QUOTE(Dark_Ambient @ Sep 2 2006, 09:47 PM) [snapback]1333280[/snapback]
Maybe Hitler was like the Mule in Asimoves Foundation books. He had a few probloms with people when he was younger(Jews) and used his talent and genius to lash out against millions. That coupled with the Anti-semitism was a ripe environment for revenge perhaps.
What i try to graple with is how soldiers in the german army could have commited such hainous crimes against people under Hitlers influence. Humans are like sheep and if one jumps off a cliff others will follow. Hitler was pure evil but his example clearly displays the power one individual will is capable of.
I don't know enough about Stalin to talk about him but i still believe that something other then human will at least sets the stage and leaves it up to human wills to act when the time is right.
As for demons,well, they are no body's fool it seems and still seem to remain safely hidden in the Devils favorite sin.
VANITY.
Well why did they follow?
Well the soldiers followed due to the fact that if they didn't they'd be shot or thrown in concentration camps and be gassed or made to work and die of exhustion. They may of not wanted to do it, but the fact is simple if they didn't they'd bekilled.
But why did all the army do this? Theres enough to over throw power?
To answer this you got to go back too indoctrination, the propoganda, it was everywere, on the radio, on posters you couldn't escape it not matter where you went. It ws up on walls down the streets, on trains, trams, everywere. So it had it's effect and the German's related to it and well took to it and it imprinted in there mind therefore causing this hatred and they went along.
As soon as the war was over most knew what had happened and they felt sorry, and guilty for how they could follow Hitler's evil.
So the soldiers also if they came up through the Hitler youth were indoctrinated from a early age to be 'Evil' to do things against nature, to beat up non members of the youth etc so they went into the army in most cases and took forward this belief in the 1000 year reich.
It's the main reason behind why most the soldiers followed Hitler, they believed in him, they loved him if you will, and wanted to take Germanny to becoming strong.
Was there a secondary reason to why they followed?
Yes. In world war 1 and such the Jewish people, business men took advanatge of the german people, they made money out of the war and them so whilst the Jew's where getting rich the German people were getting poor. This is one cause to why some believed what Hitler was doing and the Nazi's was right.
QUOTE(blizno @ Sep 2 2006, 10:11 PM) [snapback]1333303[/snapback]
"As for Satlin, he was a dictator he wanted power, he wanted to rule the living world, and he wanted to push forwards communism, for me he wasn't possed by the devil but by ambition by hunger for more."
I agree about Stalin. He killed more people than Hitler and most of the people he killed were his own citizens!
Japan also killed millions of innocent people and committed state-run atrocities every bit as bad as the Nazi atrocities.
The Allies killed hundreds of thousands of people by carpet-bombing cities, knowing full well that they were killing civilians as well as soldiers. The times were horrible. It was a desperate struggle between mighty powers and the ordinary folk suffered the most.
I've seen video of one ant nest invading another ant nest. Thousands of ants are killed. The victor nest kills all of the adults in the defeated nest, takes that nest's territory and all of its food and sometimes even takes the larvae to enslave them once they become adult. Are demons causing this? Of course not. Ants are doing it. Humans have far better weapons than ants have but they behave in the same way when they go to war. Demons are not needed to explain human evil. Humans are entirely capable of committing horrific evil without any supernatural help.
Good view point, but the difference between the allies bombing and the germans attrocities is that the German soldiers held up cities had them barraced and strongly defended, th allies knew going in on foot fighting would cost more lives than it would bombing them, hitting them with artileray so it's a which is the lesser evil. Killing innocent Germans or loosing troops like the number the russians did in Berlin.
But also another thing was the USA have done things similar to Hitler. The use of naplam and agent orange on innocent Vitamese, the slaughters at mei lei, bombing landscapes and shooting many innocents. They weren't trained for it i admit, and by the end of the vietnam war they were most on drugs but still they were soldiers who went in and killed some weren't under orders either.
Also the USA bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima these killed not only millions with the blasts, but killed millions with the aftermath, and still affect japan to this day. So the US can be said to have done this evil that could be put up to that of Hitler. But it can also be slated as self defense but how you can defend two a-bombs on Japan on innocent people can never be defened.
Us Brits aren't without blame for war crimes and evil happenings. Iraq our troops have beaten people, back in the colonial days we went over to American and killed countless numbers ofnative amercians taking there land.
We killed countless numbers ofinnocents increasing our empire, so every country near enough at some point has done evil. It's Human nature.
QUOTE(blizno @ Sep 2 2006, 10:27 PM) [snapback]1333324[/snapback]
"I'm glad that Pope Pius XII at least tried to do something positive to help stop the horrors."
By performing long-distance rituals from the safety of the Vatican? The Pope should have been screaming at the top of his lungs against the wholesale murder of millions of innocent people! He should have used his political and popular power to convince Christian Germans that they were doing and permitting things that would make Jesus sob with horror.
The Pope may very well have calculated that speaking out against the Fascists would cause them to smash the Vatican to silence him. He may have decided that "going along" was better than speaking out. That may have been the right decision, I don't know. The Pope, however, deserves no credit for resisting Fascism, even if he did try a "remote-exorcism".
Okay this is one of them posts which goes totally against the facts, lets say the Pope did speak out he wouldn't of been able to change out, as the Nazi party like it or not made change in Germany, they did near everything they promised made jobs for the yumeployed, installed traditional values, this all is what they wanted thanks to the depression so in actual fact whether the Pope did or didn't speakout against the war crimes for me it wouldn't of helped.
The only time it would of helped is when Germany was loosing the war and the peoplehad lost faith, but still peopl supported them, this was mainly after Hitler made the deadly and stupid mistake of invading Russia, if Hitler would of looked back at Napoleon someone who was stronger than HJitler, had more power and infulence got crushed and caused the fall of his empire, so Hitler made the mistake they lost and they soon enough lost the faith and was soon beaten.
So if the Pope spoke out then he would of had more of an impact but it was pointless as germany was falling it was onlyu a matter of time before the total collapse.