Looks like another too-good-to-be-true, but who knows. I hadn't seen this one yet, so I don't know what kind of analysis has been performed.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=11...q=ufo&hl=en


You guys know if this ones been proven fake yet?

that is 1000% fake...waste of time...you can clearly see that he never zoomed in or out...so you can assume that it was a clear sky...

why does he sound so relaxed?

Sorry, tried a couple of times but can't get it to come up.

Total and complete hoax - no doubt.

Here just ask yourself this one "little" question - why is it on "google video"?

Something this "Black and White" would be on the news, right??

Plus - how is it that this is the ONLY report of it?? I mean come on, just give it some semi serious and rational thought - >IF< it was - it would have been seen by more than just this camera only.

My guess - a project on CGI. But that is just a guess.

If it was real - more people would have seen it, more people would have reported it - this would be news.

J -

I agree this one is probably a CGI.

I would not use the argument of " why not on the news". The media notoriously avoids this kind of news, unless done in a very negative or comical tone.

Actually IF say even 1,000 college students saw this and there were still and video of it - a news team would be out there. It would be atl least a mention of a 'balloon' seen hovering around college campus or 'remote controled device' give college campus a 'sky full''

There would be something -especially if there were enough video/stills of it. That would be enough to get some attention - minor, maybe. Attention, yes.

But when you get 'reports' and 'vedios/still' and only ONE report and only ONE camera sees it. Hmm... then ya no one should touch it for good reason.

J -

Right. Now the Newberry case is different, a previous thread on this forum:

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...showtopic=79541

There was the story of it on a credible news source, then it was gone within a few hours.

=\ It's just too wobbly to be real.

I was looking at this and immediately concluded that its no more than a cheap CGI hoax.I've been playing around with CG programs for a while and can tell you this is a true fake.Just by looking at it its obvious that someone modeled the ufo in CG program like 3ds max ,maya,xsi and so forth.Then they take the model and composite it in to a live video footage,then they do some camera matchmoving witch in this case was poorly done since the ufo doesn't match the movement of the camera correctly.Probably some student made this so he can impress his friend but definitely not real for sure.
A sighting like this would definitely be all over the news with many eyewintesses and this is the first i heard of this.

It has already been established that the media is an entirely unreliable source to recieve information from as it applies to the UFO phenomenon. 1) The stories are almost always covered with great bias, and 2) Most major stories regarding the subject matter are purposely left out of the news. There are various government documents referencing the CIA, NSA etc. connection with major news corporations.

For more on Government-Media disinformation, read the following articles:

http://www.rense.com/general42/coverup.htm
http://www.wanttoknow.info/emailmedia
http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/sfjennings1.html
http://www.disclosureproject.org/abcnewsdefrauding.htm
http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/?id=177

I also highly recommend you read Terry Hansen's, The Missing Times



Website: http://www.themissingtimes.com/

"I . . . helped organize the CBS TV show around the Robertson Panel's conclusions."
- Dr. Thornton Page, CIA official (1966)

"UFOs were seen more frequently around areas vital to the defense of the United States. The Los Alamos-Albuquerque area, Oak Ridge, and White Sands Proving Ground rated high. Port areas, Strategic Air Command bases, and industrial areas ranked next."
- Edward J. Ruppelt, Head of Project Blue Book (1956)

"I do know that the CIA and the U.S. government have been concerned over the UFO phenomenon for many years and that their attempts, both past and recent, to discount the significance of the phenomenon and to explain away the apparent lack of official interest in it have all the earmarks of a classic intelligence cover-up."
- Victor Marchetti,
former executive assistant to the deputy director, CIA (1979)

On Amazon.com The Missing Times has an average grade of 5 stars out of 11 reviews.

"Five Stars"
- Amazon.com (based on 11 independent and unsolicited reader reviews)

"I just finished The Missing Times a few weeks ago. It was one of the most important books I've read in the last decade -- probably the most important, and I read a lot, almost all of it serious non-fiction. It would be almost as important even if it had never gotten to the subject of UFOs, simply for opening people's eyes to the reality and the ubiquity of propaganda. It should be mandatory reading in high school history or civics."
- Phil Meade, Kailua, HI

You can read other reviews at amazon here.

Also, be sure to check out supporting documents here

Quote from the above link, "Those unfamiliar with the long and complex history of the UFO controversy may be understandably skeptical whether the astonishing events recounted in The Missing Times actually took place. After all, the nation's media took little notice. To help address this skepticism, I have included a few supporting documents below: ... "

I could go on and on concerning media corruption, but back to the subject at hand. The provided video of a UFO is certainly one of the more poorly hoaxed videos in recent times as far as I am concerned.

Thanks for all that info Prophecy Guru ,it is very informative material to read for sure.And i totally agree with you about how much the media is corrupted when its concerning Ufo's.I rarely see any Ufo news on tv and mostly what i see is useless junk that has no interest to me whatsoever.I'm sure if the media started to concetrate on bringing forward news about Ufo's we would be a step closer to getting some pressure on the goverments that cover up this subject.

That was the best part.

Possible gravity lens effect at the end or it shot out a death ray.

They have great air security and good sky coverage.

Moving an image across the screen is cgi number one objective.

But did have dark cloudy burry fuzzy grey flat image with slight surrounding
aura or halo only common traits, just put in a rectangle of background
pixels and move it along.

Still it had the dark central disk that will be bright by the time of nightfall and
it can be a star in Texas.

That was no death ray. It was a natural affect brought upon by glare on the camera lens induced by the light from the sun... Not quite sure if I am interpreting your response accuratly though as you may have been being sarcastic, and if so I apologize. However, I am not quite sure what to make of the rest of your response. Are you suggesting the possibility or probability of a hoax based on CGI animation, or that the film seems inconsistent with CGI characteristics?

I look for what I think are ufo charteristics.

If you do not have any then you won't find any.

The dark central spot may be a spherical magnetic field that in time
become bright.

Does a cgi artist want to disclose real ufo image traits, don't think so.

So on this on 51% ufo and 49% cgi fake only due to the dsrk disc
trait.

The smoke and line to a metal flag pole might be due to its magnetic
phenomena, if thats what is holding it up in the air.

looks fake to me

Horrible video. In fact it made me want to cry a little because it was so bad.

ah...

the man sounds way too calm while viewing something like that...

what about the size ratio?...compared to the size of the building it looks 'off'...

I have to go with fake on this one...

fake just look at the pixels around it supposed ufo, really poor fake should of done it so it was midnight might be half descent fake.

But on that note, I REALLY HATE PEOPLE WHO FAKE THESE THINGS.

STOP DOING IT

zyprexia ? thorizine ?--lol--oh i forgot halidoll--lol

Well pretty much as stated:

It would/could be a logical rational:

Seen on college campus:
Computer CGI project (most likely)
Bad acting in voices seeing this. (obviously not actors or the real thing.)
To scripted with the camera everthing was focused BUT the UFO always blurred.
(That may of just killed the CGI project, or they failed that project??)

They were the only camera and people to see
No other background voices going, wtf - wth - what is that??

How was it - it was for their eyes and camera only?? That tells a whole lot right there!

J -

Says it was shot by a local security officer, hmm...

say it was shot by a local 'town drunk' or 'local "john"' - which bring up another excellent point we've NO CLUE who even shot this - there is NO background information at all given to this. Nada, nothing, zip, zero, zlich. Which also adds to the 'hoax'.

J -

Damn hicks and their fake UFO's.

I'm going to have to go with big FAKE on this one. Unless of course that is in fact a death ray near the end...

Quickly someone! Look up if there recently has been a college campus attacked by UFOs!

It doesn't look right when it goes behind the building though. It appears as though it's in front of the building and then they edited it so it looks like it's in the background.