QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
Harte,
I guess you are unfortunate to be one of those who is not allowed to think for himself. To think out of the box so to speak. Nothing in history is 100% written in stone, especially the beginnings of the Egyptian civilization. Egyptian beginnings are merely a collective of thousands of scholar's theory building onto their original theory almost with compassion of it being absolute fact. Scholars are forced by ethics to adhere to the thousands of these respected theories to date and to build on it.
This is not so. "Egyptian beginnings" are
only theorized based on actual artifactual evidence found by actual archaeologists and Egyptologists. Most of what I've tried to tell you here was discovered by people that had in mind that the Egyptian records might document the Flood of Noah, which most of these researchers actually thought to be factual (yep, that's how long this has been known.) Not exactly the adherence to generally accepted orthodoxy which you try to paint here. These were scientists that had to publish the results of what they found even though the results
directly contradicted the generally accepted view of their time.
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
The chronology you subscribe to like a religion is a sad thing as the theory of what it all means according to historians is also moulded around humankind being alone in the universe as a fact, and that everything from the beginning of humanity must follow a natural path as such.
I'm not exactly sure how pointing out facts recorded by the Egyptians, the Greeks
and the Persians constitutes "subscribing" to some "chronology" that saddens you. I hope you eventually feel better though. Had you not heard of Alexander's conquest of Egypt? Were you not aware that Taurus is a
Greek constellation? Then forgive my foolhardy attempt to educate one which desires no real knowledge and shuns any factual information for fantasy.
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
What do you feel about the Dendara Zodiac having record of ALL the exact zodiac mythological figures and its fantastically old theoretical date? I am sure this is awful to imagine. It recognises Cancer as a Crab, Pisces as two fish, Libra with the two scales and all the other current mythological iconology.
Sorry, I wasn't going to go any further, since your post indicated that you aren't really interested in the truth, but the Dendera zodiac
is (part of) the evidence that the Egyptians had no connection to any zodiac prior to the Ptolemaic era. See, the carving you're talking about was actually
commissioned by the then (Greek) pharoah. This carving from the ceiling at Dendera is certainly not "fantastically old," it can be dated from the name of the pharoah that actually appears on it. This was first pointed out by Champollion, the Frenchman that successfully translated the hieroglyphic script using the Rosetta stone, in 1822. Champollion was one of those that considered the Bible to be a factual history of humanity and that the Earth was only a few thousand years old, based on the often talked about dating of the Earth by Usher in 1654 (he claimed to have calculated a date of creation from Biblical references - Oct. 26, 4004 BC, 9:00 AM.)
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
Here is where your religious and very fixed approach has angered you to the extent of lowering your approach as a mud slinging attack on this research and its author.
My "very fixed approach" has nothing at all to do with it. Nor do you, in particular. I have a bone to pick with
all the moneygrubbing con artists that are out to scam you (and others) out of their money by foisting off on the public a completely bankrupt "theory" in which they purposefully and determinedly hide, obfuscate and otherwise dismiss the actual, verified evidence that we today have in order to further their own greedy needs. Ignoring the well-known, verified and recorded date of the Dendera Zodiac is one excellent example of this sort of shenanigans. Nice people call it "pseudoscience." Myself, I'm not so nice about it.
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
The so called exact dates have no relevance at all other than the importance that they are many thousands of years old here.
Is it too hard to imagine the Senmut (Senenmut) tomb murals celebrate an older complicated cosmic knowledge. Whether it turns out to be 3,000 years old or 10,000 years old, no one is arguing about the exact date of this tomb. It is simply thousands of years old and more inconclusive to historians than any other tomb.
Yet there can be no question that the tomb predates the Ptolemaic kings of Egypt, no? The Dendera zodiac is the earliest example of these constellations that has
ever been found in Egypt. So, if you want to believe otherwise, fine. I'm just pointing out that what you are practicing by such belief is
faith, and not reasoned opinion.
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
At the end of the day please understand that no one is being forced to buy such a book especially those of a firm belief as you have expressed. Please debate with more respect if you want intelligent response.
Sorry, but I can hardly muster any respect at all for idiots such as this author you cling so desperately to. This I do for you, by the way, and not for myself. Please be more grateful.
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
After all lets look at the whole collection of the authors presentation as a whole. One single case like the Senmut tomb is just a small fairly inconclusive piece, but it is important in context of a repeating theme found globally.
Boy, you got
that right. The "whole" picture certainly needs to be looked at. Might I suggest you visit other sources of information than some website that is trying to sell you a book? I mean, think about it! Why not look into information from sources that are not attempting to make money from you? Take a look at
every, single link you posted here that supports this crook's idea. They all link to
his "buy my book" website!
QUOTE(aaron81 @ Oct 16 2006, 02:53 PM) [snapback]1392461[/snapback]
Come on friend, let's debate without mud slinging.
Show us what you are made of. Make an arguement against the facts.
I
am arguing facts. It is
you that has let a fraudster put words in your mouth. I suggest you
at the very least take his points one by one and do a little research on each one to see if you can verify any of what he claims. That's how I got started, and that's how I dug myself out of the vonDaniken-inspired morass of ignorance from which I began my education in these matters.
Harte