of the cuts Do Not look real, but who am i to judge how another life form may be affected by injuries compared to us. There is some vital cuts i see and blood which seems to lead me to believe this is a real body, but of what i cannot say.



Not such a healthy foot



6 fingers?

And after going through this video many times over and over , i have now found a few faces from the clip. Just wish these people were around to verify its genuine







My conclusion is that this is a genuine clip taken from the date it was listed, but i still have no definate awnser. Good clip non the less.

Wow. That sixth picture of those stills you posted look exactly like the body in the autopsy film. Right down to the damage on the right leg and the position of the hands. The feet look the same too.

Pretty obvious then, that the people who made this video based the style of look 'alien' on the alien body from the hoax autopsy. Not very original if you ask me - they should've added a couple more arms and a sacrier looking face.

I don't know who is to say which facts are correct in terms of "style" of alien. Sure we can all compare this to the alien autopsy. (hoax) We always had the so called "Facts" about the incident so its obvious why the alien autospy video may
look like this. From the start of the whole inicdent it was said on the radio how the being looked etc, so i can guess that the alien autospy used those facts to make the dummy model.

Not sure what "original" means either lol, unless you mean they are supposed to look like something from a book you read. Who is to say there isent another life form out there that does kinda look like us?

Alot of people tend to think alien means big googly eyes, 4 heads, 5 arms and a huge laser gun held in its hand. (though im not implying they dont look like this )


Believe it or not we could find a worm identical to one on our planet and it would still be alien to us


Also i just noticed this now but if you all look really closly at the very start of the clip you will notice they are in an open hanger type building and you see a large truck drive off soon as its starting up. Could this be those trucks the military haul the bodies with? o.O