Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: My favorite new 9/11 theory
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Colbert Nation
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/prod/dials...aqrf00/ggua175/

its long...just go read the first line...holograms of planes striking the WTC...these people should seriously write scripts for hollywood...would make some good movies
boggle
QUOTE(Colbert Nation @ Oct 7 2006, 04:34 AM) [snapback]1380935[/snapback]

http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/prod/dials...aqrf00/ggua175/

its long...just go read the first line...holograms of planes striking the WTC...these people should seriously write scripts for hollywood...would make some good movies


They forgot to include holographic asbestos and holographic people inhaling it. Perhaps a little holographic neaderthal putting up new threads about it.
Sunofone
what you are falling for is the oldest trick in the book-- it is a strawman deliberately created to be catagorized with the truth and then ridiculed-- do not let it distract you from the video of bldg 7 collapsing,the eye witness testimony and the facts that norad stood down and bush knew he was in no danger when he sitting with children reading a book-- that little school trip photo op is a complete joke fabricated to send a very real subliminal message to those with understanding-- bushes visit was announced days in advance in local papers and if there were REALLY an unkown number of hi-jacked aircraft targeting premeditated locations bush's secret service would have rushed in and NOT andrew card
user posted image
The fictional Sherlock Holmes solved the crime in "Silver Blaze" by deducing it was the owner of the house who was the criminal. How did he know? Because the dog did not bark. The only person whocould have committed the crime without arousing the dog was someone the dog knew as a friend, the dog's owner.

QUOTE
Inspector Gregory: "Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?"

Holmes: "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time."

"The dog did nothing in the night time"

"That was the curious incident," remarked Sherlock Holmes.

From "The Adventure of Silver Blaze" by Arthur Conan Doyle


Now let us turn our Sherlockian logic on 9-11.

Hijacked aircraft were wandering across the eastern half of the country. In theory no-one could have known how many planes had been hijacked. Two planes had crashed into the World Trade Center, Bush was at a publicised photo opportunity at Booker Elementary School, and there is an airport only four miles from this School.

The Sarasota Herald Tribune announced Bush's visit to Booker Elementary on September 8th, giving the 9-11 planners three days to include Bush as a target for a diving jetliner. Nobody could have safely assumed he was not a target.

The Booker Elementary video shows the Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to a secure location, or at least to the safety of the armored Presidential Limousine. That's their job. That's what they do in the case of a real surprise attack withmany unknowns. They don't do anything else.

But the Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.

Bush defenders try to explain Bush's inaction as his not wanting to upset the children. Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9-11" suggests Bush's inaction was due to his not being told to leave. But Michael Moore fails to follow that line of reasoning through to its logical conclusion; where were the people whose job it is to get the President to a place of safety in event of attack, the people who would have, SHOULD have, pulled Bush out of there, children and public appearances be damned!

The Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.

If the events of 9-11 were truly a surprise to the United States Government then there is no way the Secret Service could have known there wasn't a hijacked or stolen plane heading towards Booker Elementary School that very second.

The Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.

The Secret Service should be in that video, but they are not. It is clear from their inaction that they KNEW FOR A FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT A TARGET OF ONE OF THE HIJACKED PLANES. The intended targets of the planes had to have been known.

The dog did not bark because the criminal was its master.

Quod Erat Demonstradum, the Bush administration was part of the 9-11 plot.
link
Shankpin
QUOTE(Sunofone @ Oct 7 2006, 12:19 AM) [snapback]1380960[/snapback]

what you are falling for is the oldest trick in the book-- it is a strawman deliberately created to be catagorized with the truth and then ridiculed-- do not let it distract you from the video of bldg 7 collapsing,the eye witness testimony and the facts that norad stood down and bush knew he was in no danger when he sitting with children reading a book-- that little school trip photo op is a complete joke fabricated to send a very real subliminal message to those with understanding-- bushes visit was announced days in advance in local papers and if there were REALLY an unkown number of hi-jacked aircraft targeting premeditated locations bush's secret service would have rushed in and NOT andrew card
user posted image
The fictional Sherlock Holmes solved the crime in "Silver Blaze" by deducing it was the owner of the house who was the criminal. How did he know? Because the dog did not bark. The only person whocould have committed the crime without arousing the dog was someone the dog knew as a friend, the dog's owner.
Now let us turn our Sherlockian logic on 9-11.

Hijacked aircraft were wandering across the eastern half of the country. In theory no-one could have known how many planes had been hijacked. Two planes had crashed into the World Trade Center, Bush was at a publicised photo opportunity at Booker Elementary School, and there is an airport only four miles from this School.

The Sarasota Herald Tribune announced Bush's visit to Booker Elementary on September 8th, giving the 9-11 planners three days to include Bush as a target for a diving jetliner. Nobody could have safely assumed he was not a target.

The Booker Elementary video shows the Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to a secure location, or at least to the safety of the armored Presidential Limousine. That's their job. That's what they do in the case of a real surprise attack withmany unknowns. They don't do anything else.

But the Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.


The Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.

If the events of 9-11 were truly a surprise to the United States Government then there is no way the Secret Service could have known there wasn't a hijacked or stolen plane heading towards Booker Elementary School that very second.

The Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.

The Secret Service should be in that video, but they are not. It is clear from their inaction that they KNEW FOR A FACT THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT A TARGET OF ONE OF THE HIJACKED PLANES. The intended targets of the planes had to have been known.

The dog did not bark because the criminal was its master.

Quod Erat Demonstradum, the Bush administration was part of the 9-11 plot.
link



Everything said here is based on nothing but assumptions mixed with reading into things too much. How do you know these assumptions as complete facts, Sun? Who was expecting these talibans with visas and quite affiliated {TRAINED for hj purposes} with aviation to hijack our planes to kill thousands? CIA agents, where could they be? behind the camera maybe?
I specifically remember that administration not wanting to cause a panic and had to remain "cool in front of the children." They got Bush out immediately. Would it be more proper thing to jump up and YELL THROW ARMS IN AIR--> "HELP ME MOMA- HELP ME, JESUS- HELP ME, THEY COMING SAVE ME!!" & scare little children to death...more casualties even. ph34r.gif
They had Bush as a target for three days? When? The targets were WTC, Pentagon, Whitehouse, and even others but they didn't pan out according to plans... Where does it say they targeted "Bush" specifically? Their mission was to kill Bush, or devastate by hitting central locations?
& that third building? What is so revelant about it going down, when the towers next to it were hit by two jets? Why does it going down confirm in your thoughts the govt. must be involved? unsure.gif

rassy
I don't see any conspiracy involving building 7 and I don't understand what all the fuss is about. That building did catch fire and they did evacuate it and demolish it for safety reasons, which is what they said when they TOLD us they demolished it. There's no secret, no?
Shankpin
QUOTE(rassy @ Oct 7 2006, 01:43 AM) [snapback]1381019[/snapback]

I don't see any conspiracy involving building 7 and I don't understand what all the fuss is about. That building did catch fire and they did evacuate it and demolish it for safety reasons, which is what they said when they TOLD us they demolished it. There's no secret, no?


Lmao, im telling you!!
Maybe if we sit and stare long enough we may see pink elephants dance in the street? no?
Or, should we make them blue? rofl.gif
Shankpin
My brother's a fireman and I hate fires. Now, he tells me they did the best thing by a "pull down" ( dont know what that means exactly) or letting it be "controlled" fall rather than natural collapse.. makes sense to me to go ahead and get it down under controlled conditions rather than wait. If this be the case, then What is the BIG DEAL?
Bill Hill

Ha ha my favorite is, hologram planes! ridiculous...

Another.. stupid CT 911 theory says... check this... laugh.gif The Bush family are connected to the Bin Larden family!?! haha yeah right. makes no sense!

and another one is .. several iserali's were arrested for cheering when the planes went into the towers! Turns out they were mossad agents! suggesting mossad was involved! haha ridiculous.. laugh.gif

conspiracysrus
QUOTE
My brother's a fireman and I hate fires. Now, he tells me they did the best thing by a "pull down" ( dont know what that means exactly) or letting it be "controlled" fall rather than natural collapse.. makes sense to me to go ahead and get it down under controlled conditions rather than wait. If this be the case, then What is the BIG DEAL?

ask your brother if its possible to enter a building with obviously intense heat and plant the explosives where they would need to be.
(and in record time too) i tell ya if brains were dinamite you couldnt blow the lid off a smartie tube.
who knows who made this stupid hologram thing up?
maybe even you!

setting up controlled demolition takes weeks not 2 hours so how do u give a command to do something that you say never happened?
Shankpin
QUOTE(conspiracysrus @ Oct 7 2006, 04:39 PM) [snapback]1381494[/snapback]

ask your brother if its possible to enter a building with obviously intense heat and plant the explosives where they would need to be.
(and in record time too) i tell ya if brains were dinamite you couldnt blow the lid off a smartie tube.
who knows who made this stupid hologram thing up?
maybe even you!

setting up controlled demolition takes weeks not 2 hours so how do u give a command to do something that you say never happened?


I don't give a rat's patootie about this "hologram thing," nor do I care where it came from--but thanks anyway!
It doesn't really matter about this third building coming down, regardless on how it came down-controlled or NOT! It was bound to come down either way. So, it came down, and......................Your {absolutely none} POINT, again? Where does this prove the government had ANY involvement at all with these attacks..?
First blood was jet hitting tower. Everything around that would be at its mercy, including this other building.

conspiracysrus
QUOTE
It doesn't really matter about this third building coming down, regardless on how it came down-controlled or NOT


so u see theres a possibility?
QUOTE
Where does this prove the government had ANY involvement at all with these attacks.

bcos if they were able to "pull it" it prooves that there were explosives in the building! this is deliberate destruction!!!

and further more , i realise it must be hard to accept that your own government could do this to its own people but it it did . TIME WILL PROOVE THIS.

imagine that if you had a son you really loved and he gets arrested for rape?
would that be easy to accept?
you would ( and it would only be natural) to say it cant be true..it cant be true.
he was provoked..she teased him..i bet shes a right tart dressed really slutty.
every imaginable excuse but that wouldnt change reality would it?
you trust your government if you wish its a free world at the moment anyway.
Shankpin
QUOTE(conspiracysrus @ Oct 8 2006, 02:41 AM) [snapback]1381939[/snapback]

so u see theres a possibility?

bcos if they were able to "pull it" it prooves that there were explosives in the building! this is deliberate destruction!!!

and further more , i realise it must be hard to accept that your own government could do this to its own people but it it did . TIME WILL PROOVE THIS.

imagine that if you had a son you really loved and he gets arrested for rape?
would that be easy to accept?
you would ( and it would only be natural) to say it cant be true..it cant be true.
he was provoked..she teased him..i bet shes a right tart dressed really slutty.
every imaginable excuse but that wouldnt change reality would it?
you trust your government if you wish its a free world at the moment anyway.


Please!!
ph34r.gif There you are assuming once again when you shouldn't, cyrus! I know full well the capabilities this master of universe government has, I don't put a friggin thing past them as I have made very very clear in my past gudzillion post on this topic.
AMF, I wonder about Columbine, suprised they werent caught earlier in mind projects such as Mkultra, you couldnt convince many to accept the fact we held Japanese in concentration camps in WW11, shall I go into Veitnam somewhat? How many of our guys {murdered} for the sake of the dollar! Iraq + oil = U.S= lives... The first outbreak and serious cases of smallpox, ebola, whatever, think we will know? I hardly doubt it..... dont give me that crap about me truly thinking my government is heavenly devil.gif , it's certinaly not by long shot devil.gif devil.gif ... I'm not being rude here or trying to be, Cyrus. B/c I cant seem to fathom this theory, and this "'proof' behind it isn't 'proof'.
YES they ARE EVIL, our govt!! I am NOT naive. GIVE ME A PIC OF THE BOMB! GIVE ME SOMETHING! GIVE ME WIRES!! GIVE ME DISGRUNTLED HIRED AND FIRED TESTIMONIES!

I looked for two hours tonight for a "flash" (theorists said it was supposed to be bombs going off) on top of a building (wtc), and yes I saw a "flash," yep, going off, this "flash" was a reflection of the glass/window off of the jet !!
Then there are the images/video I have personally seen that are not acquired off the net
( I wouldn't think), I know perfectly well what I saw.

anyhoo.
conspiracysrus
QUOTE
..... dont give me that crap about me truly thinking my government is heavenly , it's certinaly not

well thats a start.
.
QUOTE
YES they ARE EVIL, our govt!! I am NOT naive. GIVE ME A PIC OF THE BOMB! GIVE ME SOMETHING! GIVE ME WIRES!!

i tell you what we will both search the web to see if we can find any film of a controlled demolition where the bombs are visible, have u ever seen one maybe they exist but not in most if any conventional building?

im not 100% sure either but when a criminal remains silent he,s convicted guilty!!
if the u.s goverment wanted to shut us all up they would have done so by now instead of leaving it to an army of brainwashed sheep to do the job for them.
THEY SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE TO US not the other way round.


Col. Kurtz
QUOTE(billyhill @ Oct 7 2006, 05:25 PM) [snapback]1381482[/snapback]

Ha ha my favorite is, hologram planes! ridiculous...

Another.. stupid CT 911 theory says... check this... laugh.gif The Bush family are connected to the Bin Larden family!?! haha yeah right. makes no sense!

and another one is .. several iserali's were arrested for cheering when the planes went into the towers! Turns out they were mossad agents! suggesting mossad was involved! haha ridiculous.. laugh.gif


I have read that the Bush family and the Bin Laden family use the same bank and have the same banker and all those records and some others including CIA money trails were in building 7
MK ULTRA
Wasn't George Bush Snr having a meeting with Osamas brother on the morning of 911.
Or is this more "poisoning of the well"?
Terra8
QUOTE
Conspiracy Theorists have lost their minds



You must first posses something in order to be able to lose something blink.gif
Shankpin
QUOTE(conspiracysrus @ Oct 8 2006, 07:30 AM) [snapback]1382036[/snapback]

well thats a start.
.
i tell you what we will both search the web to see if we can find any film of a controlled demolition where the bombs are visible, have u ever seen one maybe they exist but not in most if any conventional building?

im not 100% sure either but when a criminal remains silent he,s convicted guilty!!
if the u.s goverment wanted to shut us all up they would have done so by now instead of leaving it to an army of brainwashed sheep to do the job for them.
THEY SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE TO US not the other way round.


Maybe I should have clarified- evidence of those wires, bombs, etc; would have done just as nicely after the fact, not necessarily before, or during the process of 'demolition.'

-Worse of the two evils: brainwashed sheep or paranoid heinna?

You being so offensive doesn't answer to anything, cysrus.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.