scumbag
Oct 27 2003, 05:26 PM
okay, i've had this theory for a few months, i've been trying to think of every possibility, please read through and give me some feedback. thanks!
aliens, a spiritual world, the afterlife (what actually happens), the TRUTH behind the reality of dreams, the truth about ghosts, etc.
it is something i have always believed, i have a huge theory which i believe, which i will tell later in the topic. However, there are so many documentations around the world of the unknown, the whereabouts of the afterlife, etc. that something MUST be out there, something that no human being could possibly get their head round. there has got to be something so big, so detailed, so complex that the human brain could not handle - and THIS leads me to my point.
I BELIEVE WE CAN FLY, FLOAT, AND CARRY SPECIAL ABILITIES.
sound crazy? yes, of course, sounds childish - but here's my theory:-
the thing is, scientists and researchers solely believe that we only use, at most, 15% of our brain's FULL power and ability. that means that there is 85% of our brain that is unexplored. Just think - if there was a way to use the full mass of our brain's potential - well, it goes beyond saying that there would be some completely amazing things that could be done. I believe that somehow, every one of us can unlock that 85%. I believe that if any of us fully focused our energy in our head, fully explored the mind, then i think that extra brain potential could be opened - a little like hacking. you see, i am a hacker, as some of you already know, and over 6 years of hacking, i have tried to transfer my knowledge to the matters of life. Yes, i undestand this might not sound too dissimilar to ''the matrix'' storyline, but if you think this through, this idea is completely individual. i don't think anybody has thought of this theory before. and i think that there is some way we can ''hack'' into our own minds, fully explore that unused 85% and use it to our own disposal.
there are 2 types of people that i think have already tried this.
These are fully-focused ''magicians'' (the experts, the people who practice it, not people like paul daniels) and ninjas (the people who practice the nin-jitsu martial art). These people have amazing self-discipline, and train every hour they can. They really understand and focus on everything they do.
i think even skateboarding can be applied to this theory. some of the tricks skaters pull, e.g., rodney mullen's phenomenal flip sequences are just crazy and make people wonder. ''skateboarding and the perception of time'' - think about it. when you pull a trick , time moves differently. sailing over a stair set - just think, time does not occur in the same way as it normally does.
and if you think what i've typed so far is ad as toast, this is really gonna blag your heads - sit down one night, one clear, starry night, lie down and look up straight into the stars. clear your head, and just think - why are we here? what is life's purpose - and even more to the point HOW did we all get here? how did the world as we know it today develop from ''prehistoric man'' - no language, no communication - no civilisation?? how have we got all this technology, who thought up all these ideas of using electric - one of the, if not the most harmful substance IN THE WORLD, to be used as something that could improve life??
so, i want your thoughts on everything in life, and it's purpose. it sounds farfetched, but look into the galaxy, think that there is inifinite space and have many billions of planets there are with life. think - no human has ever explored to the other side of a black hole. what i'm trying to say is – WE ARE NOT ALONE, be it aliens, supernatural beings, people who have fully explored and unlocked their brains.
if you see things the way i'm beginning to - we are so low developed - and if we have evolved from pre-historic man then how much % of their brain must they have used???
now, what are ghosts? the spirits of the dead, or, if you look at it in my theory - a gateway between earth life and the supernatural life? i believe that whenever someone sees a ghost, this gateway is open. we can see each other, but cannot touch each other. i believe that when we see a ghost, the ghost itself also gets scared - because in this ''other'' world, we would appear how this ''ghost'' appears to us. this is why neither 'us'' or the ''ghosts'' cannot touch each other - there's actually NOTHING there to be touched.
dreams - i also believe that when you go to sleep and dream, you actually open a small fraction of that 85% and use it at your soul disposal. you notice you can sometimes fly and do these ''things'' in dreams - but you cannot control your dreams - unless you train your mind both mentally and physically. there is a way - it's simply finding that way.
well, there is my philosophy, what i believe, what i think.
JUST THINK ABOUT IT - YOU'LL GET IT.
Phantom
Oct 27 2003, 05:47 PM
If I remember correctly, people actually do use the whole brain, only 10-20%
at one time.
Am I right?

Found a link, too:
The Ten Percent Myth
xgaryedgex
Oct 27 2003, 06:43 PM
i have to say i like your view. I've pondered that to an extent and have alot of the same felings you do on this matter.
gonzowalker
Oct 27 2003, 07:25 PM
I agree with you for the most part. I'm still trying to perfect my Jedi mind tricks, and construct my lightsaber though.
xgaryedgex
Oct 27 2003, 07:57 PM
I feel the force is strong with gonzowalker
Astrocreep
Oct 27 2003, 09:26 PM
I have had the same thoughts you speak of and I totally agree with you Scumbag
Kismit
Oct 27 2003, 09:33 PM
Phantom , great linkage

.... oops!! thought this was the flirting thread
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 06:00 PM
| QUOTE (Phantom @ Oct 27 2003, 04:47 PM) |
If I remember correctly, people actually do use the whole brain, only 10-20% at one time.
Am I right? 
Found a link, too: The Ten Percent Myth |
WOW...
That means NOTHING.
Gee, isn't it always lovely how "dyed-in-the-wool" skeptics always skirt the issue?
Keep in mind, while reading the following, that I AM a skeptical of psychic powers and abilities.
Ok, so each and every being does, at some point, use 100% of thier minds. But at the same time, we are conceding that, at any given time, that same human being is only using 10-20%. Which clearly implies that we are always using a DIFFERENT 10-20% of our minds.
For the sake of clarity, let's use the analogy of the mind as a computer processor.
Say you have a modern PC processor running at a core-clock speed of 2.6ghz. (Yes, I realize that core-clock speed is not completely indicative of actual performance, but for the sake of simplification, we can use this as our benchmark.) That processor is capable of some 2-3 billion calculations (or rather, decisions) per second. Now, let's assume that the we are, for any number of reasons, only capable of using 10-20% of the processors power at any given time. We may, at any point, use all the processor; but we can never perform more than 200-600million calculations per second (10-20% of 2-3 billion calculations per second). Although we are using the same processor, under these circumstances it is doubtful that a PC running this 2.6ghz processor could run a state-of-the-art PC program... such as a PC game like "Grand Theft Auto: Vice City"... even though the core-clock speed is well above the minimum requirements.
Now, many scientists hold the view, and many studies have been done to suggest, that the human mind is very similar to a processor... simply performing an unending series of boolean calculations... true or false, on or off, 0 or 1. Now, the mind is likely a much more powerful processor... probably capable or a comparable 8 TERRAhertz of processing power. Looking at the day to day tasks that it accomplishes using 10-20% at a time of that 8 terrahertz of processing power, just IMAGINE the tasks that it could perform it could use all 100% of that 8 terrahertz speed.
Surely, wether or not we use 100% of our minds over the course of our life, if we could use 100% at any single point in time, new gateways would certainly be open. I am not one to say wether this would allow the developement of psychic or paranormal abilities... but it could certainly allow us to tackle more difficult problems with greater efficiency, as well as better manage the many tasks we perform all at once... and possibly let us perform more tasks at one time; and that could mean something all-new for humankind.
Phantom
Oct 29 2003, 06:52 PM
| QUOTE (saxcatz @ Oct 29 2003, 07:00 PM) |
WOW... That means NOTHING. Gee, isn't it always lovely how "dyed-in-the-wool" skeptics always skirt the issue? Keep in mind, while reading the following, that I AM a skeptical of psychic powers and abilities.
|
Please review the second paragraph of the post you started this topic with, I'll do you a favour and quote it for you:
| QUOTE |
aliens, a spiritual world, the afterlife (what actually happens), the TRUTH behind the reality of dreams, the truth about ghosts, etc. it is something i have always believed |
Does not sound like a sceptic to me. But anyway, let's continue:
| QUOTE |
| Ok, so each and every being does, at some point, use 100% of thier minds. But at the same time, we are conceding that, at any given time, that same human being is only using 10-20%. Which clearly implies that we are always using a DIFFERENT 10-20% of our minds. |
You are right, this was my point exactly. Now what is yours?
To the next one:
| QUOTE |
| For the sake of clarity, let's use the analogy of the mind as a computer processor. |
For the sake of clarity, let's not. Let's use the analogy of using the mind as using the physical human body. We use our tongue to speak, we use our legs to walk, we use our eyes to see. We all use these different parts of the body to perform different things. As is with the brain, some parts are used for reading a book, other parts for remembering the smell of freshly baked bread from our childhood, and others for collecting thoughts to make, for instance, a post in the Unexplained Mysteries discussion forum.
| QUOTE |
| Now, many scientists hold the view, and many studies have been done to suggest, that the human mind is very similar to a processor... |
I could act funny and ask "name one", but I won't.
| QUOTE |
| Surely, wether or not we use 100% of our minds over the course of our life, if we could use 100% at any single point in time, new gateways would certainly be open. I am not one to say wether this would allow the developement of psychic or paranormal abilities... |
Yes, you are the one to say. Please review this line from your original post:
| QUOTE |
| I BELIEVE WE CAN FLY, FLOAT, AND CARRY SPECIAL ABILITIES. |
| QUOTE |
| but it could certainly allow us to tackle more difficult problems with greater efficiency, as well as better manage the many tasks we perform all at once... and possibly let us perform more tasks at one time |
On this, I might agree with you.
Hope this clarifies my line of thought a bit. Good post, anyway.
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 08:13 PM
| QUOTE (Phantom @ Oct 29 2003, 05:52 PM) |
| QUOTE (saxcatz @ Oct 29 2003, 07:00 PM) | WOW... That means NOTHING. Gee, isn't it always lovely how "dyed-in-the-wool" skeptics always skirt the issue? Keep in mind, while reading the following, that I AM a skeptical of psychic powers and abilities.
|
Please review the second paragraph of the post you started this topic with, I'll do you a favour and quote it for you:
| QUOTE | aliens, a spiritual world, the afterlife (what actually happens), the TRUTH behind the reality of dreams, the truth about ghosts, etc. it is something i have always believed |
Does not sound like a sceptic to me. But anyway, let's continue:
| QUOTE | | Ok, so each and every being does, at some point, use 100% of thier minds. But at the same time, we are conceding that, at any given time, that same human being is only using 10-20%. Which clearly implies that we are always using a DIFFERENT 10-20% of our minds. |
You are right, this was my point exactly. Now what is yours? To the next one:
| QUOTE | | For the sake of clarity, let's use the analogy of the mind as a computer processor. |
For the sake of clarity, let's not. Let's use the analogy of using the mind as using the physical human body. We use our tongue to speak, we use our legs to walk, we use our eyes to see. We all use these different parts of the body to perform different things. As is with the brain, some parts are used for reading a book, other parts for remembering the smell of freshly baked bread from our childhood, and others for collecting thoughts to make, for instance, a post in the Unexplained Mysteries discussion forum.
| QUOTE | | Now, many scientists hold the view, and many studies have been done to suggest, that the human mind is very similar to a processor... |
I could act funny and ask "name one", but I won't. | QUOTE | | Surely, wether or not we use 100% of our minds over the course of our life, if we could use 100% at any single point in time, new gateways would certainly be open. I am not one to say wether this would allow the developement of psychic or paranormal abilities... |
Yes, you are the one to say. Please review this line from your original post:
| QUOTE | | I BELIEVE WE CAN FLY, FLOAT, AND CARRY SPECIAL ABILITIES. |
| QUOTE | | but it could certainly allow us to tackle more difficult problems with greater efficiency, as well as better manage the many tasks we perform all at once... and possibly let us perform more tasks at one time |
On this, I might agree with you. Hope this clarifies my line of thought a bit. Good post, anyway. |
Ummmmm....
PHANTOM...
I DIDN'T START THIS POST!!!
TWO VERY DIFFERENT NAMES...
Sorry, mod or not, I get to poke a little fun at you about that one.
Phantom
Oct 29 2003, 08:15 PM
Aww damn Saxcatz, I worked
so hard on that one...
Sorry about that, man.
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 08:28 PM
| QUOTE (Phantom @ Oct 29 2003, 07:15 PM) |
Aww damn Saxcatz, I worked so hard on that one...
Sorry about that, man. |
We all make mistakes... especially me.
All is forgiven and all is well!
theSOURCE
Oct 29 2003, 08:29 PM
There is a reason why our brain operates the way it does. The brain is fueled by oxygen which is carried to it in our blood's hemoglobin. To function normally, it requires 25% of the bodies oxygen intake. In order for the brain to function at 100% it would require huge amounts of oxygen. This would quickly deplete the hemoglobin of oxygen, and brain damage would result due to oxygen depravation.
Also, if it were possible to use 100% of the brain at once, this would lead to sensory/regulatory system overload since all neurons would be firing simultaneously. At best his would result in wild hallucinations, and at worse a massive, and potentially fatal, seizure.
Just my 2 cents.
reese2
Oct 29 2003, 08:32 PM
Besides the one tiny error Phantom, you had other great points...... What about those????
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 08:33 PM
| QUOTE (Phantom @ Oct 29 2003, 05:52 PM) |
| QUOTE | | For the sake of clarity, let's use the analogy of the mind as a computer processor. |
For the sake of clarity, let's not. Let's use the analogy of using the mind as using the physical human body. We use our tongue to speak, we use our legs to walk, we use our eyes to see. We all use these different parts of the body to perform different things. As is with the brain, some parts are used for reading a book, other parts for remembering the smell of freshly baked bread from our childhood, and others for collecting thoughts to make, for instance, a post in the Unexplained Mysteries discussion forum.
|
This is EXACTLY my point...
Imagine if we had the ability to utilize all 100% of our mind at the same time...
To be able to coordinate ALL of those different parts of the brain that we use for different tasks...
Imagine what we could do if we could multi-task as well as that processor! Maybe we'd find whole new abilities that we never before realized the potential of! (Though I doubt it!) If nothing else, the efficiency of a single human would be GREATLY increased.
I think we see eye to eye on this, dispite getting off on the wrong foot!
Seraphina
Oct 29 2003, 08:36 PM
I put telepathy or telecinesis down to people who are able to use a greater protion of their brain for any given task...although I'm sketchy about it. As The Source said, there is a very fundamental reason why our use of the brain is so limited
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 08:40 PM
| QUOTE (theSOURCE @ Oct 29 2003, 07:29 PM) |
There is a reason why our brain operates the way it does. The brain is fueled by oxygen which is carried to it in our blood's hemoglobin. To function normally, it requires 25% of the bodies oxygen intake. In order for the brain to function at 100% it would require huge amounts of oxygen. This would quickly deplete the hemoglobin of oxygen, and brain damage would result due to oxygen depravation.
Also, if it were possible to use 100% of the brain at once, this would lead to sensory/regulatory system overload since all neurons would be firing simultaneously. At best his would result in wild hallucinations, and at worse a massive, and potentially fatal, seizure.
Just my 2 cents. |
About oxygen intake, this is VERY true... though I never stated that I believed 100% utilization to be possible, I was only speculating on it's effects.
As for sensory/regulatory system overload, I do not believe this would happen. For the brain to run at a full 100%, the neurons would all have to be run in tandum. IE, not every neuron would be firing at the same time; but in contrast they would be firing sequentially, one immediately after the other. The brain would obviously have to develope to function in this new system; but that may be possible, as the human mind has shown great ability for adaptation to certain situation. (Yet, at the same time, such a dismal ability to adapt to others.)
An excellent post all the same, and we can argue about this till the cows come home (from the afterlife?); yet at this point, it is all conjecture, so any points and null!
saxcatz
Oct 29 2003, 08:48 PM
| QUOTE (theSOURCE @ Oct 29 2003, 07:29 PM) |
| There is a reason why our brain operates the way it does. The brain is fueled by oxygen which is carried to it in our blood's hemoglobin. To function normally, it requires 25% of the bodies oxygen intake. In order for the brain to function at 100% it would require huge amounts of oxygen. This would quickly deplete the hemoglobin of oxygen, and brain damage would result due to oxygen depravation. |
Another thing we've yet to consider...
What if we increased our simultaneous usage to just 20-30% from 10-20%... Although this would stress the oxygen supply like a brisk jog, that 33-50% increase could potentially expand our abilities to an unimagined level. Besides, haven't many psychics said that they feel fatigued or short of breath after using thier abilities... this would fit in with our scenario. Even a meager 5-10% increase could produce a mind capable of extradonairy problem solving skills!
I really am quite skeptical about this... but I do find it to be FASCINATING conjecture!
Bruno
Oct 29 2003, 09:38 PM
Hi everybody!
This is my first post in this forum, so go easy on me!! And i'm sorry about my english...
Of course we use 100% of our brain! Why do you think nature or evolution would grant us with something as powerful as a brain and leave some blanks to fill in for our pleasure?? The fact is we don't use 100% of it intentionally! Don't you guys think the brain has better things to do than to cook up ideas all the time?? It's responsable for the correct functioning of one of natures great achievements, a sencient being!! And it still has enough capability to come up with some of the best or worst ideas of all time, such as astonishing creation and theory (like Einstein

), or destruction!
Don't be so concerned about what the brain could do; sometimes we misuse so poorly what it can do now!!
Just for the sake of argument, try and find out something about trepanation!
Or on new theories and facts about the brain read "Descartes mistake" (i think this is the correct translation to english) by Antonio R. Damasio.
This whole idea of a super-powerful brain makes me think of a comic from "Cadillacs and Dinossaurs" where a scientist creates a fluid that turns the brain into a superbrain but then the brain becomes a living thing itself and bursts out of the scientist's head! His and others...
Purple_Sprite
Nov 5 2003, 02:12 AM
ok i hate to sound like the token Junkie but i was reading that psilocybin mushrooms inrease the seratonin level of the brain. there are some links on erowid.org on studies with mushrooms and the if they really expand the mind or just make you trip.
Pinecone
Nov 12 2003, 10:45 PM
But that's not how the brain works. Many parts of your mind recieve information from multiple other areas (obviously). But the problem is they can't do it all at the same time. So there is a definite limit (AFAIK) on number of tasks the brain can acomplish at once.
mowo
Nov 18 2003, 12:39 PM

Consider the jellyfish. I remember reading that there have been jellyfish since before the dinosaurs, yet over millions of years they have hardly evolved at all. Not so much a theory, but more an idea; what if these creatures had evolved mentally and are vastly superior to humans. We humans seem to gauge our success as intellectuals on our physical accomplishments, such as buildings or inventions. But what if some beings actually 'existed' in some alternate realm made possible by some kind of telekinesis or remote viewing. A lifeform capable of this may have quite a basic physical form, and in 'our' existance may seem quite basic, much in the same way we concentrate all our efforts towards the real world and not towards dreams or meditation. Just a thought...
Kryso
Nov 19 2003, 04:35 AM
Just going to toss in my 2 cents worth… I find it interesting that the human brain is more active while we sleep then when we go throughout our waking day… Always baffled me that one?
The Nameless One
Nov 20 2003, 04:28 AM
[no human has ever explored to the other side of a black hole.[QUOTE]
Please dont get offended by this, but there is no otherside of a Black hole the way you are describing a blackhole is that it is a 2 dimensional object. Which is not true
A Black Hole is a collapsed star in which not even light can escape although I believe under certain conditions it may be possible to escape a black hole if your still not completely Destroyed.
You have to look at a black hole as a 3 dimensional object lets say you could compare a black hole to a Fishermans Net which is used to trap fish, as the fish enter in the path of the net they become trapped and are used for food.
A black hole does just the same anything that crosses its path becomes enveloped into its singularity, because its gravity is so overwhelming, and it feeds until there is nothing left to feed on or until it grows so big that it cannot consume anything else.
What you were trying to say is that we do not Know what is Beyond a Wormhole,
which is theorized to be able to be connected with different space time, if one could hold it open long enough, Thus creating what is a Quantum Leap.
kreestar
Nov 20 2003, 10:01 PM
You have an interesting theory. I agree with most of it. wow didnt know there were more posts. Well nevermind ignore me.
Sh3vA
Nov 21 2003, 03:44 AM
The Nameless one...
I disagree with your point concerning the blackhole... how exactly can u state that blackhole is like a fishing net? How do you really know that noone comes out of it? Yes the hole's gravity is extraordinary and it's possibly one of the most intresting creations on the universe but what if the blackhole is exactly the time travel device that people are lookin for at all times and that is why there is "no coming back"? What if a black hole is just a planet inside? Not a single person has ever gone in the black hole and shared either his/her experiences after the trip or their experiences seconds before they disappeared and were never heard of again. I doubt that any time in the near any of us will know what a black hole is, anyways.
As of the brain.. 10-20% sounds like too much. I remember hearing that some of the smartest people on earth use only around 3-5%. But no matter how much it is... it is still an extremely tiny amount of brain to use. Im sure there is some type of a key to that knowledge and it is not studying at a highschool and university for 10 years.
Also i have read somewhere that there are versions that dreams are actually sort of a parallel dimension to our real life and indeed our real life is our dreams and our dreams are our real life. All the dreams are connected. so basically u living to lives.. one at night (in 1 world) and the other one durin day (in other world). This is really a fascinating topic and as many opinions as we get it will take many generations to arrive to the answer. If i can recall it correctly someone mentioned controling dreams at night..... i can only control half my dreams, and all my dreams are 3D with real life images. I actually confuse the real life with my dreams a lot due to the similarity in the places and events and people. During my dreams i can sort of realize that i am dreaming... like i actually say in my dream "THIS IS MY DREAM" and then i can do anything, i can go anywhere i want i can get anything i want, i can get anyone i want, and lastly i can wake up whenever i want all i have to do is really wish to wake up. and it actually works. Ive been gettin better at it with years and now it's trully insane how similar my dreams are to my life.
The Nameless One
Nov 21 2003, 07:07 AM
| QUOTE (Sh3vA @ Nov 21 2003, 02:44 AM) |
The Nameless one...
I disagree with your point concerning the blackhole... how exactly can u state that blackhole is like a fishing net? How do you really know that noone comes out of it? |
Okay Ill make this short, the reason I was using Fish Net as an analogy to a Black Hole. Was to give the person who posted this message, an easier way to look at what a black holes function really is.
Second how do I know no one can escape, this is simply what many Scientist, and Philosophers speculate. If you would have read my message you would have seen that I stated that.
(Although I believe under certain conditions it may be possible to escape a black hole if your still not completely Destroyed.)
But lets say that You and I are wrong, and lets say that Hawking, Einstein, Thorne, and many other Physicist are right. That nothing can escape it, their theory would be based on that its Gravitational pull is so strong that nothing can escape, their proof would be that, can you get up and fly away into space, can birds or small conventional airplanes, no because we are being held down by earths gravity, you need rockets to escape earths gravity, just as you would need to travel faster than light to escape a Black Hole.
Which is also why you will never see light surrounding a black hole, as many pictures from Nasa have proven this.
Now on the other hand I have my own theories, Im studying Physics, and working on my Doctrine, but all my theories will have to be proven through time until now Einstein, Hawking, and Thorne have won the battle, but they may have not won the war.
Sh3vA
Nov 22 2003, 04:22 AM
o, i see...
well sorry for misunderstanding
As for the whole thing with nothing can escape the "black hole" and u say thats what scientist say, yes thats true, but what im saying is that there are some things in this world that science can't explain... or at least human science at our current level can't explain... I agree with you that that's the general idea of the black hole but for some reason my personal opinion on the black whole is that it is something we can't even think of yet.
Bruno
Nov 24 2003, 09:22 PM
"Which is also why you will never see light surrounding a black hole, as many pictures from Nasa have proven this."
I have to disagree with you on this one, Sh3vA!
First, if there was no light surrouding a black hole or in it, how could it be seen in a picture???
If a black hole is orbiting a greater star, like a giant blue, then the overheated matter flies away into the black hole ! The hole itself is invisible but the overheated matter is not.
It's like when a giant is orbited by a white dwarf. The disk that forms around the white dwarf, from the stellar matter it is stealing from it's larger "friend" is always seen.
When that matter is compressed into the event horizon, and slips into it, a burst of x-rays is emmited and does escape the black hole. It works as a beacon, pulsing like the radio pulse of a neutron star (after all, that's what a black hole is: a super neutron star).
When the black hole is not orbiting any larger body, then it is able to be detected through the gravitational micro-lensing phenomena. When it passes in front of another star, the light we see is deformed because of the effect of the black hole.
theSOURCE
Nov 24 2003, 09:57 PM
| QUOTE (The Nameless One) |
Please dont get offended by this, but there is no otherside of a Black hole the way you are describing a blackhole is that it is a 2 dimensional object.
A black hole does just the same anything that crosses its path becomes enveloped into its singularity, because its gravity is so overwhelming, and it feeds until there is nothing left to feed on or until it grows so big that it cannot consume anything else. |
This is true of a static black hole, but it's also theorized that there may be spinning black holes which may actually be donut shaped. It's the gap in this donut shape that could be the entrance to a worm hole.
Also, black holes don't "grow" in size. Theory states that when a black hole becomes full it may explode, thus releasing all the trapped matter back into space.
| QUOTE (The Nameless One) |
What you were trying to say is that we do not Know what is Beyond a Wormhole, which is theorized to be able to be connected with different space time, if one could hold it open long enough, Thus creating what is a Quantum Leap. |
Traveling through a worm hole is not the same as a quantum leap. In a worm hole, matter travels from one point in space time to another point. In a quantum leap, particles of matter make an abrupt change from one state to an other, with no in-between transitional state.
The Nameless One
Nov 25 2003, 07:00 AM
| QUOTE (theSOURCE @ Nov 24 2003, 08:57 PM) |
| QUOTE (The Nameless One) | Please dont get offended by this, but there is no otherside of a Black hole the way you are describing a blackhole is that it is a 2 dimensional object.
A black hole does just the same anything that crosses its path becomes enveloped into its singularity, because its gravity is so overwhelming, and it feeds until there is nothing left to feed on or until it grows so big that it cannot consume anything else. |
This is true of a static black hole, but it's also theorized that there may be spinning black holes which may actually be donut shaped. It's the gap in this donut shape that could be the entrance to a worm hole.
Also, black holes don't "grow" in size. Theory states that when a black hole becomes full it may explode, thus releasing all the trapped matter back into space.
| QUOTE (The Nameless One) | What you were trying to say is that we do not Know what is Beyond a Wormhole, which is theorized to be able to be connected with different space time, if one could hold it open long enough, Thus creating what is a Quantum Leap. |
Traveling through a worm hole is not the same as a quantum leap. In a worm hole, matter travels from one point in space time to another point. In a quantum leap, particles of matter make an abrupt change from one state to an other, with no in-between transitional state.
|
The center of the so called time machine, which was proposed by Kip Thorne, Michael Morris, along with many other Physics Pros called this a wormhole, which was first used in the movie Contact written by Dr. Carl Sagan. A wormhole is a place where the space time continuum is so warped it basically doubles back on itself, thus creating a cosmic shortcut.
That's where we get the Quantum Leap. Thorne proposes that a wormhole could be pulled from quantum foam. The quantum foam is the micro-level of the universe (Sub-Atomic Particles) beneath which things are so small nobody can observe them. No one knows whats down there so we can't assume the actual Laws of Physics would apply to this.
Oh and one more thing you are right about Black Holes not growing in size, and exploding because of all the matter trapped inside, but it actually doesn't have to explode it may also be able to implode, causing it to fold itself inside out, and thus it could create a whole new universe.
And one more thing what I meant by saying that a black hole feeds until it can't feed no more. What I meant by that, was that when there is nothing else left to feed on in the path of its Gravity.
bathory
Nov 26 2003, 04:37 AM
if only i didn't suck at maths, physics is interesting:)
Nax
Nov 26 2003, 03:20 PM
Ah... but can he tie his shoelaces?
Scar
Dec 7 2003, 03:07 PM
[QUOTE]now, what are ghosts? the spirits of the dead, or, if you look at it in my theory - a gateway between earth life and the supernatural life? i believe that whenever someone sees a ghost, this gateway is open. we can see each other, but cannot touch each other. i believe that when we see a ghost, the ghost itself also gets scared - because in this ''other'' world, we would appear how this ''ghost'' appears to us. this is why neither 'us'' or the ''ghosts'' cannot touch each other - there's actually NOTHING there to be touched.
You theory doesn't vary much from my own beleifs. But I believe that like fault lines that cause Earthquakes, "Paranormal lines" are the fault lines of the Universe where space and time tend to get warped with paralell universe's and like you say we actually appear to ghosts as ghosts appear to us!
Scorpius
Dec 17 2003, 01:53 AM
| QUOTE (theSOURCE @ Oct 29 2003, 07:29 PM) |
There is a reason why our brain operates the way it does. The brain is fueled by oxygen which is carried to it in our blood's hemoglobin. To function normally, it requires 25% of the bodies oxygen intake. In order for the brain to function at 100% it would require huge amounts of oxygen. This would quickly deplete the hemoglobin of oxygen, and brain damage would result due to oxygen depravation.
Also, if it were possible to use 100% of the brain at once, this would lead to sensory/regulatory system overload since all neurons would be firing simultaneously. At best his would result in wild hallucinations, and at worse a massive, and potentially fatal, seizure. |
Whenever you look at techniques on meditation for relaxation or either psychic "enhancement". I usually see them say to exhale and inhale with large amounts. So as i piece these topics together a theory of mine is created.
If the brain only uses 10-20% of its power at ONE TIME. And it requires a certain amount of oxygen ("25%"), would the use of the techniques of meditation enhance or develop the brain to gather more oxygen thus enabling itself to use more of its brain power. Am i right?
Therefore if the brain uses 10-20% power and uses about 25% of the oxygen that is inhaled, the brain power could probably be increased by increasing the amount of oxygen that is inhaled. So you could possibly use 20+% (like 40% or maybe 60%) and possibly be giving your brain more than the 25% (like 30 or maybe 60%) that is inhaled. Would this account for the pyschic occurences that has happened?
If anyone understands me and follows what i have said. Please reply.
Scorpius
Dec 21 2003, 06:59 AM
Is it me or does anyone not follow me on what i have just said?

... Does this theory of mine make sense?... Need people's opinions on this, and i don't mind a few criticism.

Oh yea Nax, that picture of yours is really disturbing.
moe eubleck
Dec 22 2003, 01:31 AM

are you saying ' the greater the oxygen intake , the greater the brain power ' ?
If So , then why doesnt Moe have any psychic experiences while blowing up ballons? It just makes us dizzy.....
Scorpius
Dec 23 2003, 06:39 AM
| QUOTE (moe eubleck @ Dec 22 2003, 12:31 AM) |
are you saying ' the greater the oxygen intake , the greater the brain power ' ?
If So , then why doesnt Moe have any psychic experiences while blowing up ballons? It just makes us dizzy..... |
Moe its just a theory of mine, sure it may need a few or even a lot of improvement in its mechanics, the logic, and others--whatever.
In response to your last question, i think its because of your intentions. I'll explain this one for you. You want to blow the balloon up not move objects with your mind or have a "psychic experience" for that matter. You wanted to blow up a balloon and that's what you got, a blown up balloon. Doe this make any sense?
moe eubleck
Dec 23 2003, 08:20 AM
It makes good sense and Moe applauds your theory.

Moe will also be doing you a favor as he will be testing said theory.
So next time I blow up a balloon, I shall focus my mental energies on moving random objects.
Moe will get back to you with the results soon.
Kismit
Dec 23 2003, 09:47 AM
| QUOTE |
| If the brain only uses 10-20% of its power at ONE TIME. And it requires a certain amount of oxygen ("25%"), would the use of the techniques of meditation enhance or develop the brain to gather more oxygen thus enabling itself to use more of its brain power. Am i right? |
I work with a wee brain injured girl on occasion , her mother is an amazing person who is constanly devoted to her daughters rehabilitattion . As a result all of the techniques used on this wee girl are new developments .
One of these treatments is Oxygen ( Dr advised) 3 times a day every day, in it's pure form, and has to be administered under strict controld short bursts .
The extra oxygen is supposed to speed up the brains ability to create new conections between the neurons .
I must say though I don't recomend intakes of pure oxygen for the average person but I do think the balloon experiment might just be worth trying ...
Scorpius
Dec 24 2003, 10:47 PM
I think you guys got me all wrong, I didn't say that the discussion of the balloon was part of the meditation or breathing techniques, and i don't think blowing up a balloon while attempting telekinesis or any other psychic ability will work.
Note what i said about your intentions and how you can't do so many things at one time. I'm sure most of you guys know that practicing any psychic ability requires your full attention and concentration. That is why, i think, you can't attempt psychic abilities while blowing up a balloon.
moe eubleck
Dec 24 2003, 11:09 PM
Ahha! Your theory is correct , Blue-Scorpion. Testing my psychic abilites while blowing up a ballon proved that you are one of the great thinkers of our time. The results were negative as you so predicted. For this, Moe salutes you.
One cannot practice psychic abilites while blowing up a baloon. Therefore , Moe has taken it upon himself to test his psychic abilites while blowing up a beach ball. The said beach ball is twice the diameter of the balloon, thereby enabling more lung contractions.
Moe will get back to Professor Blue-Scorpian with the results soon.
Scorpius
Dec 24 2003, 11:20 PM
I don't think i'm one of the greatest thinkers of our time nor am i a professor, but thanks for the compliment.

I'm just an average teenager with a few average grades. Well if i tried more often than not, in school i'd do a lot better, and this goes for anyone else.
Anyways thanks for testing my theory, or should i say our theory. Since you are the one testing it, i have to give you some credit.
However, i'd like to know what psychic abilities you are using to test this theory of mine.
moe eubleck
Dec 25 2003, 07:17 AM
Moe has yet to put a name to his psychic abilities. In high school I developed the ability to make the classroom flag flutter by concentrating. I am also able to understand the archetypal values one is under the inlfuence of at any given time.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.