NASA Masonic Conspiracy
Apollo Missions Masonic Symbols

To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.

All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echoed the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the Illuminati's secret religion. The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at 1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion), placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival), communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13). 13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter), and the transition from the old to the new. Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles, "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis... and all Challengers shall be destroyed."

Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being ultimately discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes.

No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology.

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings

If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.

Heat is defined as the vibration or movement of molecules within matter. The faster the molecular motion the higher the temperature. The slower the molecular motion the colder the temperature. Absolute zero is that point where all molecular motion ceases. In order to have hot or cold molecules must be present.

A vacuum is a condition of nothingness where there are no molecules. Vacuums exist in degrees. Some scientists tell us that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum. Space is the closest thing to an absolute vacuum that is known to us. There are so few molecules present in most areas of what we know as "space" that any concept of "hot" or "cold" is impossible to measure. A vacuum is a perfect insulator. That is why a "Thermos" or vacuum bottle is used to store hot or cold liquids in order to maintain the temperature for the longest time possible without re-heating or re-cooling.

Radiation of all types will travel through a vacuum but will not affect the vacuum. Radiant heat from the sun travels through the vacuum of space but does not "warm" space. In fact the radiant heat of the sun has no affect whatsoever until it strikes matter. Molecular movement will increase in direct proportion to the radiant energy which is absorbed by matter. The time it takes to heat matter exposed to direct sunlight in space is determined by its color, its elemental properties, its distance from the sun, and its rate of absorption of radiant heat energy. Space is NOT hot. Space is NOT cold.

Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool but not because space is "cold". Space is not cold. Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources of heat, radiated or otherwise.

NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.

NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT evaporate destroying their own bogus "air conditioning" explanation.

Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning with a "vacuum bottle" filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and hard when you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to drink with your lunch four hours later... and then think about it again when you pour the last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of the day.

The same laws of physics apply to any vehicle traveling through space. NASA claims that the spacecraft was slowly rotated causing the shadowed side to be cooled by the intense cold of space... an intense cold that DOES NOT EXIST. In fact the only thing that could have been accomplished by a rotation of the spacecraft is a more even and constant heating such as that obtained by rotating a hot dog on a spit. In reality a dish called Astronaut a la Apollo would have been served. At the very least you would not want to open the hatch upon the crafts return.

NASA knows better than to claim, in addition, that a water cooling apparatus such as that which they claim cooled the astronauts suits cooled the spacecraft. No rocket could ever have been launched with the amount of water needed to work such a system for even a very short period of time. Fresh water weighs a little over 62 lbs. per cubic foot. Space and weight capacity were critical given the lift capability of the rockets used in the Apollo Space Program. No such extra water was carried by any mission whatsoever for suits or for cooling the spacecraft.

On the tapes the Astronauts complained bitterly of the cold during their journey and while on the surface of the moon. They spoke of using heaters that did not give off enough heat to overcome the intense cold of space. It was imperative that NASA use this ruse because to tell the truth would TELL THE TRUTH. It is also proof of the arrogance and contempt in which the Illuminati holds the common man.

What we heard is in reality indicative of an over zealous cooling system in the props used during the filming of the missions at the Atomic Energy Commissions Nevada desert test site, where it is common to see temperatures well over 100 degrees. In the glaring unfiltered direct heat of the sun the Astronauts could never have been cold at any time whatsoever in the perfect insulating vacuum of space.

NASA claims that the space suits worn by the astronauts were pressurized at 5 psi over the ambient pressure (0 psi vacuum) on the moon's surface. We have examined the gloves NASA claims the astronauts wore and find they are made of pliable material containing no mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical devices which would aid the astronauts in the dexterous use of their fingers and hands while wearing the gloves. Experiments prove absolutely that such gloves are impossible to use and that the wearer cannot bend the wrist or fingers to do any dexterous work whatsoever when filled with 5 psi over ambient pressure either in a vacuum or in the earth's atmosphere. NASA actually showed film and television footage of astronauts using their hands and fingers normally during their EVAs on the so-called lunar surface. The films show clearly that there is no pressure whatsoever within the gloves... a condition that would have caused explosive decompression of the astronauts resulting in almost immediate death if they had really been surrounded by the vacuum of space.

If you don't believe it try it yourself... it is a very simple experiment and does not require a rocket scientist to perform. These are just two of over a hundred very simple and very easy to prove valid scientific reasons why NASA and the Apollo Space Program are two of the biggest lies ever foisted upon the unsuspecting and trusting People of the world.

In addition most, if not all, of the photos, films, and videotape of the Apollo Moon Missions are easily proven to be fake. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of photography, lighting, and physics can easily prove that NASA faked the visual records of the Apollo Space Program. Some are so obviously fake that when the discrepancies are pointed out to unsuspecting viewers an audible gasp has been heard. Some have actually gone into a mild state of shock. Some People break down and cry. I have seen others become so angry that they have ripped the offending photos to shreds while screaming incoherently.

C. Fred Kleinknect, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction. It was his reward for pulling it off. All of the first astronauts were Freemasons. There is a photograph in the House of the Temple in Washington DC of Neil Armstrong on the moons surface (supposedly) in his spacesuit holding his Masonic Apron in front of his groin.

The effect upon the people of the world was, that if we could go to the moon other creatures from other worlds could travel to our Earth. The escalation of the artificial alien threat scenario since that time is obvious.

The recent revelations of the fraudulent nature of NASA and the Apollo space program by the Intelligence Service and others has resulted in a flood of propaganda, television programs, and films designed to keep the sheople trapped in a deep ignorant sleep. The most ambitious are "Apollo 13" and "From the Earth to the Moon", both involving the actor/producer Tom Hanks. The latter opens with a monologue by Mr. Hanks who walks forward revealing a huge representation of the "God" Apollo (Sun, Osiris, lost word, etc.) guiding his chariot pulled by 4 horses through the heavens.

End Excerpt from William Cooper's Recent Conspiracy Overview

[Watcher Website wants you folks to keep in mind that Apollo is "Lucifer", and has also been linked to the planet Mars. Other significant links, remember, are that the international flag of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry is the United Nations Flag (according to their own site, as Bill Cooper points out), and that the United Nations Flag depicts the nations of the world encircled by the laurel of Apollo! This is all leading towards the coming of Antichrist.]

http://www.mt.net/~watcher/masonapollo.html

Ok. The backpacks did not eject hot water, as stated in an above post, but worked exactly like an air conditioner or fridge. In any refridgeration unit, gas is compressed into a liquid, thus raising it's temperature. This is the hot bit on the back of your fridge, or the bit with the fans on the roof if an air conditioner. Then this fluid under pressure is released through a small, carefully calibrated nozzle, and because of the pressure drop, turns into a gas. To turn a liquid into a gas requires heat, and this heat is obtained from the pipework the gas is in, and in turn the food in your fridge or the air from your house. This cools the fridge or your house. The gas is then compressed by the pump into a liquid and restarts the cycle. Freon is (was?) used as the working fluid in fridges because the temperature it turns from liquid to gas is quite low, lower than freezing, but not too low as to make it difficult to compress into gas.
The same principle applies to spacecratft and suit cooling, except that it is a 'total loss' system, and a bit back to front. Water is circulated in the suit. This is the hot part of the fridge, usually on the back. There is no need for a compressor as the water can be considered compressed compared to the pressure of the vaccuum outside the suit. A portion of this water passes through a porous plate sublimator, which is analogous to the nozzle in the fridge design. As water seeps out it comes into contact with the vaccuum (if that's the right phrase as you can't touch a vaccuum) and immediately turns to gas because of the pressure drop. This cools the plate to freezing and ice forms, this ice prevents any more water seeping out. So we've got a situation where we have water passing through an ice cold block of metal. More than enough to keep the astronaut cool. What happens when the ice melts due to the warm water passing through the plate? More water seeps out, turns into gas cools the plate and forms more ice. This process can continue until the reservoir of water in the backpack is used up, 8 hours on Apollo 17. To see the same effect of liquids turning into gas when pressure is released, take a spay deodorant can and hold it open for about a minute. Even though there is only a little liquid in these cans, and this liquid has a far lower enthalpy of evaporation than water, the can gets really cold. I've had trouble with gas bottles when camping in the cold freezing and refusing to work because there is not enough background heat to keep the bottle warm. Imagine the same principle, only the gas bottle is full of water on the Moon and is wrapped round an astronaut.

Another part of the argument is that the spacecraft did not carry enough cooling water. This is true. They made the water as they went, as a by-product of the fuel cells which produced electricity. Nothing was wasted. Fred Haise even used the crews urine to top up the cooling water on Apollo 13!

The water sourced air conditioner backpacks should have produced frequent explosive vapour discharges. They never did..... ... Not on any part of any film ever showing any of the Apollo astronots on the moon set .

well im not sure if no man has made it out wut about the iss that has people outside nasa in other countries and in the near future we will be able to buy a ticket to go to the iss but i have never been so i dont know

War- Junkie ... I have heard about tickets being sold for future trips into space , but I doubt if anyone will be flying the moon any time soon ... Maybe inner space to a space station or to fly around in low earth orbit perhaps ? ...

If there is any space agency capable of carrying civilians to the moon one day , more power to them ... cuz that's a trip that nasa sure doesn't know how to accomplish ... 37 years ago or now .

1) Google.com
2) Ctrl C
3) Ctrl V
4) Post thread
5) Repeat ad infinitum

... So what exactly are you trying to say here gav ? ... You don't have any answer to my rebuttle ? Or is that it ?

So I will repeat my statement then in case you didn't understand it the first time .

The water sourced air conditioner backpacks should have produced frequent explosive vapour discharges. They never did..... ... Not on any part of any film ever showing any of the Apollo astronots on the moon set .

There is nothing explosive about it at all, you don't even know what you are talking about. I am simply pointing out what is the point in posting an article that you don't actually understand.

Oh I understand it perfectly ... Every part of it too ... Even the part about there never being any water vapor emissions coming from the astronots's air conditioned back packs , in the phony Apollo film footage .

You see gav , it really doesn't take a rocket scientist or an astrophysicist either to understand one very simple concept .

The Apollo moon missions were SCIENCE FICTION !!

Ok straydog, lets pretent for a moment your right. Let's see, do you not think hundreds of thousands of engineers and scientists would have discovered this and proven our moon walking fake? What about Russia, China, Japan, Korea? What you think they are ok with the United States fooling the world? Get real.

How do you know what scientists from other countries think about the Apollo missions ? ... Even if they know it was a hoax , do you really think they would want to go up against the United States military / industrial complex to try to embarrass them 37 years after the fact ? ... What purpose would it serve ?

Actually China and Japan were supossed to do a fly by of the moon to photograph the lunar landing sites , a few years ago .. but no one seems to have the technology to get there , including nasa ...

But why do you think they would be so interested in doing that now , I wonder ? ... Maybe they are not so stupid after all , and would like to show the proof that nasa faked the moon landings ? .... After all , until someone has the definitive proof that Apollo was faked , there is no reason to squeal on the U. S. now is there ? ... nasa and the government would just call them delusional conspiracy nuts anyway , just like they call everyone who has figured out what nasa is really all about ... Never A Straight Answer .

Rubbish, you didn't even understand the basic laws of aerodynamics, that my 8 year old brother could understand in the other thread, and you expect people to believe you know what stuff like Radiative Heat Transfer is?

When backed into a corner you sure do become insulting .. but I guess that's just your nature .

I understand that Apollo faked the moon missions , and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out either .

Speaking of the air conditioned back packs which never produced any water vapor emmisions, ..... the wildest story that nasa ever told about this one would be when a moon hoax investigator exposed the fact that not enough water had been taken on board the LM to provide a means of cooling said back packs ... So nasa invented the new story that the astronots discovered some ice caps on the lunar surface , melted them and then used that water for their air conditioned packs !!!!.... Can you believe that one ? .... Why would nasa not carry enough water on board the LM , risking the lives of their astronots , and then hope to maybe find some extra water hanging around on the unknown lunar surface ?? ... That is just too funny !!!

I about bust a gut when I read that little invention ! ... I have never laughed so hard in my life until I read your post yesterday where you made the silly claim that a still , phony moon set picture could prove that is was shot on the moon in a vacuum !! ... Talk aobut not understanding something ... You pretty much won the prize with that one !!

This allegation is so funny because it is a complete fabrication. NASA have never made any such claim. They have said that there may be ice at the polls and that it maybe usefully for future missions but the claim you are making is fiction.

Show me where the astronauts said that. There was enough water (7 hours worth) of cooling in their packs. Regarding, cooling - They made the water as they went, as a by-product of the fuel cells which produced electricity. Nothing was wasted. Fred Haise even used the crews urine to top up the cooling water on Apollo 13!

That is total BS. NASA has never claimed that the astonauts melted some ice found at the lunar ice caps for extra water. The Apollo missions did not go near the caps and the existence of ice at the caps is still unproven.

The suits the Apollo astronauts wore used the same system that for cooling that the current space suits use. Further, the temperature on the Moon is only of the surface and then only after it has heated in the sun for a considerable amount of time. It doesn't get to 260+ degrees immediately once the sun shines. It takes time. The Apollo missions took advantage of this fact and landed during lunar morning. The surface temperature did not get above 150 degrees during any of the missions. Their suits stayed cooler as their white, reflective fabric rejected a lot of heat on its own.

The spacecraft also rejected a lot of heat due to its reflective materials and the slow rotation they kept the craft in most of the time. Most of their heat came from the heat of the running machinery on the craft and when turned off the capsule would get rather cold.

The part about the gloves is laughable. The outer glove you see is not the pressure garment. The glove that held the pressure was inside the gauntlets that are visible.

The pictures are not provably fake. Every single so called anomaly does not stand up to scrutiny. Shadow angle are explained by perspective and terrain and the effects are easily recreated on Earth with only the sun as light.

I thought you were going to keep to the one thread? We're still waiting on the time during WHOTM where this light relflection anomaly can be found. Are you unable to provide it?

So you understand that the part about Apollo not being able to cool itself by rotating is not true do you? I assume that you understand that the clue to why it isn't true is actually contained.

The article actually tells us that heat from the sun can be radiated through space. So if you understand this artice perfectly please explain what the magic force that prevents heat from the warmer side of a CSM being radiated away is. You see if this article is correct the space shuttle, Mir, Salyut and the ISS would all be impossible too. They all use radiators to remove excess heat. A process this article claims is impossible.

Perhaps it doesn't "take a rocket scientist" to understand the Apollo missions, but it does take some basic science knowledge. Perhaps you should consider taking a few science classes before coming to the conclusion that the Apollo missions were hoaxed? By taking the time to study some physics much of the material that has been presented as *evidence* here will become obvious for it really is...scientifically unsound nonsense.

Well, opinions obviously vary.... I posted this topic before being warned again not to post anymore threads on Apollo besides the one moon poll thread ... So maybe it would be best if we stayed on that one thread , as I don't want to break the forum rules again ...

You all also informed me that you didn't want any third party articles posted there either , so that makes it a bit difficult to discuss the current moon hoax information that is constantly being revealed , which proves that Apollo was a hoax .... I didn't come here to argue or to insult anyone , but only to get the information out that nasa faked the moon landings ... and I'm very sorry if this truth offends any of you .

Your truth is that they landed men on the moon and mine is that they didn't .... and like your site administrator posted the other day , neither side is ever going to agree with the other about any of this .

I don't have the time at the moment to refute your claims here or to find and post the official nasa pictures which prove that the lighting used for the moon shots was a stage arc light and not the sun .... But as soon as I find the time to view the documentary again , I will post the pictures for us all to discuss .

Actually it was aquatus1 who made the one point at atime, no third party links request.

He is one of the debate judges on this site and was trying to run the debate in a more formal way. I suspect this is because things had got out of hand on that thread a few times

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:0byOVT...t=clnk&cd=1

O'Leary's inventory turned up more than 100 items left behind, including two pairs of boot covers, food packages and 12 urine bags.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/shuttle/nature.htm

After examining some of the craters, the meteorites were found to be frozen drops of human urine - its country of origin unknown!




Was the urine really recycled???

http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/node/4636


It looks like they are still working out how to recycle water on space shuttles...etc...

do you actually think the US Govt could cover up something of this magnitude? This would take the cooperation of THOUSANDS of NASA employees. A former President of the United States couldnt even cover up getting a BJ from an intern....but you think they could pull off a fake moon landing...gimmie a break.

No , not thousands were in on it ..... only nasa management , the Apollo fly boys and the film crew and photographers ... Hardy thousands of people in the know , right ?

And hey , the phony Apollo missions occured during "Tricky Dick's" watch , so leave Bill's BJ out of this , okay ?

They couldn't have faked them, the mission was crawling with Soviet spies, now why would they stay quiet? They have objects still on the moon used to measure its distance from earth with lasers, how could they have been put there?

As we already have a moon hoax thread that is currently being visited and added to quite a bit, there is no need to rehash the same material again and again. In reading through the posts I don't see a difference in the threads and it is pointless to keep this one open.