Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Going for a blast into the real past
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Main Front Page News
UM-Bot
user posted image rSubmitted by Marvy: If his experiment with splitting photons actually works, says University of Washington physicist John Cramer, the next step will be to test for quantum retrocausality. That is he hopes to find evidence of a photon going backward in time. "It doesn't seem like it should work, but on the other hand, I can't see what would prevent it from working," Cramer said. "If it does work, you could receive the signal 50 microseconds before you send it."Uh, huh ... what? Wait a minute. What is that supposed to mean? Roughly put, Cramer is talking about the subatomic equivalent of arriving at the train station before you've left home, of winning the lottery before you've bought the ticket, of graduating from high school before you've been born -- or something like that. "It probably won't work," he said again carefully, peering through his large glasses as if to determine his audience's mental capacity for digesting the information. Cramer, an accomplished experimental physicist who also writes science fiction, knows this sounds more like a made-for-TV script on the Sci Fi Channel than serious scientific research.

"But even if it doesn't work, we should be able to learn something new about quantum mechanics by trying it," he said. What he and UW colleague Warren Nagourney plan to try soon is an experiment aimed at resolving some niggling contradictions in one of the most fundamental branches of physics known as quantum mechanics, or quantum theory.

IPB Image\ View: Full Article | Source: Seattle Pi
Bella-Angelique
This is exciting stuff. Maybe they will even be the first to create and observe a FTL slipstream.
noyritus
I don't see how choosing to see one entangled proton as a wave means the other will be a wave.
Tiggs
Well, just for the record, my model of Quantum theory predicts failure. Should be interesting to see what actually happens...
Invader Skoodge
Does anyone know how to define the difference between cause and effect without making assumptions about their temporeal order?

I don't think retrocausality can somehow be a well defined circumstance...
Mart
"If it does work, you could receive the signal 50 microseconds before you send it."

Would it not be awesome if they would NOT push the button AFTER they get the signal? Or uhm.. BEFORE they get the signal in the past.. or uhm..
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.