Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Debunking the Disclosure Project
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
drew hempel
OK I watched the Disclosure Project video:

1) An M.D. is not a Ph.D. -- the standards are much less strict for getting an M.D. Greer's message is that technology will save the Earth. That the aliens are overall "good" and that current classified projects threaten the constitution so must be declassified.

This is all bunk because technology is point blank destroying the Earth. The constitution has been null and void all along -- it's always been a joke! There is no evidence for aliens. This is CIA propaganda to displace responsibility of earth-destroying technology -- so the message is now "we must not attack the E.T.s" Again "The Stargate Conspiracy" by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince has proven that the CIA pushes this disinfo message. Also Nick Redfern's books have proven the same promotion of "techno-spirituality."

Dr. Helen Caldicott is the perfect antidote to Dr. Steven R. Greer. Caldicott's book "Missile Envy" documents that up till the 1980s there have been dozens of accidents with nuclear missles. For example 5 of the 6 safety triggers went off for a crashed nuclear missile in S. Carolina. If the last safety trigger had been released half of the state would have been destroyed and it would have launched a global apocalypse. There are still missile accidents that are classified.

We can not just ban space weapons because technological progress has ALWAYS been based on military developments. So again Greer is promoting a CIA scheme -- that if we don't attack E.T.s then E.T.s will help us use free energy (this is a complete myth to hide the fact that technology is destroying earth and that engineers have no control over the technology. The new discipline of quantum chaos has proven this -- just as professor Steve Strogatz who did his research at Los Alamos -- the computers are in control!!).

Greer's final message in the opening remarks is "mature adults have space cooperation with aliens." -- Again this is just to displace our responsibility for the current fact that modern technology is destroying Earth.

The Witnesses -- practically all old white guys that retired in the 1980s -- many of them from known sources of disinformation. Read Nick Redfern to see the details and documents on how the CIA and Wright Patterson have been kicking out disinformation and that's where many of these witnesses come from!!

John Callahan FAA -- The FAA has a known history of cover-ups regarding crashed airplanes to take out political opponents. Just read Sherman Skolnick or Anthony Lappe's recent book "True Lies." The FAA works with the CIA to murder people!!

Callahan briefed "Reagan's scientific staff" -- you mean people like Dixie Lee Ray -- the pro-nuclear scam artist. Reagan's scientific staff is an oxymoron -- much like how the Bush Jr. scientific staff are a bunch of frauds.

Charles Brown -- WWII Airforce OSI, office next to Air Technical Center at Wright Patterson. He used Bluebook sources (again well-documented DISINFO!!)

Michael Smith -- Airforce Sargent till 1973 -- notified NORAD about UFOs on radar and NORAD notified him about "UFOs" -- so what?

Enrique Corbick -- Mexico City Air Traffic Controller 1992 15 objects, 1994 several near collisions and 5 hours on radar -- 15 meter diameter UFO seen by many -- pilot-radar confirmation. "Doesn't know why Mexico has so many sightings?" -- well probably because it's close to the U.S. where all this technology is designed!!

Graham Baffoon -- Retired Navy Pilot, top clearance. 1991 Iceland circle of lights with halo shoots out from over water -- Dome with corona discharge. Al Jones, co-pilot, has instrument failure but tracks object as 1800 MPH. Has Navy Intelligence reports (again this is new technology -- big deal!!)

Dan Willis US Navy, top secret Level 14 in San Francisco Code Room, 1969 came out of ocean, elliptical, 70 feet in diameter, 7,000 MPH. Ship radar substantiated. NORAD tells him "visit from our little friends" -- so a joking aside comment is confirmation of what??

Don Phillips CIA -Airforce Design Engineer Deep Black SR71 Blackbird -- predecessor is CIA -- one pilot, one passenger craft on missions to chase UFOs to and from Earth. Las Vegas Airforce Station -- Nullis Airforce Base -- Radar site, Mt. charleston, 1965-6. 8000 Ft elevation. UFO tracked at 3800 MPH by commander staff. Craft stops and reverses and leaves trails at high speeds -- OVER Groom lake, area 51 where his employer Skunkworks tests crafts. Anthony Skazar, scopes radar at 10,000 feet confirms UFO sightings and states the UFOs had no clearance (again secret technology at Area 51 -- big deal).

Captain Robert Salas -- Airforce base, Montana 1971 Minuteman Missiles sees red glow, oval hovering outside gate and losses 6 to 8 missiles -- confirmed by retired colonel. Echo-flight also lost 10 weapons with a UFO -- confirmed by Captain Eric Carlson and Lt. Colonal Walt Feigel with FOIA documents from Airforce stating UFOs. (again top secret aircraft -- big deal). SAC Headquarters telexes the same information.

Electromagnetic Pulse Weapons can easily dismantle missiles.

Minut North Dakota -- same thing -- UFOs dismantle missiles.

Dwaynne Arnessons, US Airforce Above Top Secret clearance at Wright Patterson (again confirmed DISINFO source). 1960s, Germany, crashed UFO. 1967, Montana -- deactivated Nukes by UFOs. This Arnesson commanded divisions in Vietnam (I'm getting warm, fuzzy feelings all over!! -- how many people did he massacre!!) Lauren Airforce Base -- same thing UFOs dismantle Nukes.

All these people state they will testify to Congress -- BIG WHOOP -- CIA and military lie to congress all the time.

Harland Bentley Airforce -- 1968 Maryland -- pulsating transformer UFO crashes and then takes off. 12 - 15 UFOs travelling 17,000 MPH. California 1978 hears Houston Astronaut Comlink mention "bogie" on the Moon and "there they go."

Is this why E. Mitchell has disowned Greer ?

John Maynard -- Sargent Army Top Secret -- retired from DIA, 1980. Signed 2000 documents, many with UFO references. Was in charge of SALT II verifications. Wants the Black-ops, secret goverment exposed -- Don't We All!! Again top secret technology.

Karl Wolf, Airforce Langley VA, 1965 consults for NASA Lunar Orbiter Project. Told there is a "base on the back side of the moon with structures, towers, and mushroom shapes" -- had breeched security. Well was he a victim of DISINFO or is he speading DISINFO -- who knows?

Donna Hare -- NASA, 1981 retired -- secret clearance -- so photos had UFOs airbrushed out -- a guard was hit on the head after looking at them. Apollo astronauts saw craft on Moon.

Again so E. Mitchell disowns these people -- why?

Larry Warren Airforce -- NATO Nukes dude in Great Britain. UFOs knock out nukes -- "potentially other life form seen" (well that's a very leading statement) this is a "human rights issue" -- What Nuclear radiation out of control or... aliens!! Charles Holt -- deputy commander of station could give a briefing like a sci-fi document (I bet he could!!)

George Filer III -- Airforce Intelligence, 1962 London told to chase a UFO (how convenient!!) Vietnam he briefed General Glouth (about how great it was to massacre the Vietnamese?!! -- over 2 million killed in Indochina!)
Iran 1976 -- airforce electronics dismantled 1978 -- crashed UFO at Fort Dicks and McGwyer -- "the Roswell of the East" -- Well that makes sense considering Roswell was a huge CIA disinfo project. Again read Nick Redfern's latest book on the topic -- "Body Snatchers in the Desert."

Filer states that aliens were shot at and he was supposed to testify but Filer was not sure that aliens were shot at so didn't testify (well what is it!!)
Now he's MUFON director for East Coast -- again another well-documented CIA-disinfo organization -- infilitrated by scam artists.

Clifford Stone -- Army Nukes special Ops -- recovered Saucers and Bodies (you mean bodies of humans or...?) 1969 Fortley Virginia -- goes to Indiantown Penn -- recovers UFO with Nuke materials but later he is told it was our craft. Stone knows better because he saw the bodies and the Geiger Counter showed it was radiation (again so the U.S. has nuke-powered aircraft and it crashed! -- Read Nick Redfern's "Body Snatchers in the Desert" for confirmation of this fact)

Mark McCandlish -- US Airforce Artist -- 1967 Westover base -- UFO hovered over nukes. (yawn) 1988 Brad Sorenson (his buddy) saw UFOs in a hangar at Norten Airforce Base!! (so again we have secret UFO-type craft. It's not aliens!!) McCandish consults with chairman of Space, Science and Technology committee, Congressman Brown. 3 disks were seen hovering and are called "flux liner" or ARV -- alien reproduction vehicles (aka ARV). They use high voltage electronics. 1967 Utah -- an ARV is seen at 12,000 ft.

Kent Selin -- Edwards Airforce Base, 1973 Crew Chief for classified Aircraft and wandered into the ARV area. Burt Retain, aeronautical engineer and Ray Walsh, Colonel at Edwards Airforce base in 1994 can confirm these ARVs. 1960 wind tunnel tests for ARVs doing Mach 20. NASA has spherical and lenticular shape ARVs. Hercules Aerospace is using anti-gravity or zero-point energy technology with scalar waves. Documents show DIA and Russkies met 6 times to discuss Tesla Technology.

Daniel Sheehan -- General Counsel to Disclosure Project. Sheenan represented Watergate -- which WAS A CIA COVER-UP -- read Jim Hougan's book "Secret Agenda." Sheehan then worked for Jesuits (which were the model for the Nazis and are not to be trusted). Sheehan notes that Carter is refusd information on "extraterrestrial intelligence" (well probably cause there isn't any!!) Marsha Smith is Science and Technology researcher for Congress (big deal) and Sheehan helps her out. Sheehan goes into Library of Congress and traces outline of symbols on sides of UFOs in photos (again secret military technology). Sheehan then trys to get into Vatican Library -- keep in mind that the Vatican firmly believes in aliens and is working with NASA to baptize aliens when the time is right. Sheehan refers to classified Bluebook documents (again Bluebook was a CIA disinfo project!!)

Dr. Carol Rosin, 1974 hangs with Werner Von Braun -- the NAZI SS Major who personally supervised mass slave labor and who tested rockets on civilians -- a war criminal who was insane.

Rosin goes on to praise the Nazi SS war criminal stating how there really is no E.T. threat and how we can work with the "alien cultures" just as Von Braun wanted us to. How we can achieve a technological utopia of "peace on Earth" just as Von Braun envisioned -- one that will overcome suitcase bombs, biological weapons, chemical weapons. All those Real Threats are reasons why making space weapons is pointless and that E.T. Beings have now been identified.

This is a big joke!!

So then Dr. Greer states that each of these people could individually go on for 2 to 5 hours (WOW!!) and there are 400 more witnesses (but if those are the best witnesses then this is all a waste of time!!)

Greer answers a question stating that compartmentalization caused the military to get out of control and even Clinton couldn't access this secret UFO-Alien stuff.

NO -- TECHNOLOGY IS OUT OF CONTROL -- not compartmentalization. As physicist Jeremy Bernstein stated this year -- no one really even understands the decay process of plutonium.

Greer claims we already have a complete replacement for Big Oil and Nukes but this would cause too much crisis to the N.S.C. economic areas (so that's why they have huge underground cities!!)

Greer then responds to another question about the UN stating he met with Boutrous Boutrous Gali's wife (who was in the UN when -- ??)

Clifford Stone is asked a question and Stone states he saw "57 different species" cataloged in 1989 but some of them look just like us and some have very heightened senses (gee never heard of the "Brain Port" -- a current special forces technology that gives heightened senses -- just google Brain Port). He says that there are 3 types of greys and that some are taller than humans but they are all humanoids. Stone asks why? -- if they are supposed to be from other planets. Because Stone -- they are not from other planets!!

UPI asks a question about the Alien Reproduction Vehicles. Greer states they use anti-gravity zero-point technolgy that is superliminal or faster-than-light. But Greer then states he's "just a country doctor from Virginia" -- headquarters of the CIA by the way!! Greer is adamant that this technology IS based on aliens and not -- like UPI mentions, something like the snooper program called "carnivore." UPI asks what proof Greer has. Greer states -- the witnesses of course! (Oh My God!!)
haha what a joke!!

Greer states this technology uses the ambient field to cancel mass inertia and that a 1950s RAND witness states already in the 1950s the research was bigger than the Manhatten project.

Murry Mellshen, publisher of a LANDSAT space satellite newsletter in D.C. states there are 35 million photos from space -- yet no UFOs. Greer states -- yes they've been all "sanitized out" or airbrushed but there are probably photos he hasn't seen (yes I'm sure of that!) haha. Greer states please remember there are billions of dollars to keep the public hidden from this information (yes I'm sure. haha).

Then Greer talks about patients faking kidney stone tests so they get free narcotic shots. Wow -- that's an excellent parallel !! (yawn.)

Finally Greer (a bit overly defensive) states we are liscensed professionals -- him and Sheenan -- so certainly we can not perpetuate a hoax. Greer states all his witnesses have been vetted with their DT214 Defense Forms -- big deal!!

Finally the Soap Opera Actor comes back on and states there's been 10,000 sightings but only one needs to be true.

Ah that's deeply profound (NOT!!)

Greer then states that illegal enterprise agreements are not legally binding so any more witnesses please come forward!

Wow big confidence factor here.

End of Film.

Bill Hill
Wow impressive debunk.. although some might say you're just adding your personal opinion.

You sound like this-

Sergent Stone says there are 57 humanoid aliens that exist.
Yeah right, they exist! in your head!

Dr Greer? He must be queer!

Mind you I don't like Dr Greer, he's an idiot. thumbsup.gif
SOUL-DRIFTER
People who still hold that the moon landing is a hoax, think just like this.

Explain why Steven Greer is an idiot. If you have good reason, I would gladly side with you.
AstroPro
It isn't Greer that matters. Personally, I don't trust Dr. Greer myself, but I don't think that is the issue here. The question should not be, are SOME of these witnesses frauds? Instead it should be, are SOME of these witnesses telling the truth? After all, if just ONE of these over 400 witnesses are telling the truth that changes everything. Also, considering the fact that unlike Lazar these officials can PROVE who they are, I don't really see any good reason to dismiss them all as frauds.
drew hempel
QUOTE(SOUL-DRIFTER @ Sep 13 2006, 10:08 PM) [snapback]1348773[/snapback]

People who still hold that the moon landing is a hoax, think just like this.

Explain why Steven Greer is an idiot. If you have good reason, I would gladly side with you.


From Saucer smear Vol. 4, nbr. 45 (see link above)

On Feb. 23rd, Dr. Steven Greer of CSETI posted the following: "Nerve Gas Attack on ET Base Backfires on Covert Forces: A recent attack by covert forces with a deadly Sarin-like nerve gas on the ET spaceport under 14,345 foot Mount Blanca, Colorado, ended in disaster when the attacking forces were overcome by the gas and a quarter of the personnel involved had to be medically evacuated..."

In a telephone interview, Greer told a supporter that last June, while he and his group were training in the San Luis Valley, he "remote-viewed the ETs inside the mountain". People in his group saw Greer disappear in a "gold light" which seemed to be coming from above them. Then a "semi-circle of a dozen ET elders, all different sized" surrounded Greer and told him that they were "under attack in the mountain by a covert military force".

The amusing part is that another follower, named Steve Moreno, realized that the above was too Far Out to be believed, and tried to suppress it! He says, "While there are tangents of truth to this incredible report, it is premature at this time for Dr. Greer to release such information..."

Yes, very premature!...
drew hempel
QUOTE(Prophecy Guru @ Sep 13 2006, 10:37 PM) [snapback]1348800[/snapback]

It isn't Greer that matters. Personally, I don't trust Dr. Greer myself, but I don't think that is the issue here. The question should not be, are SOME of these witnesses frauds? Instead it should be, are SOME of these witnesses telling the truth? After all, if just ONE of these over 400 witnesses are telling the truth that changes everything. Also, considering the fact that unlike Lazar these officials can PROVE who they are, I don't really see any good reason to dismiss them all as frauds.


Ed Mitchell Most Unhappy
With Greer Using His Name
As Disclosure Witness
From Dr. Jack Sarfatti sarfatti@well.com
Subject: Astronaut Ed Mitchell on Washington Times story of the
Greer UFO Disclosure Conference
To: Edgar Mitchell
Organization: Internet Science Education Project
5-13-1

"Steve Greer...began to overreach his data continuously"
- Edgar Mitchell


Edgar Mitchell) Jack, et al: The Washington Times (story) on UFO disclosure mentions my name as a witness for the Disclosure Project -- which I am not ...and have not been.

(Jack Sarfatti) I am not surprised at all. If you look to see who is running that CSETI Horse and Pony Disinfo Show & Tell you will recognize familiar names. Consider the source. As a Navy man and NASA Astronaut who really was Out There, you know what I mean. Smile

(Edgar Mitchell) I cooperated with Steve Greer some years ago, but he began to overreach his data continuously, necessitating a withdrawal by myself, and, I believe, several others. I have requested to be removed from any web site, announcements, etc., but see that has not taken place.

(Jack Sarfatti) Typical of politically-based influence operations. The real motive of the Press Club Event was the issue of militarization of space not UFOs, on which reasonable well meaning people can differ of course. Since many millions of voters believe UFOs are real, getting control of the UFO movement clearly is a top priority for all the players.

(Edgar Mitchell) Although I firmly believe it is time for openness and disclosure by government, I object to being misused in this fashion and acquire guilt by association with certain claims that simply are not true.

(Jack Sarfatti) I feel exactly as you do. I think you, Don Ecker and I see it eye-to-eye on this one.

(Edgar Mitchell) I, nor any crew I was on (I was on three Apollo crews), received any briefing before or after flights on UFO events, saw anything in space suggesting UFOs or structures on the moon, etc. We did it just like we said in official reports. My only claim to knowledge of these events is from the individuals, mostly of yesteryear, who were in government, intelligence, or military; were there, saw what they saw, and now believe it should be made public. But I claim no first hand knowledge, nor have any. Pass it on to the rest of the net, if you will.

--Edgar Mitchell

(Jack Sarfatti) Is The Pope Catholic? Pass it on. I certainly will. Smile



Comment

'Disclosure Project' Oversteps Bounds

From Jason Leigh jasonsos@digitex.net
5-14-1

To all,

First, thanks to Dan of UFOzone for sending me this article: http://www.rense.com/general10/mitch.htm from Jeff Rense's one-of-a-kind excellent world news website.

Second: Dr. Steven Greer used my copyrighted UFO videos to sell, promote and include in his past 'paid public lectures,' without my expressed permission.

He showed my stated UFO video tape (of June 11, 1995, © by Jason Leigh) to the U.S. Congress in 1997, as was verified by Dr. Bob Hieronimus (and was mentioned to my surprise on one of our 'on-air' radio interviews), who was present at that U.S. Congress meeting conducted by Dr. Greer, again: without my written, or expressed permission. A blatant copyright infringement . . .

I wrote to Dr. Greer, who at first, denied having ever showed this footage, but then recanted when I wrote him back and related what Dr. Bob Hieronimus had told me, stating that he (Dr. Greer) had,"forgotten."

Now, I certainly didn't mind--and was actually proud that my UFO footage was included in the presentation to the U.S. Congress back in 1997, but NOT when it was used in 'paid lectures' presented to the public and was also included in his UFO promotional videotape--which was also 'sold' for purposes for profit, or monetary gain: yet another copyright infringement.

Since the amazing broad daylight UFO was videotaped by me on June 11, 1995, I have invested over $5,000 to date to present this 'proven' footage to the world--for free. But when another would take (or steal) this copyrighted footage and profit from it without so much as a 'howdy do' to me, it certainly would have put most anyone in a mood of discontent.

It seems that the stories we have all heard of Dr. Greer and his 'non-profit' organization ('non-profit' meaning he does not offer any moneies towards charites--only towards the 'Disclosure Project') 'using' other people's research, names and photographs to promote his own project is such a derogatory issue, that we should all be infuriated by this inexcusable conduct.

I, for one, am bewildered at the attentions he has been able to reap via the paranormal and major media in his 'Disclosure Project,' which should have a post-script to it by giving credit where credit is due to the many HUNDREDS of people he has used as well as the above mentioned thief and misuse of other people's work and names, usually, and apparently: without their consent. He should be brought up on charges for his illegal actions in an attempt to force the U.S. government to admit to the reality of UFOs, but this would just bring yet another collective 'black eye' to this field of research, which is scared enough by the countless others who have perpetrated hoaxes and lies, most assuredly for personal profit and gain.

Will I sue Dr. Greer for infringing upon, and profiting from, my copyrighted video of the UFO? I am not sure at this point, although others in this field have suggested that I should--and must.

What say ye?

I affirm that the above is true, and correct. Jason Leigh http://jasonleigh.org

Comment
Dear Mr. Bassett:

With respect, the majority of the MUFON members who we surveyed believed the Greer "Disclosure Project" was unsuccessful. Moreover, most thought it set back Ufology. Here were some of their reasons:

Ufology was mixed with other issues -- like Space Based defense deployment. Space systems are a primary focus of the Bush administration. And, are were to think that sworn officers and esteemed graduates of West Point, Annapolis and the Air Force Academy are dupes who do not hold the U.S. public's interest in defense matters?

Witnesses were publicly known prior to the disclosure -- none were insiders. Only one person that he eye-witnessed (ET) alien bodies. When asked what ETs looked like, Clifford Stone's statement was ludicrous. Mr. Bassett, were these the best of 400 witnesses that Dr. Greer vetted?

ET's are not hostile... What then do we do with the work of Dr. Jacobs (and 50 years of UFO/ET studies by other researchers), abductees, ET hybrids, implants, cattle, human mutilations and hostile acts (Brazil and South Africa).

Mr. Bassett, unless Congress acts, your new Paradigm Clock setting at 11:59 PM should be reconsidered...

Respectfully,
Jerry Glass,
Director MUFON
Riverside County, CA
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='drew hempel' date='Sep 13 2006, 09:18 PM' post='1348711']
OK I watched the Disclosure Project video:


I am familiar with some of those UFO incidents as presented by the Disclosure Project and they are well documented and have been verified. There have been those who have attempted to debunk the case files but were unsuccessful and rightly so because they offered nothing in the way of evidence to prove the case files were anything else but as what were reported, documented and corroborated by a multitude of reliable sources.
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='Prophecy Guru' date='Sep 13 2006, 10:37 PM' post='1348800']
It isn't Greer that matters. Personally, I don't trust Dr. Greer myself, but I don't think that is the issue here. The question should not be, are SOME of these witnesses frauds? Instead it should be, are SOME of these witnesses telling the truth? After all, if just ONE of these over 400 witnesses are telling the truth that changes everything. Also, considering the fact that unlike Lazar these officials can PROVE who they are, I don't really see any good reason to dismiss them all as frauds.


The Malmstrom AFB missile incidents of 1967 and 1975 have already be verified and those cases are well-documented. Look who is listed as a Disclosure Witness in the 1967 Malmstrom AFB missile case. The well-documented JAL/UFO case file has an FAA official on the witness list as well and that incident has been verified as well.

There will always be those who attempt to debunk the Disclosure Project but as always, they have been unsuccessful as those who continue to claim the world is flat.
drew hempel
QUOTE(skyeagle409 @ Sep 14 2006, 01:53 AM) [snapback]1349071[/snapback]

The Malmstrom AFB missile incidents of 1967 and 1975 have already be verified and those cases are well-documented. Look who is listed as a Disclosure Witness in the 1967 Malmstrom AFB missile case. The well-documented JAL/UFO case file has an FAA official on the witness list as well and that incident has been verified as well.

There will always be those who attempt to debunk the Disclosure Project but as always, they have been unsuccessful as those who continue to claim the world is flat.


Obviously these incidents "happened" that's not the point!!

The point is THEY WEREN'T ALIENS!!

None of those witnesses have any evidence of aliens -- and those are the best witnesses.

Disclosure Project is full of Disinfo CIA agents promoting the E.T. invasion!!

It's just a scam to promote the whole "technology will save us" if we focus on anti-gravity space tech......

meanwhile the earth runs out of water!!!

http://www.animatedsoftware.com/cassini/cass2001/nks0003.htm

CIA bunk!!
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='drew hempel' date='Sep 14 2006, 02:18 AM' post='1349099']
Obviously these incidents "happened" that's not the point!!

The point is THEY WEREN'T ALIENS!!


I don't buy it simply because we didn't have an aircraft the size of two aircraft carriers tagging along with a Japanese cargo B-747 and that UFO was verified by mulitiple sources and we didn't have the tecnology in the field to dismantle those Minuteman missiles either and a saucer-shaped flying object was reported nearby.
drew hempel
QUOTE(skyeagle409 @ Sep 14 2006, 02:20 AM) [snapback]1349104[/snapback]

I don't buy it simply because we didn't have an aircraft the size of two aircraft carriers tagging along with a Japanese cargo B-747 and that UFO was verified by mulitiple sources and we didn't have the tecnology in the field to dismantle those Minuteman missiles either and a saucer-shaped flying object was reported nearby.


Nobody's selling you anything -- just go to your library and have them order this book! Stop ignoring all the documentation of CIA DISINFO -- read "The Stargate Conspiracy" -- !!

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Nick Redfern

Email: nickredfern.nul

The Government Has Been Spying On Its Citizens

For More Than 50 Years

Wake up, America. There is nothing new about President Bush's
secret domestic spying program of American citizens. The
Government has been secretly spying on its citizens for more
than half a century in the cause of national security and
particularly on those citizens who have seen, been abducted by,
or study UFOs.

The complete story is detailed in a controversial new book
called On the Trail of the Saucer Spies: UFOs and Government
Surveillance by Nick Redfern, just published by Anomalist Books.
Redfern, who was himself the subject of government surveillance
for his interest in UFOs, uses on-the-record interviews,
previously-classified official records, and testimony provided
by insider-sources to tell this amazing story about how and why
Military, Intelligence, and Government agencies of both the U.S.
and U.K. have been secretly spying on UFO witnesses and
researchers.

Highlights of On the Trail of the Saucer Spies include: the
FBI's officially-declassified reports on people who claim to
have met extraterrestrials; Top Secret surveillance of Alien
Abductees; the real-life Men in Black who spy on UFO witnesses;
phone-tapping and mail-interference of UFO researchers; Scotland
Yard's secret monitoring of UFO computer hackers; Secret
government files on researchers of the famous Roswell crash of
1947; infiltration of UFO research groups by secret agents; and
UFO authors suspected by the Government of working for hostile
nations to uncover defense secrets.

Nick Redfern is one of the world=92s foremost authorities on UFOs.
His previous books include A Covert Agenda; The FBI Files;
Cosmic Crashes; Strange Secrets (with Andy Roberts); Three Men
Seeking Monsters; and Body Snatchers in the Desert. He has
written for Military Illustrated; Eye-Spy; Fate; Fortean Times;
Phenomena Magazine; and the London Daily Express.


On The Trail Of The Saucer Spies: UFOs And Government
Surveillance

by Nick Redfern

Trade Paperback, 308 pages, illustrated, index, $15.95

ISBN: 1933665106

For more information visit: AnomalistBooks.com
leadbelly
I don't know much about the D.P., but offhand, Clifford Stone sounds like a plant, and the moon guy sounds "lunar". He could be a plant, too. All to add confusion to the mix, and thus discredit the whole topic.

It was overly political, with the anti-weapons research jabs. Research which leads its own life, and proceeds ever-onward.

As for the Greer lunacy (out in the mountains and desert, etc...) how much of that is disinfo? Meaning, it did not happen, obviously, but who started the story, and why?

The Agency and the No Such Agency were in this, up to the limit. Probably in the capacity of monitor, then discredit.

Yet, Drew's assumption leads me to ask- what are the physics? A plausible outline would be nice...
skyeagle409
QUOTE(drew hempel @ Sep 14 2006, 02:46 AM) [snapback]1349122[/snapback]

Nobody's selling you anything -- just go to your library and have them order this book! Stop ignoring all the documentation of CIA DISINFO -- read "The Stargate Conspiracy" -- !!


I am already aware of the CIA's disinformation campaign on UFOs but I haven't read that book yet.
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='leadbelly' date='Sep 14 2006, 02:50 AM' post='1349124']
I don't know much about the D.P., but offhand, Clifford Stone sounds like a plant, and the moon guy sounds "lunar". He could be a plant, too. All to add confusion to the mix, and thus discredit the whole topic.


Here's an incident that is covered by the Disclosure Project. Years ago, there was a video covering this incident.

Malmstrom AFB, UFO

http://www.cufon.org/cufon/malmstrom/malm1.htm
drew hempel
QUOTE(leadbelly @ Sep 14 2006, 02:50 AM) [snapback]1349124[/snapback]

I don't know much about the D.P., but offhand, Clifford Stone sounds like a plant, and the moon guy sounds "lunar". He could be a plant, too. All to add confusion to the mix, and thus discredit the whole topic.

It was overly political, with the anti-weapons research jabs. Research which leads its own life, and proceeds ever-onward.

As for the Greer lunacy (out in the mountains and desert, etc...) how much of that is disinfo? Meaning, it did not happen, obviously, but who started the story, and why?

The Agency and the No Such Agency were in this, up to the limit. Probably in the capacity of monitor, then discredit.

Yet, Drew's assumption leads me to ask- what are the physics? A plausible outline would be nice...



Here's my angle on this -- if you read Nick Redfern (and his work is excellent!) basically the whole Disclosure Project along with Coast To Coast promotion of Greer -- is just a psy-ops campaign that is part of the CIA going public with "anti-gravity technology."

Why would I say this? I, myself, had a very close encounter with a big, black, equilateral trianangle preceded by spheres of light doing inexplicable manuevers on the horizon, each a different color. Summer 1997.

Now Redfern has documents proving that those black triangles have been around since the 1960s and even earlier!!

Thomas Valone has researched "anti-gravity" propulsion as has Moray B. King.

I've read their books. Indeed it's also called electrogravitic technology.

You can go to any university and use the library's I.S.I. web of science citation index -- the main search engine for academic research.

Just search vortex propulsion or pulsed propulsion. There's tons of stuff on this -- even describing it as anti-gravity.

There's already antigravity research online although the "anti-matter" reseach has been taken off the web.

Positronium or antimatter research is a big part of the unified field superstring verification.

The problem with this stuff, besides vaporizing matter, is that it creates synthetic black holes that can have a chain reaction.

Even professor Timothy Ferris, the astronomer, has admitted there's a slight chance the CERN experiments could vaporize the whole planet.

He stated online -- no need to be worried because if it happens no one will know it happened!! James Blodgett is worried and he and I have corresponded about the threat of synthetic black holes.

That pretty much sums up the Mad Scientist attitude in a nut-shell.

Electrogravitic technology just creates a differential of magnetic momentum between the front and back of the craft which propels it forward as pressure waves or antigravity.

The angular momentum is fairly contained but protons can become superconducting at room temperature and it's between the proton and electron that magnetic momentum occurs.

Redfern figured out that these black triangle sightings, many in very public places, over cities and along highways, are part of a psy-op campaign to see how disabling the craft are for those unfamiliar with them.

In fact the black triangles were shown on X-Files and the sighting I had was right after X-files -- the craft flew from the horizon to right over the tree on the north end of my yard. I could have hit it with a rock -- slow, humming, flat.

I had no idea this thing had been on X-files nor did I know that it had already been sighted by hundred of people worldwide -- and clocked at Mach 15.

Curt Sutherly's book "UFO Mysteries" has some great details on the black triangle.

Sutherly is fairly strong on the Fortean, higher dimensional shape-shifting aspect of this phenomenon -- that it is just as much spiritual or higher dimensional as it is hard science technology.

Well there's definitely something to that because strong magnetic fields warp are sense of time by messing with the brain fields and also cause visions, etc. -- as Dr. Michael Persinger has documented (and I've corresponded with him about this).

So in that sense there is some sort of "alien invasion" but it's certainly helped along by CIA abductions and experiments on unwitting witnesses of these black-op projects -- just read Redfern, he's really figured this all out with lots of documents. Remember the CIA MKUltra was an extensive mad science mind control experiment with unwitting subjects.

drew hempel, MA
http://nonduality.com/hempel.htm
http://drewhempel.gnn.tv
Exeter
QUOTE(skyeagle409 @ Sep 13 2006, 09:03 PM) [snapback]1349140[/snapback]

Here's an incident that is covered by the Disclosure Project. Years ago, there was a video covering this incident.

Malmstrom AFB, UFO

http://www.cufon.org/cufon/malmstrom/malm1.htm


Skyeagle - The Malstrom AFB incident is genuinely intriguing and the objects are/were definitely unknowns. But how do you reach the conclusion that they (the objects) were alien in origin?

Regardless of the military connections you claim to have, you cannot possibly be aware of every single secret project that has been performed and tested. I would assume that a device that could interfere with the ICBMs of foreign nations would be a perfect candidate for a US black project.

Also, a logical step would be to test these devices with our (the US) own missiles.

This is not an attack on you in any way. I just fail to grasp how you can conclude that what happened that day was related to ETs.

Sorry if this OT.
Bill Hill

QUOTE(SOUL-DRIFTER @ Sep 13 2006, 11:08 PM) [snapback]1348773[/snapback]

People who still hold that the moon landing is a hoax, think just like this.

Explain why Steven Greer is an idiot. If you have good reason, I would gladly side with you.


He talks to balloons. Someone fooled him and attached a light to a balloon, in a field and Dr Greer began talking to the balloon, he thought it was a UFO, he thought he was telepathically communicating with aliens.
It's a cruel trick and this type of behaviour doesn't impress me.. but still..what an idiot.
Bill Hill

QUOTE(drew hempel @ Sep 14 2006, 04:11 AM) [snapback]1349148[/snapback]

Here's my angle on this -- if you read Nick Redfern (and his work is excellent!) basically the whole Disclosure Project along with Coast To Coast promotion of Greer -- is just a psy-ops campaign that is part of the CIA going public with "anti-gravity technology."


Er This doesn't make much sense. Why would the CIA need a Psy-Ops for anti grav?

Lets make the public believe in aliens and then we'll tell em the truth, er UFO's are our anti gravity tech! Great psy-op huh.gif w00t.gif
drew hempel
QUOTE(billyhill @ Sep 14 2006, 08:15 PM) [snapback]1350246[/snapback]

Er This doesn't make much sense. Why would the CIA need a Psy-Ops for anti grav?

Lets make the public believe in aliens and then we'll tell em the truth, er UFO's are our anti gravity tech! Great psy-op huh.gif w00t.gif


Yeah the military makes A LOT of sense (the first UFO disinformation was part of the Cold War -- the CIA thought the UFOs were Russkies and then the CIA spread alien belief so that the Russkies wouldn't find out about our black ops and THEN the CIA thought the Russkies were using UFOlogists to infiltrate black ops programs).

But then the CIA totally lied about the extent of the Russkie threat -- the bomb gap, the missile gap, the Star Wars gap, etc.

Why because the CIA is Wall Street and fear creates a lot of free money from tax dupes.

Basically ever since nuclear power, technology has been completely apocalyptic -- that's why there's COG --continuity of government -- huge underground cities for the elite are in use - to continue this

MISSILE ENVY battle (get more sex because we have bigger edifice complexes).

That's what it's all about! haha.
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='Exeter' date='Sep 14 2006, 03:33 AM' post='1349163']
Skyeagle - The Malstrom AFB incident is genuinely intriguing and the objects are/were definitely unknowns. But how do you reach the conclusion that they (the objects) were alien in origin?

Regardless of the military connections you claim to have, you cannot possibly be aware of every single secret project that has been performed and tested. I would assume that a device that could interfere with the ICBMs of foreign nations would be a perfect candidate for a US black project.

Also, a logical step would be to test these devices with our (the US) own missiles.

This is not an attack on you in any way. I just fail to grasp how you can conclude that what happened that day was related to ETs.

Sorry if this OT.



I know as a fact that no U.S. involvement was responsible for the Malmstrom AFB/UFO incident. First of all, SAC would never degrade its strategic assets for the sake of a test and an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) would never degrade our nuclear systems in such a manner and I have been though many ORIs in the Air Force over the years. Secondly, there are no ORI critique reports relating to that incident and in fact, the Boeing Co. and other government contractors were brought in to do their own investigations as to the cause of the missile shutdowns, so a test and an ORI are totally out of the question. The shielded cable systems were strong enough to withstand a direct hit from a lightning bolt yet investigators have stated that only an external electromagnetic pulse would be capable of dismantling the Minuteman missiles. The folks at SAC headquarters were alarmed that our national strategic missile assets were shutdown and that sent the generals scrambling. A saucer-shaped UFO was sent hovering near the area at the time of the interference by Air Force security personnel and this wasn't the first time a saucer-shaped UFOs have tampered with our nuclear assets as noted on the Department of Defense's website in the UFO section that not many people were aware of..

UFOs that interfered with our nukes were often called "helicopters" as they were called in Vietnam so the public would not take notice. Other SAC bases and nuclear facilities were also affected by saucer-shaped UFOs as well. UFOs also affected Loring AFB, Minot AFB, Los Alamos, Kirtland AFB, and at RAF Bent-Waters where a UFO changed the nuke codes on warheads and even Soviet nuke missiles were affected. In 1975, the UFOs revisited Malmstrom AFB and this time NORAD scrambled two F-106 Delta Darts. Eventually, NORAD last track of one of the UFOs when it climbed above 200,000 feet when the jets arrived in the area. In the case of the Minot AFB UFO incident, a B-52 crew made visual confirmation of the UFO that was also tracked by ground-based radar and confirmed that the UFO was an artificial flying object and we didn‘t have ‘flying saucers‘ that could mimic the performance of those objects..

http://www.nicap.org/malmstrom75-1.htm

UFOs were often seen in that part of the country and UFOs also affected another base and the story on that incident is as follows.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <^>

1968-Minot Air Force Base, UFO Hovers, Seen by B-52 crew

What we have, then, was a group of sightings made by men on the ground, at the missile sites scattered around the base. There were radar sightings from ground and weather's radar. There were visual sightings from the crew of the B-52, and an airborne radar sighting where the target traveled at 3,000 miles per hour. Scope photographs were taken. There were sightings made by S.Sgt. Bond the FSC at Nov. Flight, S.Sgt. Smith at Oscar-1, Julelt, and Mike Flight Team and a number of men in widely scattered locations. The object landed at location AA-43 and the entire observation lasted for 45 minutes. Fourteen other people in separate locations also reported the UFO. Security alarm were activated for both the outer and inner ring at the missile sites. When the guards arrived at the outer door it was open and the combination lock on the inner door had been moved.

Three armed teams in fast trucks pursued the alien vehicle as it maneuvered and finally stopped and hovered 500 feet off the ground. The strike teams held their fire. They had orders to capture it undamaged if it should land. Then abruptly it began moving once again and circling directly over a launch control facility. Back at Minot, F-106 fighter planes were awaiting orders from the North American Air Defense Command to launch an attack. Base operations became impatient and had just decided to scramble the jets without confirmation. Suddenly the UFO climbed straight up and streaked away at incredible speed.

http://www.ufocasebook.com/minotafb.html

http://www.ufocasebook.com/minotafbufo1968.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <^>



The video of interviews with the B-52 crew in this incident was shown on TV about a month ago. To sum it up, those UFOs were definitely not secret aircraft of the military and you can also review the official documents on those bases and the incident at Loring AFB on the Department of Defense website on the UFO section. The Pentagon knows that those objects were not our secret aircraft yet those UFOs were real artificial flying objects whose outstanding performance characteristics were noted by the military.

drew hempel
QUOTE(skyeagle409 @ Sep 15 2006, 01:16 AM) [snapback]1350622[/snapback]

I know as a fact that no U.S. involvement was responsible for the Malmstrom AFB/UFO incident. First of all, SAC would never degrade its strategic assets for the sake of a test and an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) would never degrade our nuclear systems in such a manner and I have been though many ORIs in the Air Force over the years. Secondly, there are no ORI critique reports relating to that incident and in fact, the Boeing Co. and other government contractors were brought in to do their own investigations as to the cause of the missile shutdowns, so a test and an ORI are totally out of the question. The shielded cable systems were strong enough to withstand a direct hit from a lightning bolt yet investigators have stated that only an external electromagnetic pulse would be capable of dismantling the Minuteman missiles. The folks at SAC headquarters were alarmed that our national strategic missile assets were shutdown and that sent the generals scrambling. A saucer-shaped UFO was sent hovering near the area at the time of the interference by Air Force security personnel and this wasn't the first time a saucer-shaped UFOs have tampered with our nuclear assets as noted on the Department of Defense's website in the UFO section that not many people were aware of..

UFOs that interfered with our nukes were often called "helicopters" as they were called in Vietnam so the public would not take notice. Other SAC bases and nuclear facilities were also affected by saucer-shaped UFOs as well. UFOs also affected Loring AFB, Minot AFB, Los Alamos, Kirtland AFB, and at RAF Bent-Waters where a UFO changed the nuke codes on warheads and even Soviet nuke missiles were affected. In 1975, the UFOs revisited Malmstrom AFB and this time NORAD scrambled two F-106 Delta Darts. Eventually, NORAD last track of one of the UFOs when it climbed above 200,000 feet when the jets arrived in the area. In the case of the Minot AFB UFO incident, a B-52 crew made visual confirmation of the UFO that was also tracked by ground-based radar and confirmed that the UFO was an artificial flying object and we didn‘t have ‘flying saucers‘ that could mimic the performance of those objects..

http://www.nicap.org/malmstrom75-1.htm

UFOs were often seen in that part of the country and UFOs also affected another base and the story on that incident is as follows.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <^>

1968-Minot Air Force Base, UFO Hovers, Seen by B-52 crew

What we have, then, was a group of sightings made by men on the ground, at the missile sites scattered around the base. There were radar sightings from ground and weather's radar. There were visual sightings from the crew of the B-52, and an airborne radar sighting where the target traveled at 3,000 miles per hour. Scope photographs were taken. There were sightings made by S.Sgt. Bond the FSC at Nov. Flight, S.Sgt. Smith at Oscar-1, Julelt, and Mike Flight Team and a number of men in widely scattered locations. The object landed at location AA-43 and the entire observation lasted for 45 minutes. Fourteen other people in separate locations also reported the UFO. Security alarm were activated for both the outer and inner ring at the missile sites. When the guards arrived at the outer door it was open and the combination lock on the inner door had been moved.

Three armed teams in fast trucks pursued the alien vehicle as it maneuvered and finally stopped and hovered 500 feet off the ground. The strike teams held their fire. They had orders to capture it undamaged if it should land. Then abruptly it began moving once again and circling directly over a launch control facility. Back at Minot, F-106 fighter planes were awaiting orders from the North American Air Defense Command to launch an attack. Base operations became impatient and had just decided to scramble the jets without confirmation. Suddenly the UFO climbed straight up and streaked away at incredible speed.

http://www.ufocasebook.com/minotafb.html

http://www.ufocasebook.com/minotafbufo1968.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <^>
The video of interviews with the B-52 crew in this incident was shown on TV about a month ago. To sum it up, those UFOs were definitely not secret aircraft of the military and you can also review the official documents on those bases and the incident at Loring AFB on the Department of Defense website on the UFO section. The Pentagon knows that those objects were not our secret aircraft yet those UFOs were real artificial flying objects whose outstanding performance characteristics were noted by the military.



Have you read Nick Redfern's book "On the Trail of the Saucer Spies"?
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='drew hempel' date='Sep 15 2006, 02:20 AM' post='1350680']
Have you read Nick Redfern's book "On the Trail of the Saucer Spies"?


Not yet!
contactismade
Oh my another sales pitch, big surprise nick....er....I mean drew
drew hempel
QUOTE(contactismade @ Sep 15 2006, 02:02 PM) [snapback]1351082[/snapback]

Oh my another sales pitch, big surprise nick....er....I mean drew


Yeah I get a big kick back from all sales of the latest books on the subject of this forum!

Also recommended Curt Sutherly's "UFO Mysteries" and http://tricksterbook.com

Twitch98
If you are going to diss someone at least spell his name correctly. Dr. Wernher von Braun was not a war criminal and did not supervise slave labor. Please get your facts straight. mellow.gif
drew hempel
QUOTE(Twitch98 @ Sep 15 2006, 03:50 PM) [snapback]1351211[/snapback]

If you are going to diss someone at least spell his name correctly. Dr. Wernher von Braun was not a war criminal and did not supervise slave labor. Please get your facts straight. mellow.gif


More brainwashed propaganda on UM!! haha. Read and weep my friends.

The Nazi Rocketeers: Dreams of Space and Crimes of War by Dennis Piszkiewicz

In the late 1920s, Hermann Oberth, an early theoretician of space travel, told the world of his plan for using liquid-fueled rockets as vehicles for space travel. To his surprise and delight, he found himself with a group of young German disciples, prominent among them Wernher von Braun, who wanted to turn this dream into reality. During the years of the Third Reich, with von Braun as their technical leader, these men developed the first modern rockets and were in attendance at the birth of the Space Age. Although von Braun rocket and his fellow rocket scientists dreamed of exploring space, they readily embraced the goal of creating weapons of terror rocket and mass destruction. The myth they encouraged after the war described them as brilliant visionaries whose genius was exploited by the Nazi regime. Now, fifty years later, The Nazi Rocketeers tells the true story of how these men enthusiastically participated in the Nazi cause and crimes.

The Nazi Rocketeers describes how Hermann Oberth, Wernher von Braun, and their colleagues progressed, from the innocent dream of space travel, through the development of the V-2 ballistic missile, to the transfer of their technological legacy to the Americans. Other notable Nazi Rocketeers are Army General Walter Dornberger, career soldier rocket mp3 and von Braun's mentor; Albert Speer, technocrat and advocate of the rocket as a weapon; and SS General Hans Kammler, architect of Auschwitz and director of the V-2 rocket war. This book tells how Wernher von Braun and several of his fellow rocket scientists were early and active members of the Nazi movement; von Braun was both a member of the Nazi party and a major in the SS. For their service to the Nazi cause, they were honored by the Third Reich rocket mp3 and by Hitler himself. Most damning is the revelation that they actively collaborated with the SS in the exploitation of concentration camp slave labor to build the V-2 missile.

AND MORE DAMNING INDICTMENT -- THE FACTS!!

The expert on Wernher Von Braun is Michael J. Neufeld at the Smithsonian Insitute. His research is what I was referring to in 2000 when my published staff op-ed column was censored by the U of MN Daily, in response to an email I received from the director of my graduate program, Art Harkin, whose personal mentor was Von Braun:

"I will personally make sure you are never published in the MN Daily again."

That's not much of an intellectual debate -- it's a threat!! Nevertheless this same man signed my masters thesis. haha.

Here's a list of Neufeld's publications based on his Von Braun research:

Neufeld MJ
V-2: A combat history of the first ballistic missile.
JOURNAL OF MILITARY HISTORY 70 (2): 548-549 APR 2006

Neufeld MJ
"Space superiority": Wernher von Braun's campaign for a nuclear-armed space station, 1946-1956
SPACE POLICY 22 (1): 52-62 FEB 2006

Neufeld MJ
The end of the Army Space Program: Interservice rivalry and the transfer of the von Braun Group to NASA, 1958-1959
JOURNAL OF MILITARY HISTORY 69 (3): 737-757 JUL 2005

Neufeld MJ
The secret of Apollo: Systems management in American and European space programs.
JOURNAL OF MILITARY HISTORY 68 (1): 304-305 JAN 2004

Neufeld MJ
Wernher von Braun and concentration camp labor - A reply
GERMAN STUDIES REVIEW 26 (1): 124-126 FEB 2003

Neufeld MJ
Stalin's V-2 - Technology transfer and German remote control systems in the USSR and the development of the Soviet missile industry 1945-1959
TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE 43 (4): 820-822 OCT 2002

Neufeld MJ
Wernher von Braun, the SS, and concentration camp labor: Questions of moral, political, and criminal responsibility
GERMAN STUDIES REVIEW 25 (1): 57-78 FEB 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From "Wernher von Braun, the SS, and Concentration Camp Labor" by Michael J. Neufeld, National Air and Space Musuem, Smithsonian Institution, Feb. 2002

"Many critics and many survivors of the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp, on the other hand, see him [von Braun] as an unprincipled opportunist or even a convinced Nazi who was directly responsbile for the deaths of 20,000 prisoners..... The watershed event was the Justice Department announcement in 1984 -- seven years after von Braun died of cancer -- that one of his closest associates, Arthur Rudolph, had left the United States because of his involvement in slave labor in the Mittelwerk underground plant..... It is his [von Braun] involvement in concentration-camp labor that is central to any judgement of him, and the documents I and others have uncovered show him to be responsible, in some sense, for 'crimes against humanity.'"

Baron Von Braun's family were far right aristocrats. His dad would have joined Hitler's cabinet if asked, according to his memoirs.

Von Braun joined the Nazi SS equastrian unit ten months into the Third Reich, Nov. 1933.

There is "no evidence von Braun was bothered by the regime's brutal suppression of opposition or its growing persecution of the Jews."

In 1937 von Braun jointed the Party, according to the NSDAP central file card, although von Braun claimed to have joined in 1939.

In 1940 Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler urges von Braun to join the SS.

In 1942 von Braun "requested permission to marry from the SS Race and Settlement Office in April 1943, he had to send the letter through Reichsfuhrer-SS; to curry favor he added the greeting "Fuhrer!" in his own hand."

In 1943 "the rocket's program's leaders also spent a long night at the officer's club listening to the Nazi empire's chief policeman explaining the need for brutal policies against the occupied countries. Von Braun never commented on this evening in his later autobiographical articles."

"Yet as he admitted in his most honest accounts of the arrest, his jailing was actually Himmler's revenge for his refusal to play along in a conspiracy to have the SS supplant the army as the dominant power in the V-2 program."

Von Braun's arrest by the Gestapo was not due to any anti-Nazi views.

V-2 slave labor was moved underground after a Royal Air Force raid in 1943. 20 prisoners died a day on average due to overwork and bad conditions.

Von Braun was the one to recommend the move underground:

"The move underground directly implicated Wernher von Braun in concentration-camp labor for the first time. Immediately after the air raid, on 25 August 1943, he chaired a meeting at Peenemunde to discuss moving the SS prisoners housed in the production plant to an underground site in western Germany."

"We must conclude that, before von Braun's arrest by the Gestapo, he had already become thoroughly acquainted with the employment of concentration-camp labor at a minimum of six locations in the V-2 program, had witnessed at least some of the catastrophic conditions of working and sleeping in the tunnels at Dora, and had been drawn into the administration of slave labor in the program."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also The rocket and the reich : Peenemünde and the coming of the ballistic missile era by Michael J. Neufeld. New York : Free Press, c1995.

Stellar
oy.

QUOTE

This is all bunk because technology is point blank destroying the Earth.


1. That's a personal opinion. I can say technology is point blank helping the Earth.
2. So what if it was, how does that debunk anything?

QUOTE

The constitution has been null and void all along -- it's always been a joke!


Once again, personal opinion. Some others believe it has some credence.

QUOTE
There is no evidence for aliens.


And thats generally the reason why the disclosure project exists... They say they're there to get the evidence to the public...

QUOTE
This is CIA propaganda to displace responsibility of earth-destroying technology --


You just wanted evidence for aliens, so now I want evidence of this claim...

QUOTE

Dr. Helen Caldicott is the perfect antidote to Dr. Steven R. Greer. Caldicott's book "Missile Envy" documents that up till the 1980s there have been dozens of accidents with nuclear missles. For example 5 of the 6 safety triggers went off for a crashed nuclear missile in S. Carolina. If the last safety trigger had been released half of the state would have been destroyed


Oh please, stop exaggerating. Half the state would not have been destroyed.

QUOTE
and it would have launched a global apocalypse.


I doubt it.

QUOTE
There are still missile accidents that are classified.


If they're classified, how do you know about them?

QUOTE
We can not just ban space weapons because technological progress has ALWAYS been based on military developments. So again Greer is promoting a CIA scheme -- that if we don't attack E.T.s then E.T.s will help us use free energy


What? How does that help the CIA scheme?

QUOTE
(this is a complete myth to hide the fact that technology is destroying earth and that engineers have no control over the technology.


Proof please.

QUOTE
The new discipline of quantum chaos has proven this -- just as professor Steve Strogatz who did his research at Los Alamos -- the computers are in control!!).


Proof please. I really doubt you understand quantum chaos.


QUOTE
Greer's final message in the opening remarks is "mature adults have space cooperation with aliens." -- Again this is just to displace our responsibility for the current fact that modern technology is destroying Earth.


Proof please. I see humans "hurting" the Earth... but modern technology helps produce cleaner vehicles, cleaner products that are environmentally friendly so that when, undoubtedly, humans use them, they dont hurt the Earth...

QUOTE
The Witnesses -- practically all old white guys that retired in the 1980s -- many of them from known sources of disinformation. Read Nick Redfern to see the details and documents on how the CIA and Wright Patterson have been kicking out disinformation and that's where many of these witnesses come from!!


Unfortunately none of that can be conclusively proven.

QUOTE
John Callahan FAA -- The FAA has a known history of cover-ups regarding crashed airplanes to take out political opponents. Just read Sherman Skolnick or Anthony Lappe's recent book "True Lies." The FAA works with the CIA to murder people!!


Why would that be? It probably has something to do with keeping a ring hidden from public. Read J.R.R. Tolkien's book "The Lord of the Ring" and you'll understand why the CIA would want to keep it under wraps!
rolleyes.gif
...
Stellar

QUOTE
Charles Brown -- WWII Airforce OSI, office next to Air Technical Center at Wright Patterson. He used Bluebook sources (again well-documented DISINFO!!)


A person saying "Omg, this is disinfo because I think that in some odd twisted, perverted way it might fall into some grand CIA scheme of things" does not prove it is disinfo...

QUOTE
Michael Smith -- Airforce Sargent till 1973 -- notified NORAD about UFOs on radar and NORAD notified him about "UFOs" -- so what?


Funny... I've been asking myself the same question throughout this post...

QUOTE
Enrique Corbick -- Mexico City Air Traffic Controller 1992 15 objects, 1994 several near collisions and 5 hours on radar -- 15 meter diameter UFO seen by many -- pilot-radar confirmation. "Doesn't know why Mexico has so many sightings?" -- well probably because it's close to the U.S. where all this technology is designed!!


Undoubtedly that could have something to do with some sightings... although it'd be pretty risky to be testing this super secret technology in a foreign country...

So what?


QUOTE
Dan Willis US Navy, top secret Level 14 in San Francisco Code Room, 1969 came out of ocean, elliptical, 70 feet in diameter, 7,000 MPH. Ship radar substantiated. NORAD tells him "visit from our little friends" -- so a joking aside comment is confirmation of what??


I dont think its meant as a confirmation of anything... his point is more about the technology of what he claims he saw, rather than the comment.

QUOTE
Don Phillips CIA -Airforce Design Engineer Deep Black SR71 Blackbird -- predecessor is CIA -- one pilot, one passenger craft on missions to chase UFOs to and from Earth. Las Vegas Airforce Station -- Nullis Airforce Base -- Radar site, Mt. charleston, 1965-6. 8000 Ft elevation. UFO tracked at 3800 MPH by commander staff. Craft stops and reverses and leaves trails at high speeds -- OVER Groom lake, area 51 where his employer Skunkworks tests crafts. Anthony Skazar, scopes radar at 10,000 feet confirms UFO sightings and states the UFOs had no clearance (again secret technology at Area 51 -- big deal).


Secret technology? Again, the guy's point is rather that the craft maneuvered in such a superior way, and he's using that to imply that, whether the craft was or wasnt piloted by humans, it displayed some characteristics that put in doubt whether we'd be able to create such an object at this time or not.

QUOTE
Captain Robert Salas -- Airforce base, Montana 1971 Minuteman Missiles sees red glow, oval hovering outside gate and losses 6 to 8 missiles -- confirmed by retired colonel. Echo-flight also lost 10 weapons with a UFO -- confirmed by Captain Eric Carlson and Lt. Colonal Walt Feigel with FOIA documents from Airforce stating UFOs. (again top secret aircraft -- big deal). SAC Headquarters telexes the same information.


Proof please. How do you know they were top secret aircraft?

QUOTE

Electromagnetic Pulse Weapons can easily dismantle missiles.


Nuclear Missiles are generally shielded from EMPs, and EMP weapons generally arent in the form of a glowing red oval that can hover.


QUOTE
Dwaynne Arnessons, US Airforce Above Top Secret clearance at Wright Patterson (again confirmed DISINFO source).


Confirmed? How?

QUOTE
1960s, Germany, crashed UFO. 1967, Montana -- deactivated Nukes by UFOs. This Arnesson commanded divisions in Vietnam (I'm getting warm, fuzzy feelings all over!! -- how many people did he massacre!!)


?


QUOTE
John Maynard -- Sargent Army Top Secret -- retired from DIA, 1980. Signed 2000 documents, many with UFO references. Was in charge of SALT II verifications. Wants the Black-ops, secret goverment exposed -- Don't We All!! Again top secret technology.


Funny, you're just like these UFO nuts... just instead of claiming every possible blur or speck, or shiney object is an alien craft, you scream out "top secret technology!"
You want proof from them? I want proof from you too!


QUOTE
Karl Wolf, Airforce Langley VA, 1965 consults for NASA Lunar Orbiter Project. Told there is a "base on the back side of the moon with structures, towers, and mushroom shapes" -- had breeched security. Well was he a victim of DISINFO or is he speading DISINFO -- who knows?


Exactly, who knows? Therefore, you have not debunked anything yet.

Wow... and the rest of your post goes on just like that
drew hempel
QUOTE(Stellar @ Sep 15 2006, 04:05 PM) [snapback]1351233[/snapback]

A person saying "Omg, this is disinfo because I think that in some odd twisted, perverted way it might fall into some grand CIA scheme of things" does not prove it is disinfo...
Funny... I've been asking myself the same question throughout this post...
Undoubtedly that could have something to do with some sightings... although it'd be pretty risky to be testing this super secret technology in a foreign country...

So what?
I dont think its meant as a confirmation of anything... his point is more about the technology of what he claims he saw, rather than the comment.
Secret technology? Again, the guy's point is rather that the craft maneuvered in such a superior way, and he's using that to imply that, whether the craft was or wasnt piloted by humans, it displayed some characteristics that put in doubt whether we'd be able to create such an object at this time or not.
Proof please. How do you know they were top secret aircraft?
Nuclear Missiles are generally shielded from EMPs, and EMP weapons generally arent in the form of a glowing red oval that can hover.
Confirmed? How?
?
Funny, you're just like these UFO nuts... just instead of claiming every possible blur or speck, or shiney object is an alien craft, you scream out "top secret technology!"
You want proof from them? I want proof from you too!
Exactly, who knows? Therefore, you have not debunked anything yet.

Wow... and the rest of your post goes on just like that


Have you watched the video? How can you infer what they are implying from my little tid bits of joy?!

Have you read the latest books on UFO CIA disinformation and top-secret technology?!

I take it no from your comments.

UFO Mysteries by Curt Sutherly

Body Snatchers in the Desert by Nick Redfern

On the Trail of the Saucer Spies by Nick Redfern

http://tricksterbook.com

drew hempel
QUOTE(Stellar @ Sep 15 2006, 04:05 PM) [snapback]1351233[/snapback]

A person saying "Omg, this is disinfo because I think that in some odd twisted, perverted way it might fall into some grand CIA scheme of things" does not prove it is disinfo...
Funny... I've been asking myself the same question throughout this post...
Undoubtedly that could have something to do with some sightings... although it'd be pretty risky to be testing this super secret technology in a foreign country...

So what?
I dont think its meant as a confirmation of anything... his point is more about the technology of what he claims he saw, rather than the comment.
Secret technology? Again, the guy's point is rather that the craft maneuvered in such a superior way, and he's using that to imply that, whether the craft was or wasnt piloted by humans, it displayed some characteristics that put in doubt whether we'd be able to create such an object at this time or not.
Proof please. How do you know they were top secret aircraft?
Nuclear Missiles are generally shielded from EMPs, and EMP weapons generally arent in the form of a glowing red oval that can hover.
Confirmed? How?
?
Funny, you're just like these UFO nuts... just instead of claiming every possible blur or speck, or shiney object is an alien craft, you scream out "top secret technology!"
You want proof from them? I want proof from you too!
Exactly, who knows? Therefore, you have not debunked anything yet.

Wow... and the rest of your post goes on just like that



PROOF PLEASE! What a joke -- the very first proof of Western science was based on imperial technology: The Pythagorean Theorem was for catapults yet the academic journal Philosophy, spring, 1999 has two professors arguing that the Pythagorean Theorem is not a valid logical proof!

haha eversince Archytas designed catapults using the the Pythagorean Theorem western science has inherently been eurocentric imperialism.

We have 25 years left of freshwater on the planet -- according to many top research institutes and published studies.

We are replacing the Amazon (the brain of the planet, source of 25% of freshwater and oxygen) with SOYBEANS!! 25% of the Amazon has already been destroyed and some scientists state it's too late to reverse the destruction because of positive feedback.

We have 10 years to solve the global warming crisis -- as if we are even close to doing so.

Ever heard of the Petkau Effect?

People like you -- in total denial about ecological collapse -- are the very reason WHY there is an environmental crisis!!

Read "The Religion of Technology" by Professor David F. Noble (1996) published while he was at M.I.T.

Or read my evidence online:

http://drewhempel.gnn.tv
http://nonduality.com/hempel.htm

Remember what J. Hynek wrote:

"Violation of logic is not proof."

The ecological crisis stems from violation of logic!!

So proof is based on self-affirming experimental controls which already are inherently destructive of the environment!!

Screw proof. It's too late for that.

Read "the Wealth of Nature" by professor Robert Nadeau.

Quantum chaos is the future of supercomputing environmental management.

Yet, as Professor Steve Strogatz has confirmed (see my blog), the logic of quantum chaos can not be proven.

Computers have taken over logic and computers have taken over proof.

Computers do not care about the environment -- but neither does civilization!

In fact humans were never in control!

Nature is in control! Proof by contradiction through deduction of controlled experiments is the modus operandi of science yet such a technique is inherently environmentally destructive!!

What a total joke!

I've had 3 websites censored at this University library:

1) On project HAARP --

2) On underground military cities

3) the conspiracy theory research list led by Kris Millegan, recently subject of a lawsuit by Special Forces. Millegan won the lawsuit but Special Forces was trying to run up his costs for publishing an expose on the lies of the military.
hazzard
Ah yes, the Disclosure project.

Theres the simple factor that extraordinary claims require, and in fact demand, extraordinary evidence. Whats being offered by Greer doesnt even bear a passing resemblance to such.

I really want to believe - I really do. But what concerns me most about these fringe discoveries is that they often come accompanied with an agenda - that is, you have to buy the DVD or come to the conference, oh yes, its not for free. Are these people spreading valid information - or selling snake oil?

Dr. Greer, who is obviously dedicated to this project, made some statements at the beginning of this briefing. He said that the conference would disclose the truth about the subject of UFOs. He stated that the witnesses there "can and will prove that we are not alone".

His drive is to get the whole matter of alien life and alien technology exposed, because, in large part these alien technologies ("connected to extraterrestrials") ...


"...will solve the looming energy crisis...sure to sweep the planet in the coming decade;...will end global warming," etc.

The only problem with this is that no one presented anything evidentiary to indicate that extraterrestrial life exists, or that weve obtained technologies from them. There were merely testimonials about someones experience with UFO sightings, and of course a couple of completely unsubstantiated claims about actually cataloging "57 different "humanoid" species of alien life", as well as some discussion about alien technologies that have been supposedly obtained.

Nothing about that Disclosure conference proved anything at all. No evidence was provided, only peoples testimony. Unfortunately, Dr. Greers assertion fell far short of any standard of scientific proof.

These people all largely had secret or top secret clearances at one time, which is not a big deal (even Bill Kaysing, "father" of the ludicrous moon hoax notion, claimed a top secret clearance when he worked at Rockcetdyne in the late 50s and early 60s...and of course, Mr. Kaysing knows nothing at all of that which he speaks). And they revealed nothing at all top secret in their testimonies. One might get the impression that they were, but they didnt. Anyone can say, "We examined, and classified 57 different alien species," but without anything to back that up, theres simply someone saying something. It's valueless.

I have never said that the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation is not a valid idea.

I did not dismiss DP without a second thought. I simply find it inconsequential based upon actually listening to what these people have said, and realizing all too well the sensationalistic claims of providing proof of extraterrestrial life have never materialized.

I have seen several things myself that I am pretty sure that people with less knowledge of the sky would have considered a UFO (One was the ISS, one a satelite, one was a distant helicopter with a search light and the other was Venus, apparently moving, due to fast moving clouds.)

I think that all the known UFO cases so far have been cases of misidentification or hoaxes (some perpretrated by the observers and some on the observers.) As of yet I havent seen any evidence that would totally convince me of an Alien presence on Earth in any shape or form.

To label something unidentified an alien space craft is a huge leap of unscientific nonsense.
drew hempel
QUOTE(Stellar @ Sep 15 2006, 04:05 PM) [snapback]1351233[/snapback]

A person saying "Omg, this is disinfo because I think that in some odd twisted, perverted way it might fall into some grand CIA scheme of things" does not prove it is disinfo...
Funny... I've been asking myself the same question throughout this post...
Undoubtedly that could have something to do with some sightings... although it'd be pretty risky to be testing this super secret technology in a foreign country...

So what?
I dont think its meant as a confirmation of anything... his point is more about the technology of what he claims he saw, rather than the comment.
Secret technology? Again, the guy's point is rather that the craft maneuvered in such a superior way, and he's using that to imply that, whether the craft was or wasnt piloted by humans, it displayed some characteristics that put in doubt whether we'd be able to create such an object at this time or not.
Proof please. How do you know they were top secret aircraft?
Nuclear Missiles are generally shielded from EMPs, and EMP weapons generally arent in the form of a glowing red oval that can hover.
Confirmed? How?
?
Funny, you're just like these UFO nuts... just instead of claiming every possible blur or speck, or shiney object is an alien craft, you scream out "top secret technology!"
You want proof from them? I want proof from you too!
Exactly, who knows? Therefore, you have not debunked anything yet.

Wow... and the rest of your post goes on just like that


From http://templarlodge.com -- Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince give a lecture on their book "The Stargate Conspiracy" proving a CIA scheme to promote Alien Invasion DISINFO:

The Face of Mars and Extraterrestrial Invasion

There appears to be a genuine mystery about Mars. Perhaps there really are pyramids or other artificial structures there. However, attempts to link Cydonia with ancient Egypt simply don't work and have been contrived. But for what purpose?

Perhaps a clue lies in the fact that Richard Hoagland was working at SRI International when he first became interested in the Martian enigmas in 1982. He formed a research group to study them further, which was funded by SRI. The co-founder of this group was Dr Lambert Dolphin, who a few years earlier had led the SRI teams at Giza.

In case you think that we are overly paranoid about SRI's intimate involvement with the Pentagon and CIA, it is as well to take on board the initial reaction of one social scientist who attended Hoagland's first lecture on the Face on Mars. What he said was:

'At first I thought it was some kind of joke, or maybe a complex social experiment being conducted by the CIA - to study psychological reactions to such a hypothetical discovery. I mean - SRI involvement, 'Faces' on Mars... what would you think?... Was this an elaborate psychological experiment sponsored by the defense community?'

In fact, Hoagland's work has always received active encouragement by members of the intelligence community, and most of the key members of his research groups have connections with either intelligence agencies or the Pentagon.

All of this is really, in a sense, just setting the scene for the 'stargate conspiracy', at the heart of which are revelations about a very interesting group of people.

Nearly fifty years ago, this American group believed that they had established contact with powerful extraterrestrial beings. Not physical contact, but psychic or telepathic communication. Over a period of many years these entities made many revelations about themselves - including that they had been the gods worshipped in ancient Egypt.

Let's make this clear. We are not talking about a little New Age channelling group. From the very beginning - half a century ago - it reached the very top levels of American society, even involving a former Vice President. Since then its influence has grown, and it now has followers across the world, including in Britain. And it still whispers in the ear of the Presidency.

So what do these entities, or intelligences, claim?

They claim that they come from Sirius. They built the 'monuments' of Mars (although, significantly, these claims only appeared after the first NASA images of Cydonia.) They created the human race, and taught it the arts of civilisation, and have guided us from behind the scenes throughout history.

And they are now about to return to preside over a great 'cleansing'.

They claim to have been responsible for the destruction of Atlantis, after which survivors founded the Egyptian civilisation and built the Great Pyramid - around the year 10500 BC. They claim that the Sphinx was built in honour of them - and that there are hidden chambers that can be accessed from beneath it.

Some of those who claim to be in contact with these extraterrestrials also claim to have been in contact with Edgar Cayce's spirit guide, and that Cayce's pronouncements came from essentially the same source.

In its fifty-year history, the 'contact group' in touch with these entities have had some very interesting dealings. During the early 1970s, it was intimately involved with SRI International - interestingly, at the same time that SRI first became interested in Giza. In fact, one of the leaders of this group worked alongside Lambert Dolphin's team.

Key members of this group have been behind the promotion of the Face on Mars - and its connection with Egypt - from the very beginning. In fact, Richard Hoagland's so-called Message of Cydonia comes directly from these 'space-gods'.

Throughout its long history, many eminent names have been connected with this group - names from the fields of politics, high finance, entertainment, and even science.

Among those present at the 'first contact' with these alleged extraterrestrials in 1952 was the philosopher and inventor Arthur M. Young - who was later to become the mentor of Robert Temple, and who directly inspired him to write The Sirius Mystery.

Put like this it all sounds very exciting. Has contact with the gods of ancient Egypt been re-established? Are they, as they promise, about to return?

Of course, many would consider their claims to have been backed up by independent research: the connection between Sirius and ancient Egypt; the importance of the year 10500 BC; the connection between Egypt and Mars. But we have seen that all this 'evidence' is not only flawed but highly contrived.

It must be pointed out that these allegedly all-knowing entities not only make mistakes when dealing with ancient history, but sometimes come out with downright howlers. They even give the ancient Egyptian name for the Sphinx as arq ur - which, as we have seen, comes from a misreading of a particular dictionary.

But the whole story takes on a much darker hue. We have discovered that military and intelligence agencies, mainly the CIA, were involved with this group right from the beginning. In fact, the research institute where the entities first made their appearance was actually a front for Pentagon psychological warfare and parapsychological experiments.

The person who formed and led the 'contact group', and who first established contact with the entities, was - at the very same time - working for both the Pentagon and the CIA on various techniques of psychological manipulation. This included the use of hallucinogenic drugs, hypnosis and electromagnetic influence. He was working specifically on ways to induce apparent mental contact with non-human entities - and, much more disturbingly, this was part of the CIA's MKULTRA mind control project.

We have seen the involvement of the CIA in much of this story. But how far does it go?

Did they create this scenario from the beginning, as part of a long-term programme of psychological and sociological manipulation?

Or could it really be that some non-human entities - but not necessarily who they claim to be - are either running the show or are partners in its stage management?

Either way, it should scare the hell out of us...

Release date 1st July 1999, 320pp, ISBN 0 316 64861 2


drew hempel
QUOTE(Stellar @ Sep 15 2006, 04:04 PM) [snapback]1351231[/snapback]

oy.
1. That's a personal opinion. I can say technology is point blank helping the Earth.
2. So what if it was, how does that debunk anything?
Once again, personal opinion. Some others believe it has some credence.
And thats generally the reason why the disclosure project exists... They say they're there to get the evidence to the public...
You just wanted evidence for aliens, so now I want evidence of this claim...
Oh please, stop exaggerating. Half the state would not have been destroyed.
I doubt it.
If they're classified, how do you know about them?
What? How does that help the CIA scheme?
Proof please.
Proof please. I really doubt you understand quantum chaos.
Proof please. I see humans "hurting" the Earth... but modern technology helps produce cleaner vehicles, cleaner products that are environmentally friendly so that when, undoubtedly, humans use them, they dont hurt the Earth...
Unfortunately none of that can be conclusively proven.
Why would that be? It probably has something to do with keeping a ring hidden from public. Read J.R.R. Tolkien's book "The Lord of the Ring" and you'll understand why the CIA would want to keep it under wraps!
rolleyes.gif
...


You tell me to stop exaggerating: "Oh please, stop exaggerating. Half the state would not have been destroyed.
I doubt it."

Obviously you don't doubt enough or you would have looked it up. Doubt for you is an excuse to stop thinking!! What a "skeptic" you are! haha. Totally bogus.

Here's the quote from the book "Missile Envy" by Dr. Helen Caldicott (william morrow and co., NY, 1984)

"Accidents with nuclear weapons are probably much more frequent than even the unclassified data reveals. Obviously, as the number of nuclear weapons increases, the probablility of an accident increases.... According to a Department of Defense unclassified dcoument, there were thirty-two accidents involving nuclear weapons between 1950 and 1980.... On January 24, 1961, a B-52 on airborne alert developed structural failure of the right wing over Goldsboro, North Carolina. Two weapons separated from the aircraft during the breakup of the plane at an altitude of 2,000 to 10,000 feet. The bombs were both 24-megaton bombs, which is equivalent to 24 million tons of TNT. The total energy of TNT released during World War II was 3 million tons. One bomb crashed, and five of its six safety catches were triggered. Had that bomb exploded, it would have destroyed much of North Carolina." (pp. 44-5)

It was North not South Carolina and it was "much" not "half" -- well is much more than half or not? haha.

Stellar
QUOTE

Have you watched the video? How can you infer what they are implying from my little tid bits of joy?!


Yes, I actually HAVE watched the video.

QUOTE

Have you read the latest books on UFO CIA disinformation and top-secret technology?!


The latest? probably not, depending on how often they come out. Care to post the proof?

QUOTE

PROOF PLEASE! What a joke


Gee... its a joke to ask for proof? Wow. What kind of world are you living in?

QUOTE

We have 25 years left of freshwater on the planet -- according to many top research institutes and published studies.


What's your point? Gee... you know, if it werent for technology, this would be much more alarming than it is.

QUOTE

We are replacing the Amazon (the brain of the planet, source of 25% of freshwater and oxygen) with SOYBEANS!! 25% of the Amazon has already been destroyed and some scientists state it's too late to reverse the destruction because of positive feedback.


What's your point? This has to do with...?

QUOTE

We have 10 years to solve the global warming crisis -- as if we are even close to doing so.


10 years to solve the global warming crisis? Where'd you get that from? And what's your point?

QUOTE

Ever heard of the Petkau Effect?


Yes I have. He's the one that found that 7 rads over 11 1/2 hours could rupture a cell membrane. What's your point?

QUOTE

People like you -- in total denial about ecological collapse -- are the very reason WHY there is an environmental crisis!!


I'm not in total denial about the ecological damage there is. Its people like you, who are convinced that the Earth is about to cave in on itsself within a couple of years, yet blame everything on technology and are unwilling to support the very thing that could help the environment out are the reason why there is an environmental crisis.

QUOTE

The ecological crisis stems from violation of logic!!


1. How so?
2. What does that have to do with debunking the Disclosure Project?

QUOTE

So proof is based on self-affirming experimental controls which already are inherently destructive of the environment!!


Oh, is that the excuse you're using for not being able to prove your points?

QUOTE

Computers have taken over logic and computers have taken over proof.

Computers do not care about the environment -- but neither does civilization!


What are you talking about? Computers are tools guided by humans, they have not taken over anything yet.

QUOTE

Nature is in control! Proof by contradiction through deduction of controlled experiments in the modus operandi of science yet such a technique is inherently environmentally destructive!!


How is it environmentally destructive, hmm? Oh wait... you cant prove that because it would hurt the environment. What a joke. rolleyes.gif

QUOTE

I've had 3 websites censored at this University library:

1) On project HAARP --

2) On underground military cities

3) the conspiracy theory research list led by Kris Millegan, recently subject of a lawsuit by Special Forces. Millegan won the lawsuit but Special Forces was trying to run up his costs for publishing an expose on the lies of the military.


So what?
skyeagle409
QUOTE
name='hazzard' date='Sep 15 2006, 04:44 PM' post='1351289']
Ah yes, the Disclosure project.

Theres the simple factor that extraordinary claims require, and in fact demand, extraordinary evidence. Whats being offered by Greer doesnt even bear a passing resemblance to such.

I really want to believe - I really do. But what concerns me most about these fringe discoveries is that they often come accompanied with an agenda - that is, you have to buy the DVD or come to the conference, oh yes, its not for free. Are these people spreading valid information - or selling snake oil?


That's peculiar considering scientific investigations have already verified many of the case files covered by the Disclosure Project.

QUOTE
Nothing about that Disclosure conference proved anything at all. No evidence was provided, only peoples testimony. Unfortunately, Dr. Greers assertion fell far short of any standard of scientific proof.


Goes to show how wrong you were. Have you done any homework on the cases covered by the Disclosure Project? I think not, otherwise you would have found that some of those cases are also documented on the Department of Defense's own website.

QUOTE
To label something unidentified an alien space craft is a huge leap of unscientific nonsense.


Unless you can explain those UFOs over Washington D.C. in 1952 as those of mankind, your claim has no merit, none whatsoever and it is as simple as that.

QUOTE
To label something unidentified an alien space craft is a huge leap of unscientific nonsense.


I wouldn't say that considering scientific means have been used to validate many UFO case files.
Atheist God
QUOTE
That's peculiar considering scientific investigations have already verified many of the case files covered by the Disclosure Project. The "snake oil" you are speaking of was the Condon Report you posted a reference of.


What scientific evidence? I have seen no scientific data at all to support ET visitation. The scientific community as a whole does not accept this premise either. Despite what many beleivers think.
QUOTE
Goes to show how wrong you were. Have you done any homework on the cases covered by the Disclosure Project? I think not, otherwise you would have found that some of those cases are also documented on the Department of Defense's own website.


Aren't you supposed to not trust government info or only when it suits your agenda? So they have it on their website it prooves nothing except that it's on their website.

QUOTE
Unless you can explain those UFOs over Washington D.C. in 1952 as those of mankind, your claim has no merit, none whatsoever and it is as simple as that.


There is nothing explaining what was seen was ET so your claims have no merrit as simple as that. Fact is aside from knowing that unknown aircraft or possibly space craft do fly around and no we don't know what they are or who's they are. There is nothing solid enough to back up ET visitation and nothig concrete enough to suggest military involvement. However I still lean towards the militaries involvement in such things.
crystal sage
thumbsup.gif cool.gif



"Beginning in 1993, I started an effort that was designed to identify firsthand military and government witnesses to UFO events and projects, as well as other evidence to be used in a public disclosure. From 1993, we spent considerable time and resources briefing the Clinton Administration, including CIA Director James Woolsey, senior military officials at the Pentagon, and select members of Congress, among others. In April of 1997, more than a dozen such government and military witnesses were assembled in Washington DC for briefings with Congressmen, Pentagon officials and others. There, we specifically requested open Congressional Hearings on the subject. None were forthcoming.

In 1998, we set out to "privatize" the disclosure process by raising the funds to videotape, edit, and organize over 100 military and government witnesses to UFO events and projects. We had estimated that between $2 million and $4 million would be needed to do this on a worldwide basis. By August of 2000 only about 5% of this amount had been raised but we decided to proceed since further delay was deemed imprudent given the serious issues involved here. So beginning in August we began creating the Witness Archive Project and we set about the task of traveling all over the world to interview these witnesses in broadcast quality digital video format. Due to the severe limitation of funds, this effort was predominantly prepared by myself and a few other volunteers roughly from August 2000 through December 2000.

Beginning in late December 2000, I began editing over 120 hours of raw digital video testimony at home. I should note that I am a medical doctor and not an editor. Nevertheless, from late December 2000 until late February 2001 the 120 hours were reduced first to 33 hours of select testimony and then 18 hours of super-select testimony. The 33 hours of select testimony were dubbed to audiotape and transcribed resulting in approximately 1200 pages of testimony transcripts. In March and early April, 2001 I edited these transcripts into a readable form, which appear herein.

I must emphasize that this has been done under the most severe time and funding constraints, working 7 days a week and mostly 18 hours a day. And I thought the Emergency Department was tough!

I share this only so the reader will understand that these transcripts and other materials are very likely to contain errors. These include likely errors in proper names arising from the phonetic spelling of such names directly from transcribed audio tapes of testimony. I apologize in advance for these.

Dr. Greer's Books
Disclosure : Military and Government...

Contact Steven M. Greer, M.D. at info@disclosureproject.org .

Media: Contact Steven M. Greer, M.D. at media@disclosureproject.org.

Visit Dr. Greer's website http://www.disclosureproject.org.

[End]





hazzard
QUOTE(crystal sage @ Sep 15 2006, 10:16 PM) [snapback]1351726[/snapback]


I share this only so the reader will understand that these transcripts and other materials are very likely to contain errors. These include likely errors in proper names arising from the phonetic spelling of such names directly from transcribed audio tapes of testimony. I apologize in advance for these.

Dr. Greer's Books
Disclosure : Military and Government...

Contact Steven M. Greer, M.D. at info@disclosureproject.org .

Media: Contact Steven M. Greer, M.D. at media@disclosureproject.org.

Visit Dr. Greer's website http://www.disclosureproject.org.




Ah yes, the Disclosure project.

Theres the simple factor that extraordinary claims require, and in fact demand, extraordinary evidence. Whats being offered by Greer doesnt even bear a passing resemblance to such.

I really want to believe - I really do. But what concerns me most about these fringe discoveries is that they often come accompanied with an agenda - that is, you have to buy the DVD or come to the conference, oh yes, its not for free. Are these people spreading valid information - or selling snake oil?

Dr. Greer, who is obviously dedicated to this project, made some statements at the beginning of this briefing. He said that the conference would disclose the truth about the subject of UFOs. He stated that the witnesses there "can and will prove that we are not alone".

His drive is to get the whole matter of alien life and alien technology exposed, because, in large part these alien technologies ("connected to extraterrestrials") ...


"...will solve the looming energy crisis...sure to sweep the planet in the coming decade;...will end global warming," etc.

The only problem with this is that no one presented anything evidentiary to indicate that extraterrestrial life exists, or that weve obtained technologies from them. There were merely testimonials about someones experience with UFO sightings, and of course a couple of completely unsubstantiated claims about actually cataloging "57 different "humanoid" species of alien life", as well as some discussion about alien technologies that have been supposedly obtained.

Nothing about that Disclosure conference proved anything at all. No evidence was provided, only peoples testimony. Unfortunately, Dr. Greers assertion fell far short of any standard of scientific proof.

These people all largely had secret or top secret clearances at one time, which is not a big deal (even Bill Kaysing, "father" of the ludicrous moon hoax notion, claimed a top secret clearance when he worked at Rockcetdyne in the late 50s and early 60s...and of course, Mr. Kaysing knows nothing at all of that which he speaks). And they revealed nothing at all top secret in their testimonies. One might get the impression that they were, but they didnt. Anyone can say, "We examined, and classified 57 different alien species," but without anything to back that up, theres simply someone saying something. It's valueless.

I have never said that the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation is not a valid idea.

I did not dismiss DP without a second thought. I simply find it inconsequential based upon actually listening to what these people have said, and realizing all too well the sensationalistic claims of providing proof of extraterrestrial life have never materialized.

I have seen several things myself that I am pretty sure that people with less knowledge of the sky would have considered a UFO (One was the ISS, one a satelite, one was a distant helicopter with a search light and the other was Venus, apparently moving, due to fast moving clouds.)

I think that all the known UFO cases so far have been cases of misidentification or hoaxes (some perpretrated by the observers and some on the observers.) As of yet I havent seen any evidence that would totally convince me of an Alien presence on Earth in any shape or form.

To label something unidentified an alien space craft is a huge leap of unscientific nonsense.

Yes people, for you that are actually reading every post this is a re-run.

crystal sage
COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS
COSMIC CULTURES:

DEVELOPING COSMIC AWARENESS AS THE FOUNDATION OF INTERPLANETARY PEACE:

An Intensive Course Taught by Steven M. Greer MD

November 6-11, 2005
(arrive the afternoon of the 5th and leave on the 12th)
Palm Springs, California

*** This training is definitely going to happen on these dates, so please register soon! ***

Click Here for Ambassador to the Universe Trainings Schedule

Download MS Word version here

Download PDF version here



Dr. Greer, founder and director of CSETI and The Disclosure Project is an accomplished meditation instructor who has conducted intensive trainings in meditation, higher states of consciousness, remote viewing and cosmic awareness for 30 years.

In this nearly week long intensive, the student will learn about:

The nature of mind and how to experience the unbounded, cosmic aspect of consciousness always within us
Specific meditation techniques to experience cosmic consciousness