captain pish
Jul 28 2006, 08:16 PM
I just thought these pics needed discussing. I know theyre taken from the main page but i cant help but think this is one big con yet again. They look nothing like the stereotype bigfoot. I think its just a bear walking upright. If you were close enough to take these pictures i think youd go out on a limb and make a noise or throw a rock at its head to get it to turn around. Typically, bigfoot pictures are obscured in some way either by brances or a shaky camera but in this case its great quality just no frontal images. Just enough to make you think it could be bigfoot but not enough to confirm it.
Also notice it has no opposable thumb! whats that all about?
CryptoRay
Jul 28 2006, 08:20 PM
The first two pictures look like a gorilla, and the last two looks like a bear walking upright. But who knows.
~Onyx~
Jul 28 2006, 08:25 PM
Bigfoot?.....Naw, more like Smokey T. Bear.
aliennobasoure
Jul 28 2006, 08:28 PM
the first two might be something,but the last two just made me laugh
alien
Bella-Angelique
Jul 28 2006, 08:28 PM
Perhaps they were going for a giant sloth look?
BEACHCOMBER
Jul 28 2006, 08:31 PM
Looks like someone or something with a pelt on its back, the fur is a different colour, runs in different directions and you can see where the pelt ends at its butt and elbows. Although the forearm sticking out looks furry too.
~Onyx~
Jul 28 2006, 08:32 PM
QUOTE(Bella-Angelique @ Jul 28 2006, 04:28 PM) [snapback]1286681[/snapback]
Perhaps they were going for a giant sloth look?

Hahahaha....I do believe you nailed this one....
DeJay352
Jul 28 2006, 08:42 PM
Its either smokey the bear or a polar bear in alabama. I'm going with the polar bear one

but you never know. It could be the giant rappid qualla bear native to North America lmao
captain pish
Jul 28 2006, 08:47 PM
aha! i think youve hit the nail on the head with the sloth idea. Looks just like one! Does anybody know when Vincent Chows book is coming out? Ive been waiting for what seems like ten years for his "difinitive" pictures. I think hes welching on it a bit. He said his book would be out in july to shake the crypto world off its feet with the new bigfoot pics. Im starting to think he doesnt have any picture and is just drumming up publicity for his new book.
Raptor
Jul 28 2006, 08:49 PM
QUOTE
If you were close enough to take these pictures i think youd go out on a limb and make a noise or throw a rock at its head to get it to turn around.
Are you sure you'd do that if you were standing next to something so huge? Anyway, I believe the photographs were taken by cameras that had been set up beforehand.

Assuming the thing is wearing a pelt (as suggested by the two very distinct fur types, and unnatural body shape), it's true figure would resemble the typical bigfoot image a lot more nicely. I did a rough outline, it could perhaps be a little smaller though.

It looks a lot like a figure wearing a bear pelt here (The bear head is facing upwards and a lower jaw can't be seen; and the fact that it's a bear head on the body of something which is obviously not a bear).
Not saying that I believe this is necessarily a genuine set of photographs, but maybe people should pay more attention before classing something as fake without any serious consideration (and also before blindly believing something)...
coldethyl
Jul 28 2006, 08:49 PM
I just think those last couple of pictures look like a dude in some kind of costume.
Raptor
Jul 28 2006, 08:52 PM
QUOTE(coldethyl @ Jul 28 2006, 09:49 PM) [snapback]1286708[/snapback]
I just think those last couple of pictures look like a dude in some kind of costume.

Bigfoot in a tribal costume...obviously.

QUOTE
Also notice it has no opposable thumb! whats that all about?
In the 4th picture it looks like the hand has been rotated outwards, so the thumb is facing towards the camera. Twist your arm 180 degrees to see what I mean.
mr_crypto
Jul 28 2006, 09:07 PM
why is it that who ever took the picture is so close to this thing, and it never turns around. Maybe, its because, it would be harder to fake the front of a bigfoot, than the back. Also, why is it zoomed in so close, why cant we look at the legs and feet?
Raptor
Jul 28 2006, 09:13 PM
QUOTE
why is it that who ever took the picture is so close to this thing, and it never turns around. Maybe, its because, it would be harder to fake the front of a bigfoot, than the back. Also, why is it zoomed in so close, why cant we look at the legs and feet?
From the article itself.
QUOTE
A local store owner set up game cameras hoping to catch a glimpse. The pictures are below. We'll let you be the judge.
As for why can't you see the legs and feet, you can. The 4th picture is just a zoomed in version of the 3rd.
capoeiranger
Jul 28 2006, 09:27 PM
Might be too small for a ground sloth. It looks like an Ulfsark (Norse hunter) Which might be a good reason to camouflage his human form, especially in a game-rich area:)
Never_Hit_Nirvana
Jul 28 2006, 09:41 PM
Ah, finally! Photographic evidence of the secret mating rituals of the Habitually Drunken Hillbilly! If you listen closely you can almost her the mating song...
Freebiiiiiiiiiiird
and the female's call...
Why did you sleep with my sister
and the male preparing himself for the ultimate act...
Throw a....that'll shut her...truck broke down again...only man I'd have sex with is Toby Keith....
Ah the beauty of nature.
And why hasn't the Croc Hunter gone after this thing?
~Onyx~
Jul 28 2006, 09:50 PM
*Wipes away tears*....That.....*sniffles*...was beautiful, man.
capoeiranger
Jul 28 2006, 09:55 PM
QUOTE(Never_Hit_Nirvana @ Jul 29 2006, 04:41 AM) [snapback]1286758[/snapback]
And why hasn't the Croc Hunter gone after this thing?
Ay, cause it's crikey, mate!
blu_shark_29
Jul 28 2006, 10:25 PM
I go with the bear pelt theory. It looks like someone had fun with a stuffed bear. Is it supposed to be standing still in the photo in the open, or walking? If it's walking then it has an awfully small stride, like a toddler...
kenshinx
Jul 29 2006, 02:02 AM
QUOTE(mr_crypto @ Jul 28 2006, 09:07 PM) [snapback]1286726[/snapback]
why is it that who ever took the picture is so close to this thing, and it never turns around. Maybe, its because, it would be harder to fake the front of a bigfoot, than the back. Also, why is it zoomed in so close, why cant we look at the legs and feet?
coz it wearing Levi's and Converse shoe
hunterXkiller
Jul 29 2006, 05:53 AM
Doesn't look right . Its hands are almost humanlike considering numerous eyewitness accounts stating that bigfoots have muscular and long arms .
Its looks like it also had a tail . Tho the side view of its face gives almost the exact resemblance of an Orc .
Can't say much for now . Looks fake but at the same time almost real .
Amanda Panda
Jul 29 2006, 06:43 AM
Looks pretty fake to me... seriously now.
Lizard King
Jul 29 2006, 07:10 AM
QUOTE(Never_Hit_Nirvana @ Jul 28 2006, 02:41 PM) [snapback]1286758[/snapback]
Ah, finally! Photographic evidence of the secret mating rituals of the Habitually Drunken Hillbilly! If you listen closely you can almost her the mating song...
Freebiiiiiiiiiiird
and the female's call...
Why did you sleep with my sister
and the male preparing himself for the ultimate act...
Throw a....that'll shut her...truck broke down again...only man I'd have sex with is Toby Keith....
Ah the beauty of nature.
And why hasn't the Croc Hunter gone after this thing?
Lmao, I'll try to stay indoors next time. Sorry guys. Once again.
SarahSue2
Jul 29 2006, 08:13 AM
Very odd creature indeed and there appear to be more and more these days. This would be the last thing that any of us would expect to come waltzing into our yard. Even on a clear, sunlight day, it would tend to make ones heart go pitter-patter-ka-thump!
We have seen an influx of very peculiar wildlife in Texas in the past 15 years. The most unusual were several bear-like mammals that were certainly not bear. The features were all wrong and they exited the area bi-pedally. If I had not seen them move on two legs instead of four, I would have said they were some variety of short-nosed bear with tiny ears.
It just bugs me to know that there are unusual things out there and no one has any idea what they are or where they come from.
Schnaffler
Jul 29 2006, 11:24 AM
I agree with the man in a bear pelt theory. To me, the photos look too staged and unnatural.
Just my opinion.
I'm also resisting the urge to shout "Gentle Ben, you've come back!"
Schnaff
SLGena
Jul 30 2006, 12:12 AM
QUOTE(Bella-Angelique @ Jul 28 2006, 08:28 PM) [snapback]1286681[/snapback]
Perhaps they were going for a giant sloth look?

Thats what I think. Another hoax?

Yup.
coldethyl
Jul 30 2006, 04:07 AM
I never realized how many ribs a giant sloth had. That picture has been quoted more times than Bill Clinton.
cyrus11
Jul 31 2006, 07:06 AM
looks like a guy in a coyote or wolf skin. you can definitely see the pelts edge ending in a v toward the bottom near his rear-end. in fact it looks like he's wearing several layers of pelt.
this is rediculous. people these days are doing more damage for proving the existance of bigfoot than helping it by making so many fake pictures. then again, it might be helping. because the more people think it's a fake, the less likely that people will go out and hunt it.
p.s. check out the hand and arm of that thing. it's totally a human arm. compare that arm with the arm from the patterson film..you can see the difference, that bigfoot has a way longer and more massive arm than the new bigfoot photo, and that patterson bigfoot was a female. this new bigfoot just look like a girlyman in animal skin costumes.
sadistic jellyfish of doom
Jul 31 2006, 03:29 PM
QUOTE(coldethyl @ Jul 29 2006, 09:07 PM) [snapback]1288039[/snapback]
I never realized how many ribs a giant sloth had. That picture has been quoted more times than Bill Clinton.
3 times, to be precise.
~Onyx~
Jul 31 2006, 04:15 PM
QUOTE
people these days are doing more damage for proving the existance of bigfoot than helping it
HA!!!....you ain't seen nuthin' yet!!!!......I've got a camera-shy cousin who hasn't shaved or cut his hair since puberty!!!!! Stay-tuned!!!!*looks around for some stilts*
zakoo
Aug 5 2006, 07:47 AM
Malaysia's Bigfoot Pictures posted by Vincent Chow (A well-known Bigfoot Researcher) is a fake...
Bigfoot's Hoax Vincent Chow's website has been closed after the truth emerge about the pictures on his website
Johor Hominid..
- Lies will not last... The Truth will Prevail ---
Samael
Aug 5 2006, 09:24 AM
I don't think they're very realistic. Either a costume or a posable dummy.
~Onyx~
Aug 5 2006, 05:55 PM
QUOTE(Mister E. @ Aug 5 2006, 05:24 AM) [snapback]1295822[/snapback]
I don't think they're very realistic. Either a costume or a posable dummy.
Don't you mean a costume ON a dummy?
Lois
Aug 5 2006, 06:12 PM

it's back seems awfully hairy
CaitSith
Aug 5 2006, 06:52 PM
That deffinately looks like a pelt to me. The fur pattern doesn't seem to match with that of a primate, it looks more like dog or bear fur
~Onyx~
Aug 5 2006, 08:43 PM
Yeah, it looks like the local Taxidermist had "one to many" and decided to make a home-video.....a BAD home-video........What the hell ever happened to "drink responsibly"?
SecondHeartbeat
Aug 5 2006, 09:10 PM
it was Sgt.Grumbles
~Onyx~
Aug 5 2006, 10:35 PM
QUOTE(A7X @ Aug 5 2006, 05:10 PM) [snapback]1296178[/snapback]
it was Sgt.Grumbles


.........funny, and yet, relatively disturbing....
the_sasquatch_hunter
Aug 5 2006, 10:37 PM
If that's a sasquatch, I'm Randy Newman.
coldethyl
Aug 16 2006, 09:19 PM
QUOTE(A7X @ Aug 5 2006, 04:10 PM) [snapback]1296178[/snapback]
it was Sgt.Grumbles


What the?...........
capoeiranger
Aug 16 2006, 09:54 PM
Whoa! That's even funnier than seeing Chewbacca high on weed!
chaoszerg
Aug 16 2006, 10:17 PM
It's yogi on his way to swipe some picanic baskets
It also looks like a man wearing bear skin or some other animal hide i dont really think its a bigfoot.
crawler2000
Aug 16 2006, 10:27 PM
if this was a real picture of bigfoot then who ever took the picture or set up camers should have caught the bigfoot climbing or coming down the tree.its a true fake obviously because the back is slouched too much and the hair on the fake bigfoot looks too new like if it wasent touched by dirt in its life.
Ring Tailed Lemur
Aug 23 2006, 05:18 AM
QUOTE(aliennobasoure @ Jul 28 2006, 04:28 PM) [snapback]1286680[/snapback]
the first two might be something,but the last two just made me laugh
alien

same
sadistic jellyfish of doom
Aug 23 2006, 03:23 PM
I denounced those pics as fake the moment I saw them. All Cryptids Produce an Aura of the so-called "Blurry camera syndrome" , Making them impossible to photograph...
designer
Aug 23 2006, 07:36 PM
I'd say a stuffed bear or plet on something. The arm position seems very un-natural. And why would it be standing in that strange pose in a clearing? It seems to be leaning to far forward to balance. The fur looks like it is too long for the size of the figure which could be from a person wearing a large bear pelt.
sadistic jellyfish of doom
Aug 23 2006, 08:49 PM
QUOTE(designer @ Aug 23 2006, 12:36 PM) [snapback]1318949[/snapback]
I'd say a stuffed bear or plet on something. The arm position seems very un-natural. And why would it be standing in that strange pose in a clearing? It seems to be leaning to far forward to balance. The fur looks like it is too long for the size of the figure which could be from a person wearing a large bear pelt.

Meh...
Agent. Mulder
Aug 23 2006, 09:55 PM
im not sure really. the first two look like some weird animal/sasquatch type thing in the bushes. and the last two just look like a bear standing up
frogfish
Aug 23 2006, 09:57 PM
Looks like a badly kept stuffed bear...
Allfather of Valhalla
Aug 24 2006, 12:20 AM
QUOTE(captain pish @ Jul 28 2006, 05:16 PM) [snapback]1286663[/snapback]
I just thought these pics needed discussing. I know theyre taken from the main page but i cant help but think this is one big con yet again. They look nothing like the stereotype bigfoot. I think its just a bear walking upright. If you were close enough to take these pictures i think youd go out on a limb and make a noise or throw a rock at its head to get it to turn around. Typically, bigfoot pictures are obscured in some way either by brances or a shaky camera but in this case its great quality just no frontal images. Just enough to make you think it could be bigfoot but not enough to confirm it.
Also notice it has no opposable thumb! whats that all about?
I sorta figured out that it's supposed to be a Sasquatch wearing a bear's hide, sorta like those cavemen or Viking berserkers.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.