lmao Click to view attachment

Well I dont care what they say that winkie on the Little Mermaid was indeed a winkie !!!!

Heh god bless snopes.
I couldn't stop laughing!

Snopes Disney

I rekon there is more to it. But that is just my opinion.

Ya some can believe disney and think they are hoaxes but I choose not to. I could be wrong.

Aladdin tells teenagers to take off their clothes.
I forget what it was he REALLY said, but he wasn't telling them to take their clothes off, it just sounded as if he was. I played back the movie over and over just to listen to it. I believe he was saying something to the tiger.

A phallus was drawn on the video cover of The Little Mermaid by a disgruntled artist.
Yeah, I think he did that for revenge. I believe they re-did it, though.

A minister becomes aroused during the wedding scene in The Little Mermaid.
It LOOKS like he is aroused, but really it is just his foot/knee, which protrudes from his robes.

Photographic images of a topless woman can be spotted in The Rescuers.
This is true, and Disney did a recall on all the Rescuer movies, I believe, and took that out. That's why lots of people didn't get to see it.

I have the first cover of the little mermaid VHS and it's definately there.. and there are more than just one, if I am remembering right. snopes.com the website says it's a "false" statement, and it's not. I'll drag it out of the attic later and post the pic.. OT from Disney.. I also have a red teletubby doll, when you press the tummy on the third recording it says "maggot maggot... maggot maggot.. bite my butt.." and I could get that recorded for proof It was rumored only 1000 or so of them made it to the stores. I <3 my bro.. he must have searched everywhere to get me that stupid doll hahah but it makes for great conversation when someone asks about it. "Oh, man!!. my bro got me that here listen to what it says.." and I always leave it on the second push.. so when they push it.. they hear it clear as day. Oh BTW.. turn that M into an F and we're in business. Back on topic, I'm not too sure but I heard the rumors about the Sex spelled out in the lion king.. it wasn't the clouds it was when simba laid down in the grass before rafeki found him, you can do a google search for Sex in the wind + the lion king and got this to show.

Edit: To Delete typo

^^ I've also heard that that SEX thing in the Lion King was actually SFX for the special effects company or something. It's hard to tell one way or the other.

It makes more sense for it to be SFX, the bottom line for the E isn't strong enough to make it an E, but first glace knowing the rumor.. it's assumed to be an E, that one is busted it seems.

Yay! I get to be Jaimie! You have to be Adam!

LOL

Woah, woah, woah.... *mumbles* stupid F "I reject your reality and substitute my own" it was better when it looked like an E

Hey, are you missing an eyebrow?

LOL

Damn!! Did I miss adam getting scroched on myth busters ??? ... I must search youtube!!.. and I will take pleasure in watching it while lmao at him.

Of course Disney is going to deny it. Take the preacher's knee. Why did they choose to draw the knees that way when it obviously looks like an erection? Sex in the clouds I see it! I am sure there are guys who do this for the kicks of other animators and not so much to influence kids. But when they get busted of course they are going to say its not true.

It's a good idea, though. You know, the whole
"any publicity is good publicity" thing.
Personally, I think it is funny.

And in Aladin, it definitely tells them to take of their clothes.
But as previously stated, the voice is deeper - it's someone else's

Jessica Rabbits is not disney!! But yes its in there I have all the old vhs copies and i noticed the dvd copies they have been edited out!

"Jessica Rabbit is a fictional character created by author Gary Wolf for his humorous novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit?. The character was later used by The Walt Disney Company and Amblin Entertainment for the movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit, loosely based on Wolf's book."

From wikipedia.com

There are tons of sexual refrences in Disney like The Little Mermaid penis.

Little Mermaid cover art close up- NSFW or school

Or the word sex which popped up in the lion king

from their site -



What they forgot to tell you, is that he pokes his extended middle finger into a specific area of the womans lower body (one frame) then re-emerges with a spot of drool. It has been several years since I have seen it, while no actual penetration is shown, it is pretty clear where his little finger is intended to go. And if I remember correctly, at the frame of the "insertion" hermans facial expression changes to one of glee.

I've read that the Little Mermaid cover was a bit overdue or something and the cover artist quickly drewrandon towers and one happened to turn out looking like a winky.

The Rescuers one is true.
The "Arroused" priest was just a tower that happened to be put in the wrong place


I still have to say, although not Disney, the funniest one has to be the '70's Coke poster.

I think that could be true I was talking about the story lines with a couple of friends any way and even they are pretty awful but that isn't disney really that is the people who wrote the fairy tale. I mean Peter Pan has several women on the go at the same time the mermaids,tinkerbell, tiger lily and Wendy and they all know about each other which promotes swinging. The little mermaid just marries for a pass to the human world which promotes marrying for a green card. Cinderella marries to get away form her step mother when she should just grow some and tell her to get stuffed. Marriage of convenience is promoted there. Sleeping beauty gives in to peer pressure all the time, with the spinning wheel and actually going back to her parents that never even bothered to bring her up. I could go on, most Disney films promote a woman being passive and marrying for convenience. Even princess Jasmine only marries Aladdin because he can "show her the world". I don't actually think its a good influence on little girls since my daughter started pashing her dolls after see the disney princesses pash the first man that comes along I have cut her way back on watching it. So I don't really think a few naked people and some hidden sexual words are going to add any more confusing sexual messages to kids than have already been sent. I mean this is just from my experience some people might disagree but thats what I see. Oh wait and beauty for beauty and the beast she falls in love with the man that inprisons her now if thats not completely wrong I don't know what is.

Ok I have my little mermaid video still from when I was a little girl when it first came out and if anyone sees a winky in those towers in the background you would have to make an effort and really be looking for it.

Can I ask with the rescuers one is it the resuers or the rescuers down under?

I love this topic. I actually owned that Little Mermaid poster when I was a little. I've read all the rumors about little nasties hidden in Disney movies and they usually say they come from disgruntled animators. It's not just Disney either, there are tons of hidden sexual jokes and innuendo hidden in kids cartoons that go right over a kid's head. A good example being the "Chokey Chicken" restaurant in Rocko's Modern life. It's actually really interesting re-watching the old cartoons and movies you watched when you were little, because you understand all the jokes and double meanings and satirical humor that they put in it.

The first one...its when their flying away from the house, you can see the pic at snopes.com i think.

i think its funny to add it in

i mean i dont suppose children who watch the films are scanning the scenes to see what sexual things they can find

funny if they did though

There’s loads of mainstream animation what has rather "risky" scenes that have been added, one of the more commonly known is Betty Boop.

I can Imagine that some board animation artist has drawn like 3000 pictures of betty and being human adds a bit of a naughtiness to one of them for shear amusement, its a bit like when in Fight Club Tyler Durden aka Brad Pitt adds a single frame of a 12" member to the film

Since time began humans have been fascinated with human anatomy and animation is just another form of expressing that fascination.

Well I dunno about those movies and yes I have the original Little Mermaid cover and I do not think there's any thing wrong on it... at least from not what I have seen and I ussually have a keen eye. But /i would say that Tinkerbell's dress is too short. Not only that but if you watch The Hunchback of Notre Dame then you can see some, but it's only very slightly hinted... like that crazy preist... or it could've been that my firends and I were really hyped up on sugar when we watched it last.

There are some funny ones...like the Seven Dwarves's personalities each represent a stage or symptom of drug withdrawl.

Or How Alice in Wonderland is a big Metaphor for hallucinatory drugs.


Why does Goofy get to live in a house but Pluto is Mickey's pet and lives in a dog house? Is Mickey keeping a slave?

I add sexual content to my Disney....

Everyone knows they do, good advertising nowadays.

There is lot's of proof that they do, and I bet I can make some good money from suing these guys!
(I wish)
And for those artists, it's true, after drawing 3000 or more drawing of the same character they will try to add something naughty or something that humours them... In some cases a winkie.
It's funny how some people are so observant, I would have never realised that cover for the little mermaid was containing sexual contents

The little mermaid phalus is rediculous, and is more of a statement of people's gutter minds than subliminal sex adverts. If you look on the little mermaids box, the so called phalus is extremely tiny. And seriously, if you draw a picture of a coral castle with spires on top of it, there is a good chance someone will look at one of them and say, "Hey, it looks like a dink!"

The Lion king one is also false. The letters in the dust are meant to read "SFX", a company which worked on the movie.

And the alladin one is also false. The actualy diologue reads, "Hush up and go", in referrence to Jasmine's tiger cornering Alladin. If you fast forward to the supposed place where he says this, as I have, it sounds nothing at all like "Take off your clothes".

The little mermaid minister's arousal is also false. It's his bended knee behind his robe, and really looks nothing like a phallus.

The only real ones are the Rescuers one and the jessica rabbit one. Two frames of animation in the rescuers contain a topless woman behind a building window, and there was hell to pay for the animators.

Also, in "WHo framed roger rabbit", when daffy and donald duck are dueling it out piano style, you can hear donald say, "Dog gone rotten N****R! (The racial "N" word!)" in reference to daffy. Now, donald is hard to understand at the best of times, but I've heard this one for myself, and it really, really sounds like he says it.

Alladin saying take off clothes-true
topless woman in window-true
penislike tower-true though not neccacarily done by a disgruntled artist
Minister had erection- Looks very much like he does, but not the case apparently.
sex in sky- Yeah, though the x isnt ultra vivid it is far too much of a coincidence
Baboon says dirty phrase-I listened to clips, and it does say that though its not intentional.

this topic is so funny! I always knew disney was pure evil

I am sorry but this does not resemble any castle spire I have ever seen before....

Fact is animators have a sense of humor and it is all intentional kinda like the Camel on the package of cigarettes. They are subliminal but I doubt Disney as a company is responsible it is more the animators adding it in there and seeing if they get caught etc.

Except that C.S Lewis stated on many occassions that it was a book written for his neice (or neighbour, can't quite recall). It was a children's story, nothing more. Anything else you want to add in (drug-induced hallucinations, for example) is purely of your own mind trying to rationalise that someone might possibly have an active imagination (a real shock for this day and age).

And since I'm replying to this thread, i may as well respond to this (though it's a few months old):

I think the Lion King was more based on the Japanese cartoon - Kimba, the White Lion . Not only are the names similar, but much animation is similar, and there are many similar story arcs. The Lion King (Simba) is, IMO of course, nothing more than a blatant rip-off.

Anywho, to actually answer the original post, I'm certain that there are some scenes in Disney films that are a little..... questionable. Though i doubt Disney actually had anything to do with it, rather just an animator's joke. The themes running through many Disney cartoon's are bad enough, without adding in subliminal content (ever seen that 1940's propaganda flick with Donald Duck fighting the evil Germans, for example, lol)

Dude, I've listened to the clip myself many times, and it sounds NOTHING at ALL like "Take off your clothes". In fact, the dialogue is barely distinguishable at all. You have to really turn up the volume on your TV and sit there a dozen times rewinding to hear it again. What was your source for your information? I'm just curious, because maybe you know something I don't.

I got most of mine from anomalies-unlimited.com. I would have posted the link in my last reply, but when I went to the site, it was down or something, with a message telling the webmaster to contact the server. There was a ton of information about the whole disney thing there. It also included other disney horror stories, like some security guards who car-cased a man off of disney property, which ended up with the man having a fatal car crash.

What if one of us was to go up there and really ask them what was going on with these messages? How would they reply? I bet it would be some "misunderstanding" bs. Even if one sued them, I bet they would get out of any charges right? Since their such a big company and all? There really is no way of totally stopping things like these. Their company has grown too much for being stopped for such "little" problems. ( Correct me if im wrong )

Actually, this one has been admitted to be true by the guy who designed the poster. He wasn't seriously trying to hide a penis in the drawing, but was playing around with the phallic idea, like artists are wont to do, and admits to being surprised the picture was okay'ed.

It's actually "Good teenagers, take off your clothes". It starts right when Raja is face to face with Alladin. He says "Good Kitty", and right when he is saying kitty, if you shut your eyes and listen really hard, you can hear a male voice whispering "Teenagers, take off your.." and what could be "clothes", although I was not able to hear the last part no matter how many times I ran it through. It is there, once you know where to find it, but I am amazed that anyone heard it in the first place. Personally, and without a shred of proof to back me up, I would call it an extraneous recording from someone in the studio that didn't get caught in editing.



When I was in OCS, we had to design our own Unit T-Shirt. The preliminary drawing we got back was perfect, with the Marine Bulldog and the Navy Goat Watching in anger as a poor boot was made to exercise intensly. The only problem was that the Goat had an entirely too suspicious bulge in a very inappropriate place. We check the sketch we had sent in, and sure enough, our artist had sketched in an awkward knee that when rendered and colored, looked like an erection.



Even at that, with the Jessica Rabbit flash, one has the option of considering it a panty flash (I don't think anyone would disagree that red panties would be right in character for her) as opposed to au natural.

Who framed roger rabbit, jessica rabbit is riding in the cartoon car and they hit a tree, jessica gets thrown pout of the car and bounces legs open across the road. if you slow the movie down at that point you definitly get a flash.
mmmmmmmmmmm jesica.

To see or hear most f these things you have to have the original versions of the movie.

I listened to the Aladin one that I still have on VHS and it isn't very clear but something is definetly being said. You have to turn up the volume to hear it and since it isn't clear It doesn't seem to be "part of the movie". I had to listen to it 5 times before I heard anything distinguishable. I did here "take off your clothes" but It could just be because thats what I wanted to hear...my brother heard it but my mom couldn't.

I have a lot of old Disney movies and I remember the first time I watched the Rescuers when i was little...when that scene comes up its not noticeable but i think it had some subliminal affect because I remember something "off" about that scene when I was little and felt like I shouldn't be watching the movie anymore.

All of these incidences are caused by the artists or editors and is not an agenda of Disney...there hasn't bin anything like this in a long time.

A good one to look for is the infamous Wizard of OZ hanging man...you have to have the very original version to even try to see it because all later versions of the movie have it edited out and/or replaced with a "bird". I couldn't really tell if there was actually a hanging man in that movie but whatever was happening in that particular scene wasn't part of the script. Also in a certain scene in that movie you can see a "creature" on the yellow brick road...its a weird little gray
thing...look it up.

My ex claimed Disney used to make porn...so I wouldn't be surprised lol

If I remember correctly the made porn way before they where a kiddie organization...companies can change radically like that (For example Nintendo didn't start out as a video game company they started out making collectable cards...ironically they made cards for Disney at one time).

And at that point in time they use to show porn in the movie theatres....and it wasn't the kind of porn that we see today...it was more "tastefull" hehe.

In certain scenes from Mary Poppins, you can cleary see a penis- singing and dancing across the London sky line.

hahahaha please tell me you are just kidding!

Why in the world would a company go from making porn to kiddie movies? Seems like a loss of income right there.

Believe me Disney has made more money making kids movies, TV shows, merchandise, games, etc then they ever would have making porno.

I wonder what Disney World would be like if they didn't change their business...

It is a fact that in one of the roger rabbits movie there is one scene where jessica rabbit goes flying of a motorcycle does a few flips in the air. In one frame a mere 1/25th of a second too short for anybody to notice jesiicca rabbit has no underwear and you can see her.... well you get the point.

Yep- Dick Van Dyke. Best London cockney accent by an non-londoner seen in a film.

Its possible that disney added sexual content theyve got to put something in there to keep the adults interested kids wouldnt pick up on it. I belive it