QUOTE
- Araezel -- post Nov 22 2006, 12:55 PM Post: #83
My point is that a subject should be further researched, tried/practiced, and experienced before anyone starts saying that it is completely false or is unable to be done.
Ok – how “much” is valid ‘research’, valid ‘practice’? In the past 16 yrs of my own life – this has totally come up empty. Then you take the multitude of people on the internet and add that to it – that have ‘practiced’ – ‘researched’ and also came up, empty. Then you add to that, those that make claims of ‘doing it’ can and have never been able to produce any kind of results: zero. So just how much is going to be needed? Right now I can easily say with no reservations, ‘the Psi Construct claims are and have been proven: NOT TRUE.
So I have to ask – just exactly,
HOW MANY PEOPLE, HOW MANY HOURS and HOW MANY YEARS will it take before it's except:
DOES NOT WORK?? Cause when one figures out the man hours, days and years already that has been in ‘play’ for this with no results – when is it reasonable to say, “not going to happen, not real..”??
QUOTE
- Araezel -- post Nov 22 2006, 12:55 PM Post: #83
Especially when some people are able to construct PSI, there is a level of understanding that some people have as to what they are doing, and how it all works that others might not truly understand until they ACTUALLY do it, whether it be seen in their mind, or in physical reality.
But see no one has produced
anything but excuses when asked to honestly
validate their claims.
Yes, asking for validation is a reasonable expectation from those who hear a claim made.
It is a very real and long term FACT OF LIFE. From science, investments, music and art, when a claim is made,
validation is ALWAYS asked for and should be expected. One would not invest their money in a claim. They would look for validation before they invest.
If one is going through a medical procedure, one asks for expectations and results.
When ever money and/or time is asked for, people always ask for validation, expectations, confirmation before they invest.
So why is this any different?? But see no one has produced
anything but excuses when asked to honestly
validate their claims. Yes asking for validation is a reasonable expectation from those who hear a claim made. It is a very real and long term FACT OF LIFE. From science, investments, to you name it ... when a claim is made,
validation is ALWAYS asked for and should be expected. One would not invest their money in a claim. They would look for validation before they invest. If one is going through a medical procedure, one asks for expectations and results. When ever money and/or time is asked for, people always ask for validation, expectations, confirmation before they invest.
So why is this any different??Besides I have invested 16+ years into this and have found nothing and no one that can ‘step up to the plate’, except with excuse after excuse. So again – where does one begin to ‘draw the line’ and say, ‘this does not work…’??
QUOTE
- Araezel -- post Nov 22 2006, 12:55 PM Post: #83
Furthermore, if people want proof, why don't they try it and give it their all to prove it to themselves instead of asking others to do it for them? Are people just going to sit there bantering away about how no one can give them the proof when they can do it themselves? If they are asking for it, and they want to learn if it is true, just do it themselves?
You are making a likely false assumption that they haven’t tried and put out the effort. Actually I know a good many people that have over the past 20+ years. Given the same conditions, “maybe..”, “if….”, “might….” – IF – practiced enough. But here to again is the ‘clincher’: the ‘teachers’, the ‘believer’ and the ‘authors’ –
NONE of them have stepped up with any, none, zip evidence, proof or validation. Why is that, honestly??
QUOTE
Because they are quite capable of doing it. If they are unwilling to learn/practice and experience it, then they truly do not want the proof. And to make this even more clear, I'm talking about PSI CONSTRUCTS, or rather PSI ENERGY MANIPULATION!
Again as stated, in 20+ years, NO ONE has been able to step up to the ‘bat’ and say, “Here it is – and - yes… PROVE IT. In this case, VALID PROOF, not ‘hear say’ or ‘Personal Subject Reality’, this is not proof. PSR is simply, hear say – UNTIL one can give valid proof, that can be verified. Which again I submit: HAS NEVER BEEN DONE! Why is that??
See let me give an example:
Remote Viewing – for instance.
It has been documented by even the greatest of skeptics.
It has been filmed, again by the greatest of skeptics. All of which passed to the point – it is considered: VALID. People made claims and did step and gave VALID evidence, VALID proof, all of which could be verified without “fine print”.
Where are the Psi Construct and Energy Manipulators??
Why is it they cannot and will not do this?See there are two tools out there that would easily verify and prove this:
EMF detectors and
Thermal Image Cameras. Yes they actually would do this. But some who practice the “Construct and Energy Manipulation” are quick to say, “No it won’t!” Not because it will not – because they do not want it to! They reject anything that could/would validate this with NO SMALL EMOTIONS. Why is this?? (Rhetorical question.)
Jj -