Science-fiction fans may fondly recall writer-physicist David Brin's "Uplift Saga," in which cranky old alien races reliant on super-powerful computers are outsmarted by crafty humans who count on cunning to survive. Fun stuff, but also the sort of idea that may point to where real-life searches for aliens have gone wrong, suggest a pair of extraterrestrial-minded astronomers. In the last decade, space has become much more crowded, note Milan Cirkovic of the Astronomical Observatory Belgrade, and his colleague, Robert Bradbury, in a recent edition of the journal, New Astronomy. About 200 "exoplanets" — planets orbiting nearby stars — have been discovered, including as many as 16 lately observed by the Hubble Space Telescope in another arm of our Milky Way Galaxy. This suggests that Earth-like planets, relatively small, rocky and orbiting a star, must be relatively common. Meanwhile, back on Earth, biologists have been setting back the dates of life's earliest appearance to nearly 3.9 billion years ago, close to the planet's beginning. They're finding more and more "extremophile" microbes capable of living in freezing, boiling or otherwise nasty conditions once considered inhospitable to life.So why hasn't SETI, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, heard any alien radio signals yet, ask the report authors? The question is best known as "Fermi's Paradox," first posed by physicist Enrico Fermi in 1950, when he asked, "Where are they?" Even a modestly sophisticated alien species could likely colonize every star in the galaxy within 10 million years, Fermi reasoned, based on technologies understood more than half-a-century ago. Ever since, Fermi and his successors have been asking why we haven't heard from any aliens yet.